Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Elsevier BV, Vol. 23, No. 3 ( 2017-03), p. S96-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1083-8791
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3056525-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2057605-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: American Journal of Hematology, Wiley, Vol. 92, No. 8 ( 2017-08), p. 789-796
    Abstract: ABO incompatibility is commonly observed in stem cell transplantation and its impact in this setting has been extensively investigated. HLA‐mismatched unrelated donors (MMURD) are often used as an alternative stem cell source but are associated with increased transplant related complications. Whether ABO incompatibility affects outcome in MMURD transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients is unknown. We evaluated 1,013 AML patients who underwent MMURD transplantation between 2005 and 2014. Engraftment rates were comparable between ABO matched and mismatched patients, as were relapse incidence [34%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 28–39; for ABO matched vs. 36%; 95% CI, 32–40; for ABO mismatched; P  = .32], and nonrelapse mortality (28%; 95% CI, 23–33; for ABO matched vs. 25%; 95% CI, 21–29; for ABO mismatched; P  = .2). Three year survival was 40% for ABO matched and 43% for ABO mismatched patients ( P  = .35), Leukemia free survival rates were also comparable between groups (37%; 95% CI, 32–43; for ABO matched vs. 38%; 95% CI, 33–42; for ABO mismatched; P  = .87). Incidence of grade II‐IV acute graft versus host disease was marginally lower in patients with major ABO mismatching (Hazard ratio of 0.7, 95% CI, 0.5–1; P  = .049]. ABO incompatibility probably has no significant clinical implications in MMURD transplantation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0361-8609 , 1096-8652
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1492749-4
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 4558-4558
    Abstract: Abstract 4558 Myeloid Sarcoma (MS) is a rare malignant disorder usually presenting as an extramedullary myeloid cell tumor proliferation. MS can be observed in 3 to 7% of AML cases (called “leukemic” MS, LMS hereinafter). MS prognosis is rather poor with overall survival (OS) not exceeding 2 years. We have previously shown, that allo-SCT following an AML-like chemotherapy is likely the best available therapeutic option for patients with LMS (J Clin Oncol 2008). However, it is still unclear whether allo-SCT is a valid therapeutic option for patients with isolated MS (IMS). The aim of this analysis was to assess the role of allo-SCT in patients with IMS as compared to patients with LMS. We retrospectively analysed the outcome of 99 MS patients with a median age of 40 years (range: 18–70), including 30 cases of IMS and 69 cases of LMS, reported to the EBMT registry between January 1991 and June 2009. The majority of patients were in complete remission (CR) at time of transplant (IMS: first CR n=14, second CR or beyond n=7 vs. LMS: first CR n=38, second CR or beyond n=21, P=0.20). In this series, patients received either a standard (IMS, n=24 vs. LMS, n=55, P=NS) or a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (IMS, n=6 vs. LMS, n=14, P=NS) prior to allo-SCT from a matched-related (IMS n=21 vs. LMS, n=48, P=NS) or unrelated donor (IMS, n=9 vs. LMS, n=21, P=NS). After allo-SCT, engraftment was observed in all patients. The incidences of grade 2–4 and grade 3–4 acute GVHD were 32% and 9%, respectively. The incidence of chronic GVHD at 2 years was 45%. With a median follow-up of 48 (range: 6–213) months, the 5-years OS, and leukaemia-free survival (LFS), and the cumulative incidences of relapse (RI), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 48%, 36%, 40% and 19%, respectively. When comparing the two sub-groups (IMS vs. LMS), there were no significant differences in term of outcomes: neutrophils recovery (15 vs 18.5 days), grade 2–4 acute GVHD (27% vs 35%), chronic GVHD (54% vs 41% at 2 years), 5-year OS (33% vs. 48%), 5-year LFS (30% vs. 38%), 5-year RI (45% vs. 38%) and 5-year NRM (19% vs. 17%). In all, we conclude that allo-SCT is an effective treatment for patients with MS. The current data suggest that patients with isolated or leukemic MS have similar outcome after allo-SCT. Therefore, allo-SCT is likely to be considered as the optimal therapy for both isolated and leukemic MS. Disclosures: Tilly: Amgen: Honoraria.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 185-185
    Abstract: Introduction: Invasive aspergillosis (IA) frequently occurs during treatment for acute leukemia. Historically IA has been a major barrier for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In the recent decade there has been significant improvement of anti-fungal management including novel anti-fungal agents and diagnostics. The influence of invasive IA on long term survival and on transplant related complications has not been investigated in a larger patient cohort under current conditions. Specific Aim: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the long term outcome of patients undergoing allo-HSCT with history of prior proven, probable and possible IA as compared to patients without history of IA. Methodology: Patient-, disease-, and transplant-related variables were collected according to the data entries in the EBMT database. Inclusion criteria were as follows: first allo-HSCT performed between 2005 and 2010 in patients with acute leukemia; availability of data on IA prior to allo-HSCT. The median time of death after allo-HSCT was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and cohorts were compared by the log-rank test. The following variables entered the multivariate model as possible confounders: age (as continuous variable), gender (M vs. F), underlying disease (ALL vs. AML), status at SCT (1st CR vs. ≥2 CR vs. Prim Refr/noCR), time from diagnosis to SCT (as continuous variable), donor type (sibling vs. matched UD vs. mismatched UD vs. Haplo), source of SCT (BM vs. PB vs. CB), donor age, d/r gender match, d/r CMV status, conditioning regimens (MAC vs. RIC, TBI yes/no), type of immunosuppression (in vivo T depletion y/n, in vitro T-depletion y/n). The cumulative incidences were computed using the cumulative incidence method. Differences between the two cohorts were verified with the Gray test. Results: 1150 patients fulfilled the entry criteria and were included in the analysis (patient characteristics, table 1). The median follow up time was 52.1 months (95% CI 49.0, 56.6). The impact of prior IA on overall survival in allo-HSCT recipients with acute leukemia was not statistically significant (figure 1). We detected no significant differences in the cumulative incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV [29.1% IA vs. 32.0% no IA, p=0.27, hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) 0.89 (0.71, 1.10)]; chronic GVHD [43.9% IA vs. 49.3% no IA, p=0.26, HR (95% CI) 0.89 (0.73, 1.09)] ; relapse [33.7% IA vs. 33.0% no IA, p=0.35, HR (95% CI) 1.11 (0.9, 1.36)] and pulmonary complications [8.3% IA vs. 6.9% no IA, p=0.4, odds ratio (95% CI) 1.21 (0.77, 1.90)] Conclusion: Prior IA had no significant impact on transplant-related complications and overall survival in this large data set of patients with acute leukemia undergoing allo-HSCT. We speculate that an overall better management of IA may have contributed to this result. Considering that we did not assess the impact of the type of IA (proven/probable vs. possible) and the status of IA before allo-HSCT, these data deserve to be confirmed by a prospective study. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 1975-1975
    Abstract: Abstract 1975 Background: Among patients with AML with normal cytogenetics (CN-AML), the presence or absence of the NPM1 mutation (NPM1mut) and the FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) allows to define molecular subgroups, which proved to influence leukemia-free survival (LFS) both after chemotherapy and allo-SCT (Schlenk, NEJM 2008, Brunet, JCO 2012). Hence, the genotypes are currently used as “disease risk” criteria, especially to define indication for allo-SCT in CR1. The influence of these markers on overall survival (OS) after allo-SCT has not been evaluated so far. Methods: An EBMT registry-based analysis included adults fulfilling the following criteria: CN-AML, peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow allo-SCT in CR1 between 2006 and 2011, using matched-related (MRD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD), and detailed information on the mutational status of NPM1 and FLT3-ITD being available. OS, LFS, relapse incidence (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were calculated according to molecular subgroups. Further, a multivariate Cox model for risk factors was applied, including the following, predefined variables: Age ( 〈 〉 median), white blood cell counts at diagnosis, time from diagnosis to CR1, donor type (MRD versus MUD), conditioning regimen (reduced versus standard) and presence or absence of NPM1mut and FLT3-ITD. Results: 366 patients (median age: 49.5 years, range 18.0–70.6; 49% males, MRD in 54%) were included. Median time from diagnosis to CR1 was 45 days (range: 7–181), and median time from CR1 to allo-SCT was 109 days (range: 11–308). Median follow-up from allo-SCT was 12 months (range: 1–61). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of 2-year OS and LFS for the entire cohort were 69±3% and 62±3%, the cumulative incidence of relapse and NRM were 23±2% and 14±2%. Presence of an NPM1mut had no influence on LFS or OS. In contrast, presence of an FLT3-ITD was strongly associated with increased RI (p=0.0004), and decreased LFS (p=0.004) and OS (p=0.0007). Results at 2 years from allo-SCT (% +/− SD) according to molecular subgroups are shown in the table below (mut, mutated, WT, wild type): In the multivariate Cox model, age above the median of 49.5 years was the only factor associated with increased NRM (HR= 3.15, 95%CI: 1.27–7.82, p=0.01), whereas FLT3-ITD was the only factor that correlated with RI (HR=2.80; 95%CI; 1.26–6.20, p=0.01). Both older age and presence of FLT3-ITD were significantly associated with inferior LFS (HR=1.73, 95%CI: 1.03–2.91, p=0.04 for age, HR=2.03, 95%CI: 1.13–3.65, p=0.02 for FLT3-ITD) and, most importantly, with decreased OS (HR=2.29; 95%CI: 1.27–4.15, p=0.006 for age, and HR=2,75; 95%CI: 1.41–5.34, p=0.003 for FLT3-ITD). The latter data allowed the development of a scoring system, identifying three prognostic groups with 2-year survival rates of 42+/−7% (patients with both older age and FLT3-ITD), 66+/−4% (older age or FLT3-ITD) and 74+/−7% (younger age and FLT3-ITDneg, p 〈 0.0001), respectively. Conclusion: We conclude that older age and FLT3-ITD are major risk factors for OS after allo-SCT in CN-AML patients in CR1, independently from other factors such as donor type, intensity of the conditioning, or NPM1 mutational status. Disclosures: Schmid: Novartis Germany: Honoraria, Research Funding; Fresenius Germany: Honoraria, travel grants, travel grants Other; Roche Germany: Honoraria, travel grants, travel grants Other; Pfizer: Travel Grants, Travel Grants Other; MSD Pharma: Honoraria, Travel grants Other; Cellgene: travel grants, travel grants Other. Attal:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 122, No. 21 ( 2013-11-15), p. 920-920
    Abstract: Despite the advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma using new targeted therapies and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) the disease remains largely incurable. Recent efforts in using reduced intensity allogeneic HSCT have been hampered by increased allograft-related morbidity and mortality. Several prospective studies comparing single or tandem autologous HSCT with planned tandem autologous-reduced intensity allogeneic HSCT (auto-allo) have shown no overall survival advantage despite improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and lower relapse rates with reduced intensity allograft, mainly due to increased non-relapse related mortality (NRM) rates. However, two of these prospective studies; the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation NMAM 2000 and the Italian group study with long term follow-up reported PFS and overall survival (OS) benefits in favor of the auto-allo arm. Currently allogeneic HSCT is recommended within the context of clinical trials and only in high risk multiple myeloma patients who continue to have a very poor outcome with autologous HSCT. While such clinical trials are ongoing there remains a need to address the role of autologous HSCT prior to reduced intensity allogeneic HSCT. The objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate the role of upfront cytoreductive autologous HSCT prior to allograft in the outcomes of patients who have undergone allograft following induction therapy. Study We performed a retrospective analysis of the EBMT database comparing the outcomes of patients who were planned to receive auto-allograft to those who underwent reduced intensity allograft (early RIC) without a prior autologous HSCT within one year from diagnosis. The data in 504 patients were previously reported at the ASH meeting 2010 (abstract 3512). We subsequently included additional patients and requested more information from the participating EBMT centers and updated the study. From 1996 to 2013 a total of 689 patients were registered as reduced intensity allograft. 517 patients were registered as planned auto-allograft; however, 73 did not receive the planned allograft. A total of 172 patients received reduced intensity allograft after induction treatment without prior auto-HSCT. Median age at first transplant was 53 years (range 20-72) in the auto-allo and 51 years (range 31-77) in the early RIC group. Median time from diagnosis was 6.6 months (range 2-156 months) in the auto-allo and 7.7 months (2.8-12.0) in the early RIC group. The disease status at the time of first transplant for the auto-allo group was CR - 8%, PR - 67%, other or missing - 25%; and for the RIC group was CR - 15%, PR - 62%, other or missing - 23%. Donors were HLA matched siblings in 88% and matched unrelated in 12% for the auto-allo group, and 84% siblings and 16% matched unrelated in the RIC group with no significant differences between the two groups. Results With a median follow-up of 93 months in the auto-allo and 84 months in RIC groups, PFS rates were significantly better at 3 and 5 years in the auto-allo group (45.6% and 34.2%) as compared to the RIC group (33.9% and 22.0%, p 〈 0.001). Overall survival was also significantly improved in favor of the auto-allo (3 yr and 5 yr OS 67.9% and 58.9%) as compared to the RIC group (54.3% and 42.7%, P = 0.001). The non-relapse mortality (NRM) rates were lower in the auto-allo group as compared to RIC: 1 yr and 3 yr NRM were 8.1% and 14.1% in the auto-allo and 20.3% and 27.4% in early RIC group, p 〈 0.001. We examined potential differences in outcomes based on use of novel agents, and used the year 2004 as a surrogate for introduction of novel agents to routine clinical practice. There were no significant differences by multivariate analysis in outcomes for patients transplanted before or after 2004. Conclusion This large multicenter retrospective study suggests that cytoreductive autologous HSCT prior to allograft is associated with improved PFS and OS. We are in the process of conducting an extended analysis to control for possible confounders. If the results are confirmed, future studies should be conducted to verify the importance of autologous stem cell transplant as part of the allograft treatment strategy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages