Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Kaiser, Adam R.  (4)
  • 2000-2004  (4)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Acoustical Society of America (ASA) ; 2001
    In:  The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Vol. 109, No. 5_Supplement ( 2001-05-01), p. 2502-2502
    In: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Acoustical Society of America (ASA), Vol. 109, No. 5_Supplement ( 2001-05-01), p. 2502-2502
    Abstract: This study investigates the relationship between speech production and auditory feedback by comparing vowel production and perception in normal hearing and cochlear implant (CI) using populations. CI users vary greatly in their improvement in speech production after implantation, indicating varying benefit from the CI device. This study examines the degree to which distortions in CI users’ speech can be attributed to perceptual distortions. Three predictions are tested in this study: (1) perceptual distortions will correlate with distortions in speech, (2) there will be a tendency to collapse towards the middle of the vowel space, (3) there will be hyperarticulation of vowels analogous to the Lombard effect. Three measures were used in relation to gender and dialect matched normal hearing subjects: (1) overlap between vowel categories, (2) the distortions of the vowel space centers, (3) vowel space compression. Results indicate that there is little correlation between individual CI users’ spoken vowel spaces and the range of variability in the perceptual vowel space. However, there is a tendency to collapse towards the middle of the vowel space. This behavior is unlike the normal hearing response to noise in which production vowel categories tend to expand away from the middle of the space.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0001-4966 , 1520-8524
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
    Publication Date: 2001
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1461063-2
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Acoustical Society of America (ASA) ; 2000
    In:  The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Vol. 107, No. 5_Supplement ( 2000-05-01), p. 2886-2887
    In: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Acoustical Society of America (ASA), Vol. 107, No. 5_Supplement ( 2000-05-01), p. 2886-2887
    Abstract: Cochlear implant (CI) users show substantial individual differences in their ability to understand speech in general, and vowels in particular. These differences may result from widely different abilities in identifying formant frequencies or in adapting to the more basal than normal spectral information presented by the implant. In this study, we administered a vowel perception test, using a method-of-adjustment (MOA) paradigm, to 8 CI users and 43 normal-hearing listeners. The MOA vowel test consisted of 330 steady-state synthetic vowel stimuli, varying in F1 and F2, arranged in a visual two-dimensional grid. Subjects were asked to label and rate on a 7-point scale those stimuli that matched the vowels contained in ten visually-presented words, ‘‘heed,’’ ‘‘hid,’’ ‘‘aid,’’ ‘‘head,’’ ‘‘had,’’ ‘‘hut,’’ ‘‘odd,’’ ‘‘whod,’’ ‘‘hood,’’ ‘‘owed,’’ and ‘‘odd.’’ Plots of subjects’ responses for all ten words constituted the vowel spaces of the subjects. With one exception, no systematic shift was observed across all vowel categories of CI users, suggesting that these subjects were able to adapt completely to the spectral shift introduced by the implant. However, the CI users’ spaces differed substantially from normal vowel spaces in terms of the relative size of the vowel categories and their location in perceptual space.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0001-4966 , 1520-8524
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
    Publication Date: 2000
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1461063-2
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Speech Language Hearing Association ; 2003
    In:  Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol. 46, No. 2 ( 2003-04), p. 390-404
    In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, American Speech Language Hearing Association, Vol. 46, No. 2 ( 2003-04), p. 390-404
    Abstract: The present study examined how postlingually deafened adults with cochlear implants combine visual information from lipreading with auditory cues in an open-set word recognition task. Adults with normal hearing served as a comparison group. Word recognition performance was assessed using lexically controlled word lists presented under auditory-only, visual-only, and combined audiovisual presentation formats. Effects of talker variability were studied by manipulating the number of talkers producing the stimulus tokens. Lexical competition was investigated using sets of lexically easy and lexically hard test words. To assess the degree of audiovisual integration, a measure of visual enhancement, R a , was used to assess the gain in performance provided in the audiovisual presentation format relative to the maximum possible performance obtainable in the auditory-only format. Results showed that word recognition performance was highest for audiovisual presentation followed by auditory-only and then visual-only stimulus presentation. Performance was better for single-talker lists than for multiple-talker lists, particularly under the audiovisual presentation format. Word recognition performance was better for the lexically easy than for the lexically hard words regardless of presentation format. Visual enhancement scores were higher for single-talker conditions compared to multiple-talker conditions and tended to be somewhat better for lexically easy words than for lexically hard words. The pattern of results suggests that information from the auditory and visual modalities is used to access common, multimodal lexical representations in memory. The findings are discussed in terms of the complementary nature of auditory and visual sources of information that specify the same underlying gestures and articulatory events in speech.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1092-4388 , 1558-9102
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Speech Language Hearing Association
    Publication Date: 2003
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2070420-3
    SSG: 5,2
    SSG: 7,11
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Acoustical Society of America (ASA) ; 2001
    In:  The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Vol. 109, No. 5 ( 2001-05-01), p. 2135-2145
    In: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Acoustical Society of America (ASA), Vol. 109, No. 5 ( 2001-05-01), p. 2135-2145
    Abstract: Cochlear implant (CI) users differ in their ability to perceive and recognize speech sounds. Two possible reasons for such individual differences may lie in their ability to discriminate formant frequencies or to adapt to the spectrally shifted information presented by cochlear implants, a basalward shift related to the implant’s depth of insertion in the cochlea. In the present study, we examined these two alternatives using a method-of-adjustment (MOA) procedure with 330 synthetic vowel stimuli varying in F1 and F2 that were arranged in a two-dimensional grid. Subjects were asked to label the synthetic stimuli that matched ten monophthongal vowels in visually presented words. Subjects then provided goodness ratings for the stimuli they had chosen. The subjects’ responses to all ten vowels were used to construct individual perceptual “vowel spaces.” If CI users fail to adapt completely to the basalward spectral shift, then the formant frequencies of their vowel categories should be shifted lower in both F1 and F2. However, with one exception, no systematic shifts were observed in the vowel spaces of CI users. Instead, the vowel spaces differed from one another in the relative size of their vowel categories. The results suggest that differences in formant frequency discrimination may account for the individual differences in vowel perception observed in cochlear implant users.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0001-4966 , 1520-8524
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
    Publication Date: 2001
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1461063-2
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages