Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 13-13

Abstract: Background In newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the general recommendation is to start treatment immediately after the diagnosis has been made. This paradigm is based both on the observation that untreated acute leukemia has a poor prognosis and on retrospective analyses demonstrating a shorter survival in younger AML patients (pts) in whom treatment was delayed by more than 5 days (Sekeres et al., 2009). A more recent single-center analysis came to a different conclusion, showing no prognostic effect for the time from diagnosis to treatment (TDT; Bertoli et al., 2013). We explored the relationship between TDT and prognosis on a large set of real-world data from the AML registry of the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL) and compared it to the published cohorts. Methods The SAL runs a transregional AML registry in 46 treatment centers across Germany (NCT03188874). All registered patients with an intensive induction treatment, a minimum follow-up time of 12 months and no acute promyelocytic leukemia were selected (n=2,200). Treatment start was defined by the first day of cytarabine, whereas single agent hydroxyurea (HU) was labeled as pretreatment. We analyzed the influence of TDT on complete remission (CR), early death (ED) and overall survival (OS) in univariable analyses for each day of treatment delay, in groups of 0-5, 6-10, 11-15 and & gt;15 days of TDT, and by using the restricted cubic spline (RCS) method for data modelling. In order to adjust for the influence of established prognostic variables on the outcomes, we used multivariable regression models and propensity score weighting. The influence of HU pretreatment on outcomes was investigated by introducing an interaction term between TDT and the presence of HU pretreatment. Results The median age was 59 years (y) (IQR 50-68), the proportion of pts with favorable, intermediate and adverse genetic risk according to ELN was 27%, 53%, and 20%; & gt;95% of pts received induction treatment with standard 7+3. HU pretreatment was administered in 4% of pts. The median TDT was 3 days (IQR 2-6). Descriptive statistics after grouping of pts showed the highest median age and the lowest proportion of NPM1 mutated and favorable risk in the TDT group 11-15. Of all pts, 79% achieved a CR/CRi; unadjusted CR rates for the patient groups with TDT of 0-5, 6-10, 11-15 and & gt;15 days were 80%, 77%, 74% and 76%, respectively (p=0.317). In multivariable analysis accounting for the influence of ELN risk, age, WBC, LDH, de novo versus secondary AML and ECOG, the OR for each additional day of TDT was 0.99 (95%-CI, 0.97-1.00; p=0.124). Four percent of pts died within the first 30 days from treatment start. The respective rates in the four TDT categories were 4.0%, 3.8%, 5.1% and 4.1% (p=0.960). In multivariable analysis, the OR for TDT was 1.01 (95%-CI, 0.98-1.05; p=0.549). After a median follow-up of 40 months, the 2-y OS of all pts was 51%. The unadjusted 2-y OS rates stratified by TDT of 0-5, 6-10, 11-15, & gt;15 days were 52, 49, 46, and 51% (see Table 1 and Figure 1). The hazard ratio (HR) for each day of treatment delay was 1.00 (95%-CI; 0.99-1.01; p=0.317). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, the HR for TDT as continuous variable was 1.00 (95%-CI, 0.99-1.01; p=0.689). When OS was analyzed separately stratified for age ≤60 and & gt;60 ys and for high versus lower initial WBC defined by a threshold of 50 x 109/L, no significant differences between TDT groups were observed. Multivariable models using TDT as a grouped variable or with RCS did not provide evidence for a significant influence of TDT on outcomes. Propensity score matching of pts in the four TDT groups did not reveal an influence on outcomes. The use of HU was not associated with CR, ED nor OS. Conclusion Our study on 2,200 newly diagnosed registry pts receiving consistent intensive induction with standard-dose cytarabine plus daunorubicin (7+3) suggests that TDT is not related to response or survival, neither in younger nor in older pts. Despite multivariable analyses, a bias towards longer TDT intervals in pts judged to be clinically stable by the treating physician cannot be excluded entirely. As treatment stratification in intensive first-line treatment of AML evolves, the TDT data suggests that it may be a safe and reasonable approach to wait for genetic and other laboratory test results in order to assign clinically stable pts to the best available treatment option before the start of intensive treatment. Disclosures Krämer: Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hänel:Roche: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: advisory board. Jost:Daiichi: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Brümmendorf:Merck: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen: Employment; Ariad: Consultancy. Krause:Siemens: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel; Celgene Corporation: Other: Travel. Scholl:Novartis: Other: Project funding; Pfizer: Other: Advisory boards; Gilead: Other: Project funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: Advisory boards; AbbVie: Other: Advisory boards. Hochhaus:Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding. Kiani:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Middeke:Sanofi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy. Thiede:AgenDix GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Speakers Bureau. Stoelzel:JAZZ Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Neovii: Other: Travel funding; Shire: Consultancy, Other: Travel funding. Platzbecker:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-123717

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 644-644

Abstract: Background: Measurable residual disease (MRD) can identify patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in complete hematological remission (CR) at high risk of relapse even after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We have recently shown in 53 pts treated within the first cohort of the RELAZA2 trial that pre-emptive therapy with azacitidine (AZA) at the time of MRD-positivity (MRDpos) can successfully prevent imminent hematological relapse (Platzbecker et al. Lancet Oncol. 2018). We now report on the results of the second cohort of 41 pts undergoing MRD-guided treatment in the RELAZA2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01462578) by the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL). Methods: Between 2015 and 2018, 166 MDS/AML pts were screened and centrally monitored for MRD in bone marrow or peripheral blood at monthly intervals for a period of 2 years prospectively in 9 centers in Germany. Of these 166, 41 pts with either advanced MDS (n=6) or AML (n=35) in CR after either conventional chemotherapy only (n=13) or consecutive allogeneic HSCT (n=28) developed MRD above a threshold defining imminent hematological relapse. Still being in morphological CR, these pts pre-emptively received 6 cycles of AZA (75mg/m2, s.c. days 1-7), which was followed by a risk-adapted AZA-maintenance therapy based on MRD-response for up to 18 additional months. Pts developing a hematological relapse went off study. MRD was detected by either the quantification of NPM1 mutation level (n=19), leukemia-specific fusion genes DEK-NUP214 (n=1) or RUNX1/RUNX1T1 (n=2) or a sensitive donor chimerism analysis of sorted CD34(+)/CD117(+) peripheral blood cells (n=28) in pts undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Here, we report the analysis of the primary endpoint of the 41 pts in the second cohort as well as the data for the entire 94 pts who entered the treatment phase of the RELAZA-2 study. Results: At a median of 110 days (range 28-476) after start of screening, 41 (25%) out of 166 prospectively screened pts became MRDpos as defined by either a decrease of CD34(+)/CD117(+) donor chimerism to & lt;80% (n=23) or a detectable mutation level & gt;1% (NPM1 n=18) while being still in hematological CR. All of these MRDpos pts started AZA-based pre-emptive treatment to prevent imminent hematological relapse. Six months after start of MRD-guided therapy, 25 out of 41 pts were still in CR (61%, 95%-CI 45-76%, p & lt;0.001, one-sided binomial test for H0: pexp≤0.3) while a total of 15 pts (37%) developed hematologic relapse after median of 3 AZA cycles. In fact, 19 pts (46%) responded with either a decline of MRD below a predefined threshold (increasing CD34(+) donor chimerism to ≥80% or mutation level & lt;1%), while a stabilization in the absence of relapse was achieved in 6 pts (15%). Overall response rate was not statistically different between pts with (57%) or without (69%) antecedent allogeneic HSCT (p=0.5). After 6 months of initiation of MRD-guided treatment, 21 pts (51%) continued to receive a median of 6 (range 1-15) subsequent AZA cycles. Eventually, hematologic relapse occurred in 6 of those pts (29%), but was delayed until a median of 320 days (range 219-375 days) after initial MRD detection. With a median follow-up of 9 months after start of MRD-guided pre-emptive treatment the 12-months overall and progression free survival rate is 94% and 44%, respectively. When combining results for the primary endpoint with the first cohort, the 6 months relapse free survival for all 94 pts was 60% (56/94 pts.; 49-70%; p & lt;.001 one-sided binomial test for H0: pexp≤0.3; Fig. 1). Conclusion: These multicenter prospective data provide further strong evidence that continuous MRD monitoring is feasible and can identify MDS/AML pts at high risk of hematological relapse. Pre-emptive MRD-guided therapy with AZA is an effective treatment to prevent or at least substantially delay hematologic relapse in these pts. Disclosures Platzbecker: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Wolf:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria. Krämer:Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding. Bug:Gilead Sciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants; Hexal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Other: travel grants; Celgene Neovii: Other: travel grant. Götze:AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stelljes:Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MDS: Consultancy. Subklewe:AMGEN: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Oxford Biotherapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Research Funding. Hänel:Celgene: Other: advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: advisory board; Amgen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Dührsen:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CPT: Consultancy, Honoraria. Müller-Tidow:MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thiede:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AgenDix GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-129926

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 29 ( 2019-10-10), p. 2632-2642

Abstract: Nucleophosmin 1 ( NPM1) mutations are associated with a favorable prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) when an internal tandem duplication (ITD) in the fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 gene ( FLT3) is absent ( FLT3-ITD neg ) or present with a low allelic ratio ( FLT3-ITD low ). The 2017 European LeukemiaNet guidelines assume this is true regardless of accompanying cytogenetic abnormalities. We investigated the validity of this assumption. METHODS We analyzed associations between karyotype and outcome in intensively treated patients with NPM1 mut / FLT3-ITD neg/low AML who were prospectively enrolled in registry databases from nine international study groups or treatment centers. RESULTS Among 2,426 patients with NPM1 mut / FLT3-ITD neg/low AML, 2,000 (82.4%) had a normal and 426 (17.6%) had an abnormal karyotype, including 329 patients (13.6%) with intermediate and 83 patients (3.4%) with adverse-risk chromosomal abnormalities. In patients with NPM1 mut / FLT3-ITD neg/low AML, adverse cytogenetics were associated with lower complete remission rates (87.7%, 86.0%, and 66.3% for normal, aberrant intermediate, and adverse karyotype, respectively; P 〈 .001), inferior 5-year overall (52.4%, 44.8%, 19.5%, respectively; P 〈 .001) and event-free survival (40.6%, 36.0%, 18.1%, respectively; P 〈 .001), and a higher 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (43.6%, 44.2%, 51.9%, respectively; P = .0012). These associations remained in multivariable mixed-effects regression analyses adjusted for known clinicopathologic risk factors ( P 〈 .001 for all end points). In patients with adverse-risk chromosomal aberrations, we found no significant influence of the NPM1 mutational status on outcome. CONCLUSION Karyotype abnormalities are significantly associated with outcome in NPM1 mut / FLT3-ITD neg/low AML. When adverse-risk cytogenetics are present, patients with NPM1 mut share the same unfavorable prognosis as patients with NPM1 wild type and should be classified and treated accordingly. Thus, cytogenetic risk predominates over molecular risk in NPM1 mut / FLT3-ITD neg/low AML.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.00416

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5

In: Leukemia Research, Elsevier BV, Vol. 85 ( 2019-10), p. 106192-

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0145-2126

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2019.106192

Language: English

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2008028-1

In: The Lancet Oncology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 19, No. 12 ( 2018-12), p. 1668-1679

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 1470-2045

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30580-1

Language: English

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Publication Date: 2018

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049730-1

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 2553-2553

Abstract: Background: For patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with poor prognostic indicators, such as unfavorable cytogenetics or secondary AML, overall and event-free survival (EFS) rates are much worse, highlighting the critical need for more effective therapeutic modalities. Increasing evidence implicates epigenetic processes in the development of AML. Panobinostat (PAN), a potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor, has been shown to augment the effects of standard chemotherapies (anthracyclines and Ara-C) in preclinical studies with AML cells. These preclinical results led to a phase 1b study of PAN in combination with idarubicin and Ara-C in pts with high-risk AML. Methods: The trial included younger pts (≥ 18 y and ≤ 65 y) with newly diagnosed high-risk AML, defined as: treatment-related AML, AML following previously diagnosed myelodysplasia or medical history of relevant hematologic disorders, and presence of unfavorable cytogenetics. The primary objective was determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of PAN when given in combination with idarubicin and Ara-C. Secondary objectives included safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK). Exploratory endpoints included assessment of the relationship between efficacy and PK parameters and 1-year EFS. The study examined escalating doses (15-25 mg) of PAN given 3 times per wk for 2 wk starting on day 8 of a 28-day cycle (ie, D8, D10, D12, D15, D17, D19) in combination with standard induction doses of idarubicin (12 mg/m2/d; D1-D3) and Ara-C (100 mg/m2/d; C1, D1-D7). After 2 cycles, pts achieving a complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) moved to a consolidation phase with a combination of high-dose Ara-C and PAN at the dose received during induction. After determination of the RP2D, additional pts were enrolled in the expansion phase and treated at the RP2D dose. Results: A total of 46 pts with a median age of 55.5 y (range, 19-65 y) were enrolled in the study (34 in the dose-escalation phase [15 mg, n = 11; 20 mg, n = 15; 25 mg, n = 8] and 12 in the dose-expansion phase). Seven dose-limiting toxicities were observed in the escalation phase: 4 of 12 pts in the 20-mg group (left ventricular systolic dysfunction [n = 2] , hepatosplenic candidiasis [n = 1], increased QTCF [n = 1] ) and 3 of 7 pts in the 25-mg group (febrile neutropenia [n = 2], grade 3 diarrhea [n = 1] ). Based upon the Bayesian linear regression model, the upper limit (≤ 25% probability of excessive toxicity in 〉 33% of pts) was not reached for determination of MTD. The RP2D of PAN was 20 mg. Among the 27 pts treated at the RP2D, common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) regardless of causality were mainly hematologic, including febrile neutropenia (59.3%), thrombocytopenia (48.1%), and anemia (40.7%). Although most pts experienced gastrointestinal AEs, they were largely grade ≤ 2 (all grades, 74.1%; grade 3/4, 11.1%). AEs led to discontinuation in 15% of pts treated at the RP2D. Four pts (3 of 46 during induction and 1 of 19 during consolidation) treated with RP2D died during treatment. Of the on-treatment deaths, 1 (grade 4 sepsis) was potentially related to study drug, whereas the remaining 3 (progressive AML, ischemic stroke, and cerebral hemorrhage) were determined to be unrelated. The geometric mean AUC0-24 of PAN after oral dosing increased with increasing PAN dose (42.5 hr•ng/mL [15 mg], 62.6 hr•ng/mL [20 mg] , and 74.6 hr•ng/mL [25 mg]). However, AUC0-24 was higher in the expansion phase (92.7 hr•ng/mL) than at 25 mg in the escalation phase, with high variability (coefficient of variation, 32.3% [expansion] ; 45.5% [25-mg escalation]). Among pts treated at the RP2D, 44.4% and 11.1% achieved CR and CRi, respectively (CR/CRi, 56%). In the subset of pts in the RP2D, no relationship was found between AUC0-24 and response rates. In the overall population, the 1-year EFS rate was 78.3%. Conclusions: The data from this study showed high variability in PAN PK and largely overlapping exposure between dose levels. Overall, these data demonstrate a safety profile consistent with those of single-agent PAN and the combination of Ara-C and idarubicin. Disclosures DeAngelo: Incyte: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; Pfizer: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; Novartis: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; BMS: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Other: Consulting & Advisory Role; Amgen: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role. Schlenk:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Arog: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sierra:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Ocio:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Strickland:Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Steering Committee and Advisory Board Participation; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board Particpation; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board Particpation; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory Board Particpation; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Other: Advisory Board Particpation. Valera:Novartis: Employment. Wegener:Novartis: Employment. De:Novartis: Employment. Mu:Novartis: Employment. Binlich:Novartis: Employment. Stuart:Novartis: Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V126.23.2553.2553

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2015

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 4396-4396

Abstract: Background Allogeneic stem cell transplantion (allo SCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) takes advantage of a tumor cell-free graft along with potential immunosurveillance of residual malignant plasma cells. However, multiple factors such as treatment-related mortality (TRM) and morbidity and post-allo disease progression question the more widespread use of allo SCT. The induction of an early complete donor chimerism (DC) is thought to be associated with a low incidence of relapse and improved survival. Interestingly, data on chimerism analysis are relatively scarce for allo SCT in MM. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated longitudinal DC results by short tandem repeat (STR)-based techniques from a single lab. Data were correlated with a set of baseline and outcome variables. In addition, disease- and treatment related factors like extramedullary disease (EMD), acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and post-transplant consolidation were analyzed for impact on outcome. Patients and methods We identified 118 MM patients (pts) receiving non-myeloablative allo SCT at two German centers between 01/2006 and 12/2014. 90% of pts underwent allo SCT at relapse. Median follow-up was 42 months (mos), median overall survival (OS) 25 mos (range, 1-106) and TRM was 15%. Two-thirds of pts had received treosulfan/fludarabine as conditioning regimen. Median interval between MM diagnosis and allo SCT was 40.5 mos (range, 7-175) and median number of prior treatment lines was 3 (range, 1-10). 24 pts received allografts from matched related donors, 61 from matched-unrelated donors, and 33 pts from mismatched donors. Chimerism analysis was performed by STR-PCR on whole blood and T cell subsets using a validated multiplex STR-assay with a documented sensitivity of 1%. Response assessment was performed according the international myeloma working group guidelines. Results 1398chimerism samples (mean: 12/patient, 119 marrow, 1279 blood)) were analyzed. Median interval from allo SCT to first assessment was 15 (range, 3-62) days. Median duration of chimerism sampling was 24 mos. No graft rejections occurred. Full DC ( 〉 99%) was achieved in 117/118 pts. Pts who lost full DC had a significantly shorter progression free survival (PFS) than those with sustained DC (HR 0.2; p 〈 .0001). OS, however, was not different. In patients who developed disease progression, loss of DC versus sustained DC was not predictive for outcome. In spite of relapse, a full DC was found in peripheral blood in 82% and in 45% in bone marrow samples of pts, respectively. With respect to clinical predictors of outcome, the occurrence of acute GvHD had no impact on PFS nor OS. In contrast, induction of chronic GvHD was associated with prolonged PFS (HR 0.50; p=.0088) and OS (HR 0.39; p 〈 .001). Despite the induction of full DC in the blood, 13/118 (11%) of pts not in complete response received preemptive donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI). DLI without any concomitant signs of graft rejection or disease progression was associated with favourable OS (HR 0.43; p=.0067). When analysing relapse patterns after allo SCT, a 35% rate of EMD was observed. Interestingly, OS was not different when compared to intramedullary relapses. However, when allo SCT was performed as part of a consolidation therapy for prior EMD or plasma cell leukemia, OS was significantly shorter than compared to patients without EMD history (median OS 6 vs. 41 mos, p=.0035) Nevertheless, 25% of these EMD patients showed long-lasting remissions beyond 4 years. High risk cytogenetics (del17p, t(4;14) and +1q21), CMV reactivation or use of ATG had no impact on outcome. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study of serial DC analysis in a cohort of clinically well characterized MM pts. The robust engraftment in almost all patients as well as the lack of graft rejections indicate the severe immunosuppression in MM due to pre-treatment and underlying disease. On the other hand, the most important predictors for PFS and OS was the occurrence of cGvHD. Preemptive DLI may further improve tumour control. The frequent spread of myeloma to extramedullary sites can be interpreted as an escape to more immuno-privileged regions as compared to the bone marrow. This pattern clearly limits the potential of prolonged serial DC analysis as the only tool for relapse detection. Our observations underscore the need to prospectively evaluate complementary strategies in this setting. Disclosures Einsele: Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Thiede:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AgenDix GmBH: Equity Ownership. Knop:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V126.23.4396.4396

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2015

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 1069-1069

Abstract: Background: Gilteritinib (ASP2215) is a novel, highly selective, potent oral FLT3/AXL inhibitor with preclinical activity against FLT3-ITD activating and FLT3-D835 resistance mutations. The objectives of this phase 1/2 study were to assess gilteritinib safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles after single- and multiple-day dosing, and antileukemic effects in patients with R/R AML. Methods: This open-label study (NCT02014558) enrolled patients (≥18 yr) into 1 of 7 dose-escalation cohorts (20-450 mg once daily [QD]) or concomitant dose-expansion cohorts. While confirmed FLT3 mutation was not an inclusion criterion, each expanded dose level enrolled ≥10 patients with FLT3 mutations (FLT3mut+); 120 and 200 mg dose levels were further expanded with ≥40 FLT3mut+ patients. The choice to expand these dose cohorts was based upon FLT3 inhibition in correlative assays and clinical activity seen during dose escalation. Safety and tolerability were primary endpoints; blood samples were drawn from patients in the dose-escalation cohorts to evaluate gilteritinib PK parameters and PD effects. Antileukemic response rates (eg, complete remission [CR] , CR with incomplete platelet recovery [CRp], CR with incomplete hematological recovery [CRi] , overall response rate [ORR]) were secondary endpoints. Results: Patients (N=252; 129M:123F, median age 62 yr [range: 21-90]) enrolled between October 2013 and August 2015 received ≥1 dose of gilteritinib. The study population was heavily pretreated: 70% (n=177) had ≥2 prior AML therapies, 29% (n=73) had a prior stem cell transplant, and 25% (n=63) had prior TKI treatment with sorafenib most commonly used. Across the study, 194 patients had a locally confirmed FLT3 mutation (ITD, n=159; D835, n=13; ITD-D835, n=16; other, n=6). For all enrolled patients, progressive disease (n=75), lack of efficacy (n=44), adverse events (n=34), and death (n=29) were the most common reasons for treatment discontinuation. Seven deaths were considered possibly/probably related to treatment: pulmonary embolism, respiratory failure, hemoptysis, intracranial bleed, ventricular fibrillation, septic shock, and neutropenia (all n=1). Maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 300 mg when 2 of 3 patients in the 450 mg cohort experienced diarrhea and/or hepatic transaminase elevation as dose-limiting toxicities. Diarrhea (16%) and fatigue (15%) were the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events of any grade. Less than 5% of patients (11/252) had a maximum post-baseline QTcF interval 〉 500 msec. Gilteritinib concentrations were generally dose proportional and showed both a long-elimination half-life (45-159 h) and substantial accumulation (3.2-10 fold) by day 15. An exposure-related increase in the inhibition of FLT3 phosphorylation with increasing doses of gilteritinib was also observed. Gilteritinib showed strong antileukemic activity in FLT3mut+ patients (ORR=49%); response was observed less frequently in patients with wild-type FLT3 (ORR=12%). While CR, CRi, and CRp occurred at all doses, responses were enriched among FLT3mut+ patients with gilteritinib steady-state trough concentrations ≥100 ng/mL, which correlated with potent FLT3 inhibition in PD assays and corresponded to doses ≥80 mg. The ORR in 169 FLT3mut+ patients receiving ≥80 mg was 52% (Table); median overall survival in this patient population was ~31 wk (range: 1.7-61; Figure) and median duration of response was 20 wk (range: 1.1-55). Clinical responses occurred in FLT3mut+ patients with -ITD, -D835, and both mutations (ORR: 55%, 17%, and 62%, respectively) as well as in FLT3mut+ patients with or without prior TKI treatment (ORR: 42% vs 56%, respectively). Conclusions: This PD-driven, first-in-human study shows that gilteritinib was well tolerated and generated frequent, prolonged, clinically important responses in FLT3mut+ patients with R/R AML. Antileukemic responses were enriched in FLT3mut+ patients treated at doses that consistently and potently inhibited FLT3 phosphorylation. The survival of these patients appears better than expected for this patient population when treated with standard therapy. Our data suggest that FLT3 inhibition may improve survival in patients with FLT3mut+R/R AML; as such, phase 3 testing of oral gilteritinib 120 mg QD in patients with FLT3mut+R/R AML after first-line therapy is underway (NCT02421939). Disclosures Perl: Astellas US Pharma Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Asana Biosciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Arog Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Altman:Janssen: Other: advisory board; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Other: advisory board; Ariad: Other: advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: advisory board; Syros: Other: advisory board. Cortes:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding. Smith:Astellas: Research Funding. Erba:Jannsen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, DSMB, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Gylcomimetics: Other: DSMB; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celator: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Gill:Astellas: Employment. Goldberg:Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; COTA Inc: Employment; Pfizer: Honoraria; Neostem: Equity Ownership. Jurcic:Astellas: Research Funding. Larson:Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Liu:Astellas: Employment. Ritchie:Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding. Schiller:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Strickland:Celator: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutica: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Baxalta: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ambit: Consultancy; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Wang:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Immunogen: Research Funding. Stuart:Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding. Martinelli:Ariad: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Bahceci:Astellas: Employment. Levis:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V128.22.1069.1069

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2016

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 4 ( 2016-07-28), p. 497-503

Abstract: STRATUS (MM-010), the largest POM + LoDEX trial, confirms the regimen offers clinically meaningful benefit and is generally well tolerated. STRATUS supports POM + LoDEX as a standard of care for patients with RRMM who have poor prognosis and high need for effective treatments.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-02-700872

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2016

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 2693-2693

Abstract: Background: Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is defined by the presence of either t(8;21)(q22;q22) or inv(16)(p13.1q22)/t(16;16)(p13.1;q22) and is associated with a favorable outcome, particularly if treated with repetitive cycles of high-dose cytarabine as post-remission therapy. Long-time 10-year overall survival (OS) rate was reported of 58% in FLT3-ITD negative patients (pts; Allen et al. Leukemia 2013). Nevertheless, 30-40% CBF-AML pts experience relapse. FLT3-ITD mutations occur in roughly 5-10% of adult CBF-AML. However, their prognostic relevance is still controversial. Aims: To characterize CBF-AML with FLT3-ITD and compare outcomes according to their genetic background. Methods: We retrospectively studied 65 AML pts with CBF-AML and FLT3-ITD (median age at diagnosis, 54 years; range, 22-81 years) diagnosed between 1996 and 2018 within seven study groups/institutions of the US and Europe. Results: Thirty-two (49%) of the 65 pts harbored t(8;21). Median white blood cell and platelet counts at diagnosis of patients with t(8;21) and inv(16) were 18.3/nl (range, 1.8-202/nl) and 31/nl (range, 7-372/nl), respectively. AML diagnoses were de novo in 61 (94%) and therapy-related in 4 (6%) of the pts. Thirty (46%) pts were female. Cytogenetic analysis revealed additional abnormalities (abn) in 38 (58%) pts, most frequently loss of X or Y (n=13; n=12 associated with t(8;21)), complex karyotype (≥3 abn; n=12; n=7 occurring in t(8;21)), trisomy 22 (n=7, all associated with inv(16)) or trisomy 8 (overall n=6, n=5 occurring in inv(16)). Four pts were positive for both mutations, FLT3-ITD as well as FLT3-TKD. Median ITD allelic ratio were 0.44 (range, 0.003-50) and median ITD size 60 bp (range, 3-120 bp). Three older pts (median age, 75.5 years) were treated with either azacitidine + sorafenib, azacitidine + venetoclax or with etoposide + tipifarnib. All three patients receiving non-intensive therapy died within one year and were excluded from further analysis. Complete remission (CR) after anthracycline-based induction therapy was achieved in 98% (n=61/62) of patients fit for intensive treatment including two pts treated with 7+3 ± midostaurin within the RATIFY trial. One patient died during induction. Fifteen (24%) pts underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Of those, 10 pts were transplanted in 1st and 5 pts in 2nd CR. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 4.43 years (95%-CI, 3.35-8.97 years). Median and 4-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 3.41 years (95%-CI, 1.26 years - not reached) and 44.9% (95%-CI, 32.9-61.4%). Median and 4-year overall survival rates (OS) were 4.48 years (95%-CI, 2.26 years - not reached) and 51.8% (95%-CI, 39.6.2-67.9%). Neither type of CBF-AML (p=0.60), nor additional chromosomal abn (p=0.80), nor presence of a complex karyotype (p=0.50) had a prognostic impact on OS. Higher age (≥60 years) was an in trend negative prognostic factor on RFS and OS (p=0.07, each). High allelic ratio (≥0.5) had no impact on RFS (p=0.3), but in trend on OS (p=0.10). Conclusions: Despite a high remission rate pts with FLT3-ITD had an inferior outcome as compared to previously published data on CBF-AML without FLT3-ITD. Thus, CBF-AML with FLT3-ITD should not be classified within the low-risk category. CBF pts with FLT3-ITD warrants further study and should be included in FLT3-inhibitor trials. Disclosures Brunner: Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding. Novak:Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel,Accommodations; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Other: Travel,Accommodations; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stoelzel:Neovii: Other: Travel funding; Shire: Consultancy, Other: Travel funding; JAZZ Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Thiede:Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; AgenDix GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Diaceutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Platzbecker:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Levis:Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; FUJIFILM: Consultancy, Research Funding; Menarini: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-125317

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7