Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 5464-5464

Abstract: Background: Comorbidities and body mass index (BMI) are significantly associated with outcome in patients (pts) who receive continue treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as in Ph+ leukemias. Ruxolitinib (RUX) is the first JAK1/2 inhibitor that may induce spleen/symptom responses and improve quality of life in pts with myelofibrosis (MF). Up-to-date, no data are available on the impact of comorbidities and BMI on pts treated with RUX. Aims: To evaluate the impact of comorbidities and BMI on responses, overall survival (OS) and maintenance of RUX dose in a large cohort of pts. Methods: Data were extracted from an electronic database that included retrospective data on pts treated before January 2015 in 16 Italian Hematology centers. Response to RUX was evaluated according to IWG-MRT criteria. BMI was calculated at the time of start of RUX and classified according to WHO criteria. Comorbidities were recorded at the time of start of RUX and classified according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of RUX start to the time of death or to last follow-up, whichever came first. Results: Between June 2011 and Apr 2016, 289 pts with PMF (52.6%), or PET-MF (17%) or PPV-MF (30.4%) were treated with RUX in participating Centers. At RUX start, median age was 68.4 years (range 39-89) with a male prevalence (56.4%); International Prognostic Score System (IPSS) was intermediate (intm)-1 (15.6%), intm-2 (45.3%), high (39.1%). Transfusion dependence and spleen enlargement were present in 26.6% and 96.9% of pts, respectively (69.6% with spleen≥ 10 cm). Median total symptom score (TSS) was 20 (range 0-70). JAK2V617F was present in 80.3% of 234 evaluable pts. Median follow-up from MF diagnosis was 3.8 yr (range 0.3-29.6) and median RUX exposure was 20 months (3-56.2). Overall, comorbidities were evaluable in 275 pts. CCI stratification showed the absence of comorbidities in 100 pts (36.4%), one comorbidity in 63 pts (22.9%) and two or more in 112 pts (40.7%). Compared to pts with CCI 〈 2, pts with CCI ≥2 were more frequently: male (66.1% vs 49.1%, p=0.005), ≥65y (74.1% vs 54%, p=0.001), at intm2/high IPSS risk (90.2% vs 81%, p=0.03) and transfusion-dependent (36.6% vs 20.2%, p=0.003). Notably, the percentage of pts starting RUX 〉 2y from MF diagnosis was lower if CCI≥2 (33.9% vs 54%, p=0.001). Higher CCI did not correlate with lower spleen response (achieved by 45.2% vs 34.7%, p=0.09), TSS response (90.1% vs 83.2%, p=0.11), and higher incidence of RUX-induced anemia (Hb 〈 10 g/dl in pts with baseline Hb ≥10 g/dl) (48% vs 41%, p=0.33). RUX starting and titrated doses at 12-wks were similar in the two groups (p=0.44 and p=0.81, respectively). OS was significantly higher in pts with CCI 〈 2 (96.7% vs 87.8% at 2 yr, p 〈 0.001). After stratification according to CCI (below or above 2) and the achievement of a spleen response, both factors remained significantly associated with survival. Indeed, in pts with CCI 〈 2 OS at 2 yr was 92.7% and 79.1%, depending on the achievement of a spleen response (SR) or not (NR), respectively (p=0.034). Analogously, in pts with CCI≥2 the achievement of a spleen response significantly increased survival (79.2% vs 55.3% in pts without spleen response, p=0.011). Notably, OS was comparable in pts with lower CCI /no spleen response and in pts with higher CCI/spleen response (79.1% vs 79.2%) (Figure 1). BMI was evaluable in 269 pts: 169 pts (62.8%) were classified as under-weight/normal for a BMI 〈 25, whereas 100 pts were overweight/obese (BMI ≥25). Pts with BMI≥25 were more frequently male (71% vs 47.3%, p 〈 0.001) and with a lower incidence of anemia (30% vs 42%, p=0.049). BMI stratification did not correlate with differences in spleen response (p=0.83) and TSS (p=0.18) or onset of anemia/infections during treatment (p=0.49 and p=0.28). Starting and median doses, as well as percentage of pts reducing RUX dose over time, were similar in the two groups. Summary: In MF pts treated with RUX, BMI and comorbidities did not influence the achievement of spleen/symptom responses, maintenance of RUX dose or onset of drug-related anemia. Although CCI stratification correlated with survival, as in Ph+ leukemias treated with TKIs, the achievement of a spleen response was able to counterbalance the negative prognostic effect of a higher CCI. Consequently, higher BMI and CCI should not be regarded as contraindication to RUX therapy. Figure Figure. Disclosures Breccia: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Tiribelli:Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Bonifacio:Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Cimino:Bristol-Mayer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Latagliata:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria. Cavo:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V128.22.5464.5464

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2016

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 1128-1128

Abstract: Background: Response to ruxolitinib (RUX), the only JAK1/2 inhibitor commercially available for the treatment of Myelofibrosis (MF) may vary among patients (pts) and is largely unpredictable at therapy start. Therefore, pts' selection is based only on clinical needs. Aims: To evaluate the impact of pre-treatment clinical/laboratory factors, as well as RUX dose, on response to RUX in a cohort of "real-life" MF pts. Methods: A multicenter observational study on WHO-defined MF was conducted in 18 Italian Hematology Centers. Data were extracted from a database that included retrospective data on pts treated before January 2015. Subsequently, data were prospectively collected and updated at a 6-month interval.Response to RUX was evaluated according to IWG-MRT criteria. Results: Between June 2011 and Apr 2016, 408 pts with PMF (54.4%), or postET (27.7%) / post-PV (17.9%) were treated with RUX. At RUX start, baseline characteristics were (median): age, 68.5 y (range, 26.5-89); ≥65 y, 63.5%; male, 56.4%; hemoglobin (Hb), 10.7 g/dL (7-16.7); transfusion-dependence 27.9%; PLT, 256×109/L (50-1887); PLT 〈 100×109/L, 9.6%; spleen enlargement, 96.6% (spleen length ≥10cm: 64.2%); total symptoms score (TSS), 20 (12-70).International Prognostic Score System (IPSS) was intermediate (intm)-1 (15.7%), intm-2 (47.3%), high (37%). Molecular data were available for 332 pts (81.4%) and was positive in 81% (JAK2V617F), 6.3% (CALR), 1% (MPLW515K/L); 2.7% (triple negative). 30 pts (9%) were JAK2V617Fnegative but did not receive further molecular evaluation. Karyotype was abnormal in 55 (26%) out of 210 evaluable pts (unfavorable: 8.1%). Median follow-up from MF diagnosis was 3.8 yr (0.3-29.6) and median RUX exposure was 20 mos (3-56.2). Overall, 152 out of 365 (42%) pts with spleen ≥5cm achieved a spleen response at any time during RUX therapy. At 3 and 6 mos, the response was achieved by 26.6% and 34.4% of evaluable pts, respectively. In univariate analysis, pre-treatment factors negatively correlating with spleen response were: transfusion dependence, platelet count ≤200x109/l, spleen palpable ≥10 cm below costal margin, grade 3 marrow fibrosis, intm-2/high IPSS risk and interval between MF diagnosis and RUX start ≥2y. Three variables remained significant in multivariate regression logistic analysis: large splenomegaly (HR: 2.05, 95%CI: 1.1-3.7; p=0.02), time-interval ≥2y (HR: 1.78, 95%CI:1.0-3.1; p=0.04) and transfusion dependency (HR: 1.95, 95%CI:1.0-3.7; p=0.04). Spleen response significantly correlated with the average RUX dose in the first 12 wks, with pts treated with doses ≥10 mg BID having better response rates (47.3% vs 26.6% if dose 〈 10 mg BID, HR:2.36, 95%CI:1.3-4.3, p=0.005). 360 pts had a TSS 〉 10 at RUX start and 319 (88.6%) achieved a symptom response. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with worse responses were: transfusion dependency (HR: 3.15, 95%CI 1.5-6.4, p=0.001) and a baseline TSS 〉 20 (HR: 6.7, 95%CI 3.2-13.8, p 〈 0.001). RUX titrated dose 〈 10 mg BID during the first 12-wks of therapy negatively correlated with symptoms response (HR: 2.6, 95%CI 1.05-6.7, p=0.037). Drug-related anemia (acquisition of transfusion dependency or Hb 〈 10g/dl in pts with a previous Hb≥10) was observed in 127/291 (43.6%) evaluable pts. The probability to develop anemia was significantly higher in females (HR: 1.63, 95%CI 1.03-2.57, p=0.036). Notably, anemia was not influenced by RUX 12-wks titrated dose (41.8% in pts with RUX titrated dose 〈 10 mg BID vs41.5% with higher doses). 80 (19.6%) pts discontinued RUX because of: lack/loss of response (28.8%); drug-related toxicity (27.5%, specifically: thrombocytopenia, 16.2%; infection, 6.3%; anemia, 5%); disease progression with/without acute evolution (8.8%); death (13.8%); allogeneic transplant (8.8%); 2ndneoplasia (3.8%); other unrelated causes (8.5%). Summary/Conclusion: In a real-life setting, IWG-MRT-defined spleen and symptoms response rates were observed in 42% and 88.6% of evaluable pts, respectively. Disease severity (in terms of transfusion dependency and large splenomegaly) and a delay in RUX start ≥2yr from diagnosis identified pts with lower spleen response rates. Titrated doses 〈 10mg BID significantly correlated with poorer spleen and symptoms responses. Overall, these data point out the importance of an early treatment and of an effective (≥ 10 mg BID) titrated dose in order to achieve better therapeutic results. Disclosures Palumbo: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Bonifacio:Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Tiribelli:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Latagliata:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria. Vitolo:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Honoraria for lectures; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Honoraria for lectures; Gilead: Other: Honoraria for lectures; Takeda: Other: Honoraria for lectures. Fanin:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Merli:Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cavo:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Breccia:Ariad: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V128.22.1128.1128

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2016

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 4166-4166

Abstract: Introduction. Blast phase (BP) is the terminal and most incurable phase of myelofibrosis (MF) and occurs in a not negligible fraction of patients (pts). In the pre-ruxolitinib (RUX) era, peripheral blasts, thrombocytopenia, unfavorable cytogenetics, and high risk category were identified as predictors of BP. RUX is the standard of care for symptomatic MF; however, information on clinical/laboratory correlates of BP in RUX-treated pts is not available. Aims. The primary objective of the study is to assess real-world data on incidence, risk factors and outcome of BP in RUX-treated MF pts. Methods. A multicentre observational retrospective study on RUX-treated MF pts was conducted in 20 European Hematology Centers. Data were extracted from an electronic database that included consecutive pts treated with RUX from June 2011. Data cut-off was June 2019. Risk category was assessed at RUX start according to the Dynamic International Prognostic Score System (DIPSS) or the Myelofibrosis Secondary to PV and ET Collaboration Prognostic Model (MYSEC-PM) in pts with post-Polycythemia Vera (PV)/post-Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) MF (secondary MF, SMF). A time-to-event (BP) analysis was conducted with Fine & Gray model with death/time of stem cell transplant as competing risks. Variables tested for association with BP were: age≥65yr, sex, transfusion-dependency, PLT 〈 150x109/l, peripheral blasts ≥3%, marrow fibrosis grade, CALR-unmutated genotype, unfavorable karyotype, spleen length (≥10 cm), total symptoms score (≥20), previous hydroxyurea (HU), alkylating agents, and interferon (IFN) use, time from MF diagnosis to RUX start, and PV/ET duration. Cumulative Incidence Function among risk categories for DIPSS and MYSEC-PM was calculated applying the Gray's model. Results . Overall, 589 MF pts were included and observed for 1833 pt-yrs from RUX start (median, 35.4 mos). Diagnosis was PMF in 304 pts (51.6%), PPV-MF in 164 pts (27.8%) or PET-MF in 121 (20.6%); 58.4% males. Molecular status was: JAK2V617F (82.5%), CALR (11.3%) and MPLW515K/L (1.1%); 5.1% were triple negatives. Overall, 368 (62.5%) pts received ≥1 cytoreductive therapy before RUX, specifically: HU, n. 357; alkylating agents, n. 47; anagrelide, n. 33; and IFN, n. 29. Median time from MF diagnosis to RUX start was 1.3 yrs. DIPSS for the whole cohort was: INT-1 (52.9%), INT-2 (40.1%), and HIGH (7%). DIPSS distribution in PMF pts was: INT-1 (47.8%), INT-2 (45.7%), and HIGH (6.5%), while SMF pts were categorized at LOW (11.1%), INT-1 (43.1%), INT-2 (31.2%) and HIGH (14.6%) risk according to the MYSEC-PM. Overall, 65 (11%) developed BP. In 61 pts, BP caused RUX withdrawal after a median time of 1.2 yrs (0.7-6.2); in 4 pts BP occurred after RUX stop (median time: 2.4 yrs). BP incidence rate was 3.6 x100 pt-yrs and was comparable in PMF and SMF (p=0.1). In univariate analysis, the probability of BP evolution for the PMF cohort was significantly reduced by previous IFN use (p=0.001). In SMF, predictors for BP in univariate analysis were PLT 〈 150 x109/l (p=0.001), blasts ≥3% (p=0.002), grade 3 marrow fibrosis (p=0.03) and PV/ET duration ≥ 10 yrs (p=0.02); previous IFN significantly reduced the risk of BP (p=0.02). In multivariable analysis, PLT 〈 150 x109/l (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.4, p=0.03), blasts ≥3% (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.4-7.5, p=0.004) and previous IFN (HR 0.1, 95% CI 0.02-0.8, p=0.04) remained significant. High DIPSS risk significantly predicted BP in PMF (p=0.04, HR [95% CI]: 2.6 [1.1-6.5] ) but not in SMF (p=0.40). In this latter cohort, only the MYSEC-PM was associated with BP (p=0.02, HR 1.7 [95% CI]: [1.1-2.8] ) (Fig.1). Estimated HRs, in reference to the lower score category, were: 1.10 for INT-1, 1.82 for INT-2, and 4.04 for HIGH risk. HR for HIGH risk, comparing to all lower risk groups, was 3.53 (95% CI: 1.53-8.11). Overall, 54 (81.8%) BP pts died and median survival was 2.8 mos. Survival after BP was not influenced by type of MF, previous response to RUX, and type of salvage treatment. Conclusions. Thrombocytopenia and peripheral blasts at RUX start identified pts at higher risk of BP in SMF, while previous IFN use was associated with reduced BP evolution in both PMF and SMF, suggesting a possible disease-modifying action of this agent. Also, this analysis supports the ability of MYSEC-PM in predicting BP in pts with SMF. Despite RUX use, outcome after BP remained dismal, confirming the need for newer treatment strategies. Disclosures Palandri: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Breccia:Incyte: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Tiribelli:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Benevolo:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Bonifacio:Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Iurlo:Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Elli:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Abruzzese:BMS: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Sgherza:Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Cavazzini:Pfize: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Crugnola:Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Isidori:Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Heidel:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; CTI: Consultancy. Latagliata:Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Trawinska:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Krampera:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cuneo:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cavo:takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; bms: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; novartis: Honoraria. Palumbo:Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Hospira: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-123379

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 4174-4174

Abstract: Introduction: Hydroxyurea (HU) is the recommended treatment in patients (pts) with polycythemia vera (PV) at high thrombotic risk. In 2013, European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines defined criteria for response to HU including hematology and clinical parameters (Barosi G, Blood 2013). Yet, estimates of ELN response rates and of their influence on clinical outcomes are lacking. Methods: The "PV-NET" is a European multicentre observational clinical study including now 530 cases of PV followed in 16 European Hematology Centers. Inclusion criteria are: 2016 WHO diagnosis of PV; availability of clinical/laboratory data at diagnosis and during follow-up; age≥18 yrs. Data cut-off was June 2019. A time-to-event (thrombosis, hemorrhage, evolution into blast phase [BP] or myelofibrosis [MF] ) analysis was calculated from HU start with Fine & Gray model with death as competing risk. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from HU start to last contact/death (log-rank p). Response to HU was defined per ELN criteria: Complete (CR): Hematocrit (Hct) 〈 45% without phlebotomies (PHL) & PLT ≤400×109/L & WBC ≤10×109/L & normal spleen size & no PV-related symptoms; Partial (PR): Hct 〈 45% without PHL or response in 3/4 criteria. Results: Overall, 438 required HU and were observed for 3069 pt-yrs. Characteristics at diagnosis were: median age: 62.3 yrs (22.3-89.5); males: 52.5%; median (range) WBC/PLT count, x109/l: 10.8 (1.1-33)/490 (143-1070); median hemoglobin (g/dl)/Hct (%): 18.6/56 (males); 17.6/54.7 (females); 56 (12.8%) and 30 (6.9%) pts had a thrombosis prior to or at diagnosis, respectively. Overall, 327 (74.7%) pts reported at least one PV-related symptom and 166 pts (37.9%) had a palpable spleen (≥10 cm: 8.4%). Median time from diagnosis to HU start was 2.9 (0.07-238) mos. At HU start, 350 (79.9%) pts were at high thrombotic risk. HU was used first-line in 426 (97.3%) pts and second-line in 12 pts (10 pts after interferon). Median HU dose was 0.5 g/d (0.25-2); 21.7% of pts received ≥ 1 g/d. After HU start, 36 pts presented 50 all-grades thromboses (arterial: 50%; grade ≥3: 51.1%), for an incidence rate of 1.6 per 100 pt-yrs (grade ≥3: 0.7). Thromboses were: deep/superficial vein thrombosis (32%/10%), acute myocardial infarction (12%), stroke (10%), transient ischemic attack (12%), spleen infarction (12%), retinal artery occlusion (4%), pulmonary embolisms (6%), and one splanchnic vein thrombosis. Thirteen bleedings (gastrointestinal: 61.5%; mucocutaneous: 30.8%; one hemothorax) occurred in 11 pts, for an incidence rate of 0.5 (grade ≥3: 69.2%). Overall, 12 progressions to BP and 29 MF evolutions were recorded (incidence rates: 0.5 and 1.3 X 100 pt-yr); 31 pts died. At the time of best response to HU, 62.3% of pts had at least one elevated hematology value; 231 (52.7%) pts continued PHL during HU (median PHL per yr: 2.5 [1-4]) (Fig.1). Per ELN criteria, 125 pts (28.6%) and 228 (52%) achieved a CR and PR, respectively, while 85 (19.4%) had no response (NR). The type of ELN response to HU (CR vs PR vs NR) did not affect the probability of thrombosis (p=0.56), hemorrhages (p=0.70), evolution to BP (p=0.60) or MF (p=0.14), and OS (p=0.37). After a median follow-up from HU start of 4.2 yrs, 95 (21.7%) patients discontinued HU. The percentage of pts who discontinued HU was 8.4%, 16.2% and 19.4% at 5, 10 and 15 yrs and was significantly lower in CR pts compared to pts with PR and NR (p=0.02). The overall HU discontinuation rate was 4.1 per 100 pt-yr. Reasons for HU discontinuations were: failure to control hct and/or leucocytosis and/or thrombocytosis (16.9%), failure to reduce splenomegaly and/or symptoms (7.4%), MF (12.6%) or BP (4.2%) evolution, second neoplasia (4.2%). A total of 52 pts (54.7%) discontinued due to HU-related toxicity, specifically: skin lesions (46.3%), oral aftosis (14.6%), gastrointestinal disorders (12.2%), fever (9.8%), thrombocytopenia (9.8%), and anemia (7.3%). Survival was not influenced by HU discontinuation (p=0.50). Conclusions: ELN-defined CR was rarely achieved by HU-treated pts, mainly due to low HU doses and PHL requirement, and did not influence outcome parameters. These data outline the relatively low utility in the current clinical practice of ELN criteria for the evaluation of HU treatment; their implementation would be relevant to base therapy changes on prognostic considerations. Finally, around 20% of pts discontinued HU, confirming that there is room for improvement in PV treatment strategy. Disclosures Palandri: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Elli:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Benevolo:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Tiribelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bonifacio:Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Cavazzini:Pfize: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Palumbo:Novartis: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Hospira: Honoraria. Heidel:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; CTI: Consultancy. Crugnola:Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Cuneo:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Krampera:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Breccia:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Cavo:sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; novartis: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; bms: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Latagliata:Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-125388

