Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Kodama, Kazuhisa  (2)
  • Sawamura, Tadashi  (2)
  • Takagi, Daisuke  (2)
  • Yamamuro, Megumi  (2)
Type of Medium
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
  • 1
    In: Circulation, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 142, No. Suppl_4 ( 2020-11-17)
    Abstract: Background: Extracorporeal CPR (E-CPR) is a lifesaving method for refractory cardiac arrest (CA), and IABP has been often used as the additional circulatory support. However, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) increase damaged left ventricular (LV) afterload. The percutaneous microaxial pump, IMPELLA, can reduce damaged LV preload and afterload with circulatory support. Concomitant use of VA-ECMO and IMPELLA (ECPELLA) may have significant effect on clinical outcome. Objective: This study is to evaluate the effects of ECPELLA on clinical outcome of patients with out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) or CA at the emergency room (ERCA) who underwent E-CPR. Method: We retrospectively reviewed 140 consecutive patients who underwent E-CPR from January 2012 through May 2020 in our institute. Seventy-four in-hospital CA patients were excluded, and 66 patients with OHCA or ERCA were recruited. Patients were divided into three groups ECEPLLA (n=13), ECMO with IABP (n=40), and ECMO alone (n=13). The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoint was good neurological outcome at hospital discharge defined as cerebral performance categories (CPC) of 1 or 2. Result: There were no significant differences in age, sex, OHCA, acute coronary syndrome in all three groups. The rate of shockable rhythm was higher in the ECPELLA and ECMO with IABP groups than ECMO alone. ECPELLA had the shortest time from CA to ECMO support compared with other groups. The 30-day survival and favorable neurological prognosis rates were significantly higher in the ECPELLA group, compared with other groups (ECPELLA: 61% vs. IABP: 18% vs. ECMO alone: 15%; P=0.008, ECPELLA: 38% vs. IABP: 8% vs. ECMO alone: 8%; P=0.03). Multivariate cox regression analysis including age, sex, time from CA to ECMO support and ECPELLA revealed that age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36 (10 years increase), 95% confidence interval [CI] , 1.11-1.67, P=0.04), male (HR, 2.42, 95%CI, 1.04-5.66, P=0.04), time from CA to ECMO support (HR, 1.01, 95%CI, 1.01-1.03, P=0.04), and ECPELLA (HR, 0.35, 95%CI, 0.13-0.91, P=0.03) were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Conclusion: ECPELLA could improve 30-day mortality and neurological outcome in OHCA or ERCA patients who underwent E-CPR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0009-7322 , 1524-4539
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1466401-X
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Circulation, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 142, No. Suppl_4 ( 2020-11-17)
    Abstract: Background: Extracorporeal CPR (E-CPR) using a veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) is effective for patients with refractory cardiac arrest. Intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) is often combined with VA-ECMO to increase coronary perfusion. However, this combination significantly increases left ventricular afterload. Recent studies showed VA-ECMO combined with IMPELLA pump (ECPELLA) had beneficial effect on refractory cardiogenic shock. Objective: Evaluate outcome of ECPELLA patients who underwent E-CPR as compared to ECMO with IABP. Method: We retrospectively reviewed 140 consecutive patients who underwent E-CPR from January 2012 through May 2020 in our institute. Thirty-eight patients who received ECMO alone were excluded, and 102 patients were recruited. Twenty-four patients underwent ECPELLA (ECPELLA group) and 78 patients underwent ECMO with IABP (IABP group). The 30-day survival rate and the rate of grades 1 and 2 Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) as the neurological prognosis were assessed. Result: ECPELLA group showed significantly shorter time from cardiac arrest to ECMO placement compared to IABP group (24 min [IQR; 13-41] vs. 49 min [IQR; 28-75] ; P=0.0003). The rate of favorable neurological prognosis were significantly higher in the ECPELLA group (38% vs. 13% ; P=0.01). The 30-day all-cause mortality of ECPELLA was significantly lower than IABP (P=0.005 by log-rank test). Multivariate cox proportional hazard analysis including the age, Out of hospital cardiac arrest, shockable rhythm, Acute coronary syndrome, Collaapse-to-ECMO under 60min, and ECPELLA revealed that the age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34 (10 years increase), 95%CI, 1.11-1.63, P=0.002), Collapse-to-ECMO under 60 min (HR, 0.45, 95%CI, 0.23-0.87, P=0.02) and ECPELLA (HR, 0.48, 95%CI, 0.22-0.95, P=0.035) were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Conclusion: ECPELLA improves mortality and favorable neurological outcome in patients who underwent E-CPR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0009-7322 , 1524-4539
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1466401-X
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages