Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Foerch, Christian  (2)
  • 2010-2014  (2)
  • 1
    In: Cerebrovascular Diseases, S. Karger AG, Vol. 36, No. 2 ( 2013), p. 115-119
    Abstract: 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Background: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 The novel direct oral anticoagulants (NOA), dabigatran (a thrombin inhibitor), rivaroxaban and apixaban (factor Xa inhibitors) have shown at least noninferiority compared to warfarin concerning the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism as well as the risk of hemorrhagic complications in large phase III trials in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). These results have been obtained under regular monitoring of side effects and reinforcement of medication adherence in carefully controlled clinical trials. To what extent they translate into clinical practice is a matter of ongoing research. While postmarketing registers, most prominently the GLORIA-AF registry, are currently recruiting and will not report data for several years, we aimed at extracting risk factors for hemorrhagic complications under NOA from all available case reports and single case series published to date. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Methods: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 To identify risk factors which increase the risk of hemorrhage under NOA, we performed a PubMed search for both dabigatran and rivaroxaban, as well as three search terms for hemorrhagic complications. The cases of hemorrhagic complications were analyzed for the presence of the following four factors: ‘prescriber errors', ‘unfavorable comedications', ‘renal impairment' and ‘prescription of NOA in the frail elderly'. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Results and Discussion: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 We found a discrepancy in the frequency of case reports on hemorrhagic complications to the disadvantage of dabigatran which can hardly be attributed to the earlier marketing time of dabigatran alone. As risk factors, we identified prescriber errors, impaired renal function, comedication with antiplatelet drugs or p-glycoprotein inhibitors, old age and low body weight. Strikingly, the majority of the bleeding complications reported in this compilation of case reports showed at least one and in most cases several risk factors. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Conclusions: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 We should, therefore, carefully select our patients for treatment with the NOA with an emphasis on age, body weight, renal function and comedications and follow them faithfully concerning their medication adherence and eventual side effects.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1015-9770 , 1421-9786
    Language: English
    Publisher: S. Karger AG
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1482069-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: International Journal of Stroke, SAGE Publications, Vol. 9, No. 5 ( 2014-07), p. 569-575
    Abstract: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are alternatives to the use of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) as oral anticoagulant therapies to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Aims We assembled a representative secondary prevention cohort from four tertiary care stroke centers to identify factors that independently influence therapeutic decision making 1) not to anticoagulate with either VKA or DOAC and 2) to use DOAC if the patient appears suitable for oral anticoagulant therapy. Methods We identified all patients discharged with the diagnoses ‘ischemic stroke’ (ICD-10 code 163) or ‘transient ischemic attack’ (G45) in combination with ‘atrial fibrillation’ (148) during 1 year. We performed binary logistic regression analyses to identify factors independently influencing the aforementioned decisions. Results Our cohort comprised 758 patients. At discharge from the stroke service, 374 patients (49·3%) received oral anticoagulant therapy. Older age, severe stroke, poor recovery in the acute phase, and higher serum creatinine were independent factors to withhold oral anticoagulant therapy, whereas prior oral anticoagulant therapy favored the decision to anticoagulate. Among patients who were anticoagulated, prescription was balanced for VKA (50·3%) and DOAC (49·7%). Renal function and prior oral anticoagulant therapies were the most important factors in this decision. Conclusions Shortly after their marketing, DOAC are used as frequently as VKA for secondary stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. The decision between VKA and DOAC is mainly determined by the patient's renal function and the absence or presence of prior oral anticoagulant therapy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1747-4930 , 1747-4949
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2211666-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages