Feedback
Wird geladen …

Ebola : how a people's science helped end an epidemic

Zugangsbedingungen: Abstract freely available; full-text restricted to individual document purchasers
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Angaben
Autor:in: Richards, Paul, 1945 May 14- (VerfasserIn)
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht:London, England : Zed Books, 2016
Schriftenreihe:African arguments
Umfang:1 Online-Ressource (xii, 180 pages) : illustrations, maps
Gedruckte Ausgabe:Erscheint auch als:
ISBN:9781350219779
1350219770
9781783608607
1783608609
9781783608591
1783608595
1783608587
9781783608584
9781783608614
1783608617
9781783608621
1783608625
Anmerkungen:Published in association with the International African Institute; Royal African Society; World Peace Foundation
Includes bibliographical references (pages 160-173) and index
Also published in print.
Schlagwörter:
DOI:

10.5040/9781350219779

wird zitiert von: 131 Titel im Zitationsindex COCI
Anmerkung:Also published in print.
Zusammenfassung:Introduction -- The world's first Ebola epidemic -- The epidemic's rise and decline -- Washing the dead : does culture spread Ebola? -- Ebola in rural Sierra Leone : a technography -- Burial technique -- Community responses to Ebola -- Conclusion : strengthening an African people's science -- Postscript -- Appendices : evidence and testimony from Ebola-affected community members.
In 2013, the largest Ebola outbreak in history swept across West Africa, claiming thousands of lives in Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea and sending the international community into panic. By 2014, experts were grimly predicting that millions would be infected within months, and a huge international control effort was mounted to contain the virus. Yet paradoxically, at this point the disease was already going into decline in Africa itself. Why did outside observers get it so wrong? Paul Richards draws on his extensive firsthand experience in Sierra Leone to argue that the international community's alarmed response failed to take account of local expertise and common sense. Crucially, Richards shows that the humanitarian response to the disease was most effective in those areas where it supported community initiatives already in place, such as giving local people agency in terms of disposing of bodies. In turn, the international response dangerously hampered recovery when it ignored or disregarded local knowledge
Medientyp:Mode of access: World Wide Web.