Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource (xxix, 409 Seiten) , Karten , 25 cm

Edition: Online_Ausgabe Boulder, Colo NetLibrary 2003 E-Books von NetLibrary Sonstige Standardnummer des Gesamttitels: 22382847

ISBN: 1400814332

Note: "A Century Foundation book.". - Includes bibliographical references and index

Additional Edition: Reproduktion von Harrison, Selig S., 1927-2016 Korean endgame 2002

Language: English

Keywords: Korea ; Wiedervereinigung ; USA ; Außenpolitik ; Südkorea ; Korea ; Wiedervereinigung ; Militärischer Einsatz ; USA ; USA ; Außenpolitik ; Nordkorea ; Korea ; Wiedervereinigung ; Geschichte 1945-2001 ; Korea ; Kernwaffe ; Koreakrieg ; Konfliktregelung ; Bewaffneter Konflikt ; Atomare Abrüstung ; Bürgerkrieg ; Electronic books. ; Electronic books. ; Electronic books ; Electronic books.

URL: Volltext

URL: Volltext  (Deutschlandweit zugänglich)

URL: Volltext  (Deutschlandweit zugänglich)

URL: Full text  (Click to View (Currently Only Available on Campus))

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource (345 Seiten) , Illustrationen

Edition: Online_Ausgabe Boulder, Colo NetLibrary 2003 E-Books von NetLibrary Sonstige Standardnummer des Gesamttitels: 22382847

ISBN: 0585475229 , 9780080442068

Note: Includes bibliographical references

Additional Edition: Reproduktion von Advanced modeling for transit operations and service planning 2003

Language: English

Subjects: Engineering

Keywords: Verkehrsplanung ; Mathematisches Modell ; Transitverkehr ; Logistik ; Aufsatzsammlung ; Electronic books.

URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)

URL: Full text  (Click to View (Currently Only Available on Campus))

URL: Full text  (Click to View (Currently Only Available on Campus))

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource (35, 5 Seiten) , ill , 28 cm

Edition: Online-Ausg Also available in print

Series Statement: Policy research working paper 2782

Note: "February 2002 , Includes bibliographical references (p. 32-35)

Additional Edition: Harrison, Ann E Global capital flows and financing constraints

Language: English

URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)

URL: Volltext  (Deutschlandweit zugänglich)

URL: Volltext

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource

Edition: Online-Ausg Also available in print

Series Statement: Policy research working paper 3149

Note: "October 2, 2003 , Includes bibliographical references , Title from title screen as viewed on October 2, 2003

Additional Edition: Harrison, Glenn W Rules of thumb for evaluating preferential trading arrangements

Language: English

URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)

URL: Volltext

URL: Volltext  (Deutschlandweit zugänglich)

URL: Volltext

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource (1 online resource (52 p.))

Edition: Online-Ausgabe World Bank E-Library Archive Sonstige Standardnummer des Gesamttitels: 041181-4

Content: January 2000 - Is public sector inefficiency due primarily to agency-type problems (ownership) or to the environment in which public enterprises operate (as measured by soft budget constraints or barriers to competition)? Both. Bartel and Harrison compare the performance of public and private sector manufacturing firms in Indonesia for 1981-95. They analyze whether public sector inefficiency is due primarily to agency-type problems (ownership) or to the business environment in which public enterprises operate, as measured by soft budget constraints or barriers to competition. They nest the two alternatives in a production function framework. The results, obtained from fixed-effects specifications, provide support for both models. The business environment matters. Only public enterprises that received loans from state banks or those shielded from import competition performed worse than private enterprises. Ownership matters. For a given level of import competition or soft loans, public enterprises perform worse than their counterparts in the private sector. Eliminating soft loans to Indonesia's public enterprises would raise total factor productivity by 6 percentage points; the same result could be achieved by increasing import penetration by 15 percentage points. Bartel and Harrison show that these findings are not due to selection effects for either privatization or the receipt of soft loans. This paper - a product of Poverty and Human Resources, Development Research Group - was part of a study funded by the Bank's Research Support Budget under the research project The Impact of Labor Market Policies and Institutions on Economic Performance (RPO 680-96). Ann Harrison may be contacted at aharriso@research.gsb.columbia.edu

Note: Weitere Ausgabe: Harrison, E. Ann: Ownership versus Environment

Additional Edition: Reproduktion von Harrison, E. Ann Ownership versus Environment 2000

Language: English

URL: Volltext

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource

ISBN: 9780719061516 , 9781526137951

Note: English

Language: English

Subjects: Political Science

Keywords: Politik ; Einführung

DOI: 10.7765/9781526137951

URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)

URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource (1 online resource (48 p.))

Edition: Online-Ausgabe World Bank E-Library Archive Sonstige Standardnummer des Gesamttitels: 041181-4

Content: July 2001 - Among Chile's bilateral regional agreements, only Chile's agreements with "Northern" partners provide enough market access to offset the costs to Chile of trade diversion. Because of preferential market access, however, "additive regionalism" is likely to provide Chile with far more gains than the static welfare gains from unilateral free trade. At least one partner country loses from each of the regional trade agreements considered in this study, and excluded countries always lose. The Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) produces gains for almost all the member countries, but the European Union is a big loser. Countries of the Americas gain more in aggregate from global free trade than from the FTAA. Using a multisector, multicountry, computable general equilibrium model, Harrison, Rutherford, and Tarr examine Chile's strategy of negotiating bilateral free trade agreements with all of its significant trading partners (referring to this policy as additive regionalism). They also evaluate the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) and global free trade. Among Chile's bilateral regional agreements, only Chile's agreements with "Northern" partners provide enough market access to offset the costs to Chile of trade diversion. Because of preferential market access, however, additive regionalism is likely to provide Chile with many times as many gains as the static welfare gains from unilateral free trade. Harrison, Rutherford, and Tarr find that at least one partner country loses from each of the regional trade agreements they consider, and excluded countries as a group always lose. They estimate that the FTAA produces large welfare gains for the members, with the European Union being the big loser. Gains to the world from global free trade are estimated to be at least 36 times greater than gains from the FTAA.

Content: [Fortsetzung 1. Abstract] Even countries of the Americas in aggregate gain more from global free trade than from the FTAA. This paper—a product of Trade, Development Research Group—is part of a larger effort in the group to examine the impact of regional trade arrangements on development and poverty reduction. David Tarr may be contacted at dtarr@worldbank.org

Additional Edition: Reproduktion von Tarr, David Chile's Regional Arrangements and the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas 2001

Language: English

URL: Volltext

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource (52 Seiten))

Edition: Online-Ausg

Content: January 2000 - Is public sector inefficiency due primarily to agency-type problems (ownership) or to the environment in which public enterprises operate (as measured by soft budget constraints or barriers to competition)? Both. Bartel and Harrison compare the performance of public and private sector manufacturing firms in Indonesia for 1981-95. They analyze whether public sector inefficiency is due primarily to agency-type problems (ownership) or to the business environment in which public enterprises operate, as measured by soft budget constraints or barriers to competition. They nest the two alternatives in a production function framework. The results, obtained from fixed-effects specifications, provide support for both models. The business environment matters. Only public enterprises that received loans from state banks or those shielded from import competition performed worse than private enterprises. Ownership matters. For a given level of import competition or soft loans, public enterprises perform worse than their counterparts in the private sector. Eliminating soft loans to Indonesia's public enterprises would raise total factor productivity by 6 percentage points; the same result could be achieved by increasing import penetration by 15 percentage points. Bartel and Harrison show that these findings are not due to selection effects for either privatization or the receipt of soft loans. This paper - a product of Poverty and Human Resources, Development Research Group - was part of a study funded by the Bank's Research Support Budget under the research project The Impact of Labor Market Policies and Institutions on Economic Performance (RPO 680-96). Ann Harrison may be contacted at aharriso@research.gsb.columbia.edu

Additional Edition: Harrison, E. Ann Ownership versus Environment

Language: English

URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource (48 Seiten))

Edition: Online-Ausg

Content: July 2001 - Among Chile's bilateral regional agreements, only Chile's agreements with "Northern" partners provide enough market access to offset the costs to Chile of trade diversion. Because of preferential market access, however, "additive regionalism" is likely to provide Chile with far more gains than the static welfare gains from unilateral free trade. At least one partner country loses from each of the regional trade agreements considered in this study, and excluded countries always lose. The Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) produces gains for almost all the member countries, but the European Union is a big loser. Countries of the Americas gain more in aggregate from global free trade than from the FTAA.

Content: Using a multisector, multicountry, computable general equilibrium model, Harrison, Rutherford, and Tarr examine Chile's strategy of negotiating bilateral free trade agreements with all of its significant trading partners (referring to this policy as additive regionalism). They also evaluate the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) and global free trade. Among Chile's bilateral regional agreements, only Chile's agreements with "Northern" partners provide enough market access to offset the costs to Chile of trade diversion. Because of preferential market access, however, additive regionalism is likely to provide Chile with many times as many gains as the static welfare gains from unilateral free trade. Harrison, Rutherford, and Tarr find that at least one partner country loses from each of the regional trade agreements they consider, and excluded countries as a group always lose.

Content: They estimate that the FTAA produces large welfare gains for the members, with the European Union being the big loser. Gains to the world from global free trade are estimated to be at least 36 times greater than gains from the FTAA. Even countries of the Americas in aggregate gain more from global free trade than from the FTAA. This paper-a product of Trade, Development Research Group-is part of a larger effort in the group to examine the impact of regional trade arrangements on development and poverty reduction. David Tarr may be contacted at dtarr@worldbank.org

Additional Edition: Tarr, David Chile's Regional Arrangements and the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas

Language: English

URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)

UID:

Format: XIX, 296 S. , 21 cm

ISBN: 3631364687

Series Statement: Beiträge zum Rechnungs-, Finanz- und Revisionswesen 48

Note: Zugl.: Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss., 1999

Language: German

Subjects: Economics

Keywords: Deutschland ; Aktiensplit ; Deutschland ; Aktiengesellschaft ; Aktiensplit ; Auswirkung ; Hochschulschrift

URL: Inhaltsverzeichnis