Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)  (17)
  • 1
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 26, No. 13_Supplement ( 2020-07-01), p. A03-A03
    Abstract: Background: Gene expression-based molecular subtypes of high-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer (HGSOC) are distinguished by differential immune and stromal infiltration and may provide opportunities for targeted therapies. Integration of molecular subtypes into clinical trials has been hindered by inconsistent subtyping methodology. Methods: Adopting two independent approaches, we derived and internally validated algorithms for molecular subtype prediction from gene-expression array data in 1,650 tumors. We applied resulting models to assign labels to 3829 HGSOCs from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium evaluated on NanoString. Using the labeled NanoString data, we developed, confirmed, and validated a minimal gene set, clinical-grade test and prediction tool. We also used the OTTA dataset to evaluate associations between molecular subtype, biologic, and clinical features. Findings: The locked-down test included a model with 55 genes that predicted HGSOC molecular subtype with & gt;95% accuracy. Subtype varied between primary and metastatic site taken at the time of primary surgery, and was significantly associated with age, stage, CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration, residual disease, and outcome. In multivariable models, molecular subtypes lose their prognostic significance in the presence of risk factors such as residual disease and BRCA1/2 germline mutations. Interpretation: We validated the Predictor of high-grade-serous Ovarian carcinoma molecular subTYPE, or PrOTYPE, following the Institute of Medicine guidelines for the development of omics-based tests. This simple-to-use, cost-effective, fully defined, and locked-down clinical-grade assay will facilitate molecular subtype stratification into clinical trial design. PrOTYPE will allow for objective assessment of HGSOC molecular subtype predictive value in precision medicine applications. Citation Format: Aline Talhouk, Joshy George, Chen Wang, Ellen Goode, Susan Ramus, Jennifer Doherty, David Bowtell, Michael Anglesio, OTTA Consortium. PrOTYPE (Predictor of high-grade-serous Ovarian carcinoma molecular subTYPE): The development and validation of a clinical-grade consensus classifier for the molecular subtypes of high-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 13-16, 2019; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(13_Suppl):Abstract nr A03.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 23, No. 4 ( 2017-02-15), p. 925-934
    Abstract: Purpose: Some forms of chemotherapy can enhance antitumor immunity through immunogenic cell death, resulting in increased T-cell activation and tumor infiltration. Such effects could potentially sensitize tumors to immunotherapies, including checkpoint blockade. We investigated whether platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy for ovarian cancer induces immunologic changes consistent with this possibility. Experimental Design: Matched pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy tumor samples from 26 high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) patients were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for a large panel of immune cells and associated factors. The prognostic significance of post-chemotherapy TIL patterns was assessed in an expanded cohort (n = 90). Results: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with increased densities of CD3+, CD8+, CD8+ TIA-1+, PD-1+ and CD20+ TIL. Other immune subsets and factors were unchanged, including CD79a+ CD138+ plasma cells, CD68+ macrophages, and MHC class I on tumor cells. Immunosuppressive cell types were also unchanged, including FoxP3+ PD-1+ cells (putative regulatory T cells), IDO-1+ cells, and PD-L1+ cells (both macrophages and tumor cells). Hierarchical clustering revealed three response patterns: (i) TILhigh tumors showed increases in multiple immune markers after chemotherapy; (ii) TILlow tumors underwent similar increases, achieving patterns indistinguishable from the first group; and (iii) TILnegative cases generally remained negative. Despite the dramatic increases seen in the first two patterns, post-chemotherapy TIL showed limited prognostic significance. Conclusions: Chemotherapy augments pre-existing TIL responses but fails to relieve major immune-suppressive mechanisms or confer significant prognostic benefit. Our findings provide rationale for multipronged approaches to immunotherapy tailored to the baseline features of the tumor microenvironment. Clin Cancer Res; 23(4); 925–34. ©2016 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2019
    In:  Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 25, No. 8 ( 2019-04-15), p. 2537-2548
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 25, No. 8 ( 2019-04-15), p. 2537-2548
    Abstract: Tumors with high mutation load are thought to engender stronger immune responses, which in turn promote prolonged patient survival. To investigate this, we assessed tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and immunosuppressive factors across the 4 molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer, which have characteristic mutation rates ranging from low to ultra-high. Experimental Design: A total of 460 endometrial cancers were stratified by ProMisE (Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier in Endometrial cancer) into 4 molecular subtypes: mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd), POLE mutant (POLE), p53 abnormal (p53abn), and p53 wild-type (p53wt). Immune markers (CD3, CD8, CD79a, CD138, PD-1, PD-L1, FoxP3, IDO-1) were quantified by multiplex IHC and tested for associations with ProMisE subtype, survival, and other clinicopathologic parameters. Results: Two major TIL patterns were observed. TILhigh tumors harbored dense T- and B-lineage infiltrates and multiple immunosuppressive features and were common in molecular subtypes associated with high mutation load (MMRd and POLE); however, equally strong responses were seen in significant numbers of p53abn and p53wt tumors, which have characteristically low mutation loads. TILlow tumors were generally devoid of immunologic features and were more prevalent in p53abn and p53wt endometrial cancers, yet were also seen in MMRd and POLE subtypes. In multivariable models involving ProMisE subtype, T-cell markers, and TIL clusters, only ProMisE showed independent prognostic significance. Conclusions: Immune response correlates with endometrial cancer molecular subtype but does not carry independent prognostic significance. Profound variation in immune response is seen across and within endometrial cancer molecular subtypes, suggesting that assessment of immune response rather than molecular subtype may better predict response to immunotherapy. See related commentary by Mullen and Mutch, p. 2366
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 26, No. 13_Supplement ( 2020-07-01), p. IA12-IA12
    Abstract: Background: High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common and aggressive epithelial ovarian cancer. HGSOC has poor survival, with five-year survival of less than 40%, as it is often diagnosed at a late stage. The median overall survival (OS) is approximately four years. Prognostic gene expression signatures for HGSOC have been inconsistent and have not been translated into clinical practice. The aim of this study was to develop a robust prognostic signature for HGSOC, in order to identify high-risk patients requiring alternative treatments. Methods: A meta-analysis of 1,455 tumors was performed and 200 prognostic genes were selected for expression profiling. An additional 315 candidate genes were selected from the literature, drug-targetable pathways, and other hypotheses. NanoString expression analysis of the 513 genes was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue from 3,769 women with HGSOC from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) Consortium. A prognostic model for 5-year survival was developed using regression-based and machine learning methods. The model was trained on 2,702 tumors and evaluated on an independent set of 1,067 tumors. A NanoString expression analysis was performed on 2,692 additional tumors, for a subset of 218 of the genes, including the prognostic signature. Results: Expression of 276 genes was associated with OS (false discovery rate (FDR) & lt; 0.05) in single-gene analyses adjusted for age, stage, and race. The top five genes were TAP1, ZFHX4, CXCL9, FBN1, and PTGER3 (p & lt; & lt; 0.001). A 101-gene prognostic signature was established, where a gain of one standard deviation in the gene expression score conferred a greater than two-fold increase in risk of death (HR (hazard ratio) = 2.35 [2.02, 2.71]; p & lt; & lt; 0.001). Median survival by quintile group was 9.5, 5.4, 3.8, 3.2, and 2.3 years. Sensitivity analyses, applying the signature to specific patient groups, showed that the prognostic power of the signature is not explained by residual disease, treatment, BRCA status, or CD8 score. The prognostic signature was enriched in pathways with treatment implications, such as PI3K, GPCR, and immune. This signature is suitable for use in FFPE tumor material and future cases can be assigned an HR from the gene expression score. The signature was developed in cases that did not receive neoadjuvant treatment (NACT); however, application to NACT cases was assessed in the second NanoString expression analysis. Conclusion: The OTTA-SPOT (Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium – Stratified Prognosis of Ovarian Tumors) gene expression signature may improve risk stratification in clinical trials by identifying patients who are least likely to achieve 5-year survival. Citation Format: Joshua Millstein, Timothy Budden, Ellen L. Goode, Michael S. Anglesio, Aline Talhouk, OTTA consortium, David G. Huntsman, David D. Bowtell, James D. Brenton, Jennifer A. Doherty, Paul P.D. Pharoah, Susan J. Ramus. The Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis Consortium: Stratified Prognosis of Ovarian Tumors (OTTA-SPOT) signature for high-grade serous ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 13-16, 2019; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(13_Suppl):Abstract nr IA12.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 28, No. 24 ( 2022-12-15), p. 5383-5395
    Abstract: Advanced-stage mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) has poor chemotherapy response and prognosis and lacks biomarkers to aid stage I adjuvant treatment. Differentiating primary MOC from gastrointestinal (GI) metastases to the ovary is also challenging due to phenotypic similarities. Clinicopathologic and gene-expression data were analyzed to identify prognostic and diagnostic features. Experimental Design: Discovery analyses selected 19 genes with prognostic/diagnostic potential. Validation was performed through the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium and GI cancer biobanks comprising 604 patients with MOC (n = 333), mucinous borderline ovarian tumors (MBOT, n = 151), and upper GI (n = 65) and lower GI tumors (n = 55). Results: Infiltrative pattern of invasion was associated with decreased overall survival (OS) within 2 years from diagnosis, compared with expansile pattern in stage I MOC [hazard ratio (HR), 2.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04–7.41, P = 0.042]. Increased expression of THBS2 and TAGLN was associated with shorter OS in MOC patients (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04–1.51, P = 0.016) and (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01–1.45, P = 0.043), respectively. ERBB2 (HER2) amplification or high mRNA expression was evident in 64 of 243 (26%) of MOCs, but only 8 of 243 (3%) were also infiltrative (4/39, 10%) or stage III/IV (4/31, 13%). Conclusions: An infiltrative growth pattern infers poor prognosis within 2 years from diagnosis and may help select stage I patients for adjuvant therapy. High expression of THBS2 and TAGLN in MOC confers an adverse prognosis and is upregulated in the infiltrative subtype, which warrants further investigation. Anti-HER2 therapy should be investigated in a subset of patients. MOC samples clustered with upper GI, yet markers to differentiate these entities remain elusive, suggesting similar underlying biology and shared treatment strategies.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 22, No. 12 ( 2016-06-15), p. 2865-2873
    Abstract: Purpose: The aim of this study was to confirm the prognostic significance of POLE exonuclease domain mutations (EDM) in endometrial carcinoma patients. In addition, the effect of treatment on POLE-mutated tumors was assessed. Experimental Design: A retrospective patient cohort of 496 endometrial carcinoma patients was identified for targeted sequencing of the POLE exonuclease domain, yielding 406 evaluable tumors. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the effect of POLE mutation status on progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). Combining results from eight studies in a meta-analysis, we computed pooled HR for PFS, DSS, and OS. Results: POLEEDMs were identified in 39 of 406 (9.6%) endometrial carcinomas. Women with POLE-mutated endometrial carcinomas were younger, with stage I (92%) tumors, grade 3 (62%), endometrioid histology (82%), and frequent (49%) lymphovascular invasion. In univariable analysis, POLE-mutated endometrial carcinomas had significantly improved outcomes compared with patients with no EDMs for PFS, DSS, and OS. In multivariable analysis, POLE EDMs were only significantly associated with improved PFS. The effect of adjuvant treatment on POLE-mutated cases could not be determined conclusively; however, both treated and untreated patients with POLE EDMs had good outcomes. Meta-analysis revealed an association between POLE EDMs and improved PFS and DSS with pooled HRs 0.34 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.15–0.73] and 0.35 (95% CI, 0.13–0.92), respectively. Conclusions: POLE EDMs are prognostic markers associated with excellent outcomes for endometrial carcinoma patients. Further investigation is needed to conclusively determine if treatment is necessary for this group of women. Clin Cancer Res; 22(12); 2865–73. ©2016 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 19, No. 19_Supplement ( 2013-10-01), p. B14-B14
    Abstract: Background: Ovarian cancer is a series of distinct diseases typically identified by their histopathological appearance as high-grade serous (HGSC; 70% of cases), low-grade serous (LGSC; 5%), endometrioid (ENOCa, 8%), clear cell (CCC, 12%), and mucinous (MC; 5%) carcinomas. Each type has defining molecular events, gene/protein expression patterns, genetic risk factors, sites of origin, and responses to treatment. Gold standard treatment is surgery followed by platinum-taxane chemotherapy despite mounting evidence suggesting CCCs, MCs, and LGSCs are largely platinum-taxane resistant. If outcomes are to be improved, it is critical to adopt a type specific strategy. Retrospective review studies have suggested histotype may be misdiagnosed or omitted in up to 30% of cases. However, pathological diagnosis of histotypes has been greatly refined in recent years and the use of biomarkers as aides is becoming more widespread. Nonetheless a rapid and fully objective classifier of histotypes will undoubtedly improve diagnostic accuracy, especially in the case of pre-surgical biopsies where small amounts of material present a challenge. Methods: Over 1000 ovarian carcinoma samples underwent expert gynecopathological review to establish a gold standard diagnosis for the 5 major carcinoma types. RNA was extracted from FFPE tissues and levels of a pre-selected set of & gt;100 genes were quantified using the NanoString GX system. Cohort was split with ~1/3 set aside for independent validation. Several statistical models were tested to generate a prediction algorithm for histological type including PAM, Random Forest, Lasso, Recursive Partitioning, and Discriminant Analysis. Feature selection methods and prediction error were examined using cross-validation in the train /test series prior to validation in the independent set. Results: Preliminary analysis suggests classification of the 5 major histotypes is possible using NanoString derived RNA expression levels. Accuracy appears to be equivalent to interobserver variation amongst expert gynecopathologist. Conclusions: The NanoString GX platform provides a stable and reproducible platform on which a robust single sample histological type classifier can be established. Our algorithm combined with the NanoString platform provides a rapid, and cost-effective option that does not require modification to current pathology lab tissue processing protocols. Diagnostic prediction require little material and is applicable to pre- and post- surgical specimens where an objective measure is desired to confirm diagnosis or aide in especially challenging cases. Citation Format: Michael S. Anglesio, Aline Talhouk, Steve E. Kalloger, Gholamreza Haffari, Robertson Mackenzie, Martin Cheung, Janine Senz, Christine Chow, Sherman Lau, Maria Intermaggio, Susan J. Ramus, Andreas du Bois, Jacobus Pfisterer, Jessica N. McAlpine, Friedrich Kommoss, Blake Gilks, Stefan Kommoss, David G. Huntsman. Rapid RNA-based histotyping of ovarian carcinomas. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research: From Concept to Clinic; Sep 18-21, 2013; Miami, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2013;19(19 Suppl):Abstract nr B14.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 26, No. 20 ( 2020-10-15), p. 5400-5410
    Abstract: Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (ENOC) is generally associated with a more favorable prognosis compared with other ovarian carcinomas. Nonetheless, current patient treatment continues to follow a “one-size-fits-all” approach. Even though tumor staging offers stratification, personalized treatments remain elusive. As ENOC shares many clinical and molecular features with its endometrial counterpart, we sought to investigate The Cancer Genome Atlas–inspired endometrial carcinoma (EC) molecular subtyping in a cohort of ENOC. Experimental Design: IHC and mutation biomarkers were used to segregate 511 ENOC tumors into four EC-inspired molecular subtypes: low-risk POLE mutant (POLEmut), moderate-risk mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), high-risk p53 abnormal (p53abn), and moderate-risk with no specific molecular profile (NSMP). Survival analysis with established clinicopathologic and subtype-specific features was performed. Results: A total of 3.5% of cases were POLEmut, 13.7% MMRd, 9.6% p53abn, and 73.2% NSMP, each showing distinct outcomes (P & lt; 0.001) and survival similar to observations in EC. Median OS was 18.1 years in NSMP, 12.3 years in MMRd, 4.7 years in p53abn, and not reached for POLEmut cases. Subtypes were independent of stage, grade, and residual disease in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: EC-inspired molecular classification provides independent prognostic information in ENOC. Our findings support investigating molecular subtype–specific management recommendations for patients with ENOC; for example, subtypes may provide guidance when fertility-sparing treatment is desired. Similarities between ENOC and EC suggest that patients with ENOC may benefit from management strategies applied to EC and the opportunity to study those in umbrella trials.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 26, No. 13_Supplement ( 2020-07-01), p. B20-B20
    Abstract: Objective: Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (ENOC) is associated with a generally more favorable prognosis compared to other ovarian carcinoma histotypes. Nonetheless, patients are still treated with a “one size fits all” approach. While tumor staging offers some stratification, the development of personalized treatment concepts remains elusive. Our group has recently validated the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE), to distinguish clinically relevant prognostic groups amongst endometrial carcinomas. ENOC shares risk factors, genomics, and histology with its endometrial counterpart. The aim of our study was to apply and test ProMisE on ENOC. Methods: ProMisE was applied to 509 ENOC after biomarker-assisted review of ENOC histotype. Cases were aligned into low-risk POLE mutant (POLE), moderate-risk mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), high-risk p53 abnormal (p53abn), and a final moderate-risk category lacking these biomarkers (p53wt). Kaplan-Meier and multivariate survival analysis were performed. Results: 4% of cases were POLE, 16% MMRd, 71% p53wt, and 10% p53abn. Groups showed distinct progression-free and overall survival (p & lt;0.001), near identical to profiles of endometrial cancers. 5-year PFS was 54% in p53abn, 82% in MMRd, 85% in p53wt, and 100% in POLEmut cases. Median overall survival was reached in p53 mutant cases only. ProMisE classes of ENOC were independent of stage and residual disease in multivariable analysis. Conclusion: ProMisE risk classification provides additional prognostic information in a large cohort of ENOC. Our findings support introduction of ProMisE-stratified treatment strategies to improve patient care across ENOC. Further, ENOC may benefit from parallel efforts under investigation in endometrial carcinoma. Citation Format: Pauline Krämer, Aline Talhouk, Tjalling Bosse, Florian Heitz, Naveena Singh, Felix Kommoss, Sara Brucker, Jessica McAlpine, Stefan Kommoss, Martin Koebel, Michael Anglesio. Endometrial cancer molecular risk stratification in endometrioid ovarian cancers: A novel application of precision medicine [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 13-16, 2019; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(13_Suppl):Abstract nr B20.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 25, No. 19 ( 2019-10-01), p. 5937-5946
    Abstract: Ovarian cancer is a heterogeneous disease that can be divided into multiple subtypes with variable etiology, pathogenesis, and prognosis. We analyzed DNA methylation profiling data to identify biologic subgroups of ovarian cancer and study their relationship with histologic subtypes, copy number variation, RNA expression data, and outcomes. Experimental Design: A total of 162 paraffin-embedded ovarian epithelial tumor tissues, including the five major epithelial ovarian tumor subtypes (high- and low-grade serous, endometrioid, mucinous, and clear cell) and tumors of low malignant potential were selected from two different sources: The Polish Ovarian Cancer study, and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Residual Tissue Repository (SEER RTR). Analyses were restricted to Caucasian women. Methylation profiling was conducted using the Illumina 450K methylation array. For 45 tumors array copy number data were available. NanoString gene expression data for 39 genes were available for 61 high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC). Results: Consensus nonnegative matrix factorization clustering of the 1,000 most variable CpG sites showed four major clusters among all epithelial ovarian cancers. We observed statistically significant differences in survival (log-rank test, P = 9.1 × 10−7) and genomic instability across these clusters. Within HGSC, clustering showed three subgroups with survival differences (log-rank test, P = 0.002). Comparing models with and without methylation subgroups in addition to previously identified gene expression subtypes suggested that the methylation subgroups added significant survival information (P = 0.007). Conclusions: DNA methylation profiling of ovarian cancer identified novel molecular subgroups that had significant survival difference and provided insights into the molecular underpinnings of ovarian cancer. See related commentary by Ishak et al., p. 5729
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages