Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: Leukemia, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 34, No. 9 ( 2020-09), p. 2354-2363

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0887-6924 , 1476-5551

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-0959-x

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2020

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2008023-2

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 136, No. Supplement 1 ( 2020-11-5), p. 30-31

Abstract: INTRODUCTION. Kinase inhibitors and glycoengineered monoclonal antibody, such as obinutuzumab (G), have significantly changed the treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Both like the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib (IB) and obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (G-CHL) are approved as first line therapy in CLL patients unfit for a fludarabine-base treatment. While IB has proved to be superior to bendamustine-rituximab in a phase 3 trial and an ongoing retrospective ERIC study, no head-to-head comparison has been done for IB vs G-CHL in a real-world evidence study. The aim of this study was to compared the clinical efficacy of the fixed duration G-CHL treatment vs continuous treatment with IB. METHODS. The inclusion criteria for this observational study were patients with a diagnosis of CLL, requiring treatment according to the iwCLL guideline (Hallek M, Blood 2018) and considered unfit for fludarabine-base therapy by the treating physician belonging to the Italian CLL campus. Patients received ibrutinib 420mg daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity, while G was administrated at 100mg on day 1, 900mg on day 2 and 1000mg on days 8 and 15 of the 1st cycle, then at 1000mg from cycles 2-6. Chlorambucil was administrated according to the local policy. An IGHV gene sequence homology ³98% was considered as unmutated (U-IGHV), as opposed to mutated (M-IGHV). TP53 disruptions (TP53dis) included deletions and mutations. Progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-next treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) were calculated according to the iwCLL 2018 guideline. Minimal residual disease (MRD), assessed by flow cytometry, was considered undetectable when & lt;10-4 (uMRD4). Survival curves were compared with the log-rank test and p & lt;0.05 was considered as significant. The study was approved by the ethic committee of Padua university hospital. RESULTS. We recruited 284 CLL patients from 16 hematologic centers, 104 were treated with G-CHL and 180 with IB as first-line treatment. Once TP53dis cases were excluded, 102 patients treated with G-CHL and 80 treated with IB were included for further analysis. Among patients managed with G-CHL the median age was 75 years and 20% were older than 80 years, 47% had a CIRS≥6 (range 2-18), 68% had a clearance creatinine & lt;70ml/min, 60% showed a Rai stage III-IV, 32% were U-IGHV and 11% harbored 11q deletion by FISH. Patients treated with IB displayed a better renal function (p=0.0011) and were enriched in U-IGHV cases (p=0.0001). After a median follow-up of 21 months, 23 patients relapsed (20 G-CHL, 3 IB), 16 required a subsequent treatment (14 G-CHL, 2 IB) and 17 died (10 G-CHL and 7 IB). Two patients in the IB arm developed Richter syndrome. After 8 months from the start of treatment, the overall response rates in the G-CHL and IB arms were 86% vs 77% (p=0.1480), including 25% vs 6% complete remissions (CR, p=0.0013) and 61% vs 71% partial responses (PR, p=0.6320). Remarkably, an uMRD4 by flow-cytometry was documented in 42% and 9% of G-CHL patients in the peripheral blood and bone marrow, respectively. The median PFS was 33 months for G-CHL arm, but not reached for IB patients. The 24months PFS, TTNT and OS was 67% vs 91% (p=0.0012), 83% vs 97% (p=0.0128) and 89% vs 95% (p=0.5314) for the G-CHL and IB arms, respectively. Interestingly, the depth of response influenced PFS only in the G-CHL arm both in terms of clinical response (the median PFS was 8, 29 and 38 months for no responding, PR and CR patients) and MRD status (the 24 months PFS was 82% vs 50% and 100% vs 58% for uMRD4 vs MRD+ evaluated on peripheral blood and bone marrow). While the PFS was significantly better with IB than with G-CHL in U-IGHV (p=0.007), it was superimposable for M-IGHV patients (p=0.1946). Dose reductions or discontinuations were recorded in 39% and 44% of patients in the G-CHL and IB arms. Atrial fibrillation and infections occurred in 2% and 6% (p=0.0442), and in 25% and 17% (p=0.1455) of patients in the G-CHL and IB arms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. The Italian experience with G-CHL confirms the marked efficacy and safety of this combination, in particular for patients who reach a CR and/or an uMRD4. The continuous treatment with ibrutinib provides a better disease management in CLL patients unfit for fludarabine-base therapy, but some on them - particularly those with a M-IGHV status - can achieve a long-term disease control with a fixed duration obinutuzumab-based chemoimmunotherapy. Disclosures Visentin: Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Mauro:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octopharma: Consultancy; Astrazeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jannsen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Vitale:Janssen: Honoraria. Ciolli:Janssen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Research Funding. Sportoletti:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Rigolin:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Murru:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Gozzetti:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Molica:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Marchetti:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scarfo:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Honoraria. Reda:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Coscia:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Laurenti:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pizzolo:Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; janssen: Speakers Bureau. Semenzato:Takeda: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Foà:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cuneo:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Trentin:Shire: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2020-136883

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2020

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 140, No. Supplement 1 ( 2022-11-15), p. 2772-2775

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2022-169909

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2022

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 3118-3118

Abstract: BACKGROUD. The B-cell receptor inhibitor ibrutinib has significantly improved treatment and overall management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Although several data derived from clinical trials suggest that ibrutinib increases the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), the incidence of AF in a real-life cohort of CLL patients is unknown. Furthermore, it would be clinically relevant to identify patients at high risk of AF during ibrutinib. The aim of this study is to report the prevalence and risk factors of AF in ibrutinib-naive CLL, in order to define a predictive model for the development of AF and to test it in a cohort of subjects receiving ibrutinib. METHODS. We retrospectively analyzed data from 860 ibrutinib-naive CLL patients, referred to the Padua University hospital. Comorbidities, clinical and biological prognostic markers were analyzed using the Mann-Whiney, Fisher exact or Chi-square tests, when appropriated. Time to AF (TTAF) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were run to identify independent factors associated with AF. Then, risk values were obtained based on the hazard ratios. The score for AF was calculated as the sum of each risk values. Subsequently, the model was evaluated in a cohort of 354 ibrutinib-treated patients referred from 8 Italian hematological centers. RESULTS. Among the 860 patients from Padua hospital, 60% were male, 49% were older than 65 years, 73% were Binet A stage at diagnosis and 41% underwent at least one line of treatment. A prior history of AF was present in 21 patients (2.4%) at CLL diagnosis, while, among the remaining 839 patients without a previous history of AF, 47 (5.6%) developed it after a median follow-up of 9.4 years, resulting in an estimated incidence of almost 0.8% cases/year. Moreover, the median OS for patients with AF was significantly shorter than that patients without AF (12 vs 22 years, p 〈 0.0001). Based on univariate and multivariate analysis, variables associated with the risk of AF were: age 〉 65 years (p=0.001, 1 point), male gender (p=0.003, 1 point), valvular hearth diseases (p=0.001, 2 points), cardiopathy (p 〈 0.001, 3 points), hyperthyroidism (p=0.001, 1 point), chronic lung diseases (p=0.001, 1 point), diabetes mellitus (p=0.023, 1 point), severe infections (p=0.019, 1 point). As expected, no clinical and biological prognostic markers (i.e. Binet stage, IGHV mutation, TP53 abnormalities) for CLL were associated with an increased risk of AF. A predictive model was designed based on these factors and it stratified patients into 4 different groups. The estimated TTAF after 15 years of follow-up were 0%, 10%, 19% and 61% for patients with score 0, 1-2, 3-4, and ≥5 respectively (p 〈 0.001, Fig. 1A). Furthermore, it underwent internal validation using the bootstrap method. Subsequently, we applied our AF model to a cohort of 354 ibrutinib-treated patients, 64% were male, the median age was 69 years, 88 were treatment-naive, 70% U-IGHV and 39% harbored TP53 abnormalities. Forty-four subjects developed AF after a median observation of 25 months, with an estimated 2-year TTAF of 12%. Only 9 out of the 44 patients (20%) discontinued ibrutinib. Sixteen patients (4%) were classified as AF score 0, 218 (62%) score 1-2, 73 (21%) score 3-4 and 46 (13%) at least score 5. Our model was also able to identify patients at a higher risk AF during ibrutinib, in fact the 2-year risk of AF was 0%, 5%, 17% and 40% for patients with score 0, 1-2, 3-4, and ≥5 respectively (p 〈 0.001, Fig. 1B). Patients with a score of 5 or higher have a risk 20 times higher to developed AF than the other subjects (HR 19.6, 95% interval 7-52, p 〈 0.0001). So far, the OS of ibrutinib-treated patients with AF was not inferior to that of patients who did not developed AF (2-years OS 89% and 82%, respectively p=0.1252), but the median follow-up is only 2 years. CONCLUSIONS. In this study, variables associated with an increased risk of developing AF were identified and recapitulated into a scoring system. Our model proved to be a valid tool to identify patients at a higher risk of developing AF, including ibrutinib-treated patients. Taking these data into account, patients with a score ≥5 should be carefully monitored during ibrutinib treatment given the very high-risk of developing AF or should be considered for alternative therapies. Disclosures Visentin: janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mauro:abbvie: Other: board member; janssen: Other: board member. Reda:Janssen and Cilag: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Molica:Jansen: Other: Advisory board; Gilead: Other: Advisory board; Roche: Other: Advisory board; AbbVie: Other: Advisory board. Rigolin:Gilead: Research Funding. Tedeschi:Gilead: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy. Cortelezzi:novartis: Consultancy; abbvie: Consultancy; roche: Consultancy; janssen: Consultancy. Coscia:Abbvie, Gilead, Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen, Karyopharm: Research Funding. Cuneo:Abbvie: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau. Foà:CELGENE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; CELTRION: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; ABBVIE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; JANSSEN: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; GILEAD: Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; INCYTE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; ROCHE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau. Trentin:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria; Gilead: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-99-114899

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2018

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Hematological Oncology, Wiley, Vol. 37, No. 4 ( 2019-10), p. 508-512

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0278-0232 , 1099-1069

URL: Issue

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1002/hon.v37.4

DOI: 10.1002/hon.2655

Language: English

Publisher: Wiley

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2001443-0

In: American Journal of Hematology, Wiley, Vol. 97, No. 5 ( 2022-05)

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0361-8609 , 1096-8652

URL: Issue

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1002/ajh.v97.5

DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26502

Language: English

Publisher: Wiley

Publication Date: 2022

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1492749-4

In: Frontiers in Oncology, Frontiers Media SA, Vol. 12 ( 2022-11-21)

Abstract: One of the main issues in the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) deals with the choice between continuous or fixed-duration therapy. Continuous ibrutinib (IB), the first-in-class BTK inhibitor, and obinutuzumab-chlorambucil (G-CHL) are commonly used therapies for elderly and/or comorbid patients. No head-to-head comparison has been carried out. Within the Italian campus CLL network, we performed a retrospective study on CLL patients without TP53 disruption treated with IB or G-CHL as first-line therapy. Patients in the G-CHL arm had a higher CIRS score and the worst renal function. The overall response rates between the G-CHL and IB arms were similar, but more complete remissions (CRs) were achieved with G-CHL ( p = 0.0029). After a median follow-up of 30 months, the progression-free survival (PFS, p = 0.0061) and time to next treatment (TTNT, p = 0.0043), but not overall survival (OS, p = 0.6642), were better with IB than with G-CHL. Similar results were found after propensity score matching and multivariate analysis. While PFS and TTNT were longer with IB than with G-CHL in IGHV unmutated patients ( p = 0.0190 and 0.0137), they were superimposable for IGHV mutated patients ( p = 0.1900 and 0.1380). In the G-CHL arm, the depth of response (79% vs . 68% vs . 38% for CR, PR and SD/PD; p & lt; 0.0001) and measurable residual disease (MRD) influenced PFS (78% vs . 53% for undetectable MRD vs . detectable MRD, p = 0.0203). Hematological toxicities were common in the G-CHL arm, while IB was associated with higher costs. Although continuous IB provides better disease control in CLL, IGHV mutated patients and those achieving an undetectable MRD show a marked clinical and economic benefit from a fixed-duration obinutuzumab-based treatment.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 2234-943X

URL: Article

URL: Article

DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1033413

DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1033413.s001

Language: Unknown

Publisher: Frontiers Media SA

Publication Date: 2022

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2649216-7

In: Journal of Hematology & Oncology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 15, No. 1 ( 2022-08-26)

Abstract: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) may be more susceptible to COVID-19 related poor outcomes, including thrombosis and death, due to the advanced age, the presence of comorbidities, and the disease and treatment-related immune deficiency. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of thrombosis and bleeding in patients with CLL affected by severe COVID-19. Methods This is a retrospective multicenter study conducted by ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL, including patients from 79 centers across 22 countries. Data collection was conducted between April and May 2021. The COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed by the real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for SARS-CoV-2 on nasal or pharyngeal swabs. Severe cases of COVID-19 were defined by hospitalization and the need of oxygen or admission into ICU. Development and type of thrombotic events, presence and severity of bleeding complications were reported during treatment for COVID-19. Bleeding events were classified using ISTH definition. STROBE recommendations were used in order to enhance reporting. Results A total of 793 patients from 79 centers were included in the study with 593 being hospitalized (74.8%). Among these, 511 were defined as having severe COVID: 162 were admitted to the ICU while 349 received oxygen supplementation outside the ICU. Most patients (90.5%) were receiving thromboprophylaxis. During COVID-19 treatment, 11.1% developed a thromboembolic event, while 5.0% experienced bleeding. Thrombosis developed in 21.6% of patients who were not receiving thromboprophylaxis, in contrast to 10.6% of patients who were on thromboprophylaxis. Bleeding episodes were more frequent in patients receiving intermediate/therapeutic versus prophylactic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin (LWMH) (8.1% vs. 3.8%, respectively) and in elderly. In multivariate analysis, peak D-dimer level and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio were poor prognostic factors for thrombosis occurrence (OR = 1.022, 95%CI 1.007‒1.038 and OR = 1.025, 95%CI 1.001‒1.051, respectively), while thromboprophylaxis use was protective (OR = 0.199, 95%CI 0.061‒0.645). Age and LMWH intermediate/therapeutic dose administration were prognostic factors in multivariate model for bleeding (OR = 1.062, 95%CI 1.017–1.109 and OR = 2.438, 95%CI 1.023–5.813, respectively). Conclusions Patients with CLL affected by severe COVID-19 are at a high risk of thrombosis if thromboprophylaxis is not used, but also at increased risk of bleeding under the LMWH intermediate/therapeutic dose administration.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 1756-8722

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1186/s13045-022-01333-0

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2022

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2429631-4

In: Leukemia, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 35, No. 12 ( 2021-12), p. 3444-3454

Abstract: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) may be more susceptible to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to age, disease, and treatment-related immunosuppression. We aimed to assess risk factors of outcome and elucidate the impact of CLL-directed treatments on the course of COVID-19. We conducted a retrospective, international study, collectively including 941 patients with CLL and confirmed COVID-19. Data from the beginning of the pandemic until March 16, 2021, were collected from 91 centers. The risk factors of case fatality rate (CFR), disease severity, and overall survival (OS) were investigated. OS analysis was restricted to patients with severe COVID-19 (definition: hospitalization with need of oxygen or admission into an intensive care unit). CFR in patients with severe COVID-19 was 38.4%. OS was inferior for patients in all treatment categories compared to untreated ( p   〈  0.001). Untreated patients had a lower risk of death (HR = 0.54, 95% CI:0.41–0.72). The risk of death was higher for older patients and those suffering from cardiac failure (HR = 1.03, 95% CI:1.02–1.04; HR = 1.79, 95% CI:1.04–3.07, respectively). Age, CLL-directed treatment, and cardiac failure were significant risk factors of OS. Untreated patients had a better chance of survival than those on treatment or recently treated.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0887-6924 , 1476-5551

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1038/s41375-021-01450-8

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2021

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2008023-2

In: HemaSphere, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 7, No. S3 ( 2023-08), p. e24596f8-

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 2572-9241

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1097/01.HS9.0000967508.24596.f8

Language: English

Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Publication Date: 2023

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2922183-3