Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Springer Science and Business Media LLC  (2)
  • Tachihara, Motoko  (2)
Type of Medium
Publisher
  • Springer Science and Business Media LLC  (2)
Language
Years
  • 1
    In: BMC Cancer, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 22, No. 1 ( 2022-12)
    Abstract: Bronchoscopy can be a distress for the patient. There have been few studies on the combination of sedatives and opioids. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the usefulness and safety of administration of the combination of midazolam and pethidine during bronchoscopy. Methods In this prospective randomized single (patient)-blind study, we randomly assigned 100 patients who were scheduled to undergo bronchoscopy biopsy to receive treatment with either the midazolam/pethidine combination (combination group) or midazolam alone (midazolam group) during examinations. After the end of bronchoscopy, patients completed a questionnaire and the visual analogue scale was measured. The primary outcome was the patients’ acceptance of re-examination assessed by visual analogue scale. We also assessed pain levels, vital signs, midazolam use, xylocaine use, and adverse events. Univariate analyses were performed using Fisher’s exact test for categorical data, and the t-test or Mann-Whitney test was carried out for analysis of numeric data. All P -values were two-sided, and values 〈  0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results We analyzed 47 patients in the combination group and 49 patients in the midazolam group. The primary outcome was a good trend in the combination group, but not significantly different (3.82 ± 2.3 in combination group versus 4.17 ± 2.75 in midazolam alone, P  = 0.400). In the combination group, the visual analog scale score for pain during bronchoscopy was significantly lower (1.10 ± 1.88 versus 2.13 ± 2.42, P  = 0.022), and the sedation level score per the modified observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation scale was significantly deeper (3.49 ± 0.98 versus 3.94 ± 1.03, P  = 0.031). Maximal systolic blood pressure during testing was significantly lower (162.39 ± 23.45 mmHg versus 178.24 ± 30.24 mmHg, P  = 0.005), and the number of additional administrations of midazolam was significantly lower (2.06 ± 1.45 versus 2.63 ± 1.35, P  = 0.049). There were also significantly fewer adverse events (30 versus 41, P  = 0.036). Conclusions The combination uses of midazolam and pethidine for sedation resulted in significant improvements in the pain, blood pressure, additional use of midazolam, and safety during bronchoscopy among patients. Trial registration This study was registered in the University Medical Hospital Information Network in Japan (UMINCTR Registration number: UMIN000032230 , Registered: 13/April/2018).
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1471-2407
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2041352-X
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Scientific Reports, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 11, No. 1 ( 2021-05-11)
    Abstract: Objective evaluations of cough frequency are considered important for assessing the clinical state of patients with respiratory diseases. However, cough monitors with audio recordings are rarely used in clinical settings. Issues regarding privacy and background noise with audio recordings are barriers to the wide use of these monitors; to solve these problems, we developed a novel automatic cough frequency monitoring system combining a triaxial accelerator and a stretchable strain sensor. Eleven healthy adult volunteers and 10 adult patients with cough were enrolled. The participants wore two devices for 30 min for the cough measurements. An accelerator was attached to the epigastric region, and a stretchable strain sensor was worn around their neck. When the subjects coughed, these devices displayed specific waveforms. The data from all the participants were categorized into a training dataset and a test dataset. Using a variational autoencoder, a machine learning algorithm with deep learning, the components of the test dataset were automatically judged as being a “cough unit” or “non-cough unit”. The sensitivity and specificity in detecting coughs were 92% and 96%, respectively. Our cough monitoring system has the potential to be widely used in clinical settings without any concerns regarding privacy or background noise.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2045-2322
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2615211-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages