Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
  • Komparatistik. Außereuropäische Sprachen/Literaturen  (2)
  • EQ 2630  (2)
Medientyp
Verlag/Herausgeber
Sprache
Erscheinungszeitraum
FID
Fachgebiete(RVK)
  • Komparatistik. Außereuropäische Sprachen/Literaturen  (2)
RVK
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2012
    In:  Journal of Child Language Vol. 39, No. 2 ( 2012-03), p. 383-410
    In: Journal of Child Language, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 39, No. 2 ( 2012-03), p. 383-410
    Kurzfassung: Children up to school age have been reported to perform poorly when interpreting sentences containing restrictive and additive focus particles by treating sentences with a focus particle in the same way as sentences without it. Careful comparisons between results of previous studies indicate that this phenomenon is less pronounced for restrictive than for additive particles. We argue that this asymmetry is an effect of the presuppositional status of the proposition triggered by the additive particle. We tested this in two experiments with German-learning three- and four-year-olds using a method that made the exploitation of the information provided by the particles highly relevant for completing the task. Three-year-olds already performed remarkably well with sentences both with auch ‘also’ and with nur ‘only’. Thus, children can consider the presuppositional contribution of the additive particle in their sentence interpretation and can exploit the restrictive particle as a marker of exhaustivity.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0305-0009 , 1469-7602
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publikationsdatum: 2012
    ZDB Id: 1466489-6
    SSG: 5,2
    SSG: 7,11
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2018
    In:  Journal of Child Language Vol. 45, No. 1 ( 2018-01), p. 219-241
    In: Journal of Child Language, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 45, No. 1 ( 2018-01), p. 219-241
    Kurzfassung: Previous research on young children's knowledge of prosodic focus marking has revealed an apparent paradox, with comprehension appearing to lag behind production. Comprehension of prosodic focus is difficult to study experimentally due to its subtle and ambiguous contribution to pragmatic meaning. We designed a novel comprehension task, which revealed that three- to six-year-old children show adult-like comprehension of the prosodic marking of subject and object focus. Our findings thus support the view that production does not precede comprehension in the acquisition of focus. We tested participants speaking English, German, and French. All three languages allow prosodic subject and object focus marking, but use additional syntactic marking to varying degrees (English: dispreferred; German: possible; French preferred). French participants produced fewer subject marked responses than English participants. We found no other cross-linguistic differences. Participants interpreted prosodic focus marking similarly and in an adult-like fashion in all three languages.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0305-0009 , 1469-7602
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publikationsdatum: 2018
    ZDB Id: 1466489-6
    SSG: 5,2
    SSG: 7,11
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf den KOBV Seiten zum Datenschutz