Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)  (12)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2023
    In:  Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 32, No. 12_Supplement ( 2023-12-01), p. A120-A120
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 32, No. 12_Supplement ( 2023-12-01), p. A120-A120
    Abstract: Purpose: Adolescent and young adult (AYA; diagnosed between the ages of 15-39) cancer survivors are at increased risk of experiencing social risk factors, including financial toxicity, food, housing, and transportation difficulties associated with cancer diagnosis and treatment. Screening for social risks has been shown to be associated with improved health and healthcare outcomes. There is an increased emphasis on implementing social risk screening as part of routine healthcare. However, oncology practices do not routinely assess for and assist patients with social risks, thereby missing a crucial aspect of cancer care. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of social risks among AYA cancer survivors in a United States-based integrated health system. Methods: We analyzed data from 330 AYA members of Kaiser Permanente Northwest (Northwest Oregon and Southwest Washington) who were diagnosed with cancer, either pre- or post-completion of 1 or more social risk screenings between January 1, 2017, to January 30, 2022 (first screening defined as the index date). Four social risk domains (financial hardship, food insecurity, housing instability, and transportation difficulties) were assessed based on patient self-report to indicate the presence or absence of each domain (binary: yes or no). A binary, composite variable was created to assess any social risk (i.e., the presence of any social risk) versus no social risk. Descriptive statistics, including a chi-square test and t-test, were used to compare the prevalence of social risks among AYA cancer survivors overall and by time since cancer diagnosis. Results: Of the 330 patients, the majority were female (n=229, 69%), identified as non-Hispanic white (n=251, 76%), and had an Elixhauser comorbidity index score of 3+ conditions (n=115, 35%). Most AYAs were diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 30-39 (n=181, 59%), and 43% of the AYAs had been diagnosed & lt;1 year (n=141). Overall, the majority of AYA members were diagnosed with cancer prior to their social risk screening (n=301, 91%). We found that nearly one-quarter of patients reported at least one social risk (n=64, 19%), with financial hardship as the most common (14%), followed by food insecurity (9%), housing instability (8%), and transportation difficulties (3%). A greater proportion of patients diagnosed & lt;1 year reported having & gt; 1 social risk (40%), followed by patients diagnosed 1 to & lt;5 years (37%) and patients who had been diagnosed 5+ years (23%). Conclusion: Despite the critical need for strategies to identify and address social risks within the oncology setting, few studies have explored the prevalence and impact of social risks among AYA cancer survivors. Our results suggest that AYA cancer survivors experience the highest burden of social risks proximal to a cancer diagnosis. This work demonstrates the importance of assessing and addressing social risks for AYA cancer survivors. Future studies are needed to evaluate the longitudinal effects of social risks on AYA cancer survivors’ healthcare use and subsequent health outcomes. Citation Format: Carol Y. Ochoa-Dominguez, Kimberly A. Miller, Maria Elena Martinez, David M. Mosen, John F. Dickerson, Ana I. Velázquez Mañana, Matthew P. Banegas. Social risks among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors in a US-based integrated delivery system [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A120.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2012
    In:  Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 21, No. 10_Supplement ( 2012-10-01), p. A60-A60
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 21, No. 10_Supplement ( 2012-10-01), p. A60-A60
    Abstract: Background: Breast cancer is a significant public health threat to Hispanic women in the United States (US). While evidence on the burden of breast cancer among US Hispanic women is available, it is important to assess the heterogeneity in breast cancer risk among Hispanic women of different origins. To address this gap, the purpose of our study was to assess the distribution of breast cancer risk among women from six Hispanic subgroups. Methods: Using data from the 2000 and 2005 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Cancer Control Modules, we assessed the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT) 5-year and lifetime risk of developing invasive breast cancer among Mexican/Mexican-American (n=1,932), Puerto Rican (n=385), Cuban/Cuban-American (n=274), Dominican (Republic) (n=123), Central/South American (n=468), Other Hispanic (n=204) and non-Hispanic whites (n=16,131). Multivariate linear regression models used to compare the distribution of both the BCRAT 5-year and lifetime absolute breast cancer risk between: i) Hispanic versus non-Hispanic white women and ii) Hispanic subgroups. Results: Hispanic women, overall, had a significantly lower mean BCRAT 5-year risk and lifetime risk estimates compared to non-Hispanic whites (p & lt;0.001). Cuban/Cuban-American women had a significantly higher BCRAT 5-year risk (p & lt;0.05), while Dominican women had a higher lifetime risk, compared Mexican/Mexican-American women (p & lt;0.001). A significantly lower proportion of Hispanic women, overall, were at high risk of breast cancer, based on both the BCRAT 5-year and lifetime risk estimates, compared to non-Hispanic white women (p & lt;0.001). Approximately 2.6% of all Hispanic women had BCRAT 5-year risk ≥1.67% and only 0.2% had a lifetime risk ≥20.0%. A greater proportion of Central/South American women had a BCRAT 5-year risk ≥1.67 compared to Mexican/Mexican-American women (p & lt;0.001). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that, based on the BCRAT, Hispanic women have a significantly lower risk of developing invasive breast cancer, compared to non-Hispanic white women; furthermore, we highlight differences in the BCRAT risk among women in different Hispanic subgroups. Lastly, we provide national estimates of the number of Hispanic women from six key subgroups, who would be eligible for prophylactic breast cancer chemoprevention as recommended by ASCO and NCCN. Future studies are warranted that further investigate differences in breast cancer risk as well as important breast cancer risk factors between Hispanics women of different origins. Citation Format: Matthew P. Banegas, Mei Leng, Barry I. Graubard, Leo S. Morales. Risk of developing invasive breast cancer risk in Hispanic women: A look across Hispanic subgroups. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fifth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2012 Oct 27-30; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012;21(10 Suppl):Abstract nr A60.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2018
    In:  Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 27, No. 11 ( 2018-11-01), p. 1275-1282
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 27, No. 11 ( 2018-11-01), p. 1275-1282
    Abstract: Background: Cancer survivors increasingly report financial hardship as a consequence of the high cost of cancer care, yet the financial experience of rural cancer survivors remains largely unstudied. The purpose of this study was to investigate potential rural disparities in the likelihood of financial hardship and nonadherence to surveillance colonoscopy. Methods: Individuals diagnosed with localized or regional colorectal cancer between 2004 and 2012 were ascertained by the population-based New Mexico Tumor Registry. Participants completed a mailed questionnaire or telephone survey about their colorectal cancer survivorship experience, including treatment-related financial hardship and receipt of surveillance colonoscopy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Compared with urban colorectal cancer survivors (n = 168), rural colorectal cancer survivors (n = 109) were slightly older; more likely to be married (65% vs. 59%) and have an annual income & lt;$30,000 (37% vs. 27%); and less likely to be employed (35% vs. 41%), have a college degree (28% vs. 38%), or a high level of health literacy (39% vs. 51%). Rural survivors were twice as likely as urban survivors to report treatment-related financial hardship (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.06–3.28) and nonadherence to surveillance colonoscopy guidelines (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.07–4.85). In addition, financial hardship was independently associated with nonadherence to surveillance colonoscopy (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.01–4.85). Conclusions: Substantial rural disparities in the likelihood of financial hardship and nonadherence to surveillance colonoscopy exist. Impact: Treatment-related financial hardship among rural colorectal cancer survivors may negatively affect adherence to guideline-recommended follow-up care. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(11); 1275–82. ©2018 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 27, No. 7_Supplement ( 2018-07-01), p. C52-C52
    Abstract: Introduction: Cancer survivors increasingly report financial hardship as a consequence of the high cost of cancer care, yet the financial experience of traditionally underserved patients, including racial/ethnic minorities, non-English speakers, and rural residents, remains largely unstudied. The purpose of this study was to investigate potential disparities in the likelihood of financial hardship and nonadherence to surveillance colonoscopy. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, individuals diagnosed with localized or regional colorectal cancer between 2004-2012 were ascertained by the population-based New Mexico Tumor Registry. Participants completed a mailed questionnaire or telephone survey about their cancer survivorship experience, including treatment-related financial hardship and receipt of surveillance colonoscopy. Participants were considered to have experienced treatment-related financial hardship if they reported any debt accumulation, bankruptcy filing, other financial sacrifices, or inability to pay medical bills as a consequence of their illness, its treatment, or its lasting effects. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: In this sample of 277 colorectal cancer survivors, 44% of participants reported financial hardship. Individuals with low health literacy (OR 5.41, 95% CI 1.45-20.1), Spanish-speaking Hispanics (OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.39-6.87), divorced, separated or single survivors (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.94, 95% CI 1.06-3.54), and rural residents (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.06-3.28) were more likely to report financial hardship. Nonadherence to surveillance colonoscopy guidelines was two times as likely among participants reporting financial hardship (OR 2.17 95% CI 1.01-4.67) and among rural residents (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.07-4.48) than those reporting no financial hardship and urban residents, respectively. Conclusions: Substantial disparities in the likelihood of financial hardship and nonadherence to surveillance colonoscopy exist. Identifying patients at risk of financial hardship and developing interventions to reduce the financial burden of cancer may improve adherence to surveillance recommendations. Citation Format: Jean A. McDougall, Matthew P. Banegas, Charles Wiggins, Ashwani Rajput, Vi K. Chiu, Kristina G. Flores, Anita Y. Kinney. Disparities in treatment-related financial hardship and adherence to surveillance colonoscopy guidelines in ethnically, linguistically, and geographically diverse colorectal cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr C52.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2012
    In:  Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 21, No. 10 ( 2012-10-01), p. 1716-1721
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 21, No. 10 ( 2012-10-01), p. 1716-1721
    Abstract: Background: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy among Chilean women and an increasingly significant public health threat. This study assessed the accuracy of breast cancer risk perception among underserved, Chilean women. Methods: Women aged 50 to 70 years, with no mammogram during the last 2 years, were randomly selected from a community clinic registry in Santiago, Chile (n = 500). Perceived risk was measured using three methods: absolute risk, comparative risk, and numerical risk. Risk comprehension was measured by comparing women's perceived and objective risk estimates. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess overestimation of perceived risk. Results: Women at high risk of breast cancer were more likely than average risk women to perceive themselves at high or higher risk, using absolute and comparative risk approaches (P & lt; 0.001). The majority of participants (67%) overestimated their breast cancer risk, on the basis of risk comprehension; although, participants achieved higher accuracy with comparative risk (40%) and absolute risk (31.6%) methods. [Age, breast cancer knowledge and Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT) 5-year risk were significantly associated (P & lt; 0.01) with accuracy of perceived risk]. Conclusion: Chilean women residing in an underserved community may not accurately assess their breast cancer risk, although risk perception and level of accuracy differed between perceived risk measures. Comparative and absolute risk methods may better reflect women's interpretation and accuracy of risk perception. Impact: Improving our understanding of Chilean women's perceptions of developing breast cancer may lead to the development of culturally relevant efforts to reduce the breast cancer burden in this population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(10); 1716–21. ©2012 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2014
    In:  Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 23, No. 11_Supplement ( 2014-11-01), p. A73-A73
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 23, No. 11_Supplement ( 2014-11-01), p. A73-A73
    Abstract: Background: Evidence on the burden of breast cancer subtypes among Hispanic women is limited, as prior research suggests that Hispanics may be prone to develop those subtypes that are associated with poor prognosis. Additionally, few studies have characterized the population-based distribution of breast cancer subtypes among Hispanic women, by the joint expression of hormone receptors (HR: estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR)), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Purpose: Our objective was to assess the distribution and survival of breast cancer subtypes among Hispanic women diagnosed with primary, invasive breast cancer between 2005 and 2010 in California. Methods: Based on information from the California Cancer Registry, breast cancer subtypes were defined as: HR positive/HER2 negative (HR+/HER2-); HR+/HER2+; HR-/HER2+; and triple negative (HR-/HER2-). We calculated frequency distributions of breast cancer subtypes and used polytomous multivariate logistic regression to evaluate their associations with clinical and demographic factors, including socioeconomic status (SES) and Hispanic enclave (based on quintile distribution across the state of California), and nativity. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression methods were used to assess breast cancer-specific survival and mortality. Results: Among 16,380 Hispanic breast cancer patients, HR+/HER- was the predominant subtype (62.6%), followed by triple negative (15.6%), HR+/HER2+ (13.8%) and HR-/HER2+ (8.1%). Women living in lower SES neighborhoods had a greater risk of triple negative (p & lt;0.01) and HR-/HER2+ (p & lt;0.01) subtypes. Hispanic women diagnosed with triple negative and HR-/HER2+ tumors were substantially more likely to die from the disease (HR=5.00, 95% CI:4.19-5.96 and HR=2.74, 95% CI:2.20-3.41, respectively) than patients with the HR+/HER- subtype. Breast cancer-specific mortality increased with decreasing SES, from HR=1.37 (95% CI:0.97-1.93) for quintile 4 to HR=1.77 (95% CI:1.25-2.51) for quintile 1 (lowest neighborhood SES level). Conclusion: In the most comprehensive analysis of breast cancer subtypes among Hispanic women in the United States to date, our findings indicate that low SES was significantly associated with increased risk of developing and dying from breast cancer subtypes with poor prognosis. Foreign-born women were at greater risk than US-born of HR-/HER2+ tumors, although nativity was not associated with other subtypes. Hispanic women diagnosed with HR- breast cancer subtypes were at significantly increased risk of death; especially, those with triple negative breast cancer. While these results indicate that the distribution and burden of breast cancer subtypes among California Hispanic women are similar to other racial/ethnic populations, it is imperative to better understand the impact of SES on risk factor exposures that increase the risk of developing specific breast cancer subtypes. Citation Format: Matthew P. Banegas, Li Tao, Sean Altekruse, William F. Anderson, Esther M. John, Christina A. Clarke, Scarlett L. Gomez. Breast cancer subtype distribution and survival among Hispanic women in California. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Sixth AACR Conference: The Science of Cancer Health Disparities; Dec 6–9, 2013; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014;23(11 Suppl):Abstract nr A73. doi:10.1158/1538-7755.DISP13-A73
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2010
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 70, No. 8_Supplement ( 2010-04-15), p. 983-983
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 70, No. 8_Supplement ( 2010-04-15), p. 983-983
    Abstract: Background: Evidence suggests Latinas residing along the US-Mexico border face higher breast cancer (BC) mortality rates compared to Latinas in the interior of either country. Due to similarities in these populations, risk factors associated with BC may be unique to Latinas along the US-Mexico border. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe early detection practices (EDP), BC knowledge, and attitudes among US Latina and Mexican women age 40 and older living along the US-Mexico border, and to identify factors associated with EDP in this population. Methods: For this binational cross-sectional study, 265 participants completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire that obtained information on sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, family history, and EDP. Differences between Mexican (n=128) and US Latina (n=137) participants were assessed by Pearson's χ2, Fischer's Exact test, t-tests, and multivariate regression analyses. Results: US Latinas had significantly increased odds of having ever received a mammogram/breast ultrasound (Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.81) and clinical breast exam (OR = 2.98) compared to their Mexican counterparts. Mexican women had significantly higher levels of BC knowledge (Knowledge Score (KS) = 0.84) compared to US Latinas (KS = 0.77, p & lt;.05), although Mexican women were more likely to report that they did not need to worry about BC at their age (p & lt; 0.05). Age, education, insurance, and KS were significantly associated with EDP among participants. Conclusion: Mexican women residing along the US-Mexico border are not receiving the recommended BC screening procedures, despite having high levels of BC knowledge. Further research is needed to examine other factors of EDP, and ultimately poorer survival rates, among US-Mexico border Latinas.Table 1.Results of multivariate regressiona Mammography/Breast UltrasoundClinical Breast ExamBreast Self ExamVariablebOR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)US Latina3.69 (1.61-8.48)d3.41 (1.44-8.12)d1.68 (0.68-4.17)Family History1.52 (0.72-3.22)0.79 (0.39-1.62)1.31 (0.62-2.79)Age1.07 (1.02-1.13)d1.04 (0.99-1.09)0.91 (0.87-0.96)dEducation1.12 (1.01-1.24)c1.14 (1.03-1.28)c1.21 (1.08-1.37)dIncome1.00 (0.99-1.00)1.00 (0.99-1.00)1.00 (0.99-1.00)Marital Status   Married/Living w/ Intimate Partner---Single/Never Married0.79 (0.30-2.08)2.42 (0.72-8.12)1.50 (0.41-5.45)Divorced/Widowed/ Separated1.03 (0.42-2.55)0.64 (0.25-1.63)0.28 (0.10-0.77)cInsurance2.08 (1.04-.4.16)c2.83 (1.39-5.75)d12.3 (4.43-34.4)dKnowledge Score24.0 (3.30-175.5)d3.89 (0.53-28.5)1.39 (0.17-11.0)a Results are adjusted odds ratios; bAll variables adjusted for the remaining covariates; c p & lt; 0.05; d p & lt; 0.01 Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 983.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2015
    In:  Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 24, No. 10_Supplement ( 2015-10-01), p. B39-B39
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 24, No. 10_Supplement ( 2015-10-01), p. B39-B39
    Abstract: Background: Cancer is the second leading cause of death among American Indians and Alaskan Natives (AIANs) in the United States. However, information on cancer survival among AIANs, especially those living in urban areas, is limited. California is home to the largest AIAN population, comprised of over 700,000 individuals. To address this gap, we present data on cancer diagnoses and survival after cancer diagnoses among AIANs and non-Hispanic whites (NHWs) from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) tumor registry. Purpose: To examine cancer diagnoses and overall survival rates among AIAN individuals diagnosed with primary invasive cancer and compare to NHWs. Methods: This prospective cohort study uses data on 1,022 AIANs and 139,725 NHWs diagnosed with primary invasive cancer between 1997 and 2012, from the KPNC tumor registry and other electronic health records. Information on race, cancer site, tumor size, tumor grade, stage, year and age at diagnosis, type of treatment (e.g. surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and hormone), comorbidities, follow-up time and sociodemographics were extracted. Follow-up time was defined as number of days from date of diagnosis through either death from any cause, disenrollment or end of study period (March 31, 2014), whichever came first. Descriptive statistics were calculated for tumor, and clinical characteristics. Sociodemographic characteristics, including race, were extracted from the electronic health record. We identified the top 5 cancer sites, by sex, and estimated 5- and 10-year Kaplan-Meier survival rates for AIANs and NHWs. Charlson comorbidity scores and top 5 comorbidities were also compared between these populations. Results: Among AIANs, the 5 most common cancers diagnosed were prostate (16.4%), breast (16.4%), lung (13.3%), colorectal (12.5%), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (4.0%). Among NHWs, the most commonly diagnosed cancer was prostate (17.3%), followed by breast (16.8%), lung (11.7%), colorectal (9.3%) and melanoma (6.6%) cancers, respectively. Overall 5- and 10-year survival estimates among AIANs with any cancer were statistically significantly lower than for NHWs (51.9 vs. 58.2, p & lt;0.001 and 37.4 vs. 43.8, p & lt;0.001, respectively). When examining the most common individual cancer sites, 5- and 10-year overall survival estimates were consistently lower among AIANs compared to NHWs, although only the 5-year survival following breast cancer was statistically significant. AIANs with any cancer had a significantly higher rate of comorbidity compared to NHWs (p & lt;0.003). The most common non-malignancy comorbidities among AIANs were chronic pulmonary disease (25.5%), diabetes (with and without end-organ damage), (18.7%), and congestive heart disease (7.0%); the most common for NHWs were chronic pulmonary disease (21.4%), diabetes (14.3%) and congestive heart (6.0%). Conclusions: This study adds valuable information to the literature, identifying the most commonly diagnosed cancers and overall survival among AIANs outside of the Indian Health Service (IHS). Despite equal access to health care in the study population, our results show a lower survival for AIANs than NHWs, following invasive cancer, and a greater proportion of AIAN cancer patients with multiple comorbid conditions. Given that over two-thirds of AIANs live in urban settings, research efforts to identify potentially unique drivers of cancer health disparities are warranted to improve outcomes for urban dwelling AIANs within non-IHS health care systems. Citation Format: Marc A. Emerson, Matthew P. Banegas, Neetu Chawla, Ninah Achacoso, Alyce Adams, Laurel A. Habel. Trends in 5-year and 10-year crude survival rates among American Indians and Alaskan Natives diagnosed with cancer, 1997-2012. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Seventh AACR Conference on The Science of Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; Nov 9-12, 2014; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015;24(10 Suppl):Abstract nr B39.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 71, No. 8_Supplement ( 2011-04-15), p. 3717-3717
    Abstract: Introduction: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT) has not been previously validated for use in Hispanic women. We evaluated and compared BCRAT risk projections for Hispanic and non-Hispanic White (NHW) participants in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI). Methods: We used data on 6,248 Hispanic and 127,426 NHW post-menopausal WHI participants aged 50 years and older. Absolute risks of developing invasive breast cancer over the WHI main and extension studies were calculated using the BCRAT and an updated BCRAT using 1993-2007 SEER breast cancer incidence rates. We assessed model calibration by the ratio of observed to expected number of breast cancers (O/E ratio) and discriminatory accuracy with the concordance statistic (c-statistic). Results: In the WHI main study, the BCRAT underestimated the number of breast cancers in Hispanics (O/E ratio=1.18, 95% CI = 0.99, 1.40) and NHWs (O/E ratio=1.18, 95% CI = 1.14, 1.21). The updated BCRAT was well calibrated for Hispanics (O/E ratio=1.08, 95% CI = 0.91, 1.28) and NHWs (O/E ratio=0.98, 95% CI = 0.96, 1.01). The c-statistic was 0.629 (95% CI = 0.582, 0.676) for Hispanics and 0.575 (95%CI = 0.566, 0.583] for NHWs. In the WHI extension study, where women reported being screened less frequently, BCRAT overestimated risk in both Hispanics and NHWs. Conclusion: Underestimation of breast cancer risk by the BCRAT in Hispanic and NHW women was corrected by using updated SEER breast cancer incidence rates. Recalibrating the BCRAT with current SEER incidence rates and racial/ethnic specific relative risk estimates may improve the predictive accuracy for Hispanic women. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3717. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-3717
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 77, No. 23 ( 2017-12-01), p. 6770-6776
    Abstract: Cancer is the second leading cause of death among American Indians and Alaskan Natives (AIAN), although cancer survival information in this population is limited, particularly among urban AIAN. In this retrospective cohort study, we compared all-cause and prostate, breast, lung, and colorectal cancer–specific mortality among AIAN (n = 582) and non-Hispanic white (NHW; n = 82,696) enrollees of Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) diagnosed with primary invasive breast, prostate, lung, or colorectal cancer from 1997 to 2015. Tumor registry and other electronic health records provided information on sociodemographic, comorbidity, tumor, clinical, and treatment characteristics. Cox regression models were used to estimate adjusted survival curves and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). AIAN had a significantly higher comorbidity burden compared with NHW (P & lt; 0.05). When adjusting for patient, disease characteristics, and Charlson comorbidity scores, all-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality were significantly higher for AIAN than NHW patients with breast cancer (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.13–1.92) or with prostate cancer (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.14–3.06) but not for AIAN patients with lung and colorectal cancer. Despite approximately equal access to preventive services and cancer care in this setting, we found higher mortality for AIAN than NHW with some cancers, and a greater proportion of AIAN cancer patients with multiple comorbid conditions. This study provides severely needed information on the cancer experience of the 71% of AIANs who live in urban areas and access cancer care outside of the Indian Health Services, from which the vast majority of AIAN cancer information comes. Cancer Res; 77(23); 6770–6. ©2017 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages