Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Wrobel, Ralph Michael  (5)
Type of Medium
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Walter de Gruyter GmbH ; 2019
    In:  Asiatische Studien - Études Asiatiques Vol. 73, No. 1 ( 2019-03-26), p. 149-191
    In: Asiatische Studien - Études Asiatiques, Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Vol. 73, No. 1 ( 2019-03-26), p. 149-191
    Abstract: Southeast Asia is of highest geostrategic interest for China as a rising Great Power as well as for the U.S. and its ally Japan. Since the “Pivot to East Asia” of the Obama administration in Washington in 2011 observers are discussing a “New Great Game” in the region. But has China already established a “backyard” by its economic activities in Southeast Asia and in particular in ASEAN countries? What is the spatial pattern of China’s activities? As an analysis of FDI stocks as well as trade related data show ASEAN countries can be divided into several groups. (1) China’s small neighbour Laos dominated by Chinese FDI. (2) Countries like Cambodia and Myanmar partly dominated by Chinese FDI. (3) Countries with different trade ties to China but mostly strong military or diplomatic ties to the U.S. like Singapore, the Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and (4) the independent Brunei Darussalam. Therefore, Southeast Asia and in particular ASEAN cannot be called a Chinese “backyard” yet. But if U.S. president Trump withdraws the U.S. attention from the region China could be able to achieve a hegemonic position in the region soon.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2235-5871 , 0004-4717
    Language: English
    Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2610886-0
    SSG: 0
    SSG: 6,25
    SSG: 6,24
    SSG: 6,21
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2001
    In:  International Area Review Vol. 4, No. 1 ( 2001-03), p. 101-107
    In: International Area Review, SAGE Publications, Vol. 4, No. 1 ( 2001-03), p. 101-107
    Abstract: Conventional economics assumes the existence of important limits to the operation of markets. Even economists who generally prefer the market system to solve economic problems point to the significance of market failure - for example asymmetric information. Then these economists demand government policies suspending or modifying the operation of the market, e.g. consumer protection (Kirzner, 1994, p. 101). Our thesis in this paper is that there exists no market failure because a failure can only be defined in relation to the “nirvana-approach” of static Pareto-optimum (Demsetz, 1969, p. 1). In contrast competition on markets must be seen as discovery procedure, which helps to find better solutions (Hayek, 1969, p. 249–265). A static optimum never and nowhere exists - only in the neo-classical theory. Therefore economically justified government interventions into the market process will be called into question by the following argumentation. Only policies, which are supporting market operation, will be advocated. Contrary, we will show that there exists a danger in state interventions to protect consumers. A growing state activity may lead to destruction of producer freedom and consumers' sovereignty and at last of the market economy itself. As example we will analyse consumer protection policy in Estonia.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1226-7031
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2001
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Walter de Gruyter GmbH ; 2003
    In:  Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik Vol. 52, No. 3 ( 2003-12-1), p. 380-398
    In: Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Vol. 52, No. 3 ( 2003-12-1), p. 380-398
    Abstract: The transformation of former socialist economies in Central and Eastern Europe is a still continuing long-term process. Since explanations and political recommendations by mainstream economics have not been sufficient, research on methodology and theory of transformation is necessary still today. In this paper an evolutionary approach will be introduced to explain the phenomenon of “transformation” as borderline case of long-term institutional evolution. In concrete it will be described as adaptive-imitative step within institutional competition caused by “exit” and “voice” in the Hirschman sense, initiated by political entrepreneurs, channelled by cultural restriction and path dependency and - as consequence of the evolutionary approach - independent of scientific valuation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2366-0317 , 0721-3808
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH
    Publication Date: 2003
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2112616-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2259867-4
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 865276-4
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: SSRN Electronic Journal, Elsevier BV
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1556-5068
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2003
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Walter de Gruyter GmbH ; 2001
    In:  Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik Vol. 50, No. 2 ( 2001-8-1), p. 217-250
    In: Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Vol. 50, No. 2 ( 2001-8-1), p. 217-250
    Abstract: As well interventionist as ordo-liberal strategies have a long tradition in German economic policy. Interventionism is not only supported by Keynesian economics but also by the neo-classical approach. In contrast to the common view in neo-classical mainstream - as comparative-static analysis method - in this paper scientific isolation of economic phenomenon will be rejected. The economic system is very complex. Therefore economists have to discuss appropriate methods to analyse economic policy strategies. In this paper the problem of complexity in society in common and in economics strictly is discussed. It can be shown that complexity and nonlinearity are main characteristics of dynamic economic processes. An additional problem - resulting from the characteristic of complexity - is the existence of a constitutional lack of knowledge. No one in society, neither a scientist nor an economic policy maker, is able to collect all the necessary knowledge. Therefore interventionist strategies in economic policy are weaker than ordo-liberal ones. Because of the necessity of adaptation-flexibility in dynamic economic systems an “Evolutionary Economic Policy”, characterised by ordo-liberal insights in the importance of economic and political order and evolutionary views on economic processes as discovery procedures, are advocated. But why interventionist strategies are so successful in economic policy - not only in Germany? By using a neo-classical model of institutional competition, including transaction costs etc, the dominant position of interventionist strategies cannot be explained. Therefore in this paper an analysis, basing on systems theory and the ordo-liberal idea of interdependencies of orders, is used to show the complexity in real society according to the choice of strategies in economic policy. It can be shown that dependencies with the political subsystem are mostly important for this dominant position of interventionist strategies. As Hayek predicted a long time ago, a rise of the welfare state occurred in the western world. But interventionist policies are also supported by the formation of a mainstream in economics, dominated by the neo-classical theory, and by cultural factors, by internal institutions and path-dependency. The result of this analysis is a paradox: Complexity in society and especially in economics requires ordo-liberal strategies in economic policy. But at the same time the existence of complexity in society is main argument for the problems relative to the introduction of such strategies, which are more adaptive and thereby more useful in economic policy. Hopefully nowadays by the pressure of international institutional competition, called “globalisation”, ordo-liberal and evolutionary strategies will be supported more.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2366-0317 , 0721-3808
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH
    Publication Date: 2001
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2112616-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2259867-4
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 865276-4
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages