Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: Annals of Hematology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 102, No. 10 ( 2023-10), p. 2741-2752

Abstract: The approved dose of bosutinib in chronic phase CML is 400 mg QD in first-line and 500 mg QD in later-line treatment. However, given that gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity typically occurs early after treatment initiation, physicians often tend to start therapy with lower doses although this has never been tested systematically in prospective trials in the Western world. The Bo sutinib Do se Optimization (BODO) Study, a multicenter phase II study, investigated the tolerability and efficacy of a step-in dosing concept of bosutinib (starting at 300 mg QD) in chronic phase CML patients in 2 nd or 3 rd line who were intolerant and/or refractory to previous TKI treatment. Of 57 patients included until premature closure of the study due to slow recruitment, 34 (60%) reached the targeted dose level of 500 mg QD following the 2-weekly step-in dosing regimen. While the dosing-in concept failed to reduce GI toxicity (grade II–IV, primary study endpoint) to  〈  40% (overall rate of 60%; 95% CI: 45–74%), bosutinib treatment (mean dosage: 403 mg/day) showed remarkable efficacy with a cumulative major molecular remission (MMR) rate of 79% (95% CI: 66 to 88%) at month 24. Of thirty patients refractory to previous therapy and not in MMR at baseline, 19 (64%) achieved an MMR during treatment. GI toxicity did not significantly impact on patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and led to treatment discontinuation in only one patient. Overall, the results of our trial support the efficacy and safety of bosutinib after failure of second-generation TKI pre-treatment. Trial registration: NCT02577926.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0939-5555 , 1432-0584

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05394-0

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2023

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1458429-3

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 140, No. Supplement 1 ( 2022-11-15), p. 12194-12196

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2022-164607

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2022

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 3608-3608

Abstract: Introduction: The licenced starting dose of bosutinib is 400 mg QD for first line therapy and 500 mg QD in later lines in CML. Gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AE) are observed in up to 90% in similar patient cohorts (BYOND, Hochhaus et al; Leukemia 2020). The goal of this study was to evaluate whether a bosutinib step-in dosing regimen decreases GI toxicity while maintaining optimal efficacy in patients (pts) with CML after failure or intolerance to 2G-TKIs. Methods: This is the first and final analysis of the BODO "Bosutinib Dose Optimization Study" trial (NCT02577926), which is a multicenter, open-label single arm phase II study testing tolerability and efficacy of 2 nd & 3 rd line bosutinib step-in dosing in chronic phase CML pts intolerant and/or refractory to previous imatinib, and/or nilotinib, and/or dasatinib therapy. Bosutinib was commenced with 300 mg QD and was (in the absence of & gt;G1 toxicities) dose-increased by increments of 100 mg daily dosing every 14 days if applicable up to a maximum dose of 500 mg QD. The primary endpoint (PE) was the incidence of grade 2 to 4 GI toxicity AEs within 6 months after registration. 127 pts were planned to be recruited. However, due to slow recruitment, the trial had to be stopped prematurely after inclusion of 57 pts. The 95% confidence interval (CI) around the estimated rate of the PE was calculated in accordance with Clopper and Pearson. Results: Pts´ characteristics are presented in Table 1. 23 (40.4%) pts were intolerant, 20 resistant (35.1%), and 14 (24.6%) both intolerant and resistant to previous TKI treatment. 20 (35.1%) pts entered the study in molecular response (at least MMR at screening). The probability of MMR after 24 months of treatment was 79% (95% CI: 65.8% to 87.5%); probabilities of MMR, MR4, MR4.5 are shown in Figure 1. Six out of 7 intolerant pts without MMR at baseline reached MMR or better molecular response with bosutinib. Thirty pts were refractory to previous therapy (19 being resistant; 11 being resistant and intolerant) lacking baseline MMR, of which 19 pts achieved MMR or better (2 pts with MR4.5, 2 with MR4 and 15 with MMR). Eight out of 30 pts did not achieve MMR and 3 experienced complications (2 pts with SAEs that led to discontinuation and 1 death). No patient progressed to accelerated/blast phase on treatment. Two pts died (1 CML progression (no MMR with bosutinib, death 6 months after allogenic stem cell transplant); 1 cerebral cavernoma unrelated to bosutinib). In the overall patient population (N = 57), all pts had ≥1 any grade TEAE and 71.9% of patients had ≥1 grade 3/4 TEAE. SAEs occurred in 28.1% of pts. A total of 949 AEs were reported during the study. The most frequently reported AEs (SOC terms) were GI disorders (n=346, 36.5%) and investigations (n=206, 21.7%). Among the GI events (n=346) diarrhea (55.5%), nausea (16.2%) and abdominal pain (9.8%) were most common; among investigations (n=206) liver enzyme increases were most frequent (ALT increase (26.7%), AST increase 17%). The PE was evaluated for 50 out of 57 pts (4 pts with treatment & lt; 14 days + 3 pts with observation & lt; 6 months were excluded from the analysis). Twenty pts did not develop any clinically relevant GI-toxicity during the first 6 months. Thus, the rate of GI-toxicity (grade 2 to 4) within the first 6 months of treatment was 60.0% (95% confidence interval: 45.2% to 73.6%), accordingly, the alternative hypothesis of the trial (GI-toxicity was assumed to be less than 40%) could not be accepted. However, only in 1 patient GI-toxicity led to discontinuation. Twenty-five pts discontinued bosutinib prematurely (17 due to AEs; 5 with insufficient response; 3 with other reasons). Conclusion: This is 1 of the largest cohorts published on the efficacy and safety of bosutinib after intolerance/failure to first-line 2G-TKIs. Given the limitations of a single-arm study with incomplete recruitment, we could not demonstrate an advantage of the step-in dosing concept chosen here to reduce the frequency of grade 2-4 GI toxicity overall. However, using this regimen, bosutinib was able to induce optimal responses in almost two thirds of pts previously resistant to 2G-TKIs while GI toxicity rarely led to treatment discontinuation. We conclude that treatment with bosutinib is safe (rates of AEs being similar to other trials (e.g. BYOND)) and efficacious as 2 nd and 3 rd line therapy after failure of previous 2G-TKI therapy whereas an advantage of run-in dosing regimens remains to be proven. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Isfort: Mundipharma: Other: Travel reimbursement; Amgen: Other: Travel reimbursement; Roche: Other: Travel reimbursement; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hexal: Other: Travel reimbursement; Alexion: Other: Travel reimbursement; BMS: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel reimbursement; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel reimbursement. Wolf: Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS-Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; GEMOAB: Honoraria. Teichmann: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Crysandt: Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Burchert: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; AOP Orphan: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Hochhaus: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Saussele: Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria. Kiani: Novartis Pharma GmbH: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Göthert: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel reimbursement; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel reimbursement; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel reimbursement; Proteros Biostructures: Consultancy; AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: Travel reimbursement; zr pharma & : Honoraria. Schafhausen: Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Blueprint Medicines: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brümmendorf: Novartis: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Repeat Diagnostics: Research Funding; Takepart Media: Honoraria.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-151240

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2021

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Drug Delivery and Translational Research, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 13, No. 4 ( 2023-04), p. 915-923

Abstract: Despite the introduction of multiple new drugs and combination therapies, conventional dexamethasone remains a cornerstone in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). Its application is, however, limited by frequent adverse effects of which the increased infection rate may have the strongest clinical impact. The efficacy-safety ratio of dexamethasone in MM may be increased by encapsulation in long-circulating PEG-liposomes, thereby both enhancing drug delivery to MM lesions and reducing systemic corticosteroid exposure. We evaluated the preliminary safety and feasibility of a single intravenous (i.v.) infusion of pegylated liposomal dexamethasone phosphate (Dex-PL) in heavily pretreated relapsing or progressive symptomatic MM patients within a phase I open-label non-comparative interventional trial at two dose levels. In the 7 patients that were enrolled (prior to having to close the study prematurely due to slow recruitment), Dex-PL was found to be well tolerated and, as compared to conventional dexamethasone, no new or unexpected adverse events were detected. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed high and persisting concentrations of dexamethasone in the circulation for over a week after i.v. administration, likely caused by the long-circulation half-life of the liposomes that retain dexamethasone as the inactive phosphate prodrug form, something which could significantly limit systemic exposure to the active parent drug. Thus, despite the limitations of this small first-in-man trial, Dex-PL seems safe and well tolerated without severe side effects. Follow-up studies are needed to confirm this in a larger patient cohort and to evaluate if i.v. Dex-PL can provide a safer and more efficacious dexamethasone treatment option for MM. Graphical Abstract

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 2190-393X , 2190-3948

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1007/s13346-022-01268-6

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2023

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2590155-2

SSG: 15,3

In: Annals of Hematology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 102, No. 2 ( 2023-02), p. 349-358

Abstract: Patients (pts) with polycythemia vera (PV) suffer from pruritus, night sweats, and other symptoms, as well as from thromboembolic complications and progression to post-PV myelofibrosis. Ruxolitinib (RUX) is approved for second-line therapy in high-risk PV pts with hydroxyurea intolerance or resistance. The RuxoBEAT trial (NCT02577926, registered on October 1, 2015, at clinicaltrials.gov) is a multicenter, open-label, two-arm phase-IIb trial with a target population of 380 pts with PV or ET, randomized to receive RUX or best available therapy. This pre-specified futility analysis assesses the early clinical benefit and tolerability of RUX in previously untreated PV pts (6-week cytoreduction was allowed). Twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive RUX. Compared to baseline, after 6 months of treatment, there was a significant reduction of median hematocrit (46 to 41%), the median number of phlebotomies per year (4.0 to 0), and median patient-reported pruritus scores (2 to 1), and a trend for reduced night sweat scores (1.5 to 0). JAK2V617F allele burden, as part of the scientific research program, also significantly decreased. One hundred nine adverse events (AEs) occurred in 24/28 patients (all grade 1 to 3), and no pt permanently discontinued treatment because of AEs. Thus, treatment with ruxolitinib in untreated PV pts is feasible, well-tolerated, and efficient regarding the above-mentioned endpoints.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0939-5555 , 1432-0584

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00277-022-05080-7

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2023

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1458429-3

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 4292-4292

Abstract: Introduction: Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) represent a heterogeneous group of hematological malignancies which differ in various aspects such as clinical manifestation, underlying genetic aberrations, cytomorphological features and life expectancy. However, across all subtypes, patients (pts) with MPN often suffer from severe symptoms, resulting in an impairment of the quality of life (QoL). Methods: The German Study Group for MPN (GSG-MPN) Bioregistry is a non-interventional prospective study including pts of at least 18 years with diagnosis of Ph-negative MPN according to WHO criteria (2008) having provided written informed consent. The Bioregistry study also includes assessment of QoL at baseline and on an annual basis, with all pts completing the standardized MPN-SAF-TSS questionnaire (German version) and an additional item indicating pts' subjective overall QoL on an 11-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 0 to 90 and were calculated if at least 6 items were answered (Emanuel RM et al., J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30 (33): 4098-103.)). Clinical variables, as documented in the registry, included comorbidities, reported symptoms as assessed by the physician, bleeding, and thromboembolic events (TEE). For statistical analysis, standard descriptive methods, Spearman correlation coefficient, Wilcoxon test/Kruskal-Wallis test for significance testing, and Kendall´s tau-b statistics were used. Results: 1,403 pts who had completed at least six items of the QoL assessment at baseline were included in this analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 58 years (interquartile range [IQR] 22), 98% were Caucasian, 50% were female. 494 pts were diagnosed with essential thrombocythemia (ET, 35%), 444 pts with polycythemia vera (PV, 32%), 302 pts with primary myelofibrosis (PMF, 22%), 83 pts with MPN-unclassifiable (MPNu, 6%), 43 pts with post-ET-myelofibrosis (pET-MF, 3%) and 37 pts with post-PV-myelofibrosis (pPV-MF, 3%). The most common complaint reported via the MPN-SAF-TSS was fatigue, occurring in more than 80% of the pts in all entities except MPNu (77%). More than 50 % of pts in each entity reported to suffer from early satiety, night sweats, concentration problems, or overall impairment of QoL. Table 1 summarizes all 9 symptoms and overall QoL from the questionnaire categorized by entity. Interestingly, the pts suffering from PET-MF reported the highest symptom burden, while PPV-MF pts showed the lowest overall symptom burden (median total QoL score of 23 vs. 16; p=0.01). The strongest correlations among the different symptoms were seen for fatigue and overall QoL (Spearman´s rho 0.57, p 〈 0.001) as well as concentration problems and overall QoL (Spearman´s rho 0.33, p 〈 0.001). Furthermore, the impact of variables such as age, comorbidities and TEE on QoL was assessed. Abdominal discomfort increased with age (rho = -0.14, p 〈 0.001). A history of TEE before baseline assessment correlated significantly with fatigue scores (Spearman rho= 0.07, p 〈 0.01) and with concentration problems (rho=0.07, p 〈 0.01). With an increasing number of TEE, scores for both of these items worsened over time (p 〈 0.01, respectively). Moreover, MPN-total score (MPN-TSS) was higher in pts with more comorbidities (Median: 18 (IQR:23), and 25 (27) for pts with 〈 3 versus ≥3 comorbidities, respectively, p= 0.017). Next, we compared data on 5 of the pts symptoms (reported in the questionnaire) to their assessment by the treating physician (only 5 items were available both in the questionnaire and in our registry database) in order to understand whether the "physician´s opinion" is congruent with the patient´s reported outcome in the questionnaire. While there were clear associations between the two data sources, there were also significant discrepancies, e.g., the physician did not indicate fatigue in about 20% of pts with self-assessed fatigue score of 〉 =6 points. The most concordant symptom was night sweats (further details in table 2). Conclusions: Most MPN pts suffer from a significant symptom burden which impairs their QoL. TEE influence fatigue and concentration problems. The perception of symptoms (particularly with respect to fatigue) differs between pts and treating physician which suggests that questionnaires should be used on a routine basis in order to faithfully reflect patient´s degree of suffering from MPN and/or treatment. Disclosures Isfort: Amgen: Other: i.e. travel support; Mundipharma: Other: i.e. travel support; Roche: Other: i.e. travel support; Incyte/Ariad: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: i.e. travel support; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: i.e. travel support; Alexion: Other: i.e. travel support; Hexal: Other: i.e. travel support. Stegelmann:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Al-Ali:Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Goethert:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: i.e. travel support; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: i.e. travel support; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Proteros Biostructures: Honoraria; AOP Orphan: Other: i.e. travel support. Haenel:Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Platzbecker:Celgene: Research Funding. Griesshammer:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Brümmendorf:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-99-112377

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2018

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 136, No. Supplement 1 ( 2020-11-5), p. 41-42

Abstract: Introduction Recent studies indicate that particularly in a subgroup of younger patients, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) develops due to an inherited genetic predisposition linked to mutations in genes such as ANKRD26, SAMD9, SAMD9-L, GATA-2, genes causing telomere biology disorders or Shwachman-Diamond syndrome. However, the prevalence of so-called "AML predisposition syndromes" (APS) underlying newly diagnosed cases with AML is unknown. Actual screening strategies for APS are based on the family history and clinical/genetic features. There is growing evidence that APS frequently manifest themselves with an oligosymptomatic phenotype or are lacking specific symptoms altogether. Furthermore, molecular analysis of the clonal population without additional analysis of non-clonal cells do not allow the discrimination between inherited and acquired changes. Thus, new approaches to identify the subset of patients with underlying APS in adult newly diagnosed AML patients are needed. One frequent feature observed in APS is younger age at the time of diagnosis and the initial presence of an aberrant karyotype. Along this line, we retrospectively screened the German SAL-AML registry using age and the presence of an aberrant karyotype as pre-defining parameters to analyze the prevalence of APS in this selected cohort. Patients and methods The database of the German SAL-AML registry includes over 5207 patients with AML. We screened for patients below 35 years of age and with any type of numerical or structural chromosomal aberration at first diagnosis. DNA samples of patients achieving cytological remission (CR) and available samples of peripheral blood or bone marrow were selected. CR samples were chosen to reduce potential contamination by malignant AML blasts. Patients were screened for pathogenic variants using a self-designed NGS panel containing the entire coding sequences of ACD, ANKRD26, CTC1, DDX41, DKC1, ERCC6, ETV6, GATA1, GATA2, LIG4, NHP2, NOP10, PARN, POT1, RPA1, RPL11, RPL15, RPL26, RPL35A, RPL5, RPS10, RPS17, RPS19, RPS24, RPS26, RPS7, RTEL1, SAMD9, SAMD9L, SBDS, SRP72, TERC, TERF1, TERF2, TERT, TINF2, TPP1 and WRAP53. An inherited variant was considered in all patients with a variant allele frequency between 40-60% for heterozygous variants and & gt;90% for homozygous ones. To analyze the functional consequence of SAMD9 variants, proliferation assays with HEK293 cells transfected with the respective identified variant was carried out. Results and discussion On the basis of the inclusion criteria mentioned above, we were able to identify 41 patients. All cases except one were considered de novo AML by the treating physicians and received an anthracycline/cytarabine based induction chemotherapy. Mean age of the 41 patients was 26 ± 5 years (mean ± S.D.). Predominant karyotypic aberration were abnormalities of chromosome 8 (18/41) as well as a complex aberrant karyotype (29/41). NGS analysis revealed five different heterozygous mutations in approx. 10% (4/41) of patients: GATA2 c.1009C & gt;T p.(Arg337Ter), SBDS c.183_184delInsCT and c.258+2T & gt;C (both mutations in the same patient), TINF2 c.848C & gt;A p.(Pro283His), SAMD9 c.2854G & gt;C p.(Gly952Arg). The variants in GATA2, SBDS and TINF2 are known to be pathogenic. For SAMD9, in vitro experiments showed increased inhibition of cell growth compared to wild-type supporting the pathogenicity of the mutation. Focusing on the clinical outcome, 50% (2/4) of the identified APS patients received allogeneic transplantation during follow-up compared to 65% (24/37) in the group without detectable mutations. Median survival in the APS group was significantly shorter with 3.2 months compared to 105.3 months in the remaining 37 AML patients (p & lt;0.001). Conclusions Using age and karyotype as selection criteria, we were able to identify an inherited APS in 10% of newly diagnosed AML patients below 35 years with chromosomal aberrations reaching CR. Obviously, our study is limited by rather stringent inclusion criteria not allowing overall conclusions on the incidence of APS in newly diagnosed AML. However, age and karyotype might provide simple clinical parameters to trigger genetic screening for inherited APS in addition to the actual recommendations. Given the significant difference in survival in patients with and without underlying APS, our study clearly supports inclusion of screening for APS in this cohort pending prospective validation. Figure Disclosures Röllig: Amgen, Astellas, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Roche: Consultancy; Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Müller-Tidow:Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag GmbH: Speakers Bureau; BiolineRx: Research Funding. Panse:Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grunenthal: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apellis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brümmendorf:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodation, Expenses, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Jost:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Other: travel support; JAZZ: Other: travel support.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2020-142815

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2020

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 1522-1522

Abstract: Abstract 1522 Introduction Dose calculation of chemotherapeutic agents is mainly based on body surface area (BSA). Historically, in many institutions, doses are not adapted to a BSA above 2 sqm, although recent data suggested that this relative dose reduction in patients above 2 sqm is associated with a worse outcome. Obesity is a widespread and increasing phenomenon in the developed countries and is mainly defined by the body mass index (BMI). It is known, that the risk to develop haematological or solid malignancies is increased in obese patients – and, additionally, weight influences outcome in several tumours. Therefore, in our study, we analyzed the prognostic impact of obesity in newly diagnosed AML regarding the response to the first cycle of induction therapy and overall survival. Methods We identified 145 patients with newly diagnosed AML who were treated with induction therapy containing cytarabine and an anthracycline in our institution. Clinical data including several laboratory parameters associated with nutritional status (cholesterol, triglycerides, protein, C-reactive protein, albumin, lymphocyte count, transferrin, pseudo-cholinesterase, fT3, b-type natriuretic peptide), long-term medication with statins, chemotherapy dosing as well as response and overall survival have been assessed retrospectively from the institution's database. In our institution, all patients with a high BSA received a chemotherapy-dose calculated with a cut-off of not more than 2 sqm. Results In our cohort, median BMI was 25.2 kg/sqm (range 17.0 – 48.1). Seventeen patients had a BMI above 31 kg/sqm, 128 below. The median BSA of all patients was 1.83 sqm (range 1.49 – 2.40). In 41 patients, chemotherapy doses have been adjusted owing to a BSA of more than 2 sqm. We included cytogenetic risk group, BMI, BSA above 2.0 sqm, weight, long-term medication with statins and laboratory parameters in our univariate and multivariate analysis. Only cytogenetic risk group (p=0.001), triglycerides (p=0.008) and the BMI (p=0.032) were independent risk factors for overall survival. Univariate analysis showed similar results. Patients with a BMI 〉 31 showed a significantly worse response (PR + CR) on first induction therapy (47.1% vs. 74.8%, p=0.018) and a shorter median survival (11.2 vs. 25.1 months, p=0.004). Both BMI-groups showed the same distribution of well-known risk factors including age, cytogenetic risk groups and secondary AML. Discussion/Conclusion In our cohort, a high BMI was associated with poorer response and impaired overall survival, whereas BSA was not. This leads to the conclusion, that the adverse effect may be mediated by obesity itself and not caused by underdosing of chemotherapy. Although an effect of BMI is known from several solid tumours, the reason remains unclear. Possible explanations include altered metabolisation and production of growth factors in adipose tissue (possibly indicated by elevated triglycerides), impaired or accelerated hepatic drug activation and/or metabolisation or impact on immune function. This study is limited by the retrospective single-center design and the relatively small patient number. Nevertheless, the data clearly confirmed other well established risk factors like the cytogenetic risk group supporting the validity of this approach. The study results suggest BMI as an independent risk factor for AML. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V120.21.1522.1522

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2012

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 5063-5063

Abstract: Abstract 5063 Background. There are limited options in the treatment of myelofibrosis with currently no licensed pharmaceutical agent in Germany. In addition to off-label treatment with hydroxyurea and similar drugs, participation in a clinical trial or a compassionate use program remain an important alternative for many patients (pts). In order to participate in one of these trials, pts usually have to stand the test of a long list of inclusion/exclusion criteria which in many cases prevents participation. Aim. The aim of our analysis was to investigate the reasons for which pts were not eligible for phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials for myelofibrosis. Methods. Clinical data of 21 pts presenting in our clinic during the past year were evaluated regarding six different clinical study protocols (phase II-III). Four of them were active and open for enrollment during this time (NCT01437787, NCT00949364, NCT01178281, NCT01493414) and two trials were screened retrospectively having had a major impact in this field (NCT00952289, NCT00934544). Inclusion/exclusion criteria as reported at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov were split into 6 different categories (specific disease criteria, non-hematologic laboratory abnormalities [serum chemistry/coagulation], hematologic laboratory abnormalities, patients« performance status, concomitant disease, and concomitant medication). Each patient was evaluated with respect to each trial. The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), a tool to measure comorbidity, measuring the chronic medical illness burden while taking into account the severity of chronic diseases, was used for quantification of pts comorbidities. Results. While a watch-and-wait strategy was indicated in two of 21 pts according to ELN Guidelines [Barbui et al JCO 2011], treatment was indicated in 19 of these 21 pts. Each of these 19 pts demonstrated a median of five (range: 0 – 16) criteria that prevented this patient from entering one of the trials, each patient being potentially eligible for a median of 2 trials (range 0–6). Only one patient could have been included in all of the trials, 14 pts. could have entered at least one trial. In table 1, the number of patients missing participation per protocol and category is listed. Summarizing all protocols, the most common reasons for ineligibility were specific disease criteria (not yet in need of transfusions, low Cervantes Score, etc) (37% of patients), concomitant diseases (23%), concomitant medication (10%), non-hematological laboratory abnormalities (17%), hematological abnormalities (12%) while a poor performance status prohibited enrollment only in one case (1%). As most patients with myelofibrosis in need of treatment are older than 60 years and therefore are more likely to have concomitant diseases (the median CIRS Score of all patients was 7 (range 1–12) with an average of 4. 2 concomitant pharmaceuticals per person, some trials may miss the patient population in urgent need for improvement of therapeutic strategy. Surprisingly, only 2 pts were excluded for both reasons (concomitant disease and concomitant medication) from the same trial, implying that the concomitant medication itself seems to exclude candidates. Summary and Conclusions. In our series, 74% of pts with myelofibrosis failed to meet the formal inclusion/exclusion criteria of six clinical trials evaluating JAK inhibitors or IMIDs. Since some drug combinations may raise concerns about patients' safety, more expanded access clinical trials are needed to provide specific data on drug interactions and the impact of specific disease comorbidities in order to allow a critical and quantifiable assessment of the risks and benefits of treatment in this patient population. Disclosures: Brümmendorf: Bristol Myer Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Patent on the use of imatinib and hypusination: Patents & Royalties. Koschmieder:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Travel support, Grant support Other; Novartis Foundation: Support of Professorship at Aachen university, Support of Professorship at Aachen university Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, Travel support, Grant support, Travel support, Grant support Other; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau, Travel support, Travel support Other; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau, Travel support Other; Shire: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau, Travel support, Travel support Other; Glaxo Smith Kline: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau, Travel support Other.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V120.21.5063.5063

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2012

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 2944-2944

Abstract: Introduction: Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by expansion of the granulocytic, erythrocytic, and megakaryocytic lineages in the bone marrow and peripheral blood, and in most cases, by the presence of a JAK2 mutation. Survival of patients with PV is decreased compared with age-matched controls, and this is mainly due to thromboembolic complications followed by progression to post-PV myelofibrosis and acute leukemia. While no curative treatment exists, cytoreductive treatment with hydroxyurea (HU) or ropeginterferon is approved in EU for first-line therapy, and ruxolitinib (RUX) is approved in EU and US for second-line therapy in patients with HU intolerance or resistance. The current futility analysis assesses the efficacy of ruxolitinib in newly-diagnosed PV treated within the Ruxo-BEAT trial. Methods: This clinical trial entitled "Ruxolitinib versus Best Available Therapy in patients with high-risk Polycythemia Vera or high-risk Essential Thrombocythemia" (Ruxo-BEAT; NCT02577926) is a multicenter, open-label, two-arm phase-IIb trial with a target population of 380 pts with PV and ET. Patients in first-line PV and in first and later lines ET are randomized in a 1:1 manner to receive either RUX or best available therapy (BAT). Crossover from BAT to RUX is possible in eligible patients after 6 months. Patients with PV in the RUX arm receive a starting dose of 10 mg bid and may increase their dose up to 20 mg bid. Primary endpoint is the rate of complete clinicohematologic response rate (CHR) at month 6 as defined by Barosi et al Blood 2009. Secondary endpoints include differences in the absence of phlebotomies, spleen size, patient-reported outcomes, and survival. This is a pre-specified futility analysis of RUX in the PV arm, after 50 PV patients had been enrolled. Of the 50 patients, 28 patients with newly-diagnosed PV were randomized into the RUX arm and were analyzed (a maximum of 6 weeks of HU, anagrelide, or interferon therapy was allowed). The PV arm would have to be closed if no favorable trend were observed for RUX for any of the following variables: (1) improvement (decrease) in the hematocrit level during 6 months of treatment, (2) improvement (decrease) of the JAK2V617F allele burden during 6 months of treatment, or (3) improvement of one of the following three symptom variables assessed by physician´s judgement or via MPN Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) during 6 months of treatment: pruritus, night sweats, or bone pain. Differences between screening (Hct) or baseline (all other variables) and end of month 6 (all variables) were calculated using Fisher´s exact test (for physician-assessed pruritus and night sweats) or the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test (all other variables). Results: 28 patients received RUX for at least 6 months. After 6 months, the mean hematocrit level decreased from 45.9+/-5.6% to 41.0+/-5.0% (mean+/-SD) (p=0.0003). The number of phlebotomies calculated per year decreased from 4.2+/-3.9% to 0.96+/-2.1 (p=0.0009). Mean JAK2V617F allele burden decreased from 50.2+/28.4% to 44.0+/-28.5% (p=0.0039). The percentage of patients, as assessed by the physician, with pruritus or night sweats decreased from 41% to 26% (trending with p=0.13), and from 30% to 11% (p=0.02), respectively. The points reported by patients themselves on the MPN-SAF survey for pruritus decreased from 2.7+/-3.0 to 1.3+/-1.5 (p=0.0095) and there was a strong trend for reduction of night sweat points (from 3.1+/-3.6 to 1.6+/-2.4; p=0.0579), while the points for bone pain remained unaltered (2.0+/-2.8 to 1.4+/-2.2; p=0.215). Conclusion: Treatment with ruxolitinib in first line PV is efficient regarding the above-mentioned endpoints. Recruitment of our trial will be ongoing. In order not to weaken the study´s statistical power, comparison of both arms was not performed. Disclosures Koschmieder: Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Foundation: Research Funding; CTI: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AOP Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Isfort:Mundipharma: Other: Travel reimbursement; Amgen: Other: Travel reimbursement; Hexal: Other: Travel reimbursement; BMS: Honoraria; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel reimbursement; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel reimbursement; Roche: Other: Travel reimbursement; Alexion: Other: Travel reimbursement. Schafhausen:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria. Griesshammer:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Platzbecker:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Döhner:CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Jost:Abbvie: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: Royalty payments for the drug compound ABT-199, Research Funding; Bohringer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other: Travel Support; Novartis: Research Funding. von Bubnoff:Novartis: Research Funding. Stegelmann:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria. Crysandt:Amgem: Other: travel grant; celgene: Other: travel grant; Pfizer: Other: travel grant; Gilead: Other: travel grant; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gezer:AMGEM: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brümmendorf:Merck: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen: Employment; Janssen: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Ruxolitinib as first-line treatment in newly-diagnosed PV

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-123985

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7