Format:
Online-Ressource (514 p.)
ISBN:
9780521801157
Series Statement:
Cambridge studies in international relations
Content:
It is commonly said that democracies very seldom fight each other. Huth and Allee re-evaluate this claim by testing three theoretical models using 348 territorial disputes from 1919-95. The results support the importance of democratic accountability and norms in shaping the diplomatic and military policies of democratic leaders
Note:
Description based upon print version of record
,
Cover; Half-title; Series-title; Title; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; Figures; Tables; Acknowledgments; 1 Another study of democracy and international conflict?; 2 Pathways to conflict escalation and resolution in international disputes; 3 The international strategic context; 4 Domestic institutions and the Political Accountability Model; 5 Domestic institutions and the Political Norms Model; 6 Domestic institutions and the Political Affinity Model; 7 Empirical results for decisions to challenge the status quo; 8 Empirical results for decisions to offer concessions in negotiations
,
9 Empirical results for decisions to escalate with military force10 What have we learned about the democratic peace?; Appendix A The territorial dispute data set, 1919…1995; Appendix B Territorial disputes in Europe, 1919…1995; Appendix C Territorial disputes in the Near East, Middle East, and North Africa, 1919…1995; Appendix D Territorial disputes in Africa, 1919…1995; Appendix E Territorial disputes in Central Asia, the Far East, and Pacific, 1919…1995; Appendix F Territorial disputes in North and South America, 1919…1995; Bibliography; Index;
Additional Edition:
ISBN 9780511047558
Additional Edition:
ISBN 9780521801157
Additional Edition:
Print version The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century
Language:
English
Keywords:
Electronic books
Bookmarklink