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 3052-3052

Abstract: Introduction . The 2016 WHO criteria identified early primary myelofibrosis (early-PMF) as an individual entity with different clinical/laboratory presentations and a significantly better outcome compared to overt PMF. No information is available on the therapeutic effects of ruxolitinib (RUX) in the context of each disease separately. Aims . To report the differences between early and overt PMF patients (pts) treated with RUX in terms of baseline clinical/laboratory characteristics, response to treatment and toxicity. Methods . A clinical database was created in 23 European Hematology Centers including retrospective data of 537 MF pts treated with RUX from Jan 2011 to July 2018. Spleen and symptoms response (SR & SyR) to RUX were evaluated according to the 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. Hematologic toxicity and infections were graded according to the WHO scale. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated from diagnosis using the Cox proportional hazards regression model, with adjustment for the dynamic international prognostic score system (DIPSS) and left-truncation. Results . A total of 199 pts had a diagnosis of early (n. 59, 29.7%) or overt (n. 140, 70.3%) PMF confirmed by bone marrow biopsy at RUX start and were included in this analysis. At RUX start, median age was 68.4 yrs (26.5-88.9) and 66.3% of pts had a spleen palpable at ≥10 cm below the left costal margin (LCM) (median spleen length: 12 cm). Median hemoglobin value and total symptoms score (TSS) were 10.5 g/dL and 20 (0-80), respectively. DIPSS distribution was: intermediate-1 (50.5%), intermediate-2 (42.1%), high (7.4%). Molecular status was: JAK2V617F 72.3%, CALR 13.7%, MPLW515K/L 3.1%, triple-negative 5%. Median time from diagnosis to RUX start was 22.4 mos (0.1-394). Compared to overt PMF pts, pts with early PMF started RUX with higher hemoglobin levels (median, 11.6 vs 10.4 g/dl, p=0.01) and lower circulating blast counts (p 〈 0.001), and were more frequently at intermediate-1 DIPSS risk (69.6% vs 42.5%, p 〈 0.001). RUX starting and 12-weeks titrated doses were comparable in the two groups. At 3 and 6 months, 43.1% and 48.9% of early-PMF pts achieved a SR, compared to 27.9% and 31.3% of overt-MF pts (p=0.04 and p=0.04, respectively). The rate of SyR was also higher in early-PMF pts at 3 months (82.5% vs 68.8%, p=0.05) and at 6 months (90.0 vs 73.7, p=0.02). In the first 12 months from RUX start, anemia/thrombocytopenia of all grades occurred in 75.6%/43.1% and 86.3%/60.0% of early and overt PMF pts, respectively (p=0.11 and p=0.03). At 3 months, anemia was more frequent in overt PMF pts (94.7% vs 80.0%, p=0.01), with 32.6% of pts having a grade 3-4 anemia compared to 17.8% in early PMF (p=0.02). The incidence of thrombocytopenia was also higher in overt PMF at 3 (51.5% vs 36.2%, p=0.05) and 6 (52.9% vs 35.8%, p=0.04) months, with only 2.2% and 2.5% of pts having a grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia, respectively. Seventy-five pts had at least one grade ≥2 infectious episode during RUX therapy. Considering death as competing risk, the cumulative risk of infections grade ≥2 was comparable in the two cohorts (p=0.4). Overall, 108 pts discontinued RUX (52.5% and 55.0% of early and overt PMF pts, p=0.7). Evolution into acute leukemia (AL) occurred in 21 pts. After a median follow-up of 23 months, 69 pts died (19 early), specifically because of progression of myelofibrosis (38%), AL (16.9%), infections (11.3%), hemorrhage/thrombosis (12.6%), second neoplasias (8.5%) or transplant-associated toxicity (2.8%), other causes (9.9%). OS (p=0.88) and PFS (p=0.86) were comparable in early and overt PMF pts. Conclusions . This study indicates for the first time that early PMF represents a category of pts that is projected to have better responses and lower toxicities from RUX treatmemt. In the setting of RUX therapy, a WHO-defined diagnosis may contribute to better identify pts who may deserve a strict monitoring during treatment. Disclosures Palandri: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Palumbo:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Abruzzese:BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy. Foà:INCYTE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; GILEAD: Speakers Bureau; JANSSEN: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; ROCHE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; CELTRION: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; ABBVIE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; NOVARTIS: Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau. Vitolo:Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Speakers Bureau. Aversa:Basilea: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cuneo:Roche: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau. Di Raimondo:Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cavo:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Breccia:Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-99-116165

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2018

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 2273-2273

Abstract: Abstract 2273 Background: While Imatinib (IM) has revolutionized treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), demonstrating outstanding survival figures, currently no data exist on mid to long term impact of disease burden and therapy from the patients’ perspective. Aim: The main objective of this study is to identify specific limitations of quality of life (QoL) in CML survivors who are undergoing first line treatment with IM in comparison with controls from the general population. Patient-reported symptom prevalence was also investigated. Patients and methods: Patients were recruited in 26 centers, randomly selected to geographically represent the whole study country. Patients selection criteria included: being in treatment with IM for at least three years and being in complete cytogenetic response at the time of study entry. All patients were invited by their treating physicians in the hospital to participate and all consenting patients were requested to complete a Health Survey Packet at home. Pre-paid reply envelopes were also provided with the request to send back completed Surveys to an independent National coordinating Data Center. Generic QoL was assessed with the SF-36 that consists of 36 items covering eight generic health status/QoL domains: physical functioning (PF), role limitations due to physical health (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), and mental health (MH). All scales ranging between 0 and 100 with higher scores representing better outcomes. A previously devised patient-reported CML Symptom Checklist was used to investigate 9 symptoms of possible major concern in these patients. Mean SF-36 scores were compared to available national general population reference values and all analyses were adjusted for age and gender. Statistical comparisons were all adjusted for multiple testing. Differences in mean scores were expressed in Cohen effect sizes (ES; with 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 indicating small, medium, and large ES, respectively) and clinical significance. Results: Between March and December 2009, 448 patients were recruited in a large national-based survivorship project. Patients’ compliance was optimal with 94% of patients (N=421) returning a valid Health Survey Packet to the National coordinating Data center. At study participation, mean age of patients was 56 years (59% male and 41% female) and median time of IM therapy was 5 years. Seventy-seven percent of patients were receiving standard dose of 400 mg and 43% had at least one comorbidity. Age and gender adjusted comparisons with general population norms revealed worse outcomes for the following scales: RP (P 〈 .001; ES=0.3), GH (P 〈 .001; ES=0.4) and RE (P=.01; ES=0.2). The largest clinically meaningful difference (Δ=12.3 points) was found for the RP domain with mean scores of 61.4 vs. 73.7 respectively for the CML and the general population. Age specific comparisons, adjusted by gender, (55-64; 65–74 and 〉 75 years) suggested an almost uniform pattern in all scales with worse outcomes between CML patients and population controls among the youngest groups. GH was significantly worse in younger patients (55-64) (P=.03; ES=0.4) and no differences were found in the older age groups compared with population norms. Prevalence of reported symptoms (with any level of concern) was: fatigue (82%); problems with muscular cramps (78%); problems with musculoskeletal pain (72%); problems with edema (70%); skin problems (47%); diarrhea (43%); headache (39%); abdominal discomfort and nausea (28%). Conclusion: This study suggests that while still being on treatment with IM for years, CML patients might expect to have a QoL profile broadly similar to that of general population in many areas. However, role limitations (i.e., in work or other regular daily activities) due to physical health seem the major constraint faced by these patients; there is also an indication that younger patients might be those experiencing major limitations. Additional analyses will be undertaken to ascertain the impact of symptoms and other laboratory and clinical data on specific QoL domains. Such unique patient-reported data supplements conventional information on clinical efficacy of IM and may support both clinicians and patients in making more informed treatment decisions in this area. Disclosures: Rosti: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol M. Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V116.21.2273.2273

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2010

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: British Journal of Haematology, Wiley, Vol. 183, No. 1 ( 2018-10), p. 35-46

Abstract: Ruxolitinib is a JAK 1/2 inhibitor that may control myelofibrosis ( MF )‐related splenomegaly and symptoms and can be prescribed regardless of age. While aging is known to correlate with worse prognosis, no specific analysis is available to confirm that ruxolitinib is suitable for use in older populations. A clinical database was created in 23 European Haematology Centres and retrospective data on 291 MF patients treated with ruxolitinib when aged ≥65 years were analysed in order to assess the impact of age and molecular genotype on responses, toxicities and survival. Additional mutations were evaluated by a next generation sequencing ( NGS ) approach in 69 patients with available peripheral blood samples at the start of ruxolitinib treatment. Compared to older (age 65–74 years) patients, elderly (≥75 years) showed comparable responses to ruxolitinib, but higher rates of drug‐induced anaemia and thrombocytopenia and worse survival. Nonetheless, the ruxolitinib discontinuation rate was comparable in the two age groups. Number and types of molecular abnormalities were comparable across age groups. However, the presence of high molecular risk ( HMR ) mutations significantly affected survival, counterbalancing the effect of aging. Indeed, elderly patients with 〈 2 HMR mutated genes had a comparable survival to older patients with ≥2 HMR mutations. Given that responses were not influenced by age, older age per se should not be a limitation for ruxolitinib administration. NGS analysis of HMR mutations also confirmed a strong predictive value in elderly patients.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0007-1048 , 1365-2141

URL: Issue

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1111/bjh.2018.183.issue-1

DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15497

Language: English

Publisher: Wiley

Publication Date: 2018

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1475751-5

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 2756-2756

Abstract: Abstract 2756 Background: Nilotinib is a potent and selective BCR-ABL inhibitor. The phase 3 ENESTnd trial demonstrated superior efficacy nilotinib vs. imatinib, with higher and faster molecular responses. After 24 months, the rates of progression to accelerated-blastic phase (ABP) were 0.7% and 1.1% with nilotinib 300mg and 400mg BID, respectively, significantly lower compared to imatinib (4.2%). Nilotinib has been approved for the frontline treatment of Ph+ CML. With imatinib 400mg (IRIS trial), the rate of any event and of progression to ABP were higher during the first 3–4 years. Consequently, a confirmation of the durability of responses to nilotinib beyond 3 years is extremely relevant. Aims: To evaluate the long term outcome of patients treated with nilotinib 400mg BID as frontline therapy. Methods: A multicentre phase 2 trial was conducted by the GIMEMA CML WP (ClinicalTrials.gov.NCT00481052). Median 48-month follow-up data for all patients will be presented. Definitions: MR3.0 (Major Molecular Response) as a BCR-ABL/ABL ratio 〈 0,1%IS; MR4.0, undetectable transcript levels with ≥10,000 ABL transcripts; failures: according to the revised ELN recommendations; events: failures and treatment discontinuation for any reason. All the analysis has been made according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results: 73 patients enrolled: median age 51 years; 45% low, 41% intermediate and 14% high Sokal risk. The cumulative incidence of CCgR at 12 months was 100%. CCgR at each milestone: 78%, 96%, 96%, 95%, 92% at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, respectively. The overall estimated probability of MR3.0 was 99%, while the rates of MR3.0 at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months were 52%, 66%, 85%, 81% and 82%, respectively. Two out of 73 patients never achieved a MR3.0, 1 who progressed to AP/BP (see below) and 1 in stable and confirmed CCgR at 36 months. Three pts had a confirmed loss of MR3.0 due to low adherence (all 3 still on nilotinib). The overall estimated probability of MR4.0 was 79%, while the rates of MR4.0 at 12, 24 and 36 months were 12%, 27% and 25%, respectively. One third (21/73 pts) showed a stable MR4.0 (defined based on 3 consecutive MR4.0 samples 4 months apart). Only one patient progressed at 6 months to ABP and subsequently died (high Sokal risk, T315I mutation). Adverse events were mostly grade 1 or 2 and manageable with appropriate dose adaptations. During the first 12 months, the mean daily dose was 600–800mg in 74% of patients. The nilotinib last daily dose was as follows: 800mg in 46 (63%) patients, 600mg in 3 (4%) patients and 400mg in 18 (25%), 6 permanent discontinuations. Detail of discontinuation: 1 patient progressed to ABP; 3 patients had recurrent episodes of amylase and/or lipase increase (no pancreatitis); 1 patient had atrial fibrillation (unrelated to study drug) and 1 patient died after 32 months of mental deterioration and starvation (unrelated to study drug). Two patients are currently on imatinib second-line and 2 on dasatinib third-line. With a median follow-up of 39 months, the estimated probability of overall survival, progression-free survival and failure-free survival was 97%, the estimated probability of event-free survival was 91%. Conclusions: The rate of failures was very low during the first 3 years. Responses remain stable. The high rates of responses achieved during the first 12–18 months are being translated into optimal outcome for most of patients. Acknowledgments: European LeukemiaNet, COFIN, Bologna University, BolognAIL Disclosures: Gugliotta: Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Honoraria. Castagnetti:Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Cuneo:Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Soverini:Novartis: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Saglio:Novartis Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Rosti:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V118.21.2756.2756

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2011

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 3624-3624

Abstract: Background: The presence of peripheral blasts (PB) is a negative prognostic factor in patients (pts) with primary and secondary myelofibrosis (PMF/SMF) and PB ≥4% was associated with a particularly unfavorable prognosis (Masarova L et al, Cancer 2020). Ruxolitinib (RUX) is the JAK1/2 inhibitor most used for treatment of MF-related splenomegaly and symptoms. Its role has not been assessed in correlation with PB. Aims: To evaluate the impact of PB percentage on RUX efficacy and prognosis Methods: After IRB approval, the "RUX-MF" retrospective study collected 804 RUX-treated chronic-phase (CP, defined as PB & lt;10%) pts in 26 Hematology Centers. In 794 pts, PB count was evaluated by morphology at RUX start and correlated with treatment success and outcome. Risk category was assessed according to DIPSS (Passamonti F et al, Blood. 2010). Spleen (SR) and symptoms (SyR) response were assessed using IWG-MRT criteria (Tefferi A et al, Blood. 2013). Comparisons of quantitative variables between the 3 groups were carried out by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests while association between categorical variables was tested by the χ2 test. Variables significantly associated to RUX stop/leukemic transformation (LT)/overall survival (OS) in univariate analysis (Log-rank test) were considered for multivariable analyses, carried out using the Cox regression model, with evaluation of the model's performance in terms of goodness of fit. Results: Pts were categorized according to PB at RUX start: PB-0 (no PB; n. 487, 61.3%), PB-5 (PB 1-5%; n. 283, 35.8%), and PB-9 (PB 6-9%; n. 24, 2.9%). Pts characteristics at RUX start were: median age 68.1y (24-89); males 58.1%; PMF 52.5%; JAK2, CALR and MPL mutated: 80.5%, 13.1% and 2% (4.4% triple negative), high DIPSS: 7.6%; PLT & lt;100/WBC & gt;25 x10 9/l: 10.8%/16.4%; spleen length ≥10 cm: 47.8%, TSS ≥20: 60.6%; ≥1/≥2 high-risk mutation (HMR): 69/18 out of 167 evaluable (41.3%/10.8%); fibrosis grade ≥2: 77.9%; starting/cumulative RUX dose ≥15 mg BID: 61.4%/52.6%. Higher PB count was associated to high DIPSS risk (PB-0: 1.9%, PB-5: 16.2%, PB-9: 21.7%, p & lt;0.001), PLT & lt;100 x10 9/l (PB-0: 17.6%, PB-5: 15.1%, PB-9: 26.1%, p & lt;0.001), fibrosis grade ≥2 (PB-0: 73.3%, PB-5: 84.2%, PB-9: 100%, p & lt;0.001), spleen length ≥10 cm (PB-0: 43%, PB-5: 55.1%, PB-9: 59.1%, p=0.003). At 3 and 6 mos, 26.9% and 30.4% of evaluable pts achieved a SR, while 59.7% and 68.1% were in SyR, respectively. At 3 mos, SR (PB-0: 31.8%, PB-5: 20.6%, PB-9: 10%, p=0.001) and SyR (PB-0: 62.9%, PB-5: 55.5%, PB-9: 36.8%, p=0.02) were less frequently achieved by PB-5 and PB-9 pts compared to PB-0 pts. This association remained significant for SR at 6 mos (PB-0: 35%, PB-5: 23.9%, PB-9: 14.3%, p=0.006) and for both SR (p=0.003) and SyR (p=0.01) at any time. After a median RUX exposure of 1.5 y (0.1-8.9), 491 (61.8%) pts stopped RUX, 110 (13.9%) had a LT and 365 (46%) died. In univariate analysis, at 2y PB-9 pts had higher rates of RUX stop (73.9% vs 40.8% and 34.3% in PB-5 and PB-0 pts, log-rank p & lt;0.001) and LT (38.5% vs 10.2% and 6.2% in PB-5 and PB-0 pts, log-rank p=0.003). Median survival times of PB-0, PB-5 and PB-9 patients were 5.8, 4.9 and 2 years, respectively (log-rank p & lt;0.001) (Figure 1). In multivariable analysis, PB-9 pts confirmed their association with: 1) RUX stop (HR 3.74, 95%CI 1.51-3.70, p & lt;0.001), with TSS & gt;20 (HR 1.66, 95%CI 1.05-2.61, p=0.03), and HMR≥2 (HR 2.69, 95%CI 1.26-4.47, p=0.007); 2) LT (HR 3.71, 95%CI 1.71-8.04, p & lt;0.001), with HMR≥2 (HR 7.10, 95%CI 2.28-22.1, p & lt;0.001); 3) OS (HR 2.40, 95%CI 1.60-3.60, p & lt;0.001), with age≥65 (HR 2.31, 95%CI 1.17-4.57, p=0.02) and HMR≥2 (HR 3.21, 95%CI 1.67-6.20, p & lt;0.001). Unfavorable association with LT and OS was confirmed also in patients with HMR≥1. Conclusions: CP-MF pts with PB & gt;5% have a worse response to RUX and a worse outcome. Personalized approaches beyond RUX monotherapy may be useful in this context. Further clinical trials evaluating combination strategies and new drugs are required. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Palandri: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AOP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sierra Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI: Consultancy. Abruzzese: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Iurlo: Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Bonifacio: Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Cuneo: AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Pane: AbbVie; Amgen; Novartis: Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Novartis Pharma SAS;: Research Funding; AbbVie; Amgen; Novartis, GSK , Incyte: Consultancy; AbbVie; Amgen; Novartis, GSK, Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Lemoli: Celgene: Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel; Jazz, Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo, Servier: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Cavo: Bristol-Myers Squib: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Accommodations, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Breccia: Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-152420

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2021

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 102, No. 3 ( 2003-08-01), p. 1035-1041

Abstract: Different biologic features have been associated with a more or less aggressive clinical course in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In the present study, 20 patients with highly stable CLL observed at a single institution over a period of 10 to 23 years and who never required treatment were extensively characterized. The aim was to identify a distinct and reproducible biologic profile associated with disease stability that may be used to recognize at presentation CLL patients who are likely to have a very benign clinical course and for whom treatment is not indicated. The results obtained indicate that numerous parameters are closely associated with disease stability: a typical CLL morphology and immunophenotype, the lack of expression of the CD38 antigen, the mutated immunoglobulin (Ig) heavy (H) chain variable (V) pattern, the absence of p53 mutations, a CD4/CD8 ratio more than 1, the lack of 17p and 11q deletions and of complex karyotypic aberrations, and the occurrence of the 13q14 deletion. No case displayed the VH3-21 gene, linked in mutated CLL with a poor outcome. In addition, the VH1-69 gene associated with unmutated CLL cases was never detected. These biologic features were coupled with an indolent clinical course characterized by an unmodified clinical stage over time, and by lack of autoimmune phenomena and of major infections requiring parental antibiotics. At a time when aggressive therapeutic strategies are always more frequently used in the management of CLL, the distinctive features of patients with long-lived stable disease should be prospectively identified at presentation.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-12-3639

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2003

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7