Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. 26 ( 2019-12-26), p. 2361-2368

Abstract: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). We undertook a multicenter clinical trial to determine toxicity, feasibility, and response for this therapy. A total of 25 pediatric/young adult patients (age, 1-22.5 years) with R/R B-ALL were treated with 19-28z CAR T cells. Conditioning chemotherapy included high-dose (3 g/m2) cyclophosphamide (HD-Cy) for 17 patients and low-dose (≤1.5 g/m2) cyclophosphamide (LD-Cy) for 8 patients. Fifteen patients had pretreatment minimal residual disease (MRD; & lt;5% blasts in bone marrow), and 10 patients had pretreatment morphologic evidence of disease (≥5% blasts in bone marrow). All toxicities were reversible, including severe cytokine release syndrome in 16% (4 of 25) and severe neurotoxicity in 28% (7 of 25) of patients. Treated patients were assessed for response, and, among the evaluable patients (n = 24), response and peak CAR T-cell expansion were superior in the HD-Cy/MRD cohorts, as compared with the LD-Cy/morphologic cohorts without an increase in toxicity. Our data support the safety of CD19-specific CAR T-cell therapy for R/R B-ALL. Our data also suggest that dose intensity of conditioning chemotherapy and minimal pretreatment disease burden have a positive impact on response without a negative effect on toxicity. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01860937.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.2019001641

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 130, No. Suppl_1 ( 2017-12-07), p. 842-842

Abstract: T cell therapies have had valuable clinical responses in patients with cancer. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells can be genetically engineered to recognize tumor cells and CAR T cell therapy has shown impressive results in the setting of B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia but has been less effective in treating other types of hematologic and solid tumors. The inhibitory tumor microenvironment (TME), including expression of ligands that bind inhibitory receptors on T cells, e.g. programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1), can dampen CAR T cell responses. Separately, immune checkpoint blockade therapy involving the disruption of PD-1 and programmed death receptor ligand1 (PD-L1) interaction allows for re-activation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) to have anti-tumor function. This approach has shown clinical responses in a range of malignancies, but has been less efficacious in poorly immunogenic tumors. To prevent PD-1-mediated dampening of CAR T cell function, we have co-modified CAR T cells to secrete PD-1 blocking single chain variable fragments (scFv). We first designed mouse constructs with which we could investigate the scFv-secreting CAR T cells in the context of a syngeneic immune-competent intact TME. CAR constructs were engineered directed against either human CD19 or MUC-16 (ecto) with mouse signaling domains and a anti-mouse PD-1 scFv. Mouse T cells transduced with these constructs expressed the CAR on the surface and secreted detectable amounts of scFv that bound to mouse PD-1. The scFv-secreting CAR T cells were cytotoxic and produced IFN-g when co-cultured with PD-L1 expressing tumors in vitro . We utilized a syngeneic mouse model to study scFv secreting CAR T cells in a model with an intact TME. In tumor-bearing mice treated with CAR T cells, scFv-secreting CAR T cells enhanced survival as compared to second generation CAR T cells. The survival benefit achieved with scFv-secreting CAR T cells was comparable to that achieved with systemic infusion of PD-1 blocking antibody, but with localized delivery of PD-1 blockade. Mice treated with scFv-secreting CAR T cells had detectable scFv in vivo in the TME. Lastly, long term surviving mice had detectable CAR T cells in the bone marrow by PCR, demonstrating persistence and suggesting an immunological memory. We next aimed to translate PD-1 blocking scFv CAR T cells to a clinically relevant human model utilizing a novel anti-human PD-1 blocking scFv. CAR constructs were engineered with recognition domains directed against human CD19 or MUC-16 (ecto) and human signaling domains. Human T cells modified with the CAR constructs express the CAR on the surface and secrete detectable amounts of PD-1 blocking scFv. The scFv binds to human PD-1 and scFv-secreting CAR T cells are cytotoxic to PD-L1 expressing tumors. Expression of PD-1-blocking scFv enhances CAR T cell function against PD-L1 expressing tumors in xenograft models of hematological and solid tumors by enhancing survival in tumor-bearing mice as compared to second generation CAR T cells. Furthermore, scFv-secreting CAR T cells exhibit in vivo bystander T cell enhancement of function, suggesting scFv-secreting CAR T cells can reactivate endogenous TILs in the TME. These data support the novel concept that localized delivery of scFv by CAR T cells can successfully block PD-1 binding to PD-L1 and work in an autocrine manner to prevent dampening of CAR T cell responses as well as a paracrine manner to activate endogenous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes to enhance the overall anti-tumor efficacy of CAR T cell therapy. Disclosures Curran: Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Yan: Eureka Therapeutics Inc: Employment. Wang: Eureka Therapeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Xiang: Eureka Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Liu: Eureka Therpeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Brentjens: Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V130.Suppl_1.842.842

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2017

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, BMJ, Vol. 8, No. 2 ( 2020-10), p. e000810-

Abstract: Acute leukemia is a constellation of rapidly progressing diseases that affect a wide range of patients regardless of age or gender. Traditional treatment options for patients with acute leukemia include chemotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation. The advent of cancer immunotherapy has had a significant impact on acute leukemia treatment. Novel immunotherapeutic agents including antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies have efficacy and have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with acute leukemia. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline composed of consensus recommendations on immunotherapy for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 2051-1426

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000810

Language: English

Publisher: BMJ

Publication Date: 2020

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2719863-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 677-677

Abstract: Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive B-NHL. While 50-80% of patients with DLBCL are cured with standard induction therapy, a large fraction of patients either relapse or have primary refractory (rel/ref) disease. High-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) is the established standard of care for these patients. Despite this, approximately half of all rel/ref patients that are chemosensitive to salvage therapy are cured with this approach. Relapse is the major cause of treatment failure, and ultimately death, in these patients. Our group has demonstrated encouraging activity with 19-28z chimeric antigen receptor modified T cells (19-28z CAR-T) directed against CD19 in rel/ref ALL. We hypothesize that biologic optimization of cellular therapy with 19-28z CAR-T can be met immediately post-HDT-ASCT given: lymphoproliferative cytokine availability through lymphodepletion post-HDT, depletion of prohibitive regulatory cellular elements post-HDT and achievement of minimal residual disease prior to 19-28z CAR-T consolidation. Herein, we report safety data on the first 6 patients of the phase I MSKCC #12-117: 19-28z CAR-T post HDT-ASCT for poor-risk rel/ref aggressive B-NHL. Methods: Eligibility for this study includes rel/ref aggressive B-NHL appropriate for HDT-ASCT as defined by chemosensitivity to salvage therapy and poor risk features including: 1) FDG-PET positivity following 2 cycles of salvage therapy or 2) bone marrow involvement of B-NHL at the time of rel/ref clinical restaging. Patients underwent separate apheresis for CD34+ progenitor cells and CD3+ T cells. T cells were transduced with a retrovirus encoding a CAR construct composed of anti-CD19 scFV linked to CD28 and CD3ζ signaling domains (19-28z). Patients were admitted for BEAM conditioned HDT and ASCT occurred day 0. Pegfilgrastim was administered on day+1 and 19-28z CAR-T dose per phase I study was split on days +2 and +3. Results: This analysis includes the first six patients, all male, on the phase I study. The median age is 61 (range 34-68) years at the time of HDT-ASCT. Diagnoses included: n=2 relapsed and transformed follicular lymphoma (one with double-hit biology), n=3 relapsed DLBCL (one CD5+) and one subject with relapsed and transformed marginal zone lymphoma involving the bone marrow. Five patients were treated at dose level #1 (5 x106 19-28z CAR-T/kg) with no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) observed. Four of the five patients at dose level #1 experienced grade 3 febrile neutropenia and one patient met-criterion for non-severe cytokine-release syndrome (nCRS) effectively treated with tocilizumab 4 mg/kg x1. One patient was treated at dose-level #2, 1 x107 CAR-T/kg, and experienced a DLT of grade 4 severe CRS (sCRS) manifested with acute kidney injury, hypotension and mental status changes effectively treated and fully recovered with tocilizumab in combination with dexamethasone. Peak CRP in all patients was observed at a median of 3.5 days (range 3-4 days) post-19-28z CAR-T infusion (median peak CRP= 17 mg/dL, range: 5-43.1 mg/dL), with CRP 〉 20 mg/dL identified in the two patients that experienced CRS (nCRS=27 mg/dL, sCRS=43 mg/dL). Previously associated serum cytokine elevations (Davila et al Sci Trans Med, 2014) were observed in the two patients that experienced CRS (Figure). All patients engrafted neutrophils at a median of 10 days (range: 9-10 days) post-ASCT, and achieved a complete remission at first post-HDT-ASCT restaging. No sequelae of autoimmune phenomenon were observed. At a median follow-up of six months, with 2 patients 〉 one year post HDT-ASCT, all patients remain alive and in remission. Conclusions: This is the first report of 19-28z CAR-T cells in conjunction with consolidative HDT-ASCT for poor-risk rel/ref aggressive B-NHL. No DLTs have been observed at dose level #1, 5 x106 19-28z CAR-T/kg, while sCRS was observed in n=1 at 1 x107 CAR-T/kg resulting in a DLT. CRS was associated with pro-inflammatory serum cytokine elevation. CRS was aborted with tocilizumab with (sCRS=1) or without (nCRS=1) dexamethasone. All patients engrafted neutrophils at the expected time point. The use of 19-28z CAR T cells is a promising approach in this small group of poor-risk PET+ NHL patients undergoing autologous transplant. This is an ongoing trial and updated data will be presented. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Riviere: Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, scientific co-founders Other. Sadelain:Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Scientific co-founder and Stock holder Other. Brentjens:Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, scientific co-founder Other.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V124.21.677.677

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2014

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 959-959

Abstract: Introduction: BCMA targeted CAR T cell therapy has shown promising results in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Herein, we report on the safety and efficacy of MCARH171, a second generation, human derived BCMA targeted autologous 4-1BB containing CAR T cell therapy, including a truncated epidermal growth factor receptor safety system (Smith EL. Mol Ther 2018). Methods: This is a phase I first in human, dose escalation trial of MCARH171. Patients received conditioning chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (Cy) 3 gm/m2 as a single dose or fludarabine 30 mg/m2 daily and Cy 300 mg/m2 daily for 3 days followed by MCARH171 infusion in 1-2 divided doses. The trial followed a standard 3+3 design with 4 dose levels where patients received the following mean doses per cohort: (1) 72x106, (2) 137x106, (3) 475x106, (4) 818x106 viable CAR+ T cells. The primary objective was to demonstrate safety, and secondary objectives included efficacy and expansion, and persistence of CAR T cells using PCR from the peripheral blood. The last accrued patient received MCARH171 on Dec 6, 2017 and the data cut-off is July 16, 2018. The study is closed to accrual. Results: 11 patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM were treated. Median number of prior lines of therapy was 6 (range: 4-14), and all patients received prior therapy with a proteasome inhibitor, IMiD, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, and high dose melphalan/stem cell transplant. Nine (82%) patients had high-risk cytogenetics and 9 (82%) were refractory to their immediate prior line of treatment. One patient was not evaluable for DLTs given the need for early radiation and steroids for impending spinal cord compression by tumor. There are no DLTs reported. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grade 1-2 occurred in 4 patients (40%), grade 3 occurred in 2 (20%), and there was no grade 4-5 CRS. Grade 2 encephalopathy occurred in 1 patient (10%) in the setting of high fevers which resolved in less than 24 hours. There was no grade 3 or higher neurotoxicity observed. Tocilizumab was administered to 3 patients; 2 in cohort 2, and 1 in cohort 3. Laboratory values correlating with CRS reaching grade 3 or requiring Tocilizumab (N=4) compared to those with no or milder CRS (N=6) included peak CRP (mean: 28.5 vs 4.6 mg/dL, p 〈 0.001), IFNg (mean peak fold increase: 271 vs 11-fold, p 〈 0.0001), and peak IL6 before Tocilizumab, as IL6 elevation artificially increases after use (mean: 435 vs 68.7 pg/mL, p 〈 0.005). No significant change was seen in ferritin or fibrinogen compared to baseline. Overall response rate was 64% and the median duration of response was 106 days (range: 17 to 235 days). The peak expansion and persistence of MCARH171 as well as durable clinical responses were dose dependent. Patients who were treated on the first two dose cohorts (≤150 X106 CAR T cells) had a lower peak expansion in the peripheral blood (mean 14,098 copies/µL; N=6), compared to patients who were treated on the third or fourth dose cohort 3-4 (≥450 X106 CAR T cells; N=5), where the mean peak expansion was 90,208 copies/µL (p 〈 0.05). Among the 5 patients who received higher doses (450 X106), 5/5(100%) patients responded. The duration of responses was also related to the cell dose, with 3 of 5 patients (60%) treated in the cohorts receiving ≥450 X106 had clinical responses lasting 〉 6 months compared to only 1 of 6 (16.7%) patients who received lower doses. Two patien have ongoing responses (VGPR) at 7.5+ and 10+ months of follow up. To normalize for dose administered we compared the pharmacokinetics of only patients treated at dose levels 3-4 ( ≥450 X106 CAR T cells). Here, we demonstrate that peak expansion correlated to clinical efficacy, with the 3 durable responders all having peak expansion 〉 85,000 copies/µL (mean: 131,732 copies/µL); compared to transient responders, where the maximum peak expansion was 33,213 copies/µL (mean: 27,922; Figure 1). Conclusions: MCARH171 has an acceptable safety profile with no DLTs reported. A dose-response relationship with toxicity was not clearly observed, as noted by distribution of tocilizumab use across dose cohorts. However, a dose-response relationship was observed with promising clinical efficacy at dose levels of ≥450 X106 CAR T cells. Controlling for dose level, peak expansion correlated with durability of response. These results further support the development of CAR T cells for heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed and refractory MM. Disclosures Mailankody: Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Korde:Amgen: Research Funding. Lesokhin:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Serametrix, inc.: Patents & Royalties: Royalties; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hassoun:Oncopeptides AB: Research Funding. Park:Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy. Sauter:Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy. Palomba:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Riviere:Fate Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics, a Celgene Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Landgren:Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Brentjens:Juno Therapeutics, a Celgene Company: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: CAR T cell therapies for MM, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-99-119717

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2018

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 8062-8062

Abstract: 8062 Background: Immunotherapy with anti CD20 is often associated with mild easily manageable infusion reactions. In rare cases, patients experience severe drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) serum sickness or anaphylaxis. These in turn may lead to discontinuation of the drug. In our experience, switching to a different anti-CD20 agent is a feasible alternative to discontinuation or desensitization protocols. Methods: From our pharmacology database we identified all the patients that received rituximab and/or obinutuzumab, and/or ofatumumab, and/or all the patients who received a flat dose of less than 50 mL of the same drugs and were followed at our institution. From the medical record, we identified all the cases where the anti-CD20 antibody was changed due to allergy, serum sickness or other types of DHR, and all those who received minimal doses of anti-CD20 in the context of a desensitization protocol. DHRs were evaluated either by an allergist, or by retrospective review following the World Allergy Organization guidelines. Our primary comparison, was to assess the proportion of pts able to completed planned infusion of abs using either approach (Fisher’s exact Test). Results: Among 343 patients receiving at least two different anti-CD20 antibodies or a flat dose of 〈 50 mL, we identified 44 patients experiencing severe DHRs needing intervention. At the time of the reaction, 16 (36%) received the anti-CD20 as single agent, 24 (54%) in combination with chemotherapy, 4 (9%) in combination with ibrutinib or lenalidomide. In 9 (20%) patients the reaction was defined as anaphylactoid (8 rituximab; 1 obinutuzumab) and in 8 (18%) patients, all receiving rituximab, as serum sickness. Episodes of DHR were addressed with either desensitization (n = 29) or change of anti-CD20 agent (n = 25), 9 patients received both of these approaches, one patient switched anti-CD20 antibodies twice. Overall, 21 desensitizations were successful (72.4%), 8 failed; 23 changes of anti-CD20 were successful (92%) and 2 failed (p = 0.09). Conclusions: In patients with DHR use of an alternative anti-CD20 antibody is safe and is an alternative or complementary approach to anti-CD20 desensitization.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.8062

