Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Hodyss, Daniel  (8)
  • Geography  (8)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Stockholm University Press ; 2009
    In:  Tellus A ( 2009-01)
    In: Tellus A, Stockholm University Press, ( 2009-01)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1600-0870 , 0280-6495
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Stockholm University Press
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2026987-0
    SSG: 16,13
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Meteorological Society ; 2010
    In:  Monthly Weather Review Vol. 138, No. 1 ( 2010-01-01), p. 282-290
    In: Monthly Weather Review, American Meteorological Society, Vol. 138, No. 1 ( 2010-01-01), p. 282-290
    Abstract: A widely used observation space covariance localization method is shown to adversely affect satellite radiance assimilation in ensemble Kalman filters (EnKFs) when compared to model space covariance localization. The two principal problems are that distance and location are not well defined for integrated measurements, and that neighboring satellite channels typically have broad, overlapping weighting functions, which produce true, nonzero correlations that localization in radiance space can incorrectly eliminate. The limitations of the method are illustrated in a 1D conceptual model, consisting of three vertical levels and a two-channel satellite instrument. A more realistic 1D model is subsequently tested, using the 30 vertical levels from the Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System (NOGAPS), the Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit A (AMSU-A) weighting functions for channels 6–11, and the observation error variance and forecast error covariance from the NRL Atmospheric Variational Data Assimilation System (NAVDAS). Analyses from EnKFs using radiance space localization are compared with analyses from raw EnKFs, EnKFs using model space localization, and the optimal analyses using the NAVDAS forecast error covariance as a proxy for the true forecast error covariance. As measured by mean analysis error variance reduction, radiance space localization is inferior to model space localization for every ensemble size and meaningful observation error variance tested. Furthermore, given as many satellite channels as vertical levels, radiance space localization cannot recover the true temperature state with perfect observations, whereas model space localization can.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1520-0493 , 0027-0644
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2033056-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 202616-8
    SSG: 14
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Meteorological Society ; 2014
    In:  Monthly Weather Review Vol. 142, No. 4 ( 2014-04-01), p. 1631-1654
    In: Monthly Weather Review, American Meteorological Society, Vol. 142, No. 4 ( 2014-04-01), p. 1631-1654
    Abstract: If forecast or observation error distributions are non-Gaussian, the true posterior mean and covariance depends on the distribution of observation errors and the observed values. The posterior distribution of analysis errors obtained from ensemble Kalman filters and smoothers is independent of observed values. Hence, the error in ensemble Kalman smoother (EnKS) state estimates is closely linked to the sensitivity of the true posterior to observed values. Here a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm is used to document the dependence of the errors in EnKS-based estimates of cloud microphysical parameters on observed values. It is shown that EnKS analysis distributions are grossly inaccurate for nonnegative microphysical parameters when parameter values are close to zero. Furthermore, numerical analysis is presented that shows that, by design, the posterior distributions given by EnKS and even nonlinear extensions of these smoothers approximate the average of all possible posterior analysis distributions associated with all possible observations given the prior. Multiple runs of the MCMC are made to approximate this distribution. This empirically derived average of Bayesian posterior analysis errors is shown to be qualitatively similar to the EnKS posterior. In this way, it is demonstrated that, in the presence of nonlinearity, EnKS algorithms do not estimate the true posterior error distribution given the specific values of the observations. Instead, they produce an error distribution that is consistent with an average of the true posterior variance, weighted by the probability of obtaining each possible observation. This seemingly subtle distinction gives rise to fundamental differences between the approximate EnKS posterior and the true Bayesian posterior distribution.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0027-0644 , 1520-0493
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2033056-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 202616-8
    SSG: 14
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Stockholm University Press ; 2009
    In:  Tellus A ( 2009-01)
    In: Tellus A, Stockholm University Press, ( 2009-01)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1600-0870 , 0280-6495
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Stockholm University Press
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2026987-0
    SSG: 16,13
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Meteorological Society ; 2018
    In:  Monthly Weather Review Vol. 146, No. 11 ( 2018-11-01), p. 3605-3622
    In: Monthly Weather Review, American Meteorological Society, Vol. 146, No. 11 ( 2018-11-01), p. 3605-3622
    Abstract: Because of imperfections in ensemble data assimilation schemes, one cannot assume that the ensemble-derived covariance matrix is equal to the true error covariance matrix. Here, we describe a simple and intuitively compelling method to fit calibration functions of the ensemble sample variance to the mean of the distribution of true error variances, given an ensemble estimate. We demonstrate that the use of such calibration functions is consistent with theory showing that, when sampling error in the prior variance estimate is considered, the gain that minimizes the posterior error variance uses the expected true prior variance, given an ensemble sample variance. Once the calibration function has been fitted, it can be combined with ensemble-based and climatologically based error correlation information to obtain a generalized hybrid error covariance model. When the calibration function is chosen to be a linear function of the ensemble variance, the generalized hybrid error covariance model is the widely used linear hybrid consisting of a weighted sum of a climatological and an ensemble-based forecast error covariance matrix. However, when the calibration function is chosen to be, say, a cubic function of the ensemble sample variance, the generalized hybrid error covariance model is a nonlinear function of the ensemble estimate. We consider idealized univariate data assimilation and multivariate cycling ensemble data assimilation to demonstrate that the generalized hybrid error covariance model closely approximates the optimal weights found through computationally expensive tuning in the linear case and, in the nonlinear case, outperforms any plausible linear model.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0027-0644 , 1520-0493
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2033056-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 202616-8
    SSG: 14
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Meteorological Society ; 2011
    In:  Monthly Weather Review Vol. 139, No. 4 ( 2011-04-01), p. 1241-1255
    In: Monthly Weather Review, American Meteorological Society, Vol. 139, No. 4 ( 2011-04-01), p. 1241-1255
    Abstract: An adaptive ensemble covariance localization technique, previously used in “local” forms of the ensemble Kalman filter, is extended to a global ensemble four-dimensional variational data assimilation (4D-VAR) scheme. The purely adaptive part of the localization matrix considered is given by the element-wise square of the correlation matrix of a smoothed ensemble of streamfunction perturbations. It is found that these purely adaptive localization functions have spurious far-field correlations as large as 0.1 with a 128-member ensemble. To attenuate the spurious features of the purely adaptive localization functions, the authors multiply the adaptive localization functions with very broadscale nonadaptive localization functions. Using the Navy’s operational ensemble forecasting system, it is shown that the covariance localization functions obtained by this approach adapt to spatially anisotropic aspects of the flow, move with the flow, and are free of far-field spurious correlations. The scheme is made computationally feasible by (i) a method for inexpensively generating the square root of an adaptively localized global four-dimensional error covariance model in terms of products or modulations of smoothed ensemble perturbations with themselves and with raw ensemble perturbations, and (ii) utilizing algorithms that speed ensemble covariance localization when localization functions are separable, variable-type independent, and/or large scale. In spite of the apparently useful characteristics of adaptive localization, single analysis/forecast experiments assimilating 583 200 observations over both 6- and 12-h data assimilation windows failed to identify any significant difference in the quality of the analyses and forecasts obtained using nonadaptive localization from that obtained using adaptive localization.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0027-0644 , 1520-0493
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2033056-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 202616-8
    SSG: 14
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Meteorological Society ; 2011
    In:  Monthly Weather Review Vol. 139, No. 2 ( 2011-02-01), p. 573-580
    In: Monthly Weather Review, American Meteorological Society, Vol. 139, No. 2 ( 2011-02-01), p. 573-580
    Abstract: Previous descriptions of how localized ensemble covariances can be incorporated into variational (VAR) data assimilation (DA) schemes provide few clues as to how this might be done in an efficient way. This article serves to remedy this hiatus in the literature by deriving a computationally efficient algorithm for using nonadaptively localized four-dimensional (4D) or three-dimensional (3D) ensemble covariances in variational DA. The algorithm provides computational advantages whenever (i) the localization function is a separable product of a function of the horizontal coordinate and a function of the vertical coordinate, (ii) and/or the localization length scale is much larger than the model grid spacing, (iii) and/or there are many variable types associated with each grid point, (iv) and/or 4D ensemble covariances are employed.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1520-0493 , 0027-0644
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2033056-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 202616-8
    SSG: 14
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Meteorological Society ; 2017
    In:  Monthly Weather Review Vol. 145, No. 2 ( 2017-02), p. 653-667
    In: Monthly Weather Review, American Meteorological Society, Vol. 145, No. 2 ( 2017-02), p. 653-667
    Abstract: Data assimilation schemes combine observational data with a short-term model forecast to produce an analysis. However, many characteristics of the atmospheric states described by the observations and the model differ. Observations often measure a higher-resolution state than coarse-resolution model grids can describe. Hence, the observations may measure aspects of gradients or unresolved eddies that are poorly resolved by the filtered version of reality represented by the model. This inconsistency, known as observation representation error, must be accounted for in data assimilation schemes. In this paper the ability of the ensemble to predict the variance of the observation error of representation is explored, arguing that the portion of representation error being detected by the ensemble variance is that portion correlated to the smoothed features that the coarse-resolution forecast model is able to predict. This predictive relationship is explored using differences between model states and their spectrally truncated form, as well as commonly used statistical methods to estimate observation error variances. It is demonstrated that the ensemble variance is a useful predictor of the observation error variance of representation and that it could be used to account for flow dependence in the observation error covariance matrix.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0027-0644 , 1520-0493
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2033056-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 202616-8
    SSG: 14
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages