Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 121, No. 19 ( 2013-05-09), p. 3818-3824

Kurzfassung: Independent predictors of stable, undetectable BCR-ABL1 during first-line imatinib therapy were female sex and the BCR-ABL1 value at 3 months. Time to achieve an MMR influenced time to stable, undetectable BCR-ABL1, suggesting slower dynamics of BCR-ABL1 decline with delayed MMR.

Materialart: Online-Ressource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-10-462291

Sprache: Englisch

Verlag: American Society of Hematology

Publikationsdatum: 2013

ZDB Id: 1468538-3

ZDB Id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 1890-1890

Kurzfassung: Background: Discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients in stable deep molecular response leads to treatment-free remission (TFR) in approximately 50% of cases. In most studies, monthly PCRs was performed for 12 months followed by 2-3 monthly testing thereafter. Around 80% of molecular relapses occur within the first 6 months after TKI cessation. The current recommendation for TKI recommencement is a single BCR-ABL1 value ≥0.1% IS (International scale), indicating loss of major molecular response (MMR). Not all institutions can offer monthly PCR monitoring due to financial constraints, particularly relevant in developing countries. For some patients, remaining on TKI is a cheaper alternative. Aim: To assess the safety of less frequent BCR-ABL1 monitoring for detection of loss of MMR for CML patients attempting TFR. Methods: We monitored 85 patients who ceased TKI with the aim of achieving TFR. Patients had a minimum of 24 months of sustained MR4 (n=3) or MR4.5 (n=82) prior to TKI cessation. At the time of TKI cessation, 64 patients were on imatinib (75%), 17 on nilotinib (20%) and 4 on dasatinib (5%). Forty of the patients were enrolled in the TWISTER study where the criteria for TKI recommencement was loss of MMR or 2 consecutively rising BCR-ABL1 positive values. The remaining patients were on a registry study and the trigger for TKI recommencement was loss of MMR. Results: TKI recommencement occurred in 49 of 85 patients. Median time to TKI recommencement was 4 months (range 2-28 months) at a median BCR-ABL1 value of 0.27% on the International Scale (IS), range 0.002-24% IS. Thirty-six of the 49 patients (73%) lost MMR prior to TKI recommencement; the median time to loss of MMR was 3 months (range 1 to 10 months). One patient lost MMR within the first month. Figure A demonstrates the time to loss of MMR in the 36 patients with PCR values ≥ 0.1%. Eighteen of the 36 patients (50%) lost MMR by the 3 month BCR-ABL1 assessment and 35 of 36 patients (97%) lost MMR by 6 months. The latest loss of MMR was at 10 months. Fourteen patients recommenced TKI at a BCR-ABL1 value of 〉 1% and 1 recommenced at a value 〉 10%. Clinician delay in TKI recommencement of 1 month resulted in a BCR-ABL1 rise from 0.84% to 24% with associated loss of complete hematological response. We propose monthly BCR-ABL1 testing between 2 and 6 months post TKI cessation followed by 2 monthly testing. Detection of a BCR-ABL1 value of ≥0.1% would trigger TKI recommencement. In the presence of a rising BCR-ABL1, which remains ≤0.1%, monthly monitoring should ensue in order to avoid hematological relapse. If this strategy were employed in this cohort of patients, only 1 patient would have had the trigger for TKI recommencement delayed by 1 month (estimated BCR-ABL1 at recommencement ~2.5%). This patient had loss of MMR in the first month post TKI cessation. If this molecular monitoring strategy was applied to patients in our cohort who had not lost MMR at TKI recommencement, we estimate that 1 other patient would have had TKI recommencement delayed by 1 month based on the average BCR-ABL1 doubling time of 1 log per month. A proportion of patients maintain low levels of BCR-ABL1 after TKI cessation and do not lose MMR. There were 2 such patients in our cohort. Conclusion: The critical time for molecular monitoring to trigger TKI recommencement is the first 6 months. A monthly monitoring strategy beginning 2 months after cessation would capture the majority of patients at loss of MMR. The data suggest that after 6 months, 2-monthly monitoring could follow. Monthly BCR-ABL1 testing can be re-introduced in the event of a positive result in those that ceased TKI with undetectable BCR-ABL1 or if there is a BCR-ABL1 result higher than the cessation value. This approach would reduce BCR-ABL1 testing by approximately 33% in the majority of cases while minimizing hematological relapse. Therefore this strategy would reduce the cost and inconvenience of molecular monitoring for a trial of TKI cessation, making the option of TFR available to some patients for whom it is otherwise not feasible. Disclosures Branford: Qiagen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cepheid: Consultancy; Ariad: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Yeung:BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Ross:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Hughes:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG): Other: Chair of the CML/MPN Disease Group.

Materialart: Online-Ressource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V128.22.1890.1890

Sprache: Englisch

Verlag: American Society of Hematology

Publikationsdatum: 2016

ZDB Id: 1468538-3

ZDB Id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 209-209

Kurzfassung: Abstract 209 Background: Although the majority of chronic phase (CP) Philadelphia positive (Ph+) chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients (pts) achieve good disease control with imatinib, some pts demonstrate suboptimal responses. Early dose escalation or switching to nilotinib, a more potent BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor, as soon as suboptimal molecular response is recognised may improve response and disease outcome. Aim: To optimise clinical and molecular outcomes in Ph+ CML using imatinib (IM) as frontline therapy with selective IM dose escalation based on pharmacokinetic (PK) results and switching to nilotinib (NIL) in case of suboptimal response, or IM-intolerance. Method: TIDEL-II is a multicentre, single arm prospective ALLG trial in de novo CP-CML pts with 2 separate sequential cohorts. In Cohort I, pts are treated with IM 600mg/d up-front, aiming for BCR-ABL RQ-PCR target values of ≤ 10%, 1%, and 0.1% IS (major molecular response, MMR) at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively. Pts who do not reach these treatment targets are classified as suboptimal responders. Dose escalation to 800mg/d or maximal tolerated dose occurs if trough IM level is 〈 1000ng/mL at day 22, or for suboptimal response. A switch to NIL (400mg bid) is triggered if molecular targets are still not met 3 months after IM escalation, or for loss or response, or for IM intolerance (Grade III/IV or persistent Grade II non-haematological toxicity). Results: 105 pts were assessed with median follow up of 18.9 months (range: 9–33) in cohort I. For pts with a minimum of 12 months follow up (n=80), complete cytogenetic response (CCR), MMR and complete molecular response (CMR)# rates at 12 months were 92%, 66% and 11% respectively. BCR-ABL levels at 3 months were predictive of MMR at 12 months, but not for CMR due to small pt numbers (Table 1). For pts who failed to achieve BCR-ABL of ≤10% at 3 months, the 12 month MMR rate was 25% (vs 5% in TIDEL-I where pts were also started on IM 600mg/d and suboptimal responders were dose escalated to IM 800mg/d). Of the 105 pts, 16 pts dose escalated IM due to a day 22 IM blood level 〈 1000ng/mL, after which 2/16 switched to NIL (1 suboptimal, 1 intolerant); all achieved CCR. Twelve pts dose escalated for suboptimal response, 7 subsequently switched to NIL for again failing treatment targets. In all, 21/105 pts (20%) switched to NIL: 7 for suboptimal response and 14 for intolerance. The median time to switching and the median pre-switch prescribed IM dose were 468 days & 800mg/d for the suboptimal group; and 183 days & 600mg/d for the intolerant group respectively. Of these, 20/21 achieved or remained in CCR. At the time of switching to NIL, 19/21 pts were not in MMR. With a median follow-up of 295 days post switch to NIL, 9/12 intolerant pts (75%) achieved MMR, whereas 1/7 suboptimal IM responders (14%) achieved MMR (median follow up after switching: 286 days). Only 7/105 pts (7%) discontinued treatment: 4 for non-compliance, 1 pt with a T315I mutation and 2 pts with blast crisis (BC). Progression to BC was associated with detectable mutations: 1 pt with 4 different mutations including T315I and 1 pt with H396P mutation. The progression rate to AP/BC was 2%. The overall mutation rate was 5/105 (5%). The 2 pts who progressed and the pt who discontinued when a T315I mutation was detected were among the 28 pts with BCR-ABL values 〉 1.0% at 3 months. In contrast, no resistant mutations were detected or transformations occurred in the 49 pts with BCR-ABL values ≤1.0% at 3 months. Conclusion: A strategy of selective intensification of BCR-ABL inhibitor therapy based on molecular response and PK values resulted in a 66% MMR rate by 12 months. Despite a minority of pts (20%) requiring a switch to NIL, this has enhanced the rate of MMR by 12 months when compared to IM intensification alone as seen in TIDEL-I where the rate of MMR and CMR by 12 months was 47% and 9% respectively. The IM intolerant pts demonstrated excellent response rates after switching to NIL. To date, the results from TIDEL-II compare favourably with other frontline strategies with regards to response and transformation rates. Disclosures: Yeung: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Osborn:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. White:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Branford:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Slader:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ross:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mills:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hughes:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria.

Materialart: Online-Ressource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V116.21.209.209

Sprache: Englisch

Verlag: American Society of Hematology

Publikationsdatum: 2010

ZDB Id: 1468538-3

ZDB Id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 939-939

Kurzfassung: The TIDEL-II trial used imatinib (IM) upfront in patients (pts) newly diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase (CML-CP), and switched selected pts to nilotinib (NIL) on the basis of IM intolerance or failure to achieve time-dependent molecular response. We previously reported major molecular response (MMR; BCR-ABL ≤0.1% IS) at 12 months (mths) and transformation-free survival (TFS) at 3 years. This abstract reports the final analysis with minimum follow-up of 60 months. Patients were enrolled across 27 Australasian sites in 2 equal and sequential cohorts. All started treatment with IM 600mg OD and dose escalated to IM 800mg OD if IM trough levels were 〈 1000ng/mL on day 22. A series of time-dependent molecular targets were set: BCR-ABL (IS) ≤10% at 3 mths (early molecular response: EMR), ≤1% at 6 mths and ≤0.1% at 12 mths. In cohort 1 (C1), pts failing to meet these targets dose escalated to IM 800 mg OD. Pts who failed to improve molecular response after another 3 mths, or were already on IM 800mg OD, switched to NIL 400mg BID. In cohort 2 (C2), pts who failed these targets switched to NIL directly. In addition, pts with grade III/IV or persistent grade II toxicity were also allowed to switch from IM to NIL. Data analysed were limited to 60 mths of follow-up. The study enrolled 210 pts with a median age of 49.7 years (range 16-81); 42% were female. Baseline demographics and outcomes were similar across 2 cohorts. Forty pts had day 22 IM trough 〈 1000ng/mL, and 31 had dose escalation. Switching to NIL occurred in 75 pts prior to 24 mths, 55 for failing TIDEL-II targets and 20 for IM intolerance. Table 1 summarises key results. In combination, 5 year overall survival (OS) and TFS and associated 95% confidence intervals, including withdrawn pts, were 95% (88-98%) and 92% (84-95%) respectively. Cumulative incidence by 60 mths of MMR was 86%, MR4 (BCR-ABL1 ≤ 0.01% IS) was 75% and MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1 ≤0.0032%) was 59%. Of the 181 pts achieving MMR on study, 44 (24%) did so after switching to NIL; of the 119 pts achieving MR4.5, 27 (23%) did so after switching to NIL. At 60 mths, 75 (36%) pts had withdrawn from study, and 14 were lost to follow up (including 12 with outstanding data queries). Of the 121 pts (58%) who remained on TIDEL-II until 60 mths, 33 were on NIL (30 in MMR), 77 on IM (76 in MMR); treatment was unknown for 11 (10 in MMR). The median dose of IM was 600mg OD. Of the 51 pts who dose escalated to IM 800mg OD (31 for low IM trough level and 20 for failing to achieve molecular targets), only 9 remained on this dose until mth 60 (5 and 4 pts form the respective groups). Eight pts transformed to accelerated or blastic phase; 5 within the 1st year, 2 in the 3rd and 1 in the 5th year; 2/8 occurred after study withdrawal. There were 14 deaths, mostly due to cardiac events (n=5) or progressive leukaemia (n=6). In all, 13/210 pts (6%) had cardiac, cerebral or peripheral vascular disease, 9 while on NIL and 4 having only had IM. Pts failing to meet molecular targets (analysed according to the 1st target failed) at 3, 6 and 12 mths numbered 25 (12%), 23 (11%) and 30 (14%) respectively with 19, 16 and 20 switching to NIL (subsequent molecular outcomes, Table 2). Pts failing to achieve EMR had poor achievement of MMR and MR4.5 (44% and 8% respectively by 60 mths). Of the 11 EMR failure pts who achieved MMR, only 4 remained in MMR at 60 mths. Pts failing to achieve BCR-ABL≤ 1% at 6 mths had similarly poor outcomes, with MMR and MR4.5 being 52% and 13% respectively. In pts failing to achieve MMR by 12 months, MMR and MR4.5 by 60 mths were 93% and 33% respectively. Twenty pts switched to NIL for IM intolerance prior to 24 mths: 9/20 already in MMR, and 3/20 already in MR4.5 at time of switching. For the remaining pts, MMR and MR4.5 were achieved by 100% and 88% after switching. The TIDEL-II strategy of combining IM and NIL compares favourably with other upfront treatment strategies, with MR4.5 of 59% by 60 mths. IM dose escalation to 800mg OD for target failure was not well tolerated: only 18% of pts who dose escalated maintained this dose at 60 mths. However, this did not appear to be detrimental to overall outcomes, which were similar in the 2 cohorts. Pts switching to NIL for IM intolerance, and for failing to achieve MMR by 12 months after meeting prior goals, had high rates of MMR, superior to those who failed their 3 and 6 mth targets. Early identification of pts at high risk of EMR failure who might benefit from more intensive or experimental therapies may be necessary to further improve outcomes. Disclosures Yeung: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. White:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Branford:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Qiagen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Otsuka: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Honoraria; Cepheid: Consultancy. Butcher:Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Gottlieb:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Indee: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Arthur:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ross:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Tam:Novartis: Honoraria. Mills:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship. Hughes:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG): Other: Chair of the CML/MPN Disease Group; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Materialart: Online-Ressource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V128.22.939.939

Sprache: Englisch

Verlag: American Society of Hematology

Publikationsdatum: 2016

ZDB Id: 1468538-3

ZDB Id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 113-113

Kurzfassung: Abstract 113 Introduction. Adherence to therapy is known to be a critical factor for achieving an optimal imatinib (IM) response, and non-adherence is likely to be a cause of loss of response. In the absence of a biological marker of resistance, such as BCR-ABL mutations or blast crisis (BC), it is difficult to determine whether loss of response is associated with non-adherence or drug resistance. Prior studies found that the rate of a BCR-ABL rise provided biological insight into the disease phase at relapse (Blood 1996 87 4473; Blood 2004 104 2926). A more rapid rate of rise occurred in patients (pts) who relapsed into advanced phases compared to those who relapsed into chronic phase (CP), as assessed by the number of days over which BCR-ABL doubled (doubling-time, DT). We compared the DTs of pts with progression to BC and those who acquired a BCR-ABL mutation and maintained CP to the DTs of responding pts with documented IM discontinuation/interruption. The aim was to determine whether IM interruption was associated with characteristic BCR-ABL kinetics and loss of response, and whether the DT could help to differentiate drug resistance from non-adherence. Method. The molecular data was examined for 179 CP pts who achieved a major cytogenetic response and met these inclusion criteria: relapsed directly into BC at the time of a significant BCR-ABL rise; or a mutation was detected and CP was maintained at the time of a rise; or discontinued IM while in a sustained complete molecular response (CMR) as part of a discontinuation study; and/or IM dose was documented for BCR-ABL measurement intervals. IM dose interruption was defined as zero IM for ≥10% of days of a BCR-ABL measurement interval. Results. Twelve pts relapsed directly into BC and their BCR-ABL DT was short (median 9.0 days (d), range (r) 6.1–17.6); 8 had mutations and there was no DT difference for these pts. In contrast, 28 pts who maintained CP after mutation detection had a longer DT: median 45 d (r 17–140), P 〈 .0001 (Figure). These pts met one or more criteria for IM failure (only 1 subsequently progressed to BC on IM after 8 months). While in CMR, 36 pts discontinued IM and 17 had a significant BCR-ABL rise and molecular relapse. The DT (median 9.0 d, r 6.9–27) was similar to the BC pts, P=.52. The short DT of pts who discontinued IM is consistent with the rate at which terminally differentiated leukemic cells arise from leukemic progenitors in the absence of IM (Nature 2005 435 1267, 8 d DT). The similarly short DT of BC pts suggests complete lack of BCR-ABL inhibition by IM, whereas relapse into CP with mutations was characterized by slow BCR-ABL kinetics, presumably due to maintenance of partial BCR-ABL inhibition by IM. We determined whether temporary IM dose interruption in responding pts also resulted in a BCR-ABL rise and characteristic DTs. IM interruption occurred in 42 pts (46 interruptions) for: intolerance 32; non-adherence 8; second malignancy/surgery 3; other 3. The IM interruptions were divided into 2 groups according to the days of zero IM: 100% of BCR-ABL measurement interval days (complete lack of BCR-ABL inhibition); or 10 to 〈 100% of days (partial BCR-ABL inhibition). Twelve pts had 100% IM interruption and all had a rapid BCR-ABL rise and short DTs (median 9.4 d, r 4.2–17.6), consistent with the kinetic pattern of BC and discontinued in CMR pts, P=.78. Loss of response occurred in 11/12. Thirty pts had 34 measurement intervals of zero IM for 10 to 〈 100% of days (median 33%, r 10–89). A BCR-ABL rise occurred in 27/34 interruptions and the DT (median 26 d, r 11.6–87) was significantly longer than BC, discontinued in CMR and 100% interruption pts, P 〈 .0001. BCR-ABL remained stable in 5/34 interruptions and a reduction occurred in 2. Loss of response occurred in 18/34 interruptions. Of all 46 measurement intervals with an IM interruption (complete or partial), a significant BCR-ABL rise occurred in 39 (85%) and loss of response in 29 (63%), including 7/8 interruptions due to non-adherence. No pt progressed during the interruption. Twenty-one pts with a mutation and/or BC relapse had dose data available: none had an IM interruption during the relevant measurement interval. Conclusion. IM interruption is associated with a BCR-ABL rise. Intermittent IM dosing may be associated with a longer DT, similar to that seen with the emergence of mutations in CP. A short BCR-ABL DT is typical of complete loss of BCR-ABL inhibition and, for a patient still in CP, should raise the suspicion of non-adherence. Disclosures: Branford: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Yeung:Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol Myer Squibb: Research Funding. Ross:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hughes:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Materialart: Online-Ressource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V118.21.113.113

Sprache: Englisch

Verlag: American Society of Hematology

Publikationsdatum: 2011

ZDB Id: 1468538-3

ZDB Id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 451-451

Kurzfassung: Abstract 451FN2 Background: While nilotinib and dasatinib produce faster responses than imatinib as first-line therapy in de novo Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML), an equally effective strategy may be to selectively use these more potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) only in patients who fail to achieve stringent early molecular targets or are intolerant. Aim: To update the molecular outcome and survival of patients in the TIDEL-II study. Method: TIDEL-II is a multicentre, single arm prospective ALLG trial for de novo CP-CML adult patients with two sequential cohorts each of 105 patients. All patients started on imatinib (IM) 600mg OD. Patients with IM trough levels 〈 1000ng/mL on day 22 were dose escalated to 800mg OD (IM800). All patients were monitored for achievement of time-dependent molecular targets - BCR-ABL RQ-PCR of 10%, 1% and 0.1% IS at 3, 6 and 12 months (mo) respectively. Patients in cohort I who failed to meet these targets had dose escalation to IM800. Those patients who again failed to achieve these targets after a further 3 mo were switched to nilotinib 400mg BID (NIL). Patients in cohort 2 who failed their time dependent targets switched to NIL directly without escalating to IM800. In both cohorts, switching to NIL was also permitted for grade III/IV or persistent grade II non-haematological toxicity or loss of response. Primary end point was MMR at 12 mo (BCR-ABL '0.1%IS), with CMR4.5 being a secondary end point (BCR-ABL ≤0.0032%IS). Results: At 12 mo 69% of patients achieved MMR. With median follow up (f/u) of 20mo, AP/BC progression occurred in 5 cases (2.4%) ( Table 1). The 3 mo molecular response was highly correlated with the MMR at 12mo and progression events (table 2). COHORT 1: Using intention to treat analysis (ITT) with median follow-up of 30 mo the rate of MMR at 12 and 24 mo is 66% and 81% respectively (n=105); CMR4.5 was 12% and 24%, respectively. In total, 34/105 (32%) patients switched to NIL, 12 for failure to achieve molecular targets, 19 for intolerance and 3 for loss of response. Only 2/12 patients who failed to meet targets on IM have subsequently achieved MMR on NIL (median f/u on NIL 14 mo). Fourteen patients switched for intolerance when not in MMR, and 9 subsequently gained MMR (64%) (median f/u on NIL 19 mo). Two patients progressed to AP/BC, both in the first 12 mo in patients taking IM. One progression related death and one fatal myocardial infarction (on NIL) have been reported. Fourteen (13%) of patients remain on IM800. COHORT 2: With a median f/u of 12 mo the rates of MMR and CMR4.5 at 12 mo (n=50) were 72% and 16%, respectively (ITT). To date, 35/105 patients, (33%) have switched to NIL, of which 23 switched for failure to meet molecular targets. Subsequently, 3/23 (13%) have achieved MMR (median 6 mo on NIL). Eleven patients have switched to NIL for intolerance, 7 of them not in MMR at time of switch; 6/7 reached MMR in the subsequent 6 mo (median 5 mo on NIL). Seven patients (7%) remain on IM800. Three patients progressed to AP/BC (3%), 2 on IM and 1 on NIL. Three deaths were reported (3%), 1 from cardiac causes and 1 from stroke, both patients on IM at the time; and 1 from CML progression. Relatively short f/u precludes a meaningful comparison of results between the 2 cohorts. Conclusion: The TIDEL-II strategy has achieved a higher rate of MMR at 12 mo of 69% compared to 47% achieved with the strategy of IM intensification previously utilised in the TIDEL-I study. The improvement in molecular response is mostly attributable to improved responses in patients intolerant of IM as deeper responses were uncommon with patients who failed their early molecular targets despite intensification of kinase inhibition. Molecular response at 3 mo is highly correlated with response and progression events, underscoring the importance of early molecular targets. Disclosures: Yeung: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; BMS Oncology: Research Funding. Osborn:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; BMS Oncology: Research Funding. White:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Branford:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Slader:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hiwase:CSL: Research Funding. Schwarer:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Hospira: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Arthur:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; BMS Oncology: Honoraria. Ross:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mills:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Sponsorship to professional meetings; BMS Oncology: Sponsorship to professional meetings. Hughes:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS Oncology: Research Funding.

Materialart: Online-Ressource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V118.21.451.451

Sprache: Englisch

Verlag: American Society of Hematology

Publikationsdatum: 2011

ZDB Id: 1468538-3

ZDB Id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 606-606

Kurzfassung: Abstract 606FN2 Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that about 40% of very highly selected CML-CP pts treated with imatinib achieve durable CMR and may be able to cease therapy without disease recurrence. However, most CML pts don't achieve CMR on imatinib even with long-term therapy. Results from ENESTnd demonstrated that significantly more patients achieved MMR (≤ 0.1%IS), CMR4 (≤ 0.01%IS), and CMR4.5 (≤ 0.0032%IS) with nilotinib vs imatinib by 12, 18, and 24 months (mo). No pt in ENESTnd who achieved CMR4.5 has progressed to AP/BC. In this study we asked whether pts on long-term imatinib would be more likely to achieve undetectable BCR-ABL levels if they switched to nilotinib, allowing for participation in potential cessation studies in the future. Methods: This open label, 1:1 randomized, prospective, multi-center, phase 3 study enrolled 207 pts with CML-CP who had achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) but were still BCR-ABL positive by RQ-PCR after ≥ 24 mo on imatinib. CMR (primary endpoint) was defined as undetectable BCR-ABL by RQ-PCR where there was no detectable BCR-ABL with a sample sensitivity of ≥ 4.5-logs. CMR4 and CMR4.5 were defined as BCR-ABL levels of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032% expressed on the International Scale (IS), respectively and included patients with undetectable BCR-ABL levels with high sample sensitivity (4 or 4.5 logs). Patients were randomized to nilotinib 400 mg BID vs continuing imatinib 400 or 600 mg daily (same dose as at study entry.) The randomization was stratified by prior use of IFN (none, ≤ 12 mo, 〉 12 mo) and prior duration of imatinib therapy ( 〉 36 mo or ≤ 36 mo). The primary endpoint was the rate of confirmed best cumulative CMR by 12 mo of study therapy with nilotinib or imatinib. Secondary objectives included the kinetics of CMR at different timepoints, duration of CMR, progression-free survival, and overall survival in both arms. During the study, RQ-PCR for BCR-ABL was performed at baseline (BL) and every 3 mo and expressed on the IS in national reference laboratories in Australia, Brazil, and Canada. For this report: BL, 6 mo, and 12 mo results were analyzed in a central laboratory in Australia. Assessment of the primary efficacy endpoint has not been completed for 2% of the randomized pts; unblinded data will be available for all pts and will be presented by treatment arm. Results: BL results were available for 205/207 randomized pts. Overall, 56% of pts had no prior IFN exposure, while 21% and 23% had IFN exposure of ≤ 12 mo or 〉 12 mo, respectively; 81% of pts had been on imatinib 〉 36 mos. At BL, 153 pts (74%) were known to be in MMR and 54 pts (26%) had 〈 MMR (including 2 pts with missing PCR samples); 53 pts (26%), and 20 pts (10%) had CMR4 or CMR4.5 (with detectable BCR-ABL) at BL, respectively. Overall, 67 pts (32%) had at least a half-log reduction in BCR-ABL levels from BL by 12 mo. Of the 52 pts (25%) known not to have MMR at BL, 24 pts (46%) achieved MMR or better by 12 mo in the study. To date, no pt experienced a loss of MMR or CCyR on study. By 12 mo, 50% of pts with a molecular assessment had CMR4 and 27% had CMR4.5. Of the 152 pts who did not have CMR4 at baseline, 30% had achieved CMR4 (unconfirmed) by 12 mo. Of the 185 pts who did not have CMR4.5 at baseline, 21% had achieved CMR4.5 (unconfirmed) by 12 mo. Undetectable levels of BCR-ABL transcripts (with a test sensitivity of ≥ 4.5 log), were achieved by 12 mo by 12% of pts who did not have undetectable BCR-ABL transcript levels at BL. By 12 mo, 20 (10%) pts discontinued study (none due to progression, 1 due to death). Grade 3/4 adverse events were uncommon. Conclusions: ENESTcmr is the first phase 3 randomized study in CML-CP pts to assess the achievement of CMR as the primary endpoint. Unblinded results from this ongoing study will be presented and will provide information on the ability of pts to achieve confirmed CMR on nilotinib vs imatinib following extended treatment with imatinib. These aggregate data demonstrate that 12% of pts achieved undetectable BCR-ABL levels by 12 months after study entry. This is in contrast to observations in previous trials where the increase in the proportion of pts with undetectable BCR-ABL levels over time is more gradual. Further follow-up will identify pts with sustained CMR over time, which may offer these pts an opportunity to discontinue therapy. Disclosures: Hughes: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lipton:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Leber:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Spector:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cervantes:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Pasquini:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Schwarer:Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Mahon:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Rea:BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yeung:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; BMS Oncology: Research Funding. Kamel-Reid:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Reynolds:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Williams:Novartis: Employment. Szczudlo:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Branford:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding.

Materialart: Online-Ressource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V118.21.606.606

Sprache: Englisch

Verlag: American Society of Hematology

Publikationsdatum: 2011

ZDB Id: 1468538-3

ZDB Id: 80069-7

In: Blood Advances, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 7, No. 11 ( 2023-06-13), p. 2364-2374

Kurzfassung: Dysregulation of immune-checkpoint receptors has been reported at diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), however, their role in the maintenance of remission after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) cessation is unclear. We assessed programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), T-cell immunoglobulin, and mucin-domain containing protein-3 (TIM-3), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), lymphocyte-activation gene-3 (LAG-3), and T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM) domains (TIGIT) expression on T-cell subsets, regulatory T cells (T-regs), and natural killer (NK) cells at the time of TKI cessation in 44 patients (22 patients sustained treatment-free remission [TFR] and 22 experienced molecular relapse [MolR]). We confirmed our previous finding that absolute numbers of T-regs are increased in patients who experienced MolR compared with those who sustained TFR. The immune-checkpoint receptors PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG-3, and TIGIT on T or NK cells were not differentially expressed between the MolR and TFR groups. However, TIM-3 was consistently upregulated on bulk T cells (CD3+) and T-cell subsets including, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and T-regs, in patients who relapsed in comparison with those who maintained TFR after discontinuation. Furthermore, gene expression analysis from publicly available data sets showed increased TIM-3 expression on CML stem cells compared with normal hematopoietic stem cells. These findings suggest that among the targetable immune-checkpoint molecules, TIM-3 blockade may potentially improve effector immune response in patients with CML stopping TKI, while concomitantly targeting leukemic stem cells and could be a promising therapeutic strategy for preventing relapse after cessation of TKI in patients with CML.

Materialart: Online-Ressource

ISSN: 2473-9529 , 2473-9537

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008854

Sprache: Englisch

Verlag: American Society of Hematology

Publikationsdatum: 2023

ZDB Id: 2876449-3

In: Haematologica, Ferrata Storti Foundation (Haematologica), Vol. 103, No. 12 ( 2018-12), p. 2026-2032

Materialart: Online-Ressource

ISSN: 0390-6078 , 1592-8721

URL: Article

DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.189787

Sprache: Englisch

Verlag: Ferrata Storti Foundation (Haematologica)

Publikationsdatum: 2018

ZDB Id: 2186022-1

ZDB Id: 2030158-3

ZDB Id: 2805244-4

In: Hematology, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 2012, No. 1 ( 2012-12-08), p. 111-114

Kurzfassung: An 80-year-old man has newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. His BM and blood examination at diagnosis confirms chronic-phase disease, with the Philadelphia chromosome as the sole cytogenetic abnormality. He has intermediate Sokal and Hasford risk,1 and is started on imatinib 600 mg once daily. He lives 5 hours away from the nearest specialist hematology service and prefers followup with his local physician, who cannot perform BM examinations. In patients such as this, is it acceptable to monitor his therapeutic response solely with molecular studies of his peripheral blood?

Materialart: Online-Ressource

ISSN: 1520-4391 , 1520-4383

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/asheducation.V2012.1.111.3806846

Sprache: Englisch

Verlag: American Society of Hematology

Publikationsdatum: 2012

ZDB Id: 2084287-9