Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Abuzeid, Waleed M.  (4)
  • 1
    In: International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, Wiley
    Abstract: To assess for differences of intended meaning in the description of congestion‐related symptoms among otolaryngology patients and clinicians. Materials and Methods Between June 2020 and October 2022, a questionnaire consisting of 16 common descriptors of congestion‐related symptoms within four domains (obstructive‐related, pressure‐related, mucus‐related, and other symptoms) was completed by patients and otolaryngologists at five tertiary otolaryngology practices. The primary outcome was to assess differences in patient and clinician perceptions of congestion‐related symptoms. Differences based on geographic location was a secondary outcome. Results A total of 349 patients and 40 otolaryngologists participated. Patients selected a median of 6.8 (standard deviation [SD] 3.0) terms compared with 4.0 (SD 1.6) terms for otolaryngologists ( p   〈  0.001). Otolaryngologists were more likely to select obstruction‐related symptoms (difference 6.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8%, 8.9%). Patients were more likely to describe congestion using pressure‐related (−43.7%; −58.9%, −28.5%), mucus‐related (−43.5%; −59.3%, −27.8%), and other symptoms (−44.2; −51.3%, −37.1%) compared with otolaryngologists. There were no significant differences identified based on geographic location with regard to symptom domains on multivariate analysis. Conclusions There are differences between otolaryngologists and their patients in the interpretation of the symptoms of congestion. Clinicians tended to have a narrower interpretation of congestion that was limited to the obstruction‐related symptom domain, while patients defined congestion more broadly. This has important counseling and communication implications for the clinician.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2042-6976 , 2042-6984
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2604059-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: OTO Open, Wiley, Vol. 7, No. 2 ( 2023-04)
    Abstract: To assess for differences of intended meaning in the description of reflux‐related symptoms among otolaryngology patients and clinicians. Study Design Cross‐sectional survey‐based study. Setting Five tertiary, academic otolaryngology practices. Methods Between June 2020 and July 2022, a questionnaire consisting of 20 common descriptors of reflux‐related symptoms within four domains (throat‐, chest‐, stomach‐, and sensory‐related symptoms) was completed by patients. Attending otolaryngologists at five academic medical centers then completed the same survey. The primary outcome was to assess differences in patient and clinician perceptions of reflux‐related symptoms. Differences based on geographic location was a secondary outcome. Results A total of 324 patients and 27 otolaryngologists participated. Patients selected a median of six terms compared with 10.5 for otolaryngologists ( p   〈  .001). Otolaryngologists were more likely to select sensory symptoms (difference: 35.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.2%, 52.4%), throat‐related symptoms (32.4%; 21.2, 43.6%), and chest‐related symptoms (12.4%; 8.8, 15.9). Otolaryngologists and patients were equally likely to consider stomach symptoms as related to reflux (4.0%, −3.7%, 11.7%). No significant differences were identified based on geographic location. Conclusion There are differences between otolaryngologists and their patients in the interpretation of the symptoms of reflux. Patients tended to have a narrower interpretation of reflux with symptoms primarily limited to classic stomach‐related symptoms, while clinicians tended to have a broader definition of reflux that included extra‐esophageal manifestations of disease. This has important counseling implications for the clinician, as patients presenting with reflux symptoms may not comprehend the relationship of those symptoms to reflux disease.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2473-974X , 2473-974X
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2898361-0
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Wiley, Vol. 168, No. 5 ( 2023-05), p. 1038-1046
    Abstract: To assess the perceived symptoms caused by the sinuses as defined by otolaryngology patients and clinicians. Study Design Multi‐institutional cross‐sectional study. Setting Six academic outpatient otolaryngology practices. Methods We performed a multi‐institutional, cross‐sectional study using a semantics‐based questionnaire. Consecutive patients were enrolled at 6 academic otolaryngology centers from June 2020 to May 2021. The primary outcome examined patient and provider definitions for the symptoms caused by the sinuses from a list of 28 proposed terms covering 6 general categories. These data were also collected from otolaryngology faculty at the same institutions. Results Responses were obtained from 451 patients (54% female, mean age 48.3 years) and 29 otolaryngologists (38% female, mean age 37.4 years). Patients selected a median of 12 terms, compared to 8.5 for otolaryngologists. Among patients, the most frequently selected symptom domains were mucus (419, 92.9%), airflow (412, 91.4%), and pain (389, 86.3%). Compared to clinicians, patients more frequently selected symptoms related to the ear (difference, 48.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 34.8%‐59.3%), throat (difference, 35.7%, 95% CI, 22.0%‐47.5%), systemic (difference, 34.4%, 95% CI, 21.2%‐46.0%), mucus (difference, 20.5%, 95% CI, 10.2%‐30.6%), and airflow domains (difference, 19.0%, 95% CI, 8.4%‐29.3%). Multiple domains were selected by 98% of patients and 79% of providers. Conclusion Semantic differences exist between patients and clinicians regarding the symptoms caused by the sinus with patients having a broader range of perceived symptoms. These differences may provide clues to improve communication between otolaryngologists and their patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0194-5998 , 1097-6817
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2008453-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, Wiley, Vol. 13, No. 2 ( 2023-02), p. 129-139
    Abstract: Sinus infections are a common reason patients seek medical care. However, the intended meaning of the term sinus infection among patients and otolaryngologists is incompletely understood. Methods In this multi‐institutional cross‐sectional study, a semantics‐based questionnaire was provided to consecutive patients presenting to otolaryngology clinics at six academic centers from June 2020 until May 2021. The primary outcome was respondent definitions for sinus infection from a list of 28 proposed terms covering six general categories. Secondary outcome measures included differences between geographic regions. Results Responses were obtained from 560 patients (54% female, mean age 48.9 years) and 29 otolaryngologists (42% female, mean age 37.4 years). Patients and otolaryngologists selected a median of 10 and 11 terms, respectively, to define a sinus infection. Among patients the most frequently selected symptom categories were mucus (500, 89.3%), pressure/pain (480, 85.7%), and airflow (468, 83.6%). Compared to patients, clinicians selected with greater frequency the symptom categories of pressure/pain (14.3% difference; 95% CI, 7.6% to 22.5%), mucus (10.7% difference; 95% CI, 4.7% to 18.3%) and airflow (13.0% difference; 95% CI, 4.8% to 21.7%). Multiple categories were selected by 96% of patients and 100% of providers. Conclusion The definition of sinus infection appears variable for both patients and otolaryngologists, though patients appear to apply a broader range of symptoms to the term sinus infection . There were no pronounced geographic differences in the description of a sinus infection in this US sample population. Patients commonly described sinus infection in the context of pain‐related symptoms. Appreciation of these semantic differences may enable more effective patient‐clinician communication.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2042-6976 , 2042-6984
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2604059-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages