feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Berlin International  (12)
  • SB Ulrich Plenzdorf Seelow
  • SB Zossen
  • SB Ruhland
  • SB Erkner
  • Academic theses  (12)
  • 1
    UID:
    gbv_1725134411
    Format: 1 Online-Ressource (436 Seiten) , Illustrationen
    Edition: 1. Auflage
    ISBN: 9783968216621
    Series Statement: Litterae 227
    Content: Kann man Häuser lesen, können Gebäude sprechen? Die Metapher der Architektursprache hatte in der Postmoderne ihre letzte große Konjunktur und erregte damit nicht zufällig auch ein großes literarisches Interesse. Elias Zimmermanns Studie untersucht diese Konstellation von Literatur und postmoderner Architektur anhand von zwei exemplarischen Romanen: Thomas Bernhards Korrektur (1975) und Hermann Burgers Schilten (1976). Die Untersuchung verknüpft diskursanalytische und metaphorologische Fragestellungen mit genauen Lektüren, in denen sich die Texte als Reflexionsmedien problematischer architektonischer Kommunikation erweisen. Zwei komplementäre, scheiternde Architekturkonzepte stehen sich mit den beiden Romanen gegenüber. Im größeren Zusammenhang offenbaren sich Hermann Burgers Maskenästhetik und Thomas Bernhards physiognomische Architektur als zwei Pole im architekturtheoretischen Diskurs der 1960er bis 1980er Jahre. Die Untersuchung endet darum mit einem Ausblick auf die postmoderne österreichische Architekturavantgarde, die Architekturphänomenologie und den architektonischen Dekonstruktivismus.
    Note: Dissertation Lausanne 2019
    Additional Edition: ISBN 9783793098812
    Additional Edition: ISBN 9783968215778
    Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Zimmermann, Elias, 1987 - Lesbare Häuser? Freiburg i.Br. : Rombach Verlag, 2017 ISBN 3793098818
    Additional Edition: ISBN 9783793098812
    Language: German
    Subjects: German Studies
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Keywords: Bernhard, Thomas 1931-1989 Korrektur ; Burger, Hermann 1942-1989 Schilten ; Architektur ; Postmoderne ; Hochschulschrift ; Academic theses
    URL: FULL
    Author information: Zimmermann, Elias 1987-
    Author information: Burger, Hermann 1942-1989
    Author information: Bernhard, Thomas 1931-1989
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    UID:
    kobvindex_INTbi00005101
    Format: 40 pages : , illustrations ; , 21 × 29.7 cm.
    Content: AUTHOR-SUPPLIED ABSTRACT: Abstract: This thesis examines the analysis of the impact that pet-friendly policies in an organization have on the well-being of its employees. Nowadays, organizations are aware of the importance of creating a positive well-being environment as part of their organizational culture and the burnout and distress that entails the workload. Previous studies have shown the positivity in people's lives created when their level of well-being is high. Furthermore, research has proved that pets could increase well-being despite some constraints. Therefore, some organizations opted to implement pet-friendly policies. For data collection, a survey was chosen as a quantitative method approach, where 65 answers were collected by the thesis' author. The findings clearly stated positive and negative thoughts about having pets in the workplace. In addition, the respondents also provide some reasons. Finally, all the information was analyzed and tested to prove if a positive correlation exists when employees who feel comfortable with pets present positive well-being. Keywords: pet-friendly policies, well-being, organizational culture, burnout, distress, workload, positive well-being, pets, workplace, survey, quantitative method, positive correlation.
    Note: DISSERTATION NOTE: Bachelor of Arts thesis in Business Administration - Human Resource Management & Leadership, Berlin International University of Applied Sciences, 2022. , MACHINE-GENERATED CONTENTS NOTE: Table of Contents TABLE OF FIGURES ........................................................................................ iii TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................... iii Abstract ............................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1. Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 1.1. Context...................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. Literature review.................................................................................2 2.1. Introduction...................................................................................................2 2.2. Definition of well-being ............................................................................ 3 2.3. Factors driving well-being ......................................................................... 4 2.4. The growing importance of well-being ...................................................... 6 2.5. Well-being at work....................................................................................7 2.5.1. Definition ..............................................................................................7 2.5.2. Factors impacting well-being at work.....................................................8 2.6. Animals and well-being ............................................................................. 9 2.7. Conclusion .............................................................................................. 11 Chapter 3. Methods............................................................................................12 3.1. Introduction............................................................................................. 12 3.2. Survey distribution .................................................................................. 12 3.3. Survey design .......................................................................................... 13 3.4. The sample .............................................................................................. 14 3.5. Data analysis ........................................................................................... 14 Chapter 4. Results..............................................................................................16 4.1. Introduction.................................................................................................16 4.2. Context .......................................................................................................16 4.2.1. Demographics of the sample.....................................................................16 4.2.2. Well-being results ....................................................................................17 4.2.3. Pet-friendly results ................................................................................... 20 4.2.3.1. Comfort with pets in the workplace ....................................................... 20 4.2.3.2. Discomfort with pets in the workplace...................................................20 4.2.3.3. Pet-friendly workplaces and well-being ................................................. 21 4.2.4. Testing the research question 1: animals and well-being ........................... 22 4.2.4.1. The no group ......................................................................................... 22 4.2.4.2. The yes group........................................................................................22 Chapter 5. Discussion ........................................................................................23 Chapter 6. Conclusions ...................................................................................... 24 References .....................................................................................................25 Appendix 1. ........................................................................................................IV Appendix 2. .........................................................................................................V Thesis Declaration Page......................................................................................XI
    Language: Undetermined
    Keywords: Academic theses
    URL: FULL
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    UID:
    kobvindex_INTbi00005120
    Format: 34 pages : , illustrations ; , 21.59 × 27.94 cm.
    Content: AUTHOR-SUPPLIED ABSTRACT: Abstract: This paper is an explanation of the new technologies and cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. It gives an in-depth explanation of what blockchain is, covering its characteristics, main challenges, and criticisms. It delves into the Non-Fungible token space, explaining the main characteristics and challenges in the retail fashion industry and also analyzing a study case from Nike, Inc. where they acquired the studio/team called RTFKT (pronounced “artifact”). It finishes the study with an analysis of the NFT industry utilizing Porter's Five Forces to understand the competitiveness of the industry and a VRIO analysis to understand if RTFKT can create a competitive advantage for Nike. Keywords: new technologies, cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin, Ethereum, blockchain, characteristics, challenges, criticisms, Non-Fungible token, retail fashion industry, study case, Nike, Inc., RTFKT, Porter's Five Forces, VRIO analysis, competitive advantage
    Note: DISSERTATION NOTE: Bachelor of Arts thesis in Data Science & Business, Berlin International University of Applied Sciences, 2022. , MACHINE-GENERATED CONTENTS NOTE: Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. The motivation for the study 1.2 Research question 2. Methodology (Research approach) 3. Literature review 3.2 Blockchain and its essential characteristics 3.3 Blockchain and its main challenges 3.4 Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake: a brief explanation 3.5 What is bitcoin, and how does it work? 3.6 What is Ethereum, and how does it work? 3.7 Non-Fungible Tokens and main characteristics 3.8 How the retail and retail luxury industry can use Non-Fungible tokens 3.9 Blockchain and Non-fungible tokens criticism and challenges 4. Nike acquiring RTFKT (Case Study) 5. Porter’s five forces 5.1 Porter’s Five Forces applied to the NFT industry 6. VRIO Model 7. Limitations of the study 8. Discussion 9. Results 10. Conclusion References Appendices: - Declaration Page
    Language: Undetermined
    Keywords: Academic theses
    URL: FULL
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    UID:
    kobvindex_INTbi00005238
    Format: 76 pages : , illustrations ; , 21 × 29.7 cm.
    Content: AI-GENERATED ABSTRACT: Abstract: Healthcare facility design has undergone significant changes over the years, transitioning from office-like settings to more vibrant and patient-centered spaces. The emergence of "mall hospitals" and amusement park-inspired lobbies in children's hospitals reflects a shift towards normalizing illness and prioritizing patient experiences. This trend aligns with the growing emphasis on healing environments and wellness in healthcare buildings, particularly for pediatric facilities. Designing pediatric hospital wings presents unique challenges, as the interiors must cater to both children and adults. A child-centered approach is crucial to empower young patients and reduce negative responses to the environment, thereby facilitating the healing process. Considering the considerable number of children hospitalized annually in the United States, strategic design solutions play a vital role in alleviating the stress and discomfort associated with hospitalization and expediting the healing journey. This thesis aims to investigate how design strategies can enhance the physical and psychological well-being of hospitalized children aged 6-10. The focus will be on healing environments and child-centered design principles. Specifically, the research will explore the implementation of color, light, and nature connectedness in interior healthcare spaces. A systematic review of secondary sources, including journal articles and design theory literature, will provide insights into effective design strategies for pediatric healthcare settings. Additionally, three case studies of pediatric hospitals and related spaces will undergo a critical qualitative analysis to identify successful design elements and areas for improvement. The findings will contribute to a better understanding of how design strategies can positively impact pediatric in-patient care units and foster a seamless transition between hospital life and the outside world, ultimately promoting the physical and psychological well-being of young patients. The research outcomes will inform a design project for a patient hotel in Berlin. Keywords: Healthcare facility design, pediatric hospitals, healing environments, child-centered design, design strategies, color, light, nature connectedness, patient experience, systematic review, case studies, patient well-being.
    Note: DISSERTATION NOTE: Bachelor of Arts thesis in Interior Architecture / Interior Design, Berlin International University of Applied Sciences, 2023. , MACHINE-GENERATED CONTENTS NOTE: Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Topic Definition, Context and Aims 1.2 Methodology 2. the Built Environment as a Healing Aid 2.1 Children's Perception and Needs in the Healthcare Environment 2.2 Creating Healing Environments 3. Design Strategies and Their Relation to Health 3.1 the Use of Colour in Interior Healthcare Spaces 3.2 the Use of Natural and Artificial Light 3.3 Nature Connectedness 4. Case Study 4.1 Ronald Mcdonald House Charities Bc 4.2 Copenhagen Children's Hospital 4.3 Shenzhen Children's Hospital Science and Education Building 4.4 Cross Analysis 5. Conclusion 6. Design Project bibliography list of Figures
    Language: Undetermined
    Keywords: Academic theses
    URL: FULL
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    UID:
    kobvindex_INTbi00005311
    Format: 59 pages : , illustrations ; , 21 × 29.7 cm.
    Content: AI-GENERATED ABSTRACT: Abstract: This thesis examines the relationships between Glassdoor ratings, employee recommendations, and measures of environmental responsibility and sustainability practices within companies. The study utilizes data from various companies to analyze these connections and provide valuable insights into the complex nature of company performance evaluation. The findings reveal a strong positive correlation between Glassdoor ratings and employee recommendations, indicating that higher Glassdoor ratings are associated with a greater likelihood of employees recommending their employer to others. This highlights the significance of fostering a positive work environment that promotes employee satisfaction and advocacy. However, the analysis also reveals that Glassdoor ratings do not significantly correlate with measures of environmental responsibility as assessed by the CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project) or sustainability practices evaluated by Sustainalytics. This suggests that employee perceptions and satisfaction may not directly reflect or strongly influence a company's environmental efforts. Other factors such as compensation, work-life balance, and opportunities for professional growth might impact employee evaluations. The research underscores the multidimensional nature of evaluating company performance and sustainability practices. While employee satisfaction is essential, decision-makers and stakeholders must consider a comprehensive approach incorporating multiple metrics and perspectives beyond employee feedback alone. This is crucial for accurately evaluating a company's alignment with environmental and social aims. The small sample size, potential biases in the data sources, the correlational character of the analysis, and the omission of other factors affecting employee satisfaction are some of the study's drawbacks. Future research should overcome these constraints to increase our understanding of the intricate connections between employee satisfaction, business success, and sustainable practices. Keywords: Glassdoor, employee retention, employee engagement, environmental responsibility, company performance evaluation, CDP, Sustainalytics
    Note: DISSERTATION NOTE: Bachelor of Arts thesis in International Management & Marketing, Berlin International University of Applied Sciences, 2023. , MACHINE-GENERATED CONTENTS NOTE: Table of Contents 1. Introduction............................................................................1 2. Literature Review....................................................................3 2.1 Environmental Sustainability................................................3 2.2 Environmental, Social, Governance Report (esg).......................4 2.3 Employee Turnover Rate.......................................................6 2.4 Sustainability and Employee Turnover Rate.................................7 3. Research Methods...................................................................9 3.1 Employee Retention and Engagement Rate Data.........................9 3.1.1 Turnover Rates from Reports..........................................9 3.1.2 Limitations of Current Turnover Rate Metrics and the Need for Glassdoor 2-indicators Collection.....................................10 3.1.3 Glassdoor 2-indicators Collection..................................12 3.2 Climate Change Score and Esg Ratings.................................13 3.2.1 Cdp Climate Change Score...........................................13 3.2.2 Sustainalytics Rating.................................................14 4. Data Analysis.......................................................................15 4.1 the Data Collected..........................................................15 4.1.1 Mercedes Benz Group Ag..........................................16 4.1.2 Basf Se...............................................................16 4.1.3 Deutsche Telekom Ag.............................................16 4.1.4 Allianz Se.............................................................16 4.1.5 Siemens Ag.........................................................16 4.1.6 Sap Se...............................................................17 4.1.7 Volkswagen Ag......................................................17 4.1.8 Bayer Ag.............................................................17 4.1.9 Deutsche Börse Ag.................................................17 4.1.10 Infineon Technologies Ag........................................17 4.1.11 Deutsche Post Ag................................................18 4.1.12 Vonovia Se........................................................18 4.1.13 Münchener Rück Ag............................................18 4.1.14 Kering S.a..........................................................18 4.1.15 Airbus Se..........................................................18 4.1.16 Eni S.p.a..........................................................19 4.1.17 Lvmh S.a..........................................................19 4.1.18 Asml Holding N.v...............................................19 4.1.19 Banco Santander S.a............................................19 4.1.20 Axa S.a............................................................19 4.1.21 Enel S.p.a..........................................................20 4.1.22 Philips Electronics N.v..........................................20 4.1.23 Ab Inbev Sa-nv................................................20 4.1.24 Sanofi-aventis S.a...............................................20 4.1.25 L'oréal S.a..........................................................20 4.1.26 Stellantis Nv................................................21 4.1.27 Iberdrola S.a.................................................21 4.1.28 Air Liquide S.a...................................................21 4.1.29 Schneider Electric S.a...........................................21 4.1.30 Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria.................................21 4.1.31 Bnp Paribas S.a..................................................22 4.1.32 Adyen.............................................................22 4.1.33 Danone...........................................................22 4.1.34 Essilorluxottica..................................................22 4.1.35 Vinci S.a........................................................22 4.1.36 Pernod-ricard S.a...............................................23 4.1.37 Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.a...........................................23 4.1.38 Adidas Ag........................................................23 4.1.39 Hermes International S.a.......................................23 4.1.40 Kone Corp.......................................................23 4.1.41 Ahold Delhaize.............................................24 4.1.42 Safran.........................................................24 4.1.43 Crh Plc..........................................................24 4.2 Statistical Analyses........................................................25 4.2.1 Cdp Scores.........................................................25 4.2.2 Sustainalytics......................................................25 5. Discussion.........................................................................26 6. Limitations.........................................................................28 7. Conclusion.........................................................................30 references............................................................................31
    Language: Undetermined
    Keywords: Academic theses
    URL: FULL
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    UID:
    kobvindex_INT60846
    Format: 59 pages : , illustrations ; , 21 × 29.7 cm.
    Content: AI-GENERATED ABSTRACT: Abstract: This thesis examines the relationships between Glassdoor ratings, employee recommendations, and measures of environmental responsibility and sustainability practices within companies. The study utilizes data from various companies to analyze these connections and provide valuable insights into the complex nature of company performance evaluation. The findings reveal a strong positive correlation between Glassdoor ratings and employee recommendations, indicating that higher Glassdoor ratings are associated with a greater likelihood of employees recommending their employer to others. This highlights the significance of fostering a positive work environment that promotes employee satisfaction and advocacy. However, the analysis also reveals that Glassdoor ratings do not significantly correlate with measures of environmental responsibility as assessed by the CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project) or sustainability practices evaluated by Sustainalytics. This suggests that employee perceptions and satisfaction may not directly reflect or strongly influence a company's environmental efforts. Other factors such as compensation, work-life balance, and opportunities for professional growth might impact employee evaluations. The research underscores the multidimensional nature of evaluating company performance and sustainability practices. While employee satisfaction is essential, decision-makers and stakeholders must consider a comprehensive approach incorporating multiple metrics and perspectives beyond employee feedback alone. This is crucial for accurately evaluating a company's alignment with environmental and social aims. The small sample size, potential biases in the data sources, the correlational character of the analysis, and the omission of other factors affecting employee satisfaction are some of the study's drawbacks. Future research should overcome these constraints to increase our understanding of the intricate connections between employee satisfaction, business success, and sustainable practices. Keywords: Glassdoor, employee retention, employee engagement, environmental responsibility, company performance evaluation, CDP, Sustainalytics
    Note: DISSERTATION NOTE: Bachelor of Arts thesis in International Management and Marketing, Berlin International University of Applied Sciences, 2023. , MACHINE-GENERATED CONTENTS NOTE: Table of Contents 1. Introduction............................................................................1 2. Literature Review....................................................................3 2.1 Environmental Sustainability................................................3 2.2 Environmental, Social, Governance Report (esg).......................4 2.3 Employee Turnover Rate.......................................................6 2.4 Sustainability and Employee Turnover Rate.................................7 3. Research Methods...................................................................9 3.1 Employee Retention and Engagement Rate Data.........................9 3.1.1 Turnover Rates from Reports..........................................9 3.1.2 Limitations of Current Turnover Rate Metrics and the Need for Glassdoor 2-indicators Collection.....................................10 3.1.3 Glassdoor 2-indicators Collection..................................12 3.2 Climate Change Score and Esg Ratings.................................13 3.2.1 Cdp Climate Change Score...........................................13 3.2.2 Sustainalytics Rating.................................................14 4. Data Analysis.......................................................................15 4.1 the Data Collected..........................................................15 4.1.1 Mercedes Benz Group Ag..........................................16 4.1.2 Basf Se...............................................................16 4.1.3 Deutsche Telekom Ag.............................................16 4.1.4 Allianz Se.............................................................16 4.1.5 Siemens Ag.........................................................16 4.1.6 Sap Se...............................................................17 4.1.7 Volkswagen Ag......................................................17 4.1.8 Bayer Ag.............................................................17 4.1.9 Deutsche Börse Ag.................................................17 4.1.10 Infineon Technologies Ag........................................17 4.1.11 Deutsche Post Ag................................................18 4.1.12 Vonovia Se........................................................18 4.1.13 Münchener Rück Ag............................................18 4.1.14 Kering S.a..........................................................18 4.1.15 Airbus Se..........................................................18 4.1.16 Eni S.p.a..........................................................19 4.1.17 Lvmh S.a..........................................................19 4.1.18 Asml Holding N.v...............................................19 4.1.19 Banco Santander S.a............................................19 4.1.20 Axa S.a............................................................19 4.1.21 Enel S.p.a..........................................................20 4.1.22 Philips Electronics N.v..........................................20 4.1.23 Ab Inbev Sa-nv................................................20 4.1.24 Sanofi-aventis S.a...............................................20 4.1.25 L'oréal S.a..........................................................20 4.1.26 Stellantis Nv................................................21 4.1.27 Iberdrola S.a.................................................21 4.1.28 Air Liquide S.a...................................................21 4.1.29 Schneider Electric S.a...........................................21 4.1.30 Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria.................................21 4.1.31 Bnp Paribas S.a..................................................22 4.1.32 Adyen.............................................................22 4.1.33 Danone...........................................................22 4.1.34 Essilorluxottica..................................................22 4.1.35 Vinci S.a........................................................22 4.1.36 Pernod-ricard S.a...............................................23 4.1.37 Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.a...........................................23 4.1.38 Adidas Ag........................................................23 4.1.39 Hermes International S.a.......................................23 4.1.40 Kone Corporation......................................................23 4.1.41 Ahold Delhaize.............................................24 4.1.42 Safran.........................................................24 4.1.43 Crh Plc..........................................................24 4.2 Statistical Analyses........................................................25 4.2.1 Cdp Scores.........................................................25 4.2.2 Sustainalytics......................................................25 5. Discussion.........................................................................26 6. Limitations.........................................................................28 7. Conclusion.........................................................................30 references............................................................................31
    Language: Undetermined
    Keywords: Academic theses
    URL: FULL
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    UID:
    kobvindex_INT60991
    Format: 40 pages : , illustrations ; , 21 × 29.7 cm.
    Content: AUTHOR-SUPPLIED ABSTRACT: Abstract: This thesis examines the analysis of the impact that pet-friendly policies in an organization have on the well-being of its employees. Nowadays, organizations are aware of the importance of creating a positive well-being environment as part of their organizational culture and the burnout and distress that entails the workload. Previous studies have shown the positivity in people's lives created when their level of well-being is high. Furthermore, research has proved that pets could increase well-being despite some constraints. Therefore, some organizations opted to implement pet-friendly policies. For data collection, a survey was chosen as a quantitative method approach, where 65 answers were collected by the thesis' author. The findings clearly stated positive and negative thoughts about having pets in the workplace. In addition, the respondents also provide some reasons. Finally, all the information was analyzed and tested to prove if a positive correlation exists when employees who feel comfortable with pets present positive well-being. Keywords: pet-friendly policies, well-being, organizational culture, burnout, distress, workload, positive well-being, pets, workplace, survey, quantitative method, positive correlation.
    Note: DISSERTATION NOTE: Bachelor of Arts thesis in Business Administration - Human Resource Management and Leadership, Berlin International University of Applied Sciences, 2022. , MACHINE-GENERATED CONTENTS NOTE: Table of Contents TABLE OF FIGURES ........................................................................................ iii TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................... iii Abstract ............................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1. Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 1.1. Context...................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. Literature review.................................................................................2 2.1. Introduction...................................................................................................2 2.2. Definition of well-being ............................................................................ 3 2.3. Factors driving well-being ......................................................................... 4 2.4. The growing importance of well-being ...................................................... 6 2.5. Well-being at work....................................................................................7 2.5.1. Definition ..............................................................................................7 2.5.2. Factors impacting well-being at work.....................................................8 2.6. Animals and well-being ............................................................................. 9 2.7. Conclusion .............................................................................................. 11 Chapter 3. Methods............................................................................................12 3.1. Introduction............................................................................................. 12 3.2. Survey distribution .................................................................................. 12 3.3. Survey design .......................................................................................... 13 3.4. The sample .............................................................................................. 14 3.5. Data analysis ........................................................................................... 14 Chapter 4. Results..............................................................................................16 4.1. Introduction.................................................................................................16 4.2. Context .......................................................................................................16 4.2.1. Demographics of the sample.....................................................................16 4.2.2. Well-being results ....................................................................................17 4.2.3. Pet-friendly results ................................................................................... 20 4.2.3.1. Comfort with pets in the workplace ....................................................... 20 4.2.3.2. Discomfort with pets in the workplace...................................................20 4.2.3.3. Pet-friendly workplaces and well-being ................................................. 21 4.2.4. Testing the research question 1: animals and well-being ........................... 22 4.2.4.1. The no group ......................................................................................... 22 4.2.4.2. The yes group........................................................................................22 Chapter 5. Discussion ........................................................................................23 Chapter 6. Conclusions ...................................................................................... 24 References .....................................................................................................25 Appendix 1. ........................................................................................................IV Appendix 2. .........................................................................................................V Thesis Declaration Page......................................................................................XI
    Language: Undetermined
    Keywords: Academic theses
    URL: FULL
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    UID:
    kobvindex_INT61010
    Format: 34 pages : , illustrations ; , 21.59 × 27.94 cm.
    Content: AUTHOR-SUPPLIED ABSTRACT: Abstract: This paper is an explanation of the new technologies and cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. It gives an in-depth explanation of what blockchain is, covering its characteristics, main challenges, and criticisms. It delves into the Non-Fungible token space, explaining the main characteristics and challenges in the retail fashion industry and also analyzing a study case from Nike, Incorporated where they acquired the studio/team called RTFKT (pronounced "artifact"). It finishes the study with an analysis of the NFT industry utilizing Porter's Five Forces to understand the competitiveness of the industry and a VRIO analysis to understand if RTFKT can create a competitive advantage for Nike. Keywords: new technologies, cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin, Ethereum, blockchain, characteristics, challenges, criticisms, Non-Fungible token, retail fashion industry, study case, Nike, Incorporated, RTFKT, Porter's Five Forces, VRIO analysis, competitive advantage
    Note: DISSERTATION NOTE: Bachelor of Arts thesis in Data Science and Business, Berlin International University of Applied Sciences, 2022. , MACHINE-GENERATED CONTENTS NOTE: Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. The motivation for the study 1.2 Research question 2. Methodology (Research approach) 3. Literature review 3.2 Blockchain and its essential characteristics 3.3 Blockchain and its main challenges 3.4 Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake: a brief explanation 3.5 What is bitcoin, and how does it work? 3.6 What is Ethereum, and how does it work? 3.7 Non-Fungible Tokens and main characteristics 3.8 How the retail and retail luxury industry can use Non-Fungible tokens 3.9 Blockchain and Non-fungible tokens criticism and challenges 4. Nike acquiring RTFKT (Case Study) 5. Porter's five forces 5.1 Porter's Five Forces applied to the NFT industry 6. VRIO Model 7. Limitations of the study 8. Discussion 9. Results 10. Conclusion References Appendices: - Declaration Page
    Language: Undetermined
    Keywords: Academic theses
    URL: FULL
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    UID:
    kobvindex_INT60806
    Format: 76 pages : , illustrations ; , 21 × 29.7 cm.
    Content: AI-GENERATED ABSTRACT: Abstract: Healthcare facility design has undergone significant changes over the years, transitioning from office-like settings to more vibrant and patient-centered spaces. The emergence of "mall hospitals" and amusement park-inspired lobbies in children's hospitals reflects a shift towards normalizing illness and prioritizing patient experiences. This trend aligns with the growing emphasis on healing environments and wellness in healthcare buildings, particularly for pediatric facilities. Designing pediatric hospital wings presents unique challenges, as the interiors must cater to both children and adults. A child-centered approach is crucial to empower young patients and reduce negative responses to the environment, thereby facilitating the healing process. Considering the considerable number of children hospitalized annually in the United States, strategic design solutions play a vital role in alleviating the stress and discomfort associated with hospitalization and expediting the healing journey. This thesis aims to investigate how design strategies can enhance the physical and psychological well-being of hospitalized children aged 6-10. The focus will be on healing environments and child-centered design principles. Specifically, the research will explore the implementation of color, light, and nature connectedness in interior healthcare spaces. A systematic review of secondary sources, including journal articles and design theory literature, will provide insights into effective design strategies for pediatric healthcare settings. Additionally, three case studies of pediatric hospitals and related spaces will undergo a critical qualitative analysis to identify successful design elements and areas for improvement. The findings will contribute to a better understanding of how design strategies can positively impact pediatric in-patient care units and foster a seamless transition between hospital life and the outside world, ultimately promoting the physical and psychological well-being of young patients. The research outcomes will inform a design project for a patient hotel in Berlinches Keywords: Healthcare facility design, pediatric hospitals, healing environments, child-centered design, design strategies, color, light, nature connectedness, patient experience, systematic review, case studies, patient well-being.
