Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Redl, Theresa  (2)
  • de Hoop, Helen  (2)
  • Comparative Studies. Non-European Languages/Literatures  (2)
Type of Medium
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • Comparative Studies. Non-European Languages/Literatures  (2)
RVK
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    John Benjamins Publishing Company ; 2021
    In:  Linguistics in the Netherlands Vol. 38 ( 2021-10-29), p. 81-97
    In: Linguistics in the Netherlands, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Vol. 38 ( 2021-10-29), p. 81-97
    Abstract: In an online production experiment, we investigated the effect of sentence position on the preference for either a nominative or object form of an object pronoun restricted by a relative clause in Dutch. Results show a significant preference for the nominative form of the restricted object pronoun in sentence-initial position as it was chosen in 95% of the cases. In the original object position this percentage is only 20%. The preference for a nominative pronominal object is considered a grammatical norm violation. We account for this in terms of a combination of two factors. First, the presence of the relative clause makes the object ‘long’. Second, the sentence-initial position is a syntactic position that is relatively far removed from the original object position. We argue that when a long object is topicalized, there are too many intervening elements between the pronoun and the verb of which it is the complement. If the distance between the pronominal object and the verb has become too long, the object case fades from the working memory. This then results in the appearance of nominative case as the default case for topicalized object pronominal relative clauses in Dutch.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0929-7332 , 1569-9919
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: John Benjamins Publishing Company
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2078742-X
    SSG: 7,11
    SSG: 7,23
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Vol. 51, No. 4 ( 2022-08), p. 819-845
    In: Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 51, No. 4 ( 2022-08), p. 819-845
    Abstract: In Polish, it is obligatory to mark feminine or masculine grammatical gender on second-person singular past tense verbs (e.g., Dostałaś list ‘You received-F a letter’). When the addressee’s gender is unknown or unspecified, masculine but never feminine gender marking may be used. The present self-paced reading experiment aims to determine whether this practice creates a processing disadvantage for female addressees in such contexts. We further investigated how men process being addressed with feminine-marked verbs, which constitutes a pragmatic violation. To this end, we presented Polish native speakers with short narratives. Each narrative contained either a second-person singular past tense verb with masculine or feminine gender marking, or a gerund verb with no gender marking as a baseline. We hypothesised that both men and women would read the verbs with gender marking mismatching their own gender more slowly than the gender-unmarked gerund verbs. The results revealed that the gender-mismatching verbs were read equally fast as the gerund verbs, and that the verbs with gender marking matching participant gender were read faster. While the relatively high reading time of the gender-unmarked baseline was unexpected, the pattern of results nevertheless shows that verbs with masculine marking were more difficult to process for women compared to men, and vice versa. In conclusion, even though masculine gender marking in the second person is commonly used with a gender-unspecific intention, it created similar processing difficulties for women as the ones that men experienced when addressed through feminine gender marking. This study is the first one, as far as we are aware, to provide evidence for the male bias of second-person masculine generics during language processing.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0090-6905 , 1573-6555
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2017227-8
    SSG: 5,2
    SSG: 7,11
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages