In:
Probus, Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Vol. 34, No. 1 ( 2022-05-25), p. 235-272
Abstract:
Despite the vast literature which has accrued on the fine structure of the Romance left periphery, there exists no diachronic account of the emergence of the considerable microvariation between Romance varieties today. Focussing in particular on the syntax of French and Venetan varieties, this article suggests that certain northern Romance varieties have diverged maximally from an Early Medieval Romance norm in which each left-peripheral Head attracts a wide variety of suitable Goals for movement, unlike the ‘innovative’ Romance grammars which emerge in the post-medieval period where the suitable class of Goals becomes restricted along categorial or information-structural grounds. The account predicts that the most ‘conservative’ Modern Romance grammars allow widespread argument fronting via movement, whereas their most ‘innovative’ counterparts show heavy restrictions on such operations.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0921-4771
,
1613-4079
DOI:
10.1515/probus-2022-0009
Language:
English
Publisher:
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Publication Date:
2022
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2045582-3
SSG:
7,30
SSG:
7,11
SSG:
6,12
Bookmarklink