Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Society of Exploration Geophysicists  (5)
  • Physics  (5)
Type of Medium
Publisher
  • Society of Exploration Geophysicists  (5)
Language
Subjects(RVK)
  • Physics  (5)
RVK
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Society of Exploration Geophysicists ; 2004
    In:  GEOPHYSICS Vol. 69, No. 1 ( 2004-01), p. 222-230
    In: GEOPHYSICS, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Vol. 69, No. 1 ( 2004-01), p. 222-230
    Abstract: Detecting discrete anomalies, such as cavities or tunnels, is an important application of crosshole radar tomography. However, crosshole tomographic inversion results are frequently ambiguous, showing smearing effects and inversion artifacts. These ambiguities lead to uncertainties in interpretation; hence, the size and position of anomalies can only be interpreted with limited accuracy and reliability. We present an inversion strategy for investigating discrete anomalies with crosshole radar tomography. In addition to the full traveltime data set, we use subsets of specified ray‐angle intervals for tomographic inversion. By analyzing inversion results from different ray‐angle intervals, a more accurate interpretation of anomalies is possible. The second step of our strategy is to develop a good inhomogeneous starting model from joint interpretation of the inversion results from different subsets. The third step is to invert the full data set using this new starting model and to evaluate the inversion results by analyzing the distributions of mean square traveltime residuals with respect to the ray angles. We use a synthetic model with two discrete anomalies located roughly at the same depth to demonstrate and evaluate our approach. This inversion strategy is also applied to a field data set collected to investigate karst cavities in limestone. From the inversion results of both examples, we show that horizontal smearing of anomalies can be reduced by eliminating near‐horizontal rays. A good starting model can be obtained based on the joint interpretation of the inversion results of the different subsets; it leads to a high‐resolution final image of the full data set.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0016-8033 , 1942-2156
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Society of Exploration Geophysicists
    Publication Date: 2004
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2033021-2
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2184-2
    SSG: 16,13
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Society of Exploration Geophysicists ; 2010
    In:  GEOPHYSICS Vol. 75, No. 3 ( 2010-05), p. P11-P22
    In: GEOPHYSICS, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Vol. 75, No. 3 ( 2010-05), p. P11-P22
    Abstract: Partitioning cluster analyses are powerful tools for rapidly and objectively exploring and characterizing disparate geophysical databases with unknown interrelations between individual data sets or models. Despite its high potential to objectively extract the dominant structural information from suites of disparate geophysical data sets or models, cluster-analysis techniques are underused when analyzing geophysical data or models. This is due to the following limitations regarding the applicability of standard partitioning cluster algorithms to geophysical databases: The considered survey or model area must be fully covered by all data sets; cluster algorithms classify data in a multidimensional parameter space while ignoring spatial information present in the databases and are therefore sensitive to high-frequency spatial noise (outliers); and standard cluster algorithms such asfuzzy [Formula: see text]-means (FCM) or crisp [Formula: see text] -means classify data in an unsupervised manner, potentially ignoring expert knowledge additionally available to the experienced human interpreter. We address all of these issues by considering recent modifications to the standard FCM cluster algorithm to tolerate incomplete databases, i.e., survey or model areas not covered by all available data sets, and to consider spatial information present in the database. We have evaluated the regularized missing-value FCM cluster algorithm in a synthetic study and applied it to a database comprising partially colocated crosshole tomographic P- and S-wave-velocity models. Additionally, we were able to demonstrate how further expert knowledge can be incorporated in the cluster analysis to obtain a multiparameter geophysical model to objectively outline the dominant subsurface units, explaining all available geoscientific information.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0016-8033 , 1942-2156
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Society of Exploration Geophysicists
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2033021-2
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2184-2
    SSG: 16,13
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Society of Exploration Geophysicists ; 2002
    In:  GEOPHYSICS Vol. 67, No. 5 ( 2002-09), p. 1516-1523
    In: GEOPHYSICS, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Vol. 67, No. 5 ( 2002-09), p. 1516-1523
    Abstract: We have used a combination of surface ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) profiling, crosshole radar tomography, and natural gamma‐ray logging to characterize a gravelly braided stream deposit. In a gravel pit, we conducted a survey using 300‐MHz surface GPR, 250‐MHz crosshole radar, and densely sampled gamma‐ray logging at single‐borehole locations. After excavation, we validated the geophysical results by comparison with the sedimentological and hydrogeological information obtained from the corresponding outcrop wall. We found the visual lithofacies boundaries agreed very well with the images provided by applied geophysical techniques. Our results illustrate how GPR reflector images are improved using tomographic velocity information. In addition, the structural interpretation of tomographic velocity fields is guided by the GPR reflector images in combination with natural gamma‐ray logging results. Groundwater flow and transport modeling was also performed on different subsurface models. The hydrogeological response of parameter distributions derived from a digitized outcrop image are compared with the response of a parameter field derived from the combined geophysical data and with the response of a simple block interpolation between the boreholes. Comparison of cumulative particle arrival times (breakthrough curves) indicates that the characterization of an appropriate real aquifer would benefit from incorporating high‐resolution geophysical data into the analysis.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0016-8033 , 1942-2156
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Society of Exploration Geophysicists
    Publication Date: 2002
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2033021-2
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2184-2
    SSG: 16,13
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Society of Exploration Geophysicists ; 2009
    In:  GEOPHYSICS Vol. 74, No. 4 ( 2009-07), p. G17-G25
    In: GEOPHYSICS, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Vol. 74, No. 4 ( 2009-07), p. G17-G25
    Abstract: Information about seismic velocity distribution in heterogeneous near-surface sedimentary deposits is essential for a variety of environmental and engineering geophysical applications. We have evaluated the suitability of the minimally invasive direct-push technology for near-surface seismic traveltime tomography. Geophones placed at the surface and a seismic source installed temporarily in the subsurface by direct-push technology quickly acquire reversed multioffset vertical seismic profiles (VSPs). The first-arrival traveltimes of these data were used to reconstruct the 2D seismic velocity distribution tomographically. After testing this approach on synthetic data, we applied it to field data collected over alluvial deposits in a former river floodplain. The resulting velocity model contains information about high- and low-velocity anomalies and offers a significantly deeper penetration depth than conventional refraction tomography using surface-planted sources and receivers at the investigated site. A combination of refraction seismic and direct-push data increases resolution capabilities in the unsaturated zone and enables reliable reconstruction of velocity variations in near-surface unconsolidated sediments. The final velocity model structurally matches the results of cone-penetration tests and natural gamma-radiation data acquired along the profile. The suitability of multiple rapidly acquired reverse VSP surveys for 2D tomographic velocity imaging of near-surface unconsolidated sediments was explored.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0016-8033 , 1942-2156
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Society of Exploration Geophysicists
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2033021-2
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2184-2
    SSG: 16,13
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Society of Exploration Geophysicists ; 2017
    In:  GEOPHYSICS Vol. 82, No. 3 ( 2017-05-01), p. V149-V162
    In: GEOPHYSICS, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Vol. 82, No. 3 ( 2017-05-01), p. V149-V162
    Abstract: Probabilistic prediction of 2D or 3D distributions of sparsely measured borehole or direct-push logging data can contribute to solving hydrological, petroleum, or engineering exploration tasks. We use and improve a recently developed workflow constrained by ill-posed geophysical tomography to achieve 2D probabilistic predictions of geotechnical exploration target parameters that could only be measured by 1D borehole or direct-push logging. We use artificial neural networks (ANNs) to find the optimal prediction models between ensembles of equivalent geophysical tomograms and sparsely measured logging data. During the training phase of ANNs, we consider four different training strategies taking into account the logging data uncertainty and geophysical tomographic ambiguity to avoid data overfitting of the ANNs. Thus, we successfully transform the logging data uncertainty and geophysical tomographic reconstruction ambiguity as well as differences in spatial resolution of logging and tomographic models into the probabilistic 2D prediction of our target parameters in a data-driven manner, which allows application of our methodology to any combination of geophysical tomograms and hydrologic, petroleum, or engineering target parameters solely measured in boreholes. To illustrate our workflow, we use an available field data set collected at a field site south of Berlin, Germany, to characterize near-subsurface sedimentary deposits. In this example, we employ cross-borehole tomographic radar-wave velocity, P-wave velocity, and S-wave velocity models to constrain the prediction of tip resistance, sleeve friction, and dielectric permittivity as target parameters.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0016-8033 , 1942-2156
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Society of Exploration Geophysicists
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2033021-2
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2184-2
    SSG: 16,13
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages