Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Speech Language Hearing Association  (6)
  • 1
    In: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, American Speech Language Hearing Association, Vol. 31, No. 3 ( 2022-05-10), p. 1023-1025
    Abstract: In this prologue, we introduce readers to the Forum: Clinicians and Researchers Navigating Implementation Science in CSD. Implementation science (IS), or the study of the adoption of evidence-based practice in real-world settings, is a key area of development in communication sciences and disorders (CSD). The goal of this forum was to show by example how researchers and clinicians are collaborating to begin to apply IS in CSD. This goal culminated in a scoping review of IS in CSD, a tutorial on incorporating IS into clinical practice research, three articles on stakeholder engagement, and three examples of IS studies in CSD included in this forum. We hope this forum helps clinicians and researchers to begin wherever they are in their knowledge and understanding of IS in CSD.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1058-0360 , 1558-9110
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Speech Language Hearing Association
    Publication Date: 2022
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Speech Language Hearing Association ; 2023
    In:  American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Vol. 32, No. 2 ( 2023-03-09), p. 803-810
    In: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, American Speech Language Hearing Association, Vol. 32, No. 2 ( 2023-03-09), p. 803-810
    Abstract: The purpose of this article is to contend that there is a power differential between researchers and clinicians where researchers are the primary creators of knowledge and clinicians are the primary consumers of knowledge. Rooted in a sociological model illustrating interacting levels of power at macro-, meso-, and microlevels, we argue that authentic research–practice partnerships and clinician–researcher collaborations can mitigate this power differential. Conclusions: Clinicians and researchers in our field have vastly different responsibilities and priorities that impact our ability to work collaboratively to solve the most pressing problems for the clients we serve. Although some current research practices may reinforce a power differential causing clinicians to feel less than and to only consume knowledge, there are examples of successful collaborations where this power differential is mitigated. These examples can contribute meaningfully to the dialogue on research–practice partnerships, with the goal of improving outcomes for the clients we serve.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1058-0360 , 1558-9110
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Speech Language Hearing Association
    Publication Date: 2023
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Speech Language Hearing Association ; 2022
    In:  Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups Vol. 7, No. 3 ( 2022-06-13), p. 663-668
    In: Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, American Speech Language Hearing Association, Vol. 7, No. 3 ( 2022-06-13), p. 663-668
    Abstract: Knowledge brokering is one tool to improve the lines of communication between clinicians and researchers with the ultimate goal of closing the research to practice gap. The following review article outlines definitions of knowledge brokering; describes attributes and activities of knowledge brokering, including domains of knowledge brokering; illustrates data to support the role of knowledge brokering; and provides a tool for teams to reflect upon their own knowledge brokering capabilities. Conclusions: Knowledge brokering provides practical tools to decrease the silos between researchers and clinicians with the goal of providing the best care to all the populations that we serve. While we are hopeful that the evidence for knowledge brokering will continue to develop, there are low-risk action items (e.g., active listening, relationship building across boundaries, and appreciation of the diversity of contexts in which clinical services are delivered) that readers could implement immediately.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2381-4764 , 2381-473X
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Speech Language Hearing Association
    Publication Date: 2022
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Speech Language Hearing Association ; 2022
    In:  American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Vol. 31, No. 3 ( 2022-05-10), p. 1133-1162
    In: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, American Speech Language Hearing Association, Vol. 31, No. 3 ( 2022-05-10), p. 1133-1162
    Abstract: Best practices in the field of aphasia rehabilitation increasingly acknowledge a whole-person approach that values interventions aimed at reducing impairments, while also recognizing the impact of aphasia on participation and quality of life. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this study aimed to examine whether current clinical practices along levels of service provision reflect this whole-person, multifaceted approach. Method: Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in the United States who provide intervention to people with aphasia across the continuum of care completed this cross-sectional online survey. Current outcome measurement and treatment practices were evaluated within the Living With Aphasia: Framework for Outcome Measurement via multiple-choice and open-text response questions. Data were analyzed descriptively and using ordinal logistic regression models to compare clinical practices along levels of service provision. Results: Data from 90 SLPs revealed that language and cognitive skills are assessed with equal consistency across clinical settings; however, functional communication, participation, and quality of life domains are prioritized in settings providing care to clients within the community. Psychological well-being is rarely assessed within clinical practice along most of the rehabilitation process and prioritized within the university clinic setting when clients are in the chronic stage of recovery. Conclusions: Clinical practices related to a multifaceted approach to aphasia intervention are variable across levels of service provision. Further exploration of barriers and facilitators to multifaceted aphasia care along the domains of the CFIR is needed to provide an informed approach to implementing change.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1058-0360 , 1558-9110
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Speech Language Hearing Association
    Publication Date: 2022
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Speech Language Hearing Association ; 2022
    In:  American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Vol. 31, No. 3 ( 2022-05-10), p. 1054-1083
    In: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, American Speech Language Hearing Association, Vol. 31, No. 3 ( 2022-05-10), p. 1054-1083
    Abstract: The purpose of this study was to complete a scoping review of implementation science (IS) research in communication sciences and disorders (CSD) over time and to determine characteristics of IS research in CSD. Method: A scoping review was conducted of PubMed and Education Resources Information Center for sources published in English that (a) included CSD practitioners, (b) addressed IS research, and (c) identified a specific evidence-based practice. Resulting sources were systematically examined for study aim, patient populations, implementation framework utilized, setting of the study, implementation strategy examined, and implementation outcome measured. Results: The majority of the 82 studies that underwent a full-text review (80.5%) were published in 2014 or later. One fourth of the studies were concept papers, and another one fourth focused on context assessment (25.6% of studies, each), 11% focused on designing implementation strategies, and 36.6% focused on testing implementation strategies. The patient population most frequently represented aphasia (21.3%), and most studies (34.4%) were conducted in inpatient medical settings. Nearly half (42.6%) of the nonconcept studies lacked an IS framework. Among implementation strategies identified, approximately one third of studies focused on education and/or training plus another strategy and one fourth focused on education and/or training alone. Implementation outcomes measured typically represented early stages of implementation. Conclusions: This scoping review of IS research in CSD described the landscape of IS studies in CSD. IS is intersecting with CSD at a rapid rate, especially since 2014. Future IS research in CSD should adopt an implementation framework a priori and consider the broad range of implementation strategies and outcomes to support the uptake of research into typical practice settings.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1058-0360 , 1558-9110
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Speech Language Hearing Association
    Publication Date: 2022
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Speech Language Hearing Association ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol. 65, No. 11 ( 2022-11-17), p. 4112-4132
    In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, American Speech Language Hearing Association, Vol. 65, No. 11 ( 2022-11-17), p. 4112-4132
    Abstract: The aim of this study was to use acoustic and kinematic speech measures to characterize type of motor speech impairment—apraxia of speech (AOS) versus dysarthria—in individuals with four-repeat tauopathy (4RT)–associated syndromes, including nonfluent variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA), primary progressive AOS (PPAOS), corticobasal syndrome (CBS), and progressive supranuclear palsy syndrome (PSPs). Method: Twenty patient participants were recruited and stratified into two groups: (a) a motor-speech–impaired group of individuals with nfvPPA, PPAOS, CBS, or PSPs and suspected 4RT pathology (“MSI+”) and (b) a non–motor-speech-impaired group of individuals with logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (“MSI−”). Ten healthy, age-matched controls also participated in the study. Participants completed a battery of speech tasks, and 15 acoustic and kinematic speech measures were derived. Quantitative speech measures were grouped into feature categories (“AOS features,” “dysarthria features,” “shared features”). In addition to quantitative speech measures, two certified speech-language pathologists made independent, blinded auditory-perceptual ratings of motor speech impairment. A principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted to investigate the relative contributions of quantitative features. Results: Quantitative speech measures were generally concordant with independent clinician ratings of motor speech impairment severity. Hypothesis-driven groupings of quantitative measures differentiated predominantly apraxic from predominantly dysarthric presentations within the MSI+ group. PCA results provided additional evidence for differential profiles of motor speech impairment in the MSI+ group; heterogeneity across individuals is explained in large part by varying levels of overall severity—captured by the shared feature variable group—and degree of apraxia severity, as measured by the AOS feature variable group. Conclusions: Quantitative features reveal heterogeneity of MSI in the 4RT group in terms of both overall severity and subtype of MSI. Results suggest the potential for acoustic and kinematic speech assessment methods to inform characterization of motor speech impairment in 4RT-associated syndromes. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21401778
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1092-4388 , 1558-9102
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Speech Language Hearing Association
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2070420-3
    SSG: 5,2
    SSG: 7,11
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages