Format:
40, [9] S.
,
graph. Darst.
Series Statement:
National Bureau of Economic Research 〈Cambridge, Mass.〉: NBER working paper series 11074
Content:
"Defaults can have a dramatic influence on consumer decisions. We identify an overlooked but practical alternative to defaults: requiring individuals to make an explicit choice for themselves. We study such "active decisions" in the context of 401(k) saving. We find that compelling new hires to make active decisions about 401(k) enrollment raises the initial fraction that enroll by 28 percentage points relative to a standard opt-in enrollment procedure, producing a savings distribution three months after hire that would take three years to achieve under standard enrollment. We also present a model of 401(k) enrollment and derive conditions under which the optimal enrollment regime is automatic enrollment (i.e., default enrollment), standard enrollment (i.e., default non-enrollment), or active decisions (i.e., no default and compulsory choice). Active decisions are optimal when consumers have a strong propensity to procrastinate and savings preferences are highly hetergeneous. Naive beliefs about future time-inconsistency strengthen the normative appeal of the active decision enrollment regime"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
Additional Edition:
Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe
Language:
English
URL:
Volltext
(kostenfrei)
Author information:
Laibson, David I. 1966-
Bookmarklink