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date: 2020

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 827-827

Abstract: Background: BCMA targeted CAR T cell therapy has shown promising results in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), but relapses are common. Additional treatment options with novel therapeutic targets or mechanisms of action are needed. Here we report on the safety and efficacy of MCARH109, the first-in-class G Protein Coupled Receptor Class C Group 5 Member D (GPRC5D) targeted CAR T cell therapy (Smith EL et al. Sci. Trans Med 2019) in RRMM including patients who relapsed post BCMA targeted CAR T cell therapy. Methods: This is a phase I first-in-human, dose escalation trial of MCARH109; patients received lymphodepleting chemotherapy with fludarabine 30 mg/m 2 daily and cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m 2 daily for 3 days followed by a single infusion of MCARH109. The trial followed a standard 3+3 design with the following dose cohorts to date: 25X10 6, 50X10 6, 150X10 6, 450X10 6 viable CAR + T cells. The primary objective is to assess safety of MCARH109; secondary objectives include anti-myeloma efficacy, expansion and persistence of MCARH109 using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) on peripheral blood and bone marrow samples. Results: 18 patients with RRMM were enrolled and underwent apheresis between September 15, 2020 and July 14, 2021. 12 patients have completed MCARH109 infusion to date, with 6 patients currently undergoing manufacturing and pending treatment. Of the 12 patients treated, median age was 59 (37-76) years and patients received a median of 8 (4-14) lines of therapy. 11 (92%) were penta-exposed, all patients were triple refractory, and 7 (58%) had prior treatment with BCMA targeted therapy including 6 (50%) who received prior BCMA CAR T therapy. 3 (25%) patients had non-secretory myeloma and 6(50%) patients had extramedullary plasmacytoma at baseline. 11 (92%) were refractory to last line of therapy and 11 (92%) patients received bridging therapy after apheresis prior to MCARH109 infusion; all patients were refractory to bridging therapy. There were no dose limiting toxicities. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grade 1-3 occurred in 11 (92%) patients with only one patient with grade 3 event; 4 (25%) patients received tocilizumab and 1 (8%) received dexamethasone for the treatment of CRS (Table). There were no neurologic toxicities reported to date; 3 (25%) patients had grade 1 nail changes possibly related to MCARH109 (Table). As of July 28, 2021, all treated patients have been followed for at least 2 weeks (median: 13.0 weeks; range: 2.0-39.1 weeks) and 10 (83%) had at least a minimal response or better (2 responses unconfirmed): 2 minimal response, 3 partial response, 3 very good partial response, 2 stringent complete response (sCR). 5 (56%) of the first 9 patients were minimal residual disease (MRD) negative in the bone marrow by multicolor flow cytometry (sensitivity: 10 -5). 6 (100%) patients with prior BCMA CAR T therapy had a response with 2 patients achieving sCR. We also noted robust MCARH109 expansion in the peripheral blood using qPCR across the first 3 dose levels with available data (peak expansion vector copy number/mL, median: 404,467; range: 44,670- 3,560,000; Table). With a median follow-up of 13 weeks, 9 (75%) patients are progression free and followed without additional therapy. Conclusions: MCARH109 is the first-in-class GPRC5D targeted CAR T cell therapy for MM and has a very manageable safety profile with no serious or unexpected toxicities; this dose escalation study is ongoing with additional patients planned for treatment at higher doses. Efficacy is promising in heavily pre-treated RRMM, reflected in high rates of clinical response as well as MRD-negativity, including at doses as low as 25x10 6 CAR T cells. Clinically important, all 6 patients who relapsed after BCMA CAR T therapy responded to GPRC5D targeted CAR T therapy, including 2 patients who achieved sCR. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Mailankody: Allogene Therapeutics: Research Funding; Physician Education Resource: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb/Juno: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Jansen Oncology: Research Funding; Evicore: Consultancy; Legend Biotech: Consultancy; Plexus Communications: Honoraria. Shah: Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Research Funding. Lesokhin: pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Iteos: Consultancy; Trillium Therapeutics: Consultancy; Genetech: Research Funding; Serametrix, Inc: Patents & Royalties; bristol myers squibb: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Behringer Ingelheim: Honoraria. Korde: Medimmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding. Hassoun: Celgene, Takeda, Janssen: Research Funding. Hultcrantz: GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Intellisphere LLC: Consultancy; Curio Science LLC: Consultancy. Shah: Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Landau: Takeda, Janssen, Caelum Biosciences, Celgene, Pfizer, Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding; Genzyme: Honoraria. Scordo: Angiocrine Bioscience: Consultancy, Research Funding; Omeros Corporation: Consultancy; Kite - A Gilead Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; i3 Health: Other: Speaker; McKinsey & Company: Consultancy. Roshal: Auron Therapeutics: Other: Ownership / Equity interests; Provision of services; Celgene: Other: Provision of services; Physicians' Education Resource: Other: Provision of services. Landgren: Janssen: Other: IDMC; Janssen: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Other: IDMC; GSK: Honoraria. Dogan: Physicians' Education Resource: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Peer View: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy. Giralt: Actinnum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JENSENN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AMGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CELGENE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PFIZER: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JAZZ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SANOFI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Park: Autolus: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; PrecisionBio: Consultancy; Minerva: Consultancy; Curocel: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Affyimmune: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Artiva: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Rivière: FloDesign Sonics: Other: Provision of Services; Juno Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties; The Georgia Tech Research Corporation (GTRC): Other: Provision of Services (uncompensated); Centre for Commercialization of Cancer Immunotherapy: Other: Provision of Services; Fate Therapeutics: Other: Provision of Services, Patents & Royalties. Brentjens: BMS: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Gracell Biotechnologies, Inc: Consultancy, Ended employment in the past 24 months; sanofi: Patents & Royalties; Caribou: Patents & Royalties. Smith: Eureka Therapeutics: Consultancy; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Chimeric Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novarits: Consultancy; Sanofi: Patents & Royalties: GPRC5D antibody based therapies; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: CAR T cells for MM. OffLabel Disclosure: MCARH109 is an experimental GPRC5D targeted CART therapy

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-153204

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2021

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Nature Biotechnology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 36, No. 9 ( 2018-10), p. 847-856

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 1087-0156 , 1546-1696

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4195

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2018

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1494943-X

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1311932-1

SSG: 12

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 130, No. Suppl_1 ( 2017-12-07), p. 742-742

Abstract: Patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) rarely obtain durable remissions with available therapies. Clinical use of BCMA targeted CAR T cell therapy was first reported in 12/2015 for RRMM, and based on small numbers, preliminary results appear promising. Given that host immune anti-murine CAR responses have limited the efficacy of repeat dosing (Turtle C. Sci Trans Med 2016), our goal was to develop a human BCMA targeted CAR T cell vector for clinical translation. We screened a human B cell derived scFv phage display library containing 6x1010 scFvs with BCMA expressing NIH 3T3 cells, and validated results on human MM cell lines. 57 unique and diverse BCMA specific scFvs were identified containing light and heavy chain CDR's each covering 6 subfamilies, with HCDR3 length ranges from 5-18 amino acids. 17 scFvs met stringent specificity criteria, and a diverse set was cloned into CAR vectors with either a CD28 or a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain. Donor T cells transduced with BCMA targeted CAR vectors that conveyed particularly desirable properties over multiple in vitro assays, including: cytotoxicity on human MM cell lines at low E:T ratios ( & gt;90% lysis, 1:1, 16h), robust proliferation after repeat antigen stimulation (up to 700 fold, stimulation q3-4d for 14d), and active cytokine profiling, were selected for in vivo studies using a marrow predominant human MM cell line model in NSG mice. A single IV injection of CAR T cells, either early (4d) or late (21d) after MM engraftment was evaluated. In both cases survival was increased when treated with BCMA targeted CAR T cells vs CD19 targeted CAR T cells (median OS at 60d NR vs 35d p & lt;0.05). Tumor and CAR T cells were imaged in vivo by taking advantage of luciferase constructs with different substrates. Results show rapid tumor clearance, peak ( & gt;10,000 fold) CAR T expansion at day 6, followed by contraction of CAR T cells after MM clearance, confirming the efficacy of the anti-BCMA scFv/4-1BB containing construct. Co-culture with primary cells from a range of normal tissues did not activate CAR T cells as noted by a lack of IFN release. Co-culture of 293 cells expressing this scFv with those expressing a library of other TNFRSF or Ig receptor members demonstrated specific binding to BCMA. GLP toxicity studies in mice showed no unexpected adverse events. We generated a retroviral construct for clinical use including a truncated epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFRt) elimination gene: EGFRt/hBCMA-41BBz. Clinical investigation of this construct is underway in a dose escalation, single institution trial. Enrollment is completed on 2/4 planned dose levels (DL). On DL1 pts received cyclophosphamide conditioning (3g/m2 x1) and 72x106 mean CAR+ T cells. On DL2 pts received lower dose cyclophosphamide/fludarabine (300/30 mg/m2 x3) and 137x106 mean CAR+ T cells. All pts screened for BCMA expression by IHC were eligible. High risk cytogenetics were present in 4/6 pts. Median prior lines of therapy was 7; all pts had IMiD, PI, high dose melphalan, and CD38 directed therapies. With a data cut off of 7/20/17, 6 pts are evaluable for safety. There were no DLT's. At DL1, grade 1 CRS, not requiring intervention, occurred in 1/3 pts. At DL2, grade 1/2 CRS occurred in 2/3 pts; both received IL6R directed Tocilizumab (Toci) with near immediate resolution. In these 2 pts time to onset of fever was a mean 2d, Tmax was 39.4-41.1 C, peak CRP was 25-27mg/dl, peak IL6 level pre and post Toci were 558-632 and 3375-9071 pg/ml, respectively. Additional serum cytokines increased & gt;10 fold from baseline in both pts include: IFNg, GM CSF, Fractalkine, IL5, IL8, and IP10. Increases in ferritin were limited, and there were no cases of hypofibrinogenemia. There were no grade 3-5 CRS and no neurotoxicities or cerebral edema. No pts received steroids or Cetuximab. Median time to count recovery after neutropenia was 10d (range 6-15d). Objective responses by IMWG criteria after a single dose of CAR T cells were observed across both DLs. At DL1, of 3 pts, responses were 1 VGPR, 1 SD, and 1 pt treated with baseline Mspike 0.46, thus not evaluable by IMWG criteria, had & gt;50% reduction in Mspike, and normalization of K/L ratio. At DL2, 2/2 pts had objective responses with 1 PR and 1 VGPR (baseline 95% marrow involvement); 1 pt is too early to evaluate. As we are employing a human CAR, the study was designed to allow for an optional second dose in pts that do not reach CR. We have treated 2 pts with a second dose, and longer follow up data is pending. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Smith: Juno Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: BCMA targeted CAR T cells, Research Funding. Almo: Cue Biopharma: Other: Founder, head of SABequity holder; Institute for Protein Innovation: Consultancy; AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP: Consultancy. Wang: Eureka Therapeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Xu: Eureka Therapeutics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Park: Amgen: Consultancy. Curran: Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Dogan: Celgene: Consultancy; Peer Review Institute: Consultancy; Roche Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liu: Eureka Therpeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Brentjens: Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V130.Suppl_1.742.742

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2017

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 2092-2092

Abstract: Abstract 2092 Human T-cells can be genetically modified to target tumor antigens through tumor antigen-specific artificial T-cell receptors termed chimeric antigen receptors (CARs). To provide a therapeutic option for patients with relapsed leukemia following allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) we have developed a novel immunotherapy utilizing donor derived virus specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes genetically modified to target the CD19 antigen expressed on most B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias (B-ALL). We have previously demonstrated that donor T-cells modified to express a CAR specific to the B-cell antigen CD19, termed 19–28z, traffic to systemic sites of tumor and successfully eradicate human CD19+ tumors in a SCID-Beige mouse model. This therapy is currently under clinical investigation using autologous T-cells for adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and B-ALL (BB-IND 13266). However, in the setting of allo-SCT, a lymphocyte infusion of genetically modified donor T-cells has the potential to cause graft versus host disease (GVHD). In our center's experience with infusions of donor derived EBV-CTLs and EBV-CTLs derived from third party donors for treatment of EBV associated lymphoma we have noted no alloreactivity or development of GVHD in the recipient. Furthermore, we and others have shown EBV-CTLs have long term persistence following adoptive transfer which may enhance the anti-tumor efficacy of genetically modified T-lymphocytes. To this end we postulate the therapeutic use of infusions of donor derived EBV-CTLs genetically modified to target the CD19 antigen in patients with relapsed leukemia post allo-SCT. To investigate the ability of EBV-CTLs to be genetically modified to express our anti-CD19 CAR (19-28z) via gammaretroviral vector gene transfer we tested 3 established EBV-CTL donor cell lines. We compared EBV-CTL activation using autologous EBV B-cell lymphoblastoid cell lines (EBV-BLCL), beads coated with agonistic CD3 + CD28 monoclonal antibodies (Invitrogen Carlsbad, CA), or a combination of BLCL + beads. Transduction efficiency ranged from 25–75% and was consistently higher in the EBV-CTL groups activated using EBV-BLCL alone. In standard 51Cr release cytotoxicity assay 19–28z+ EBV-CTLs exhibited specific cytotoxicity against the CD19+ human tumor cell lines BA-25 (B-ALL), Raji (Burkitt 's lymphoma) and the mouse thymoma cell line EL4 modified to express the human CD19 antigen (EL4-hCD19+). In contrast the untransduced EBV-CTLs failed to lyse these targets. However, both 19–28z+ EBV-CTLs and the untransduced EBV-CTLs retained the ability to specifically lyse autologous BLCL but not autologous PHA-blasts showing retained EBV specificity. Finally we tested the ability of 19–28z+ EBV-CTLs to eradicate established systemic Raji tumor in our SCID-Beige model of disease. Mice were injected with 5×105 Raji-eGFP-fire fly luciferase (Raji-eGFP-FFLuc) tumor cells via tail vein injection six days prior to T-lymphocyte injection. Established tumor was confirmed using bioluminescence imaging (BLI) prior to T-lymphocyte infusion. Mice were treated via tail vein injection with 7.5 × 106 19–28z+ EBV-CTL (n = 5) or control EBV-CTLs (n= 4). Control mice all died of systemic disease ( 〈 35 days) following T-lymphocyte infusion while treated mice all showed long term survival ( 〉 100 days). These results validate the therapeutic potential of tumor targeted genetically modified EBV-specific T-lymphocytes which may provide a therapeutic option for patients with relapsed CD19+ B-ALL following allo-SCT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V116.21.2092.2092

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2010

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7