In:
American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley, Vol. 73, No. 2 ( 1991-05), p. 255-265
Abstract:
Despite the Canada‐United States Free Trade Agreement, border disputes involving agricultural trade are common. A theoretical basis for the 1987 U.S. countervailing duty case against Canadian exports of potash is developed using excess capacity arguments. Empirically, within a rent‐seeking context, the U.S. potash producers gained far less from their legal action against Canada than did U.S. farmers who are significant users of Canadian potash.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0002-9092
,
1467-8276
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
1991
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2026345-4
Bookmarklink