    Note: DISSERTATION NOTE: Bachelor of Arts thesis in Interior Architecture / Interior Design, Berlin International University of Applied Sciences, 2023. , MACHINE-GENERATED CONTENTS NOTE: Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Topic Definition, Context and Aims 1.2 Methodology 2. the Built Environment as a Healing Aid 2.1 Children's Perception and Needs in the Healthcare Environment 2.2 Creating Healing Environments 3. Design Strategies and Their Relation to Health 3.1 the Use of Colour in Interior Healthcare Spaces 3.2 the Use of Natural and Artificial Light 3.3 Nature Connectedness 4. Case Study 4.1 Ronald Mcdonald House Charities Bc 4.2 Copenhagen Children's Hospital 4.3 Shenzhen Children's Hospital Science and Education Building 4.4 Cross Analysis 5. Conclusion 6. Design Project bibliography list of Figures
    Language: Undetermined
    Keywords: Academic theses
    URL: FULL
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    UID:
    kobvindex_INTbi00005021
    Format: 71 pages : , illustrations ; , 30 x 21 cm.
    Content: MACHINE-GENERATED SUMMARY NOTE: In the fast-paced world we live in, efficiency and commodity have become a primordial aspect of life. New developments and innovations take us towards a world that transforms vital needs like eating, a simple yet sometimes harmful choice—like de- livery, vending machines, and processed foods conserved by outstanding amounts of sodium. Buying food in a supermarket today is very different from what our great grandparents were accustomed to. Food and nutrients have been broken down into additives mixed with powdered milk and vitamin B12. It is not a surprise that 41 mil- lion people die each year from non-com- municable diseases (NCDs) triggered primarily by unhealthy nutrition, tobacco, alcohol, and lack of physical activity (WHO 2021). Due to this, governments are imple- menting front-of-package labeling (FOP, FOPL) systems to aid customers in under- standing which products are healthier and less harmful to decrease NCDs. Gradually countries around the world include them in packaged foods, and recently Uruguay did also. Graphic design is a discipline which consists in communicating a message through visual elements. Packaging design is the discipline that creates a container relevant for the product contained inside. Decree No 272/018 regulates all packaged food sold in the Uruguayan territory by placing a black octagon that states that the determinate product contains excess sugar, fat, saturated fat, or sodium quan- tities. These black octagons are placed on the front face of the package to warn consumers about the harmful amounts of specific ingredients. This thesis focuses on the changes that packaging design and designers have encountered when the Decree was estab- lished. Most importantly, I aim to under- stand the challenges specific packaging design elements have faced now that excess FOP labels are implemented on packaged food in Uruguay.
    Note: DISSERTATION NOTE: submitted as bachelor thesis in Graphic Design & Visual Communication, Berlin International University of Applied Sciences, 2021 , MACHINE-GENERATED CONTENTS NOTE: 1. INTRODUCTION 10 12 1.2. METHODOLOGY 14 1.3. SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS 1.4. THESIS OUTLINE 16 15 2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 2.1. NCDS IN URUGUAY 2.2. DECREE No 272/018 3. DESIGN 24 3.1. PACKAGING DESIGN 3.2. PACKAGING DESIGN HISTORY 3.3. PACKAGING DESIGN AS MEANS TO MAKE A PROFIT 3.4. ELEMENTS OF PACKAGING DESIGN 3.5. DECREE No 120/019 GENERIC TOBACCO PACKAGING 4. ANALYSIS 38 5. CONCLUSION 46 6. BACHELOR DESIGN PROJECT 48 7. BIBLIOGRAPHY 54 8. APPENDIX 60
    Language: English
    Keywords: Academic theses ; Academic theses
    URL: FULL
    URL: FULL
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages