feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Brill  (2)
  • Pfeiffer, Christian  (2)
Type of Medium
Publisher
  • Brill  (2)
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
FID
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Brill ; 2018
    In:  Mnemosyne Vol. 72, No. 1 ( 2018-12-06), p. 24-52
    In: Mnemosyne, Brill, Vol. 72, No. 1 ( 2018-12-06), p. 24-52
    Abstract: In Metaphysics 2.2, 994b21-27 Aristotle comments on how it is possible to think something that is infinitely divisible. Given that Aristotle denies elsewhere that it is possible to think an infinite number of items the passage offers important evidence for Aristotle’s positive account of how one can think something that is infinite. However, Aristotle’s statement in Metaphysics 2.2 has puzzled interpreters since antiquity. This puzzlement has been partly due to a textual problem in the passage. In this paper we first restore the original reading of Metaph . 2.2, 994b25-26 by making use of the evidence in Alexander of Aphrodisias’s commentary and second make sense of the restored passage by interpreting it in light of Aristotle’s thoughts on the infinite in Physics 3 and 8.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0026-7074 , 1568-525X
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Brill
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2043485-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 206288-4
    SSG: 6,14
    SSG: 6,12
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Brill ; 2023
    In:  Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy Vol. 37, No. 1 ( 2023-11-07), p. 97-106
    In: Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, Brill, Vol. 37, No. 1 ( 2023-11-07), p. 97-106
    Abstract: In his paper, Josh Hayes argues that inclination ( ῥοπή ) is the nature of each element. It is an active and passive principle that explains why the elements move to their proper places. Thus, according to Hayes, by introducing inclination in De Caelo IV 1, Aristotle posits a single explanatory factor that accounts for all elemental motions. By doing so, he answers the question, posed in Physics VIII 4, of what the cause of elemental motion is. In my comments, I will contest these claims. Aristotle’s theory of elemental motion does not rely on a single explanatory factor; yet, it is not, as Hayes claims, incoherent. Instead, the different strands merely reflect the special nature of the elements.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1059-986X , 2213-4417
    RVK:
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Brill
    Publication Date: 2023
    SSG: 5,1
    SSG: 6,12
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages