feed icon rss

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Die angezeigten Daten werden derzeit aktualisiert.
Derzeit steht der Fernleihindex leider nicht zur Verfügung.
Exportieren
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 787-787
    Kurzfassung: Introduction: The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs: apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban) may be used for the treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and for the prevention of stroke in the setting of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Adding aspirin (ASA) to a DOAC is often appropriate after acute coronary syndromes or percutaneous coronary intervention. However, many patients receive oral anticoagulation and ASA without a clear need for combination therapy. Current data, largely from patients treated with warfarin and ASA, suggest that the addition of ASA may increase bleeding risk without reducing thrombotic events. However, it is uncertain if this applies to patients on DOACs with ASA, and patients on combination DOAC+ASA therapy were not well represented in clinical trials. We sought to evaluate the impact of adding ASA to DOAC therapy for patients without an apparent indication for combination therapy. Methods: We conducted a registry-based cohort study of adults on DOAC therapy for NVAF or VTE followed at 6 anticoagulation clinics in Michigan between January 2009 to June 2019, recruited through the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI2). Patients were excluded if they had a history of heart valve replacement, recent myocardial infarction, or less than 3 months of follow-up. Two propensity matched cohorts (DOACs vs. DOAC+ASA) of patients were analyzed based on aspirin use at the time of study enrollment. The primary outcome was any new bleeding event. Secondary outcomes included new episodes of arterial or VTE, bleeding event type (fatal, life threatening, major, clinically relevant non-major, non-major bleeding (CRNMB), and intracranial or intraspinal), and death. Random chart audits were done to confirm the accuracy of the abstracted data. Results: Of the study cohort of 2,045 patients, 647 (31.6%) patients without a clear indication for ASA received ASA with a DOAC. We compared two groups of 639 matched patients. Patient demographics, co-morbidities, and concurrent medications were well-balanced after propensity score matching. After an average of 15.2 months of follow-up we found that patients on combination therapy (DOAC+ASA) had a significantly higher rate of bleeding compared to patients on DOAC monotherapy (319 bleeding events vs. 261 bleeding events, P=0.02; 0.41 bleeds per patient vs. 0.33 bleeds per patient). This difference was largely driven by CRNMB events (151 with DOAC+ASA vs. 109 with DOAC monotherapy, P=0.01), with the only 2 fatal bleeding events observed with DOAC monotherapy. We did not observe a significant difference between the groups in other bleeding event classifications. Bleeding sites were most commonly cutaneous, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary. Observed rates of thrombosis (stroke, VTE, myocardial infarction, or other) were similar between the groups (19 events with DOAC+ASA vs. 18 events for DOAC monotherapy, P=NS). Patients on combination therapy had more emergency room visits and hospitalizations but these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Patients on oral anticoagulation for VTE or NVAF with a DOAC, without a clear need for ASA, experienced more bleeding events with the addition of ASA compared to DOAC monotherapy, without an apparent improvement in the incidence of thrombosis. Further study is needed to assess if DOAC+ASA is safer than warfarin+ASA, to compare the outcomes of the individual DOACs, and to confirm these findings in a larger cohort. Until such assessment is complete, clinicians should carefully consider the need to add aspirin in patients on DOAC therapy. Disclosures Kaatz: Portola: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Kline-Rogers:AC Forum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; QUANTUM-AF: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sood:Bayer: Research Funding. Froehlich:Fibromuscular Dysplasia Society: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Barnes:Portola: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squib: Honoraria; AMAG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Pfizer/Bristol Myers Squib: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Hematology
    Publikationsdatum: 2019
    ZDB Id: 1468538-3
    ZDB Id: 80069-7
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    In: Vascular Medicine, SAGE Publications, Vol. 22, No. 3 ( 2017-06), p. 197-203
    Kurzfassung: A high SAMe-TT 2 R 2 score predicted poor warfarin control and adverse events among atrial fibrillation patients. However, the SAMe-TT 2 R 2 score has not been well validated in venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients. A cohort of 1943 warfarin-treated patients with acute VTE was analyzed to correlate the SAMe-TT 2 R 2 score with time in therapeutic range (TTR) and clinical adverse events. A TTR 〈 60% was more frequent among patients with a high ( 〉 2) versus low (0–1) SAMe-TT 2 R 2 score (63.4% vs 52.3%, p 〈 0.0001). A high SAMe-TT 2 R 2 score ( 〉 2) correlated with increased overall adverse events (7.9 vs 4.5 overall adverse events/100 patient years, p=0.002), driven primarily by increased recurrent VTE rates (4.2 vs 1.5 recurrent VTE/100 patient years, p=0.0003). The SAMe-TT 2 R 2 score had a modest predictive ability for international normalized ratio (INR) quality and adverse clinical events among warfarin-treated VTE patients. The utility of the SAMe-TT 2 R 2 score to guide clinical decision-making remains to be investigated.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 1358-863X , 1477-0377
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: SAGE Publications
    Publikationsdatum: 2017
    ZDB Id: 2027562-6
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 788-788
    Kurzfassung: Introduction: For warfarin-treated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE), concomitant use of aspirin and warfarin increases the risk of major bleeding 1.5-1.8 fold without an apparent reduction in thrombotic events when there is no clear indication for combination therapy. As a result, each of six anticoagulation clinics in the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI2) consortium implemented a common intervention between late 2017 and mid 2018 aiming to reduce inappropriate aspirin use. The intervention consisted of a screening process to identify possible inappropriate aspirin use and then contacting the patient's provider to discuss the need for ongoing aspirin therapy. Site-level implementation variation included the personnel carrying out the intervention, the use of technology, and the means of provider communication. Treatment decisions were deferred to the treating provider but facilitated by the anticoagulation clinic staff. We sought to assess the impact of this intervention on the rate of inappropriate aspirin use over time and compare patient characteristics based on aspirin use post intervention. Methods: First, we compared the overall rate of inappropriate aspirin use among the six center MAQI2 anticoagulation clinic cohort immediately before and after the intervention. All patients in MAQI2 were treated with warfarin. Then, we identified a sub-cohort of warfarin-treated patients with AF and/or VTE enrolled between January 2010 to June 2019. Within that sub-cohort, we assessed aspirin use pre and post the site-specific date of implementation of the intervention. Patients with a potential indication for aspirin use were excluded (e.g., any history of coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, mechanical heart valve replacement, left ventricular assist device placement, peripheral arterial disease, or coronary artery bypass grafting). Each site was able to further restrict who was targeted for intervention (for example, excluding patients with a history of antiphospholipid syndrome or stroke). Using site specific definitions for inappropriate aspirin use we identified four groups at the end of the study period: 1) patients not on aspirin, 2) aspirin-using patients without an apparent indication who stopped aspirin following implementation, 3) aspirin-using patients without an apparent indication who remained on aspirin following implementation, and 4) aspirin-using patients who developed an indication for aspirin during the study period. To assess inappropriate aspirin use in our cohort, the characteristics of the first three groups were compared. Results: Between August 2017 and May 2019, a total of 3,766 warfarin-treated patients enrolled in MAQI2. Following implementation, inappropriate aspirin use was reduced by 34% (from 27.9% [401/1437] to 18.5% [251/1356] ). A sub-cohort of 1,007 patients who met the inclusion criteria had clinical follow-up pre and post intervention and were followed for an average of 40.1 months from enrollment to their first follow-up post-intervention. Of this sub-cohort, 226 (22.4%) were inappropriately on aspirin, with 50 (22.1%) stopping aspirin. A small number of patients 37 (3.7%) developed an indication for aspirin (e.g., myocardial infarction) during the study period and were removed from this analysis. As compared to patients not taking aspirin, patients on inappropriate aspirin were more often taking warfarin for AF, had congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and had a higher Charlson Comorbidity index; they were less likely to have VTE or a history of VTE. As compared to patients continuing on aspirin following implementation, patients stopping inappropriate aspirin were more likely to have chronic kidney disease (p=0.02) or a history of falls (p=0.03). Conclusion: Among warfarin-treated patients with AF or VTE, inappropriate aspirin usage can be identified and significantly reduced using a simple intervention in the anticoagulation clinic. Patients at higher risk of bleeding may be more likely to have their aspirin discontinued. Further studies are needed to see if reducing inappropriate aspirin usage translates to improved clinical outcomes and to determine the reasons for patient persistence on inappropriate aspirin. Disclosures Kaatz: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Portola: Honoraria. Kline-Rogers:AC Forum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; QUANTUM-AF: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sood:Bayer: Research Funding. Froehlich:Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria; Fibromuscular Dysplasia Society: Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Barnes:Portola: Honoraria; Pfizer/Bristol Myers Squib: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; AMAG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squib: Honoraria; Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Hematology
    Publikationsdatum: 2019
    ZDB Id: 1468538-3
    ZDB Id: 80069-7
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 179-179
    Kurzfassung: Introduction The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) including apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban are increasingly utilized for the management of venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) and/or non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Adding aspirin (ASA) to warfarin or DOAC therapy increases bleeding risk. Patients on combination therapy with ASA and an anticoagulant were not well represented in clinical trials comparing DOACs to warfarin. We sought to compare bleeding and thrombotic outcomes with DOACs and ASA compared to warfarin and ASA in a non-trial setting. Methods We conducted a retrospective registry-based cohort study of adults on DOAC or warfarin therapy for VTE and/or NVAF. Warfarin treated patients were followed by six anticoagulation clinics. Four out of the six clinics contributed data on their patients that were on DOACs in the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI 2) from January 2009 to June 2021. Patients were excluded if they had a history of heart valve replacement, recent myocardial infarction, or less than 3 months of follow-up. Two propensity matched cohorts (warfarin+ASA vs DOAC+ASA) of patients were analyzed based on ASA use at the time of study enrollment. The primary outcome was any new bleeding event. Secondary outcomes included new episodes of arterial or venous thrombosis, bleeding event type (major, fatal, life threatening, central nervous system, and non-major bleeding), emergency room visits, hospitalizations, transfusions, and death. Random chart audits were done to confirm the accuracy of the abstracted data. Event rates were compared using Poisson regression. Results We identified a total of 1,139 patients on DOACs plus ASA and 4,422 patients on warfarin plus ASA. After propensity matching, we compared two groups of 1,114 matched patients. DOAC treated patients were predominately on apixaban (62.3%) and rivaroxaban (30.4%), most often at therapeutic doses (Table 1). Patients were largely (90.5%) on low dose ASA (≤ 100 mg). Patient demographics, co-morbidities, indication for anticoagulation, history of bleeding or clotting, medications, and duration of follow-up were well-balanced after matching. Patients were followed for a median of 11.7 months (interquartile range 4.4 and 34 months). Patients treated with DOAC+ASA had 2.4 thrombotic events per 100 patient years compared to 2.2 thrombotic events per 100 patient years with warfarin+ASA (P=0.78). There were no significant differences observed between groups by thrombotic subtype (stroke, transient ischemic attack, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, table 1). Bleeding was also similar with 30.1 bleeding events per 100 patient years with DOAC+ASA compared to 27.8 bleeds per 100 patient years with warfarin+ASA (P=0.24). There were no significant differences by bleeding subtype (table 1). Hospitalizations for clotting occurred less frequently with DOAC+ASA (0.9 hospitalizations per 100 patient years) compared to warfarin+ASA (1.7 hospitalizations per 100 patient years, P=0.03). Mortality, transfusions, and healthcare utilization were otherwise similar between the two groups. Conclusions For patients on a DOAC versus warfarin with ASA for atrial fibrillation and/or venous thromboembolic disease without a recent myocardial infarction or heart valve replacement, bleeding and thrombotic outcomes were similar. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kaatz: Gilead: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol Myer Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Osmosis Research: Research Funding. Kline-Rogers: Janssen: Consultancy; American College of Physicians: Consultancy. Sood: Bayer: Consultancy. Froehlich: Merck: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan: Research Funding; Fibromuscular Disease Society of America: Research Funding. Barnes: National Certification Board of Anticoagulation Providers: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Acelis: Consultancy; AMAG Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Connected Health: Consultancy; Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan: Research Funding; AC Forum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Hematology
    Publikationsdatum: 2021
    ZDB Id: 1468538-3
    ZDB Id: 80069-7
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 5
    In: Vascular Medicine, SAGE Publications, Vol. 24, No. 2 ( 2019-04), p. 153-155
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 1358-863X , 1477-0377
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: SAGE Publications
    Publikationsdatum: 2019
    ZDB Id: 2027562-6
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 6
    In: The American Journal of Medicine, Elsevier BV, Vol. 135, No. 10 ( 2022-10), p. 1231-1243.e8
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0002-9343
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Elsevier BV
    Publikationsdatum: 2022
    ZDB Id: 2003338-2
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 7
    In: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 10, No. suppl_3 ( 2017-03)
    Kurzfassung: Background: Most patients taking warfarin for atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) have a target International Normalized Ratio (INR) between 2-3 to reduce risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events. Body Mass Index (BMI) is not included in traditional bleed risk scores, but may be an indicator of bleeding risk in warfarin patients. Methods: Using data from the multi-site Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI 2 ) Registry, we identified all AF/VTE patients , separated them into three cohorts: BMI 〈 20 (underweight), BMI 20-25 (normal weight) and BMI 〉 25 (overweight). Bleeding events in these cohorts were identified and stratified into severity according to International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis criteria. Results: Of 6,054 patients, 4,766 (78.7%) had a BMI of 〉 25. These patients were generally younger, with higher prevalence of hypertension. The HAS-BLED scores were slightly lower in overweight AF patients (2.6 vs 2.8; p=0.04); otherwise no difference between groups. The overall minor, major, and life threatening bleeding rates were 22.8/27.7; 4.3/3.7; and 1.2/0.7 (per 100 patient years) in AF and VTE patients, respectively. A higher proportion of females were underweight for both indications, and AF patients were older. More underweight and normal weight AF and VTE patients had a bleeding history compared to overweight patients. Bleeding outcomes are listed in Table. Comparisons were made with Poisson regression analysis. Conclusion: In a large, unselected cohort of warfarin treated patient from a multi-site registry, minor bleeding was more common in underweight and normal weight AF patients; major and life-threatening bleeding was more common in underweight and normal weight VTE patients. Since the majority of patients were overweight, further studies are needed to determine if reasons for bleeding differ between patients based on BMI in order to guide quality improvement efforts.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 1941-7713 , 1941-7705
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publikationsdatum: 2017
    ZDB Id: 2453882-6
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 8
    In: Circulation, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 132, No. suppl_3 ( 2015-11-10)
    Kurzfassung: Introduction: Randomized trials of left atrial appendage (LAA) closure with the Watchman device have shown disparate results, and its cost-effectiveness compared to anticoagulation has not been evaluated using contemporary data. Methods: We used a Markov decision model to estimate lifetime quality-adjusted survival, costs, and cost-effectiveness of LAA closure with Watchman, compared directly with warfarin and indirectly with dabigatran, using data from the long-term (mean 3.8 year) follow-up of PROTECT AF and PREVAIL randomized trials. Results: Using data from PROTECT AF, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) compared to warfarin and dabigatran were $20,140 and $24,400 per quality adjusted life year (QALY), respectively. Using data from PREVAIL, LAA closure was dominated by warfarin and dabigatran, meaning that it was less effective (9.46, 9.59, and 9.64 QALYs, respectively) and more costly. At a willingness-to-pay-threshold of $50,000 per QALY, LAA closure was cost-effective 62% and 35% of the time under PROTECT AF and PREVAIL assumptions, respectively. These results were sensitive to the rates of ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage for LAA closure and medical anticoagulation. Conclusion: The cost-effectiveness of LAA closure with the Watchman device depends largely on the clinical trial used for assigning event rates. Using data from PROTECT AF, Watchman was cost-effective; using PREVAIL data, Watchman was more costly and less effective than warfarin and dabigatran. Results were highly sensitive to the rates of stroke and intracranial hemorrhage in both treatment groups. Post-marketing surveillance of major adverse events will be vital to determining the value of the Watchman in clinical practice.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0009-7322 , 1524-4539
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publikationsdatum: 2015
    ZDB Id: 1466401-X
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 9
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    SAGE Publications ; 2015
    In:  Vascular Medicine Vol. 20, No. 2 ( 2015-04), p. 143-152
    In: Vascular Medicine, SAGE Publications, Vol. 20, No. 2 ( 2015-04), p. 143-152
    Kurzfassung: Initial treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) includes the acute and intermediate phases, usually lasting for 3 months. The choice to extend therapy beyond the initial 3-month window involves assessing a combination of risk factors for VTE recurrence and bleeding, along with weighing patient preferences. In some cases, such as VTE provoked by a reversible surgical risk factor, the recurrence risk is sufficiently low that most patients should not receive extended therapy. In other cases, such as VTE associated with malignancy, the recurrence risk is sufficiently high that treatment should be extended beyond the initial 3 months. However, a large number of patients fall into a grey zone where the decision on extended therapy is less clear-cut. In this review, we summarize the evidence for VTE recurrence risk and the role for extended anticoagulation given a variety of patient-specific factors and laboratory results. We also review the role of VTE risk prediction tools and provide a recommended algorithm for approaching the decision of extended anticoagulation therapy. Various agents available for extended VTE therapy, including warfarin, aspirin and the direct oral anticoagulant agents, are discussed.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 1358-863X , 1477-0377
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: SAGE Publications
    Publikationsdatum: 2015
    ZDB Id: 2027562-6
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 10
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Elsevier BV ; 2021
    In:  Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine Vol. 31, No. 8 ( 2021-11), p. 512-514
    In: Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, Elsevier BV, Vol. 31, No. 8 ( 2021-11), p. 512-514
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 1050-1738
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Elsevier BV
    Publikationsdatum: 2021
    ZDB Id: 2010986-6
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf den KOBV Seiten zum Datenschutz