feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Cambridge University Press (CUP)  (5)
  • Economics  (5)
Type of Medium
Publisher
  • Cambridge University Press (CUP)  (5)
Language
Subjects(RVK)
  • Economics  (5)
  • Law  (3)
RVK
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2015
    In:  Macroeconomic Dynamics Vol. 19, No. 8 ( 2015-12), p. 1816-1838
    In: Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 19, No. 8 ( 2015-12), p. 1816-1838
    Abstract: This paper investigates the effects of R & D subsidies on aggregate product variety and endogenous productivity growth without scale effects. In a two-country model with imperfect knowledge diffusion, the larger country has a greater share of firms with higher productivity levels. The concentration of relatively productive firms increases knowledge flows between firms, causing an increase in firm-level employment in innovation. Accordingly, the aggregate growth rate is higher when counties are asymmetric than when they are similar in size. The larger scale of firm-level innovation activity reduces market entry, however, and aggregate product variety falls. In this framework, national R & D subsidies have positive effects on the industry share, relative productivity, and wage rate of the implementing country. If the smaller country introduces an R & D subsidy, aggregate product variety rises and productivity growth falls. If the larger country introduces an R & D subsidy, productivity growth rises, but aggregate product variety may rise or fall.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1365-1005 , 1469-8056
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1501533-6
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2006
    In:  Journal of Institutional Economics Vol. 2, No. 1 ( 2006-04), p. 1-20
    In: Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 2, No. 1 ( 2006-04), p. 1-20
    Abstract: This paper investigates whether since the 1980s neoclassical economics has been in the process of being supplanted as the dominant research programme in economics by a collection of competing research approaches which share relatively little in common with each other or with neoclassical economics. A shortlist of the new approaches in recent economics includes game theory, experimental economics, behavioral economics, evolutionary economics, neuroeconomics, and non-linear complexity theory. Two hypotheses are advanced – one regarding the relation between economics instruction and economics research and one regarding the nature of the economics research frontier – to describe social-institutional practices that contribute to the replication of economics as a field. Two further hypotheses are advanced – one regarding the boundaries of the field and one regarding how the field appraises itself – to create a historical–methodological framework for evaluating the question of change in economics and change in recent economics in particular. Finally, the paper distinguishes three leading explanations – the ‘breakdown’ view, the ‘takeover’ view, and the ‘maturity’ view – of why neoclassical economics no longer dominates a mainstream economics.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1744-1374 , 1744-1382
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2006
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2202053-6
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2015
    In:  Journal of Institutional Economics Vol. 11, No. 4 ( 2015-12), p. 749-767
    In: Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 11, No. 4 ( 2015-12), p. 749-767
    Abstract: Standard health economics concentrates on the provision of care by medical professionals. Yet ‘care’ receives scant analysis; it is portrayed as a spillover effect or externality in the form of interdependent utility functions. In this context care can only be conceived as either acts of altruism or as social capital. Both conceptions are subject to considerable problems stemming from mainstream health economics’ reliance on a reductionist social model built around instrumental rationality and consequentialism. Subsequently, this implies a disregard for moral rules and duties and the compassionate aspects of behaviour. Care as an externality is a second-order concern relative to self-interested utility maximization, and is therefore crowded out by the parameters of the standard model. We outline an alternative relational approach to conceptualising care based on the social embeddedness of the individual that emphasises the ethical properties of care. The deontological dimension of care suggests that standard health economics is likely to undervalue the importance of care and caring in medicine.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1744-1374 , 1744-1382
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2202053-6
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Institutional Economics Vol. 16, No. 6 ( 2020-12), p. 785-808
    In: Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 16, No. 6 ( 2020-12), p. 785-808
    Abstract: We forward the hypothesis and empirically establish that variations in the strength of family ties are rooted in culture. In particular, we show that individualism is associated with looser family ties. We exploit the associations between contemporary individualism and historical climatic and disease environments to establish a causal relationship. At both the individual- and country-levels, we find strong support that individualism reduces family ties. The estimated effects are economically large and robust to a wide variety of potentially confounding variables.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1744-1374 , 1744-1382
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2202053-6
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2012
    In:  Macroeconomic Dynamics Vol. 16, No. S1 ( 2012-04), p. 139-148
    In: Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 16, No. S1 ( 2012-04), p. 139-148
    Abstract: In this paper we use a simple model with a single Cobb–Douglas firm and a consumer with a CRRA utility function to show the difference between the equity premia in the production-based Brock model and the consumption-based Lucas model. With this simple example we show that the equity premium in the production-based model exceeds that of the consumption-based model with probability 1.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1365-1005 , 1469-8056
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1501533-6
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages