In:
Journal of Personality, Wiley, Vol. 74, No. 2 ( 2006-04), p. 479-510
Abstract:
ABSTRACT The validity of Cloninger's psychobiological model and the Five‐Factor Model of personality to predict DSM‐IV personality disorders was examined in a psychiatric in‐patient sample of 130 individuals. Patients completed Dutch authorized versions of the TCI ( Cloninger, Svrakic, & Przybeck, 1993 ) and the NEO PI‐R ( Costa & McCrae, 1992 ) and were also administered the ADP‐IV ( Schotte & De Doncker, 1994 ), a Dutch self‐report questionnaire to assess Axis‐II disorders. No personality‐descriptive model proved to be superior in explaining personality disorder symptoms at the higher‐order level: the TCI dimensions better explained the Obsessive‐Compulsive and the Narcissistic disorders, whereas the FFM accounted for more variance of the Avoidant disorder. However, differences were apparent at the lower‐order level with the NEO facets out performing the TCI subscales for six to four personality disorders. FFM facet‐level predictions of Widiger, Trull, Clarkin, Sanderson, and Costa (2002) were partially confirmed, with substantially better results using residualized facet scores. A set of TCI subscale personality disorder relationships is suggested.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0022-3506
,
1467-6494
DOI:
10.1111/jopy.2006.74.issue-2
DOI:
10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00382.x
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2006
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1481250-2
SSG:
5,2
Bookmarklink