Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: Leukemia, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 35, No. 8 ( 2021-08), p. 2332-2345

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0887-6924 , 1476-5551

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-01117-w

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2021

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2008023-2

In: Cancer, Wiley, Vol. 124, No. 14 ( 2018-07-15), p. 2956-2963

Abstract: Clinical trials have demonstrated that patients with chronic‐phase chronic myeloid leukemia with deep and durable molecular responses can attempt to stop using tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The French Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Study Group (France Intergroupe des Leucémies Myéloïdes Chroniques) has developed recommendations for tyrosine kinase inhibitor discontinuation in daily practice.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0008-543X , 1097-0142

URL: Issue

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1002/cncr.v124.14

DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31411

Language: English

Publisher: Wiley

Publication Date: 2018

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1479932-7

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2599218-1

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2594979-2

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1429-1

In: Haematologica, Ferrata Storti Foundation (Haematologica), Vol. 107, No. 12 ( 2022-05-26), p. 2859-2869

Abstract: Discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia is feasible in clinical practice based on recently published international recommendations. Nevertheless, factors predictive of molecular recurrence have not been fully elucidated and long-term follow-up of patients enrolled in clinical studies are required in order to update knowledge on discontinuation attempts particularly in terms of the safety and durability of treatment-free remission (TFR). In the current study, we updated results from the STIM2 study in the light of the consensual criterion of molecular recurrence reported in different international recommendations. Among the 199 patients included in the perprotocol study, 108 patients lost a major molecular response. With a median follow-up of 40.8 months (5.5-111 months), the probability of treatment-free remission was 43.4% [36.3-50.4] at 5 years, 40.9% [32.8-47.3] at 7 years and 34.5% [25.6- 43.3] at 9 years. Molecular recurrence occurred between 0 to 6 months, 6 to 24 months and after 24 months in 75 patients (69%), 15 patients (14%) and 18 patients (17%), respectively. Notably, the kinetics of molecular recurrence differed significantly between these three subgroups with a median time from loss of MR4 (BCR::ABL1 IS≤0.01%) to loss of major molecular response of 1, 7 and 22 months, respectively. Predictive factors of molecular recurrence differed according to the time of occurrence of the molecular recurrence. Durations of imatinib treatment and deep molecular response as well as BCR::ABL1/ABL1 levels at cessation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, as quantified by reverse transcriptase droplet digital polymerase chain reaction, are involved in molecular recurrence occurring up to 24 months but not beyond. (ClinicalTrial. gov Identifier NCT#0134373).

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 1592-8721 , 0390-6078

URL: Article

DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2022.280811

Language: Unknown

Publisher: Ferrata Storti Foundation (Haematologica)

Publication Date: 2022

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2186022-1

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2030158-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2805244-4

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 2553-2553

Abstract: Aims: Combining 2GTKI+pegylated IFN-a (Peg-IFN) represents an attractive approach for first-line treatment of CP CML, while providing somewhat light additional AEs, it induces high rates of deep molecular responses. We evaluated nilotinib (NIL) alone versus NIL+Peg-IFN in newly diagnosed CP-CML patients (pts) in a randomised phase III trial (PETALs, EudraCT 2013-004974-82) and analysed here the proportion of patients reaching Treatment-Free Remission (TFR) and outcome. Methods: Newly diagnosed CP CML pts ≤65 years, without vascular history were randomized 1:1 to get NIL 300 mg BID alone [M0 to M72 (unless TFR), arm A] vs Peg-IFN alone for 30 days (M-1→M0) 30 mg/wk, prior to NIL 300 mg BID + Peg-IFN 30 mg/wk 2 wks, upgraded to 45 mg/wk thereafter, for up to 2 y (M0 to M24, arm B) followed by NIL alone until M72 unless TFR. The primary endpoint was the rate of MR4.5 by M12, and after amendment, the trial was extended to 72 months follow-up in order to add, as a secondary endpoint, the TFR rate in pts reaching MR4.5 ≥2 y. The trigger for treatment resumption was loss of MMR. All molecular assessments were centralised until M36, and in case of TFR, MR4.5 was centrally confirmed at M0 TFR, and further molecular follow-up was then performed locally. All molecular quantifications are expressed as BCR-ABL1/ABL1 (IS) in % with ≥32,000 copies of ABL1 as control in the central lab and in the local labs all involved to the pluri-annual French external quality controls. Results are analysed in intention-to-treat. Results: As previously reported, 200 pts were randomized (99 in A, 101 in B), 130 M and 35 F in each arm, median age of 46 (18-66) y. The median follow-up (FU) since diagnosis is now 47.5 (33.77-62.39) Mo. and the median FU since discontinuation is 9.86 (5.8-23) Mo. in arm A and 15.57 (12.62-22.77) Mo. in arm B. Sokal and ELTS scores were high in 25% and 2.5%, intermediate in 33% and 16.5% and low in 42% and 81% pts respectively, equally balanced. All pts harboured a "Major" BCR transcript. We have previously shown that by M12, the rate of MR4.5 was 15.9% vs 21.5% (primary endpoint met, p=0.049) and that the overall cumulative incidence of MR4.5 was somewhat superior in arm B (54.6 [43.7-65.5] %) vs A (44 [31.5-54] %), p=0.05. Two pts died, one from myeloid blast crisis before TFR (arm A), one from a solid tumour (arm A). Overall, 40 pts (20%) reached the TFR criteria, 21 in arm A with a median FU of 9.86 (5.8-23) Mo. and 19 in arm B with a median FU since Nilo cessation of 15.57 (12.62-22.77) Mo, partly related to slightly different time for obtaining sustained MR4.5 in favour of arm B (16 vs 13 Mo.). For these 40 pts reaching TFR criteria, there was no statistical difference in terms of age at diagnosis and age at TFR, gender, Sokal, ELTS, FU since diagnosis, undetectability at cessation, BCR-ABL1 levels at 3 Mo. after cessation between the 2 arms. The survival without loss of MMR after cessation is illustrated in Figure 1. It looks superior in arm B over arm A, but did not reach statistical difference (p=0.445), but the FU is very short after cessation yet, especially in arm A. Once NIL was resumed in the pts that failed TFR, all pts recovered MMR within 6 Mo., with no difference between arms (p=1.00). In univariate analysis, we did not identify significant factor impacting on the TFR success (age at cessation, sex, undetectability at cessation, Sokal, ELTS) except the BCR-ABL1 value at M3-TFR (undetectable versus detectable, HR 7.15 [2.06-24.75], p=0.002), and the duration of MR4.5 before discontinuation (HR 1.11 [1.03-1.19] , p=0.004). During this TFR phase 7 SAEs were reported in arm A (2 pregnancies, 1 obstructive sleep apnea, 1 fever episode, 1 carotid stenosis and 1 femoral stenosis in the same patient at 2 Mo. after cessation, 1 lung carcinoid tumor) and 2 in arm B (1 persistent atrial fibrillation, 1 cholecystectomy). Conclusions: The combination of NIL + Peg-IFN induces higher MR4.5 rates by M36 in newly diagnosed CP CML pts that may translate in higher successful TFR rates, however a longer follow-up is needed to see consistent significant differences. Updated data will be presented. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Nicolini: Kartos Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sun Pharma Ltd.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria. Etienne: Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Huguet: Novartis: Other: Advisor; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisor; Celgene: Other: Advisor; BMS: Other: Advisor; Amgen: Other: Advisor; Pfizer: Other: Advisor. Guerci-Bresler: Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Charbonnier: Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Rousselot: Incyte, Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Deconinck: Stemline Therapetutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Imunogen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Other: Travel Grants, Research Funding; Abbevie: Research Funding. Rea: Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-146412

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2021

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 166-166

Abstract: Abstract 166 Background Imatinib mesylate combined to pegylated interferon alfa 2a (Peg-IFN) has been reported to significantly enhance the molecular responses for de novo chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients compared to Imatinib alone in a Phase 3 study (Preudhomme et al. NEJM 2010). Second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI2) such as nilotinib induce significantly higher levels of cytogenetic and molecular responses than imatinib as front line therapy for CP-CML (Saglio et al., NEJM 2010). Aims Test the combination of nilotinib + Peg-IFN as front line therapy in CP-CML patients in order to check the safety and evaluate the molecular response rates (EudraCT 2010–019786–28). Methods In this 2-step French national study, patients were assigned first to Peg-IFN (± HU) for a month at 90 mg/wk prior to a combination of nilotinib 300 mg BID + Peg-IFN 45 mg/wk for ≥ 1 year. The primary endpoint was the rate of confirmed (on 2 datapoints) molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5) by 1 year. Molecular assessments were centralised for all patients and expressed as BCR-ABLIS in %. Results In the first cohort, 40+1 patients (1 screen failure) were enrolled and a second cohort of 20 patients was planned once the last patient of cohort 1 attained 1 year of treatment, if the primary endpoint would have not been reached. The current median follow-up is 13.6 (10.1–16.3) months. Sokal and Euro scores were high for 12% and 2%, intermediate for 49% and 55% and low for 39% and 43% of the patients respectively. Euro score was high for one patient. The median age was 53 (23–85) years. Two patients had a masked Philadelphia chromosome, 3 a variant form, and 1 had additional chromosomal abnormalities, all patients had a “major” BCR transcript. Five percent of patients were in CHR at 1 month of Peg-IFN and 100% at month (M) 2 (after 1 month of combination therapy). The rates of Complete Cytogenetic Responses (CCyR) at 3, 6, and 12 months of combination (i. e. at 2, 5, 8 and 11 months of TKI2) were 47%, 71%, 100% respectively on evaluable samples. The incidence of molecular responses are mentioned in figure 1. Of note, 87% of the patients had a BCR-ABLIS ≤10% at M3. The rates of molecular responses broke down by major molecular response (MMR): 27%, 4 log reduction (MR4): 36%, and ≥4.5 log BCR-ABL reduction (MR4.5, MR5 and undetectable): 21% with a total number of 84% patients in ≥MMR and beyond (17.5% and 67.5% in intention-to-treat respectively) at 1 year. Confirmed molecular results at 1 year will be presented. Nilotinib trough levels centrally analysed at M3, 6 and 12 for the vast majority of patients were ≥ 1000 ng/ml and Peg-IFN did not seem to impact on its pharmacokinetics. One patient went on unmutated myeloid blast crisis at M6 and is alive after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Four additional patients were withdrawn from study: At M2 for non observance, at M6 for seizures related to an extra-dural hematoma, at M6 for recurrent grade 3 hepatic toxicity, at M9 for recurrent grade 3 pruritus. The median dose of Peg-IFN delivered to the patients during the first month was 90 (0–180) mg/wk, 45 mg/wk at M2, 3, 9, 12, and 33.75 mg/wk at M6. The median doses of nilotinib delivered to the patients were 600 mg daily at M2, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 as initially planned. The rate of grade 3–4 hematologic toxicities overall were anemia 2.5%, thrombocytopenia 41%, neutropenia 41% and pancytopenia 5%. These were observed mainly during M2 (16% neutropenia, 24% thrombocytopenia, 3% anemia), M3 (16% neutropenia, 13% thrombocytopenia, 3% pancytopenia) and M6 (12.5% neutropenia, 5% thrombocytopenia) and disappeared thereafter. Grade 3–4 toxicities occurred mostly during the first 3 months with 15% cholestatic episodes, 5% of ALAT elevation, 2.5% of lipase elevation, 2.5% arthro-myalgias, 2.5% abdominal pain without lipase elevation, 2.5% of depression. No PAO was observed and, to date, no dyslipidemia. Conclusion The combination of nilotinib and Peg-IFN seems relatively well tolerated despite frequent initial and transient hematologic and hepatic toxicities, and provides very high rates of molecular responses at 1 year and beyond. According to the initial methodology of this trial, the second cohort of patients will not be enrolled as the MR4.5 rates at M12 are beyond the initial expectations. A randomised phase III study testing nilotinib versus nilotinib + Peg-IFN is warranted. Disclosures: Nicolini: Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, ARIAD, and Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Etienne:Novartis, Pfizer, speaker for Novartis, BMS: Consultancy. Roy:Novartis, BMS: Speakers Bureau. Huguet:Novartis, BMS: Speakers Bureau. Legros:Novartis, BMS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Giraudier:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Coiteux:Novartis, BMS: Speakers Bureau. Guerci-Bresler:Novartis, BMS: Speakers Bureau. Rea:Novartis, BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Gardembas:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Hermet:Novartis, BMS: Speakers Bureau. Rousselot:Novartis, Pfizer, speaker for Novartis, BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Guilhot:Novartis, Ariad, and BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Mahon:Novartis, BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V120.21.166.166

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2012

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 4039-4039

Abstract: Background Ponatinib, a third generation TKI, induces high rates of cytogenetic and molecular responses in heavily pre-treated CML patients (pts) resistant to ≥2 TKI and/or with a T315I mutation, especially in CP (J. Cortes at al., NEJM 2013). This agent induces diverse non-severe adverse events (AEs), a substantial proportion of pts experience severe arterial thrombotic events [(ATE) 17% by 3 years, J. Cortes et al., Haematologica 2015]. This agent is now licensed and it is mandatory to explore the rates of responses and ATE in the real-life setting. Aims We took the opportunity of the French ponatinib compassionate use program between May 2013 (end of PACE inclusions) and January 2014 (ponatinib license) to evaluate different outcomes in real-life conditions. Methods This is a multicenter observational retrospective study, designed to examine safety and efficacy of ponatinib in CML (any phase) resistant/intolerant to prior TKIs, in university and non-university hospitals, benefiting from the national ponatinib compassionate use program. Data were captured and validated following the rules and regulations of observational studies in France. Pts were analyzed in intention-to-treat, Molecular biology tests were performed according to ELN guidelines and BCR-ABL/ABL are expressed as % IS in all centers. Standard clinical [gender, age, weight, body mass index (BMI), cardiovascular risk factors (previous events, tobacco abuse, high blood pressure, diabetes)], onset of any CV events before and during ponatinib treatment) and metabolic biological parameters (cholesterol, triglycerides) were collected. Results Thirty-five observations were collected in CP, 4 in AP and 5 in BC. We focused our analysis on the 35 CP pts only. There were 16 (46%) males and 19 females, with a median age of 53 (18-76) years at CML diagnosis and 59 (20-82) years at ponatinib initiation. Sokal scores were high in 13 (37%), intermediate in 12 (34%), low in 4 (12%) and unknown in 6 (17%); Euro scores were high in 6 (17%), intermediate in 15 (43%), low in 3 (9%) and unknown in 11 (31%); Eutos scores were high in 7 (20%), low in 20 (57%) and unknown in 8 (23%) pts. All pts harbored "major" BCR-ABL transcripts except one (e19a2). Regarding cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) prior to ponatinib, 12 pts (34%) were treated for hypertension, 1 was diabetic, 6 (17%) had dyslipidemia (all on statins). Tobacco abuse was present in 8 (23%) pts and 14 pts had some pre-existing CVRF in total. Median weight just prior ponatinib was 66 (48-107) kg, and BMI was 24.2 (17.85-33) kg/m2. Thirteen (37%) pts were on anti-aggregants or anti-coagulants (AAG/C) prior to ponatinib. All pts had received imatinib first-line for a median of 29.5 (4-123) months, 20 (57%) dasatinib and 14 (40)% nilotinib as second-line, one pt developed a T315I after imatinib only; 21 (60%) had received all 3 TKIs prior to ponatinib. At ponatinib initiation, 7 (20%) harboured a T315I mutation, 7 (20%) other mutation(s) 20 (57%) none. In one case mutation screen was not performed. The trigger for ponatinib was resistance (hematologic, cytogenetic or molecular progression) in 26 (74%) pts, intolerance in 7 (20%) pts and both in 2 (6%) pts. Pts were initiated at a median of 45 (30-45) mg daily after a median of 79.5 (12-217) months of disease duration. The median follow-up on ponatinib was 26 (2-37) months. The cumulative incidence of major molecular responses was 29% at 3, 42% at 6, 56% at 12 and 70% at 18 months. The overall survival is shown in figure 1. Four pts died, 3 of disease progression and 1 of myocardial infarction. Six (17%) pts had grade 3-4 hematologic AEs imposing transient ponatinib withhold, and 14 (40%) had diverse grade 1-2 non-hematologic, non-CV AEs (pancreatic, hepatic, skin toxicities, no grade 3-4). ATEs occurred in 19 (54%) pts after a median of 5.8 (0.7-21.7) months of ponatinib, without CVRF in 10 (53%) pts and without AAG/C in 13 (68%) pts. CVRF and AAG/C had no significant influence here on ATEs onset in univariate Cox model (p=0.76 and 0.37 respectively). Lipids and HbA1c were not modified on ponatinib. Overall 43% of pts stopped ponatinib for toxicity. Conclusion In the French compassionate use program in CP-CML patients resistant or intolerant to previous TKIs, ponatinib displayed strong efficacy, as previously described. In this unselected population of patients, ATEs were confirmed to represent the main tolerance concern in the real life setting. Disclosures Nicolini: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Coiteux:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Speakers Bureau. Charbonnier:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Speakers Bureau. Huguet:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; PFIZER: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Etienne:ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Congress Travel/Accomodations, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Legros:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Rousselot:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Amé:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. DeFrance:Ariad: Consultancy. Mahon:ARIAD: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rea:Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V126.23.4039.4039

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2015

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: British Journal of Haematology, Wiley, Vol. 194, No. 2 ( 2021-07), p. 393-402

Abstract: Dasatinib is a second‐generation BCR‐ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Dasatinib 100 mg per day is associated with an increased risk of pleural effusion (PlEff). We randomly evaluated whether therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may reduce dasatinib‐associated significant adverse events (AEs) by 12 months (primary endpoint). Eligible patients started dasatinib at 100 mg per day followed by dasatinib (C)min assessment. Patients considered overdosed [(C)min ≥ 3 nmol/l) were randomised between a dose‐reduction strategy (TDM arm) and standard of care (control arm). Out of 287 evaluable patients, 80 patients were randomised. The primary endpoint was not met due to early haematological AEs occurring before effective dose reduction. However, a major reduction in the cumulative incidence of PlEff was observed in the TDM arm compared to the control arm (4% vs. 15%; 11% vs. 35% and 12% vs. 39% at one, two and three years, respectively ( P  = 0·0094)). Molecular responses were superimposable in all arms. Dasatinib TDM during treatment initiation was feasible and resulted in a significant reduction of the incidence of PlEff in the long run, without impairing molecular responses. (NCT01916785; https://clinicaltrials.gov ).

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0007-1048 , 1365-2141

URL: Issue

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1111/bjh.v194.2

DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17654

Language: English

Publisher: Wiley

Publication Date: 2021

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1475751-5

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 140, No. Supplement 1 ( 2022-11-15), p. 9668-9669

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2022-159928

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2022

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 494-494

Abstract: The combination of 2GTKI+pegylated IFN-α (Peg-IFN) is an attractive approach for first-line treatment of CP CML, inducing high rates of deep molecular responses in phase II trials. Thus, we evaluated nilotinib (NIL) alone versus NIL+Peg-IFN in newly diagnosed CP-CML patients (pts) in a randomised phase III trial (PETALs, EudraCT 2013-004974-82). Newly diagnosed CP CML pts ≤65 y, without prior history of arterial occlusion were randomized 1:1 to get NIL 300 mg BID alone (M0 to M48, arm A) vs Peg-IFN alone for 30 days (M-1→M0) 30 μg/wk as priming, prior to NIL 300 mg BID + Peg-IFN 30 μg/wk 2 wks, upgraded to 45 μg/wk thereafter, for up to 2 y (M0 to M24, arm B) followed by NIL alone for 4 more years unless pts enter treatment-free remission (TFR). The primary endpoint is the rate of MR4.5 by 1 y. As a secondary endpoint, pts reaching MR4.5 ≥2 y are allowed to stop NIL and enter a TFR phase in both arms. The trigger for treatment resumption is loss of MMR. All molecular assessments are centralised, quantifications are expressed as BCR-ABL/ABL1 (IS) in % with ≥32,000 copies of ABL1 as control. Two hundred pts were randomized (99 in A, 101 in B), 130 M and 35 F in each arm, median age of 46 (18-66) y. Median follow-up is 43.8 (34.3-55.9) Mo. Results are analysed in intention-to-treat. Sokal and EUTOS LTS scores were H in 25% and 2.5%, Int. in 33% and 16.5% and L in 42% and 81% pts respectively equally balanced. Median age is 46 (18-66) y, 18 pts (9%) had ACAs, all pts have a "Major" BCR transcript. CHR was obtained in 9.6% of pts at M0 (in B) and 88% of pts in A and 90.4% of pts in B at M1. CCyR rates at M3 were 63% vs 75% in A and B (p=ns), and BCR-ABL1 ≤1% at M6 were 87% in A vs 93% in B (p=ns). By M12, the rates of MMR were 68.1% vs 70.1% (p=0.44), MR4 were 34% vs 47.5% (p=0.041), MR4.5 were 15.9% vs 21.5% (p=0.049), MR5 11.7% vs 23.71% (p=0.023), in A vs B respectively. By M36 the rates of MMR were 83% vs 86.6% (p=0.31), MR4 were 70.2% vs 71.13% (p=0.50), MR4.5 were 37.2% vs 49.5% (p=0.05), MR5 33% vs 42.3% (p=0.12), in A vs B respectively The overall cumulative incidence of MR4.5 is superior in B (54.6 [43.7-65.5] %) vs A (44 [31.5-54]%) close to significance (unilateral Fisher test, p=0.05, see Figure). Seven patients were mutated by Sanger in A (5 Y253, 1 E255K, 1 T315I) vs 2 in B (2 T315I). One pt (A) progressed toward AP and then myeloid BC with a Y253H mutation, is still alive in CMR on Ponatinib. Twenty nine (29%) pts were withdrawn from study in A (toxicity 9, cancer 3, resistance 14, investigator decision 2, lost for FU 1) vs 26 (26%) pts for B (toxicity 13, resistance 8, investigator decision 5), 1 pt died from cervix cancer (A). Median overall doses of NIL delivered by M36 were 600 mg/d in both arms (p=ns). The median overall dose of Peg-IFN delivered in B by M24 was 37.5 mg/wk. The overall rate of grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities was 22%; with 2% and 7% thrombocytopenia, 4% and 6% neutropenia, and 1% and 1% pancytopenia in A vs B respectively. Major grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicities consisted in 9% of cardiac disorders in A (2 coronaropathies, 1 myocardial infarction, 2 thoracic pains, 2 atrial fibrillation, 1 bradycardia, 1 palpitations, 1 pericarditis) vs 8% in B (2 coronaropathies, 1 myocardial infarction, 3 atrial fibrillation, 1 palpitations, 1 pericarditis), 4% vascular disorders in A (1 thrombophlebitis + PE, 1 transient ischemic attack, 1 PAOD, 1 carotid stenosis) vs 3% in B (1 thrombophlebitis, 1 PAOD, 1 transient ischemic attack). Three % of gastro-intestinal disorders were observed in A (2 pancreatitis, 1 anal fissure) vs 6% in B (2 pancreatitis, 1 anal fissure, 1 abdominal pain, 2 cholecystectomies); 5% auto-immune disorders in B (1 recurrent pericarditis, 2 hemolytic anemia, 1 ITP, 1 thyroiditis); 5 and 8 pregnancies (2 pts + 3 partner Arm 1, 3 pts + 5 partner Arm B), despite recommended contraceptive methods. Secondary tumours were diagnosed in 4% (1 breast, 1 cervix, 1 thyroid, 1 neuroendocrine) in A vs 2% of pts (1 neuroendocrine and 1 testis) in B. Of note 8% psychiatric episodes were reported in B pts (2 unsuccessful suicide attempts), vs 2% in A. We observed 9% lipase elevations in A, 6% in B, 2% cholestatic episodes in A, 6% in B; 3% of transaminase elevations in A vs 2% in B. Infections were detected in 3% A vs 7% in B. The combination of NIL + Peg-IFN seems to provide somewhat higher MR4.5 rates by M36 in newly diagnosed CP CML pts without inducing significant higher toxicities than NIL alone. Whether this will translate in higher TFR rates is under evaluation. Final updated results at M36 will be presented Disclosures Nicolini: Sun Pharma Ltd: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Etienne:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Huguet:Servier: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Guerci-Bresler:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Charbonnier:Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Legros:Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Coiteux:Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Cony-Makhoul:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy. Roy:Incyte Biosciences: Consultancy. Rousselot:Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Quittet:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Ame:Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Rea:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Dulucq:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Mahon:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Pegylated Interferon alpha 2 a is not licensed in this setting

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-123674

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 130, No. Suppl_1 ( 2017-12-07), p. 899-899

Abstract: Background We previously demonstrated that the combination of Nilotinib (NIL) + Pegylated IFN-a2a (Peg-IFN) is able to induce high deep molecular response rates in chronic phase CML (CP CML) patients, as first-line therapy (Nicolini FE et al., Lancet Haematol. 2015). Aims Assessment of the molecular responses obtained with the same combination vs NIL alone prospectively, in newly diagnosed CP-CML. (EudraCT 2013-004974-82). Methods Patients (pts) ≤65 years with no history of arterial damage were randomized 1:1 to get NIL 300 mg BID alone (M0 to M48, arm A) vs Peg-IFN alone (± HU) for 30 days (M-1 to M0) 30 mg/wk as a priming, prior to a combination of NIL 300 mg BID + Peg-IFN 30 mg/wk 2 weeks, upgraded to 45 mg/wk thereafter if proper tolerance for up to 2 years (M0 to M24, arm B) followed by NIL alone for 2 more years. The primary endpoint was the rate of molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5) by 1 year. Molecular assessments were centralised, quantifications were expressed as BCR-ABL/ABL1 (IS) in % with ≥32,000 copies of ABL1 as control. Results Two hundred and one pts were randomized (100 in arm A, 101 in arm B), 65 males in both arms, 35 females in arm A, 36 in arm B. The median follow-up is 20.6 (9.1-34.7) months. Results are analysed in intention-to-treat. Sokal scores were high in 25%, intermediate in 36% and low in 39% of pts; Euro scores were high in 13%, intermediate in 44% and low in 43% of pts; Eutos LTS scores were high in 2%, intermediate in 17%, and 81% low; equally balanced in the 2 arms The median age was 46 (18-66) years, equally balanced. Eight (4%) pts had a cryptic Philadelphia chromosome, 12 (6%) a variant form, and 15 (7.5%) had ACAs, all pts had a "Major" BCR transcript. CHR was obtained in 9.6% of pts at M0 (arm B) and in 88% of pts in arm A and 90.4% of pts in arm B at M1. The rates of CCyR at M3 were 63% vs 65% in arms A and B, and BCR-ABL1≤1% at M6 were 83% in arm A vs 86% and arm B, on evaluable samples. The incidence of molecular responses are shown in Fig. 1. Of note, 90% of the pts had a BCR-ABL1 ≤10% at M3 in arm A vs 84% in arm B (p=ns). By M12, the rates of MMR were 69.9% vs 72.4% (p=0.079), MR4 were 34.65% vs 47.9% (p=0.094), MR4.5 were 17.9% vs 24.11% (p=0.272), MR5 12.1% vs 22.31% (p=0.075), in arm A and arm B respectively. Data from 11 pts in arm A and 16 in arm B at M12 are still pending. Definitive results at 1 year will be presented. One pt progressed toward accelerated phase in arm A with a Y253H mutation. Fifteen pts were withdrawn from study in arm A (toxicity 5, other cancer 2, failure 8) and 12 patients from arm B (toxicity 6, failure 6), no pt died. Interestingly, 5 mutated (ie. failure) pts were found in arm A (3 Y253H, 1 E225K, 1 F317L), vs only 1 pt (T315I) in arm B. The median dose of Peg-IFN delivered in arm B during the first month is 30 (0-30) mg/wk, 30 (0-45) mg/wk at M2, 45 (0-45) mg/wk at M3, 37.5 (0-45) mg/wk at M6, 30 (0-45) mg/wk at M9 and 12. The median doses of NIL delivered were 600 mg daily at M2, 3, 6, 9, 12 as initially planned in both arms. The rate of grade 4 hematologic toxicities overall was 15%, with no anemias, 1% and 4% thrombocytopenias, 3% and 4% neutropenias, 0% and 1% leucopenias, and 0 and 1% pancytopenias in arms A and B respectively. Grade ¾ non-hematologic toxicities consisted in 4% of cardiac disorders in arm A (1 coronaropathy, 2 thoracic pains and 1 atrial fibrillation) vs 1% in arm B (palpitation), 2% vascular disorders in arm A (1 pulmonary embolism, 1 transient ischemic attack) and 1% in arm B (PAOD). Three % of gastro-intestinal disorders in arm A (resolutive pancreatitis) vs 1% in arm B (anal fissure); 1% of skin disorders in arm A; 2% auto-immune disorders in arm B (1 recurrent pericarditis, 1 hemolytic anemia); 2 and 5 pregnancies (of the partner except 1) were observed in arm A and B respectively, despite recommended contraceptive methods. We observed 10% lipase elevations in arm A, 3 in arm B, 2% cholestatic episodes in arm A, 1% in arm B; 1% of transaminase elevations in each arm. There were 2% depressive episodes in arm B, 1% in arm A; infections were detected in 1% arm 1 and 3% in arm B. Finally 3 intercurrent cancers were detected in arm A (cervix, breast, thyroid). Conclusion The combination of NIL + Peg-IFN seems to provide slightly deeper molecular responses rates (especially MR5) by M12, but so far not significantly, in newly diagnosed CP CML pts without increasing the rate of more frequent early SAEs in such a setting. Definitive results at M12 will be updated for the meeting. Disclosures Nicolini: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Etienne: Incyte: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Guerci-Bresler: BMS: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Charbonnier: Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Legros: BMS: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Coiteux: Incyte: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Cony-Makhoul: BMS: Speakers Bureau. Rousselot: Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sunesis: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Guyotat: BMS: Speakers Bureau. Ianotto: Novartis: Other: Grant. Rea: BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Mahon: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V130.Suppl_1.899.899

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2017

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7