UID:
almahu_9949702621002882
Format:
1 online resource (xi, 253 pages)
ISBN:
9789004309395
Series Statement:
Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae, v. 135
Content:
In this work T. Scott Manor provides a new perspective on a common view, known as the 'Johannine Controversy', which maintains that the early church once tried to jettison the Gospel and Apocalypse of John as heretical forgeries. Primary evidence comes from Epiphanius of Salamis, who mentions a heretical group with such views, the Alogi . This along with with other evidence from sources including Irenaeus, Hippolytus, Origen, Eusebius, Photius, Dionysius bar Salibi, Ebed-Jesu and others has led to the conclusion that a certain Gaius of Rome led the Alogi in this anti-Johannine campaign. By carefully examining Epiphanius' account in relation to these other sources, Manor arrives at very different conclusions that question whether any such controversy ever existed at all.
Note:
Preliminary Material /
,
Introduction /
,
1 The Evidence /
,
2 An Implausible Consensus and a New Way Forward /
,
3 Exonerating Gaius of Rome /
,
4 Dismantling the Syrian Evidence: Dionysius bar Salibi and Ebed-Jesu /
,
5 Epiphanius: History and Heresy /
,
6 Epiphanius' Alogi in Context /
,
7 Epiphanius' Use of Papias and Irenaeus /
,
8 Epiphanius' Use of Origen /
,
9 Epiphanius' Use of Eusebius /
,
10 Sources Behind the Alogi's Objections to the Apocalypse /
,
Conclusion /
,
Bibliography /
,
Index of Modern Authors /
,
Subject Index /
Additional Edition:
ISBN 9789004309395 (online)
Language:
English
Keywords:
Criticism, interpretation, etc.
;
History.
Bookmarklink
