Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 7051-7051

Abstract: 7051 Background: Since complete molecular remission (CMR 4.5) defines a subgroup of patients who may stay in remission even after discontinuation of treatment, we analysed whether CMR 4.5 is reached faster with dose optimized IM 800 mg and whether the achievement of CMR 4.5 at specified points in time results in better survival than the achievement of less deep remissions. Methods: Confirmed CMR 4 and CMR 4.5 are defined as ≤ 0.01% BCR-ABL IS or ≥ 4 log reduction and ≤ 0.0032% BCR-ABL IS or ≥ 4.5 log reduction, respectively, from standardized baseline as determined by real-time PCR in 2 independent analyses. Details on CML-Study IV have been published (Hehlmann et al., JCO 2011). Cumulative incidences were estimated under consideration of competing risks. Landmark analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic impact of different remissions at 4 years on survival. Results: Of 1551 randomized patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML 1525 were evaluable. Median age was 52 years, 88% were EUTOS low risk, 12% high risk. 113 patients were transplanted (73 in first chronic phase), 246 received 2nd generation TKI. 152 patients have died. After a median observation time of 67.5 months, 6-year OS was 88.2%.CMR 4.5 was reached after a median of about 76.1 months with IM 800 and 107.3 months with IM 400. EUTOS low-risk patients reached all remissions faster than high-risk patients. Independent of treatment approach CMR 4.5 at 4 years predicted OS significantly better than complete cytogenetic remission (p=0.043), but not significantly better than major molecular remission (MMR) or CMR4. After a median observation of 3.9 years 1 of 626 patients with CMR 4 has progressed. Only six of the 394 patients with CMR 4.5 have died after a median observation time of 3.0 years, no patient has progressed. An additional finding was that achieving MMR at 3 and at 6 months predicts faster achievement of CMR 4.5. Conclusions: We conclude that dose optimized IM 800 induces CMR 4.5 faster than IM 400 and that CMR 4.5 at 4 years is associated with a survival advantage. Dose optimized IM 800 may provide an improved therapeutic basis for treatment discontinuation in patients with CML. Clinical trial information: NCT00055874.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.7051

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date: 2013

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 32, No. 5 ( 2014-02-10), p. 415-423

Abstract: Deep molecular response (MR 4.5 ) defines a subgroup of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who may stay in unmaintained remission after treatment discontinuation. It is unclear how many patients achieve MR 4.5 under different treatment modalities and whether MR 4.5 predicts survival. Patients and Methods Patients from the randomized CML-Study IV were analyzed for confirmed MR 4.5 which was defined as ≥ 4.5 log reduction of BCR-ABL on the international scale (IS) and determined by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in two consecutive analyses. Landmark analyses were performed to assess the impact of MR 4.5 on survival. Results Of 1,551 randomly assigned patients, 1,524 were assessable. After a median observation time of 67.5 months, 5-year overall survival (OS) was 90%, 5-year progression-free-survival was 87.5%, and 8-year OS was 86%. The cumulative incidence of MR 4.5 after 9 years was 70% (median, 4.9 years); confirmed MR 4.5 was 54%. MR 4.5 was reached more quickly with optimized high-dose imatinib than with imatinib 400 mg/day (P = .016). Independent of treatment approach, confirmed MR 4.5 at 4 years predicted significantly higher survival probabilities than 0.1% to 1% IS, which corresponds to complete cytogenetic remission (8-year OS, 92% v 83%; P = .047). High-dose imatinib and early major molecular remission predicted MR 4.5 . No patient with confirmed MR 4.5 has experienced progression. Conclusion MR 4.5 is a new molecular predictor of long-term outcome, is reached by a majority of patients treated with imatinib, and is achieved more quickly with optimized high-dose imatinib, which may provide an improved therapeutic basis for treatment discontinuation in CML.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.9020

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date: 2014

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 122, No. 21 ( 2013-11-15), p. 4008-4008

Abstract: Depth of molecular remission on tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment is of rising importance for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients (pts) with regard to possible treatment discontinuation and competing TKIs available to improve molecular response. At present, it is unknown which level of deep molecular response is necessary for optimal prognosis and for successfully stopping therapy. The aim of this work is both to evaluate the technical feasibility of molecular monitoring at the mentioned level and to search for factors allowing to predict MR5.0 in pts on imatinib (IM)-based treatment. Methods Real-time quantitative PCR on mRNA BCR-ABL transcripts in addition to total ABL transcripts as internal control has been performed on a LightCycler platform in 1,442 pts within the randomized CML-Study IV and adapted according to the International Scale (IS). In order to qualify for MR5.0 the BCR-ABLIS expression should meet one of the following criteria: a positive result ≤0.001% or a negative result with a minimum sample quality of 100,000 ABL copies (Cross et al., Leukemia 2012). Calculating cumulative incidences of remission or progression, the competing risks progression and/or death before possible progression were considered. Cox models were estimated for the multivariate analysis. Results In 1,198 of the 1,442 molecularly examined pts at least one sample fulfilled the sensitivity criteria for a MR5.0 (8,266 of 24,101 samples, 34.3%). Cumulative incidence of MR5.0 was 51% at 8 years. The median time to MR5.0 according to randomized treatment arms differed as follows: IM 800mg 79.7 months (mos), IM 400mg 95.0 mos, IM 400mg + IFNα 98.0 mos, IM 400mg + AraC 103.3 mos, IM 400mg after IFN failure 112.9 mos. A Cox model examining the different treatment arms compared to IM 400mg revealed a significantly higher chance for MR5.0 in the IM 800mg arm (HR 1.305, 95% CI 1.003-1.698, p=0.048). Baseline factors like thrombocytosis 〉 450/nl were associated with better responses (HR 1.701 compared to 〈 450/nl, 95% CI 1.405-2.059, p 〈 0.001) and higher leukocyte counts 〉 100/nl (HR 0.503 compared to 〈 50/nl, 95% CI 0.400-0.632, p 〈 0.001) and 50-100/nl (HR 0.746 compared to 〈 50/nl, 95% CI 0.591-0.942, p=0.014) with unfavorable responses. Other upfront factors like age, gender, blasts, eosinophils, hemoglobin, and EUTOS score did not significantly influence the probability for MR5.0. Taken all treatment arms together, our analyses have shown that the chance of achieving a MR5.0 by 8 years was considerably reduced if the pts had a BCR-ABLIS 〉 10% at 3 mos (40.2% vs 58.0%), 〉 1% at 6 mos (40.3% vs 68.7%), 〉 0.1% at 12 mos (37.7% vs 72.0%), and 〉 0.1% at 24 mos (21.5% vs 60.5%). Conclusion This evaluation of a large randomized trial reveals feasibility of MR5.0 detection in the majority of pts underlining the benefits of standardized molecular monitoring on the IS with optimized highly sensitive technologies. Baseline low leukocyte count, high thrombocyte count and high dose IM treatment are predictors of future MR5.0. Further, early molecular landmarks qualify for excellent outcome giving hope to a rising number of pts to successfully discontinue treatment and avoid possible side effects or comorbidities. Disclosures: Müller: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hehlmann:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Hochhaus:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Other; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria. Saussele:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Other; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel, Travel Other; Pfizer: Honoraria.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V122.21.4008.4008

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2013

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 3138-3138

Abstract: Introduction: The clonal selection of a mutant BCR-ABL positive clone can be observed in about one of two patients with imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The early detection of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations is crucial, since it allows to change the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) regimen in a timely manner and may therefore prevent disease progression and the accumulation of further genetic lesions. European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations suggest a mutation analysis if optimal response criteria are not achieved at 3, 6, 12 or 18 months, or whenever a loss of optimal response occurs (Soverini et al., Blood 2011). Several attempts have been made to derive this indication from a specific increase of BCR-ABL levels. Here we report on the correlation of a rise in BCR-ABL transcript levels and the prevalence of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations in imatinib-treated patients of the CML-Study IV. Methods: A total of 1,173 patients were enrolled until 2009 and randomized to one of four imatinib-based treatment arms. BCR-ABLIS of 988 patients was determined in 7,876 samples by quantitative RT-PCR in the central laboratory (median sample number per patient: 8.4, range 1-37; median follow up: 34 months, range 0-86), representing the eligible patients for the study. Thereby, the estimated intra-laboratory variance is assumed to be about 20%. A first rise of BCR-ABLIS to at least two-fold and 〉 0.1% between two samples of a patient's molecular course defined a sample suspected of bearing a mutant BCR-ABL positive clone. A mutation analysis was performed on this critical sample by direct sequencing of ABL exons 4 to 10. Results: A critical rise in BCR-ABLIS was observed in 231 of 988 patients (23%) after a median of 15.2 months on treatment (range 2.8-59.4). In the corresponding sample 33 mutant clones could be detected in 31 patients (13%). Thereby a steeper rise of BCR-ABLIS was correlated with a higher incidence of BCR-ABL mutations in the respective group (table). A total of 18 different mutations could be detected, the most frequent were: M244V, n=7 (21%); E255K, n=4 (12%); T315I, n=3 (9%); L248V, G250E, L387M and F486S, n=2 (6%), respectively. Mutations occur in a substantial proportion (8%) of patients with an only 2 to 3-fold rise of BCR-ABLIS transcript levels (table). Therefore, the most sensitive cut-off should be applied and mutation analysis may be triggered by a doubling of BCR-ABL transcripts at levels 〉 0.1% IS. Conclusion: BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations occur already in a substantial proportion of patients with a doubling of BCR-ABL transcript levels, which should determine mutation analysis. Table 1. Rise of BCR-ABL expression Patients (n) Patients with BCR-ABL mutations (n) Patients with BCR-ABL mutations (%) Inter-sample interval(median, days) 2 to 3-fold 72 6 8.3 98 3 to 5-fold 50 3 6.0 100 5 to 10-fold 39 4 10.3 99 10 to 100-fold 49 10 20.4 98 〉 100-fold 21 8 38.1 125 〉 2-fold (total) 231 31 13.4 101 Disclosures Hanfstein: Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Hehlmann:Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Saussele:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel, Travel Other; Pfizer: Honoraria, Travel, Travel Other. Schnittger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Equity Ownership. Neubauer:MedUpdate: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kneba:Novartis: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Pfirrmann:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Hochhaus:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Müller:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V124.21.3138.3138

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2014

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 3761-3761

Abstract: Abstract 3761 Introduction: Early assessment of molecular and cytogenetic response at 3 months of imatinib treatment has been shown to predict survival and might trigger treatment intensification in slow responders who are supposed to harbor a BCR-ABL positive clone with inferior susceptibility to tyrosine kinase inhibition (Hanfstein et al., Leukemia 2012). BCR-ABL transcript levels at 3 months depend on levels at diagnosis and the subsequent decline under treatment. Which of both parameters determines the clinical course and allows for prediction of survival is unclear. The BCR-ABL/ABL ratio is supposed to be skewed for high values, e.g. 〉 10%, due to the fact that ABL transcripts are also amplified from the fusion gene and in fact BCR-ABL/(ABL + BCR-ABL) is determined. Therefore, Beta-glucuronidase (GUS) was used as reference gene to determine high transcript levels at diagnosis. In addition, the linearity of the BCR-ABL/GUS scale allowed for an optimization of prognostic cut-off levels. We compared the significance of 1) BCR-ABL/GUS at diagnosis, 2) BCR-ABL/GUS at 3 months, 3) the individual reduction of transcripts given by (BCR-ABL/GUS at 3 months)/(BCR-ABL/GUS at diagnosis), and 4) the established 10% BCR-ABL/ABL landmark expressed on the international scale (BCR-ABLIS). Patients and methods: A total of 337 patients (pts) were investigated. According to the protocol of the German CML study IV pts could have been pre-treated with imatinib up to 6 weeks before randomization. 56 pts with imatinib onset before initial blood sampling within the study were excluded from the analysis. A total of 281 evaluable patients (median age 51 years, range 17–85, 42% female) were treated with an imatinib-based therapy consisting of imatinib 400 mg/d (n=76), imatinib 800 mg/d (n=110) and combinations of standard dose imatinib with interferon alpha (n=84) and low-dose cytarabine (n=11). Median follow-up was 4.8 years (range 1–10). Transcript levels of BCR-ABL, ABL, and GUS were determined by quantitative RT-PCR from samples taken before imatinib onset (“at diagnosis”) and 3 month samples. Only patients expressing typical BCR-ABL transcripts (b2a2 and/or b3a2) were considered. Disease progression was defined by the incidence of accelerated phase, blastic phase or death from any reason. A landmark analysis was performed for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after dichotomizing patients by a cut-off optimized by the cumulative martingale residuals method. Results: The median BCR-ABL/GUS ratio was 15.5% at diagnosis (0.07–271) and 0.62% at 3 months (0–34.7) reflecting a decline by 1.4 log. Disease progression was observed in 17 patients (6.0%), 14 of them died (5.0%). With regard to the above described parameters the following findings were observed: 1) at diagnosis no cut-off level could be identified for BCR-ABL/GUS ratios to separate two prognostic groups according to long-term PFS or OS. 2) At 3 months an optimized 2.8% BCR-ABL/GUS cut-off separated a high-risk group of 61 pts (22% of pts, 8-year PFS 78%, 8-year OS 81%) from a good-risk group of 220 pts (78% of pts, 8-year PFS 94%, 8-year OS 94%, p 〈 0.001, respectively). 3) At 3 months an individual reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts to at least 40% (0.4 log) of the initial level separated best and divided a high-risk group of 33 pts (12% of pts, 8-year PFS 74%, 8-year OS 80%) from a good-risk group of 248 pts (88% of pts, 8-year PFS 93%, 8-year OS 93%, p 〈 0.001, respectively). 4) When the established 10% BCR-ABLIS at 3 months was investigated, 63 pts were high-risk (22% of pts, 8-year PFS 82%, 8-year OS 85%) and 218 good-risk (78% of pts, 8-year PFS 91%, 8-year OS 93%, p=0.002 for PFS, p=0.011 for OS). Conclusions: Initial BCR-ABL transcript levels at diagnosis did not show prognostic significance. To predict survival at 3 months of treatment the absolute transcript level normalized by ABL or GUS can be used. Disclosures: Schnittger: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Equity Ownership. Hochhaus:Novartis, BMS, MSD, Ariad, Pfizer: Consultancy Other, Honoraria, Research Funding. Müller:Novartis, BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V120.21.3761.3761

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2012

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 122, No. 21 ( 2013-11-15), p. 611-611

Abstract: In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), clonal chromosome aberrations in metaphases not carrying a t(9;22)(q34;q11) have been described during treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), so-called Philadelphia-negative (Ph-) clones. The most frequent abnormalities in these Ph- clones reported are -7, +8 and -Y. This pattern of cytogenetic aberrations is comparable to alterations found in MDS. In the majority of patients no clear evidence of a secondary hematologic malignancy is observed. However, few cases especially with -7 were reported to evolve to MDS or even AML. Aim 1) Analyze whether TKI-treated CML patients who developed Ph- clones also harbour molecular mutations. 2) Evaluate whether these mutations were already present at diagnosis of CML. Patients and Methods We selected 42 patients (pts) treated with TKIs (Imatinib: n=27, Nilotinib: n=2, and 13 pts who were treated with 2 or 3 different TKIs) who developed Ph- clones. Median time from start of therapy to analysis was 3.2 years (range 8.9 months-13.5 years). 23 cases were male and 19 female; median age was 63.3 years (range: 34.1-83.9 years). Cytogenetics in pts with Ph- clones were as follows: +8 sole (n=18), -Y (n=7), -7 sole (n=2), +9 (n=2), an 10 cases with various abnormalities. Additional three cases had two different clones: 1) -7 and +8; 2) +8 and +Y, 3) -Y and +Y. Median clone size was 37.5% (range 10-100%) of all metaphases. BCR-ABL1 levels at the time point of analysis were between 0 and 4.5 (median: 0.019) according to international scale. All cases were analyzed with a pan-myeloid gene panel of 29 genes: ASXL1, BCOR, BRAF, CBL, DNMT3A, ETV6, EZH2, FLT3 (TKD), IDH1, IDH2, JAK2, KIT, KRAS, MLL-PTD, NOTCH1, NPM1, NRAS, PRPF40B, PTPN11, RUNX1, SF1, SF3A1, SF3B1, SRSF2, TET2, TP53, U2AF1, U2AF2 and ZRSR2. Either complete coding genes or hotspots were first amplified by a microdroplet-based assay (RainDance, Lexington, MA) and subsequently sequenced with a MiSeq instrument (Illumina, San Diego, CA). RUNX1 was sequenced on the 454 Life Sciences NGS platform and the MLL-PTD was analyzed by quantitative real time PCR. Median coverage per amplicon was 2215 reads (range 100-24,716). The lower limit of detection was set at a cut-off of 1.5%. Results In total, in 13/42 pts (31.0%) one (n=9) or two (n=4) of the analyzed genes were mutated. Median mutation load was 15% (range: 3-50%). In detail, mutations in the following genes were detected: ASXL1 (n=5), DNMT3A (n=4), NRAS (n=2) and each one in BCOR, CBL, MLL-PTD, RUNX1, TET2 and ZRSR2. 4 pts had combinations of: 2 ASXL1mut, 2 NRASmut, BCORmut and RUNX1mut, or ASXL1mut with MLL-PTD, respectively. Subsequently, the mutations were tracked as far as serially collected samples were available (12 pts with a total of 125 samples, range: 3-20 samples/pt) from earlier or later time points. In 6 cases it clearly could be shown that the mutations were not present at diagnosis and arose 5 months, 7 months, 14 months, 15 months, 5 years, and 7 years after start of TKI therapy, respectively. In all these cases the mutation loads increased in parallel to decreasing BCR-ABL1 levels. In one of these cases one mutation was found 3 years and a second 11 years after start of therapy. Importantly, in three of these cases the molecular mutations were detectable before the cytogenetic aberration in the Ph- clone. In six further cases mutations were present with similar levels in several samples but due to lack of samples from initial diagnosis no estimation of the time to their occurrence was possible. In one of these cases the BCR-ABL1 load increased again during therapy and the DNMT3A mutation decreased showing that the BCR-ABL+ clone and the DNMT3Amut clone were competitive clones. Conclusions 1) For the first time we show that more than 30% of CML patients treated with TKI who develop Ph- clones as defined by cytogenetic abnormalities, also harbour molecular mutations. 2) For most of the cases it was shown that these mutations arose during treatment. 3) In some cases the molecular mutations were detectable before the cytogenetic aberrations. This may be regarded as further proof of the malignant character of these Ph- clones. However, none of the analyzed cases, so far, developed a secondary disease, i.e. MDS or AML, thus the relevance of these findings is still unclear and needs further attention. Disclosures: Schnittger: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kuznia:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Meggendorfer:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Nadarajah:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Jeromin:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Alpermann:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Roller:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Albuquerque:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Weissmann:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Eder:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Dicker:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Kern:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kohlmann:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership; Novartis: Research Funding. Hochhaus:Novartis: Research Funding. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V122.21.611.611

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2013

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 122, No. 21 ( 2013-11-15), p. 253-253

Abstract: Early assessment of BCR-ABL transcript levels at 3 months allows the prediction of survival and may serve as a trigger for treatment intensification in CML patients with slow response to imatinib. The exact decline of BCR-ABL transcript levels within the first 3 months of treatment is defined by the ratio BCR-ABL transcripts at 3 months to BCR-ABL transcripts at baseline. This ratio might better reflect the individual biology of disease and its susceptibility to tyrosine kinase inhibition. Methods A total of 408 chronic phase CML patients (pts) with baseline and 3 month blood samples available in one single laboratory were investigated. Pts with pre-treatment before first blood sampling were excluded (imatinib with or without hydroxyurea, n=58; hydroxyurea only, n=49). A total of 301 evaluable pts (median age 52 years, range 18-85, 41% female) were treated with an imatinib-based therapy within the CML-Study IV. Median follow-up was 4.8 years. Transcript levels of BCR-ABL, total ABL, and beta-glucuronidase (GUS) were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Exploratory landmark analyses were performed with regard to overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS) to evaluate the prognostic significance of (i) BCR-ABL/GUS before treatment, (ii) the individual reduction of transcripts given by (BCR-ABL/GUS at 3 months) / (BCR-ABL/GUS before treatment), and (iii) the 3-month 10% BCR-ABLIS landmark. Results The median BCR-ABL/GUS ratio was 15.5% at diagnosis (0.06-107) and 0.63% at 3 months (0-84) reflecting a decline to the 0.04-fold (1.4 log reduction). i) No prognostic cut-off could be identified for BCR-ABL/GUS before treatment. ii) A reduction to the 0.35-fold of the initial BCR-ABL transcript level at diagnosis (0.46 log reduction) was identified as best cut-off according to a hazard ratio of 5.6 (95%-CI 2.3-13.4, p 〈 0.001 for PFS). Using this cut-off a high-risk group of 48 pts (16% of pts, 5-year PFS and OS: 77% and 83%) was separated from a good-risk group of 253 pts (84% of pts, 5-year PFS and OS: 96% and 98%). iii) As a comparison we investigated the 10% BCR-ABLIS landmark at 3 months with a hazard ratio of 2.4 (95%-CI 1.0-5.8, p=0.06 for PFS). With this landmark a high-risk group of 67 pts (22% of pts, 5-year PFS and OS: 87% and 90%) was separated from a good-risk group of 234 pts (78% of pts, 5-year PFS and OS: 95% and 97%). Conclusion A two-group risk stratification according to the individual reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts to the 0.35-fold of pre-treatment levels yields a superior separation of risk groups with a 5-year difference of 19% for PFS and 15% for OS. This predictive marker might identify patients at risk more precisely than 3-month 10% BCR-ABLIS. Disclosures: Hehlmann: BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Saussele:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Other; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel, Travel Other; Pfizer: Honoraria. Hochhaus:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Other; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Müller:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V122.21.253.253

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2013

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Annals of Hematology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 93, No. 1 ( 2014-1), p. 71-80

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0939-5555 , 1432-0584

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00277-013-1937-4

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2014

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1458429-3

In: Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer, Wiley, ( 2010), p. NA-NA

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 1045-2257 , 1098-2264

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20757

Language: English

Publisher: Wiley

Publication Date: 2010

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1018988-9

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1492641-6

SSG: 12

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 155-155

Abstract: Background: In the current ELN recommendations (Baccarani et al., Blood 2013) the optimal time point to achieve major molecular remission (MMR) is defined at 12 months after diagnosis of CML. MMR is not a failure criterion at any time point leading to uncertainties when to change therapy in CML patients not reaching MMR after 12 months. Aims: We sought to evaluate a failure time point for MMR using data of the CML-Study IV, a randomized five-arm trial designed to optimize imatinib therapy alone or in combination. In addition the optimal time-point to achieve a MMR should be evaluated. Methods: Patients with valid molecular analysis on MR4 level were divided randomly into a learning (LS) and a validation sample (VS). For the LS, MR2 (defined as BCR-ABL 〈 1% which corresponds to complete cytogenetic remission (Lauseker et al. 2014)), MMR and deep molecular remission levels (MR4 or deeper) monthly landmarks were defined between one and five years after diagnosis. A patient was considered to be in MR2, MMR or MR4 from the first diagnosis of the corresponding remission level and could only change to a higher level of response. Patients were censored after SCT. The best prediction time was found via dynamic prediction by landmarking (van Houwelingen, Scand J Stat 2007). For the failure time point analysis, for each of the resulting 48 landmarks, a Cox model was used to define the time to progression with age and EUTOS score as additional prognostic factors. Additionally, the regression coefficients of the model of one landmark were converted to hazard ratios (HR) and treated as dependent on the HRs of the other landmarks, using a cubic smoothing function (see Fig 1). The minimum of this function was considered to be the optimal landmark point for the prediction of progression-free survival (PFS). For the calculated time point, landmark analysis for probability of PFS (defined as appearance of accelerated phase, blast crisis or death) was performed in the VS. For the evaluation of the optimal time point of achieving a MMR the same analysis was done from 0.25 to 5 years to define the time to MR4 or deeper. Results: 1551 patients were randomized from 2002 to 2012, 1358 had a valid molecular analysis on the MR4 level. 114 patients in the imatinib after IFN arm and 16 patients with missing EUTOS score were excluded. Of the 1228 evaluable patients two thirds were randomly allocated to the LS (n=818) and one third to the VS (n=410). Percentage of patients of the LS in MR2, MMR and MR4 or deeper at one year was 28%, 29% and 14%, and at 5 years 5%, 21% and 71%, respectively. Monthly time points in between were also calculated. 44 patients of the LS reached MMR on second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors.. The minimum of the cubic function of the HRs was found for MMR at 2.34 years with a HR of 0.25 (compared to patients without any remission) and 0.75 compared to those in MR2. For MR4 or deeper no exact time point could be calculated (see Fig. 1), although it was shown that the risk of progression was slightly lower for MR4 than for MMR. Since the time interval for molecular evaluation in the study is 3 months, the validation was done with 2.25 instead of 2.34 years. 364 of the 410 of the VS were still at risk at this time point and evaluable. A significant PFS advantage for patients in MMR could be demonstrated (p=0.018). At 8 years, the probability of PFS for patients in MMR was 90.8% (confidence interval 87.0-93.7%) vs. 80.5% (confidence interval 70.2-88.6%) for patients not in MMR (see Fig 2). For the optimal MMR analysis no singular time point could be calculated as the earlier a MMR was reached the higher was the chance to achieve a MR4. Conclusions: In this model, an optimal time point to predict PFS in patients with MMR was defined at 2.25 years after diagnosis and could be validated as significant. Nevertheless, patients being in MMR had a lower risk of progression than patients not being in MMR on any other time point as well. With this model we can give hints when to define MMR as failure and a change in therapy should be considered. Despite this we should keep in mind that the earlier MMR was achieved the higher was the chance to achieve deep molecular response later during therapy. Figure 1 Cubic smoothing function of the HR to predict PFS with confidence intervals Figure 1. Cubic smoothing function of the HR to predict PFS with confidence intervals Figure 2 Landmark analysis at 2.25 years for PFS of the VS Figure 2. Landmark analysis at 2.25 years for PFS of the VS Disclosures Saussele: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel, Travel Other; Pfizer: Honoraria, Travel, Travel Other. Hehlmann:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Schnittger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Equity Ownership. Hanfstein:Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Neubauer:MedUpdate: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kneba:Novartis: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Pfirrmann:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Hochhaus:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Müller:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V124.21.155.155

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2014

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7