X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (5)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Risk Factors for Local Failure Following Chemoradiation and Magnetic Resonance Image–Guided Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Results From the EMBRACE-I Study
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2023
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 41, No. 10 ( 2023-04-01), p. 1933-1942
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 10 ( 2023-04-01), p. 1933-1942
    Abstract: To report clinical and treatment characteristics, remission and failure patterns, and risk factors for local failure (LF) from the EMBRACE-I study. MATERIALS AND METHODS EMBRACE-I was a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study on magnetic resonance imaging–based image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (MR-IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer. Treatment consisted of external beam radiotherapy, concurrent chemotherapy, and MR-IGABT. LF was defined as progressive or recurrent disease in the cervix, uterus, parametria, pelvic wall, or vagina. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate local tumor control (LC) and Cox proportional regression models for multivariable analysis and dose-response analysis. RESULTS One thousand three hundred eighteen patients with a median follow-up of 52 months were available for this analysis. Eighty-one patients had persistent disease 3 months after end of treatment. Of those, 60 patients achieved LC at 6-9 months without further treatment, whereas 21 patients had progressive disease. In addition, 77 patients developed a local recurrence after complete remission comprising a total number of 98 LFs. LFs were located inside the MR-IGABT target volumes in 90% of patients with LF. In multivariable analysis, histology, minimal dose to 90% of high-risk clinical target volume (CTV HR ), maximum tumor dimension, CTV HR 〉 45 cm 3 , overall treatment time, tumor necrosis on magnetic resonance imaging at diagnosis, uterine corpus infiltration at diagnosis and at MR-IGABT, and mesorectal infiltration at MR-IGABT had significant impact on LF. Dose-response analysis showed that a minimal dose to 90% of 85 Gy to the CTV HR led to 95% (95% CI, 94 to 97) LC 3 years postintervention for squamous cell in comparison to 86% (95% CI, 81 to 90) for adeno/adenosquamous carcinoma histology. CONCLUSION The present study demonstrates the safety and validity of the GYN GEC-ESTRO/ICRU-89 target concept and provides large-scale evidence for dose prescription and new risk factors for LF in MR-IGABT in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.01096
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
    Open Access Request
    Availability (electronic / print)
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Effect of germ-line BRCA mutations in biochemical relapse and survival after treatment for localized prostate cancer.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2013
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 31, No. 6_suppl ( 2013-02-20), p. 29-29
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 6_suppl ( 2013-02-20), p. 29-29
    Abstract: 29 Background: Biochemical relapse after local treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) indicates recurrent disease and is associated with shorter cause-specific survival (CSS). Germline BRCA mutations are associated with worse PrCa outcomes. In this study, we analyzed biochemical-progression free survival (bPFS) after conventional treatments for localized PCa in a cohort of BRCA patients from the UK. Currently, BRCA1/2 carriers are treated with the same protocols used for non-carriers. Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, each BRCA carrier (10 BRCA1 and 34 BRCA2) treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (RT) was matched with 3 non-carriers (NC) by: age at diagnosis (±5 yrs), TNM stage, Gleason score, presenting PSA, local treatment (RT or RP), androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and year of treatment (±5yrs). All NC were screened for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Biochemical failure was reviewed according to ASTRO and NCCN criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariate Cox regression model adjusted by matching factors were employed. Results: 176 patients (pts) were included. Median follow-up was 97 months (ms). Median age at diagnosis was 58.5 yrs (43-75). 80 pts received RT (16 BRCA2, 4 BRCA1, 60 NC) and 85% also received ADT≥6 ms. 96pts underwent RP (18 BRCA2, 6 BRCA1 and 72 NC). Following RT treatment, 5yrs-CSS was 96% in NC and 47% in BRCA carriers (p=2x10 -5 ), whilst no difference was seen after RP (5yrs-CSS was 98.5% in NC vs 93.3% in BRCA). Five-years bFPFS after RT was 74% in NC and 24% in BRCA (p=0.002). No difference was observed in 5yrs-bPFS between BRCA carriers and NC treated with RP (52% vs 66% , p=0.346). The adjusted MVA (including tumour stage, local treatment, ADT and BRCA status) confirmed the independent prognostic value of BRCA status for bPFS and CSS. Among BRCA carriers, the independent risk was greater when the analysis was limited to BRCA2 pts . Conclusions: Our results suggest that BRCA carriers have worse local disease control than NC when conventionally treated with RT. No differences in bPFS were observed in pts treated with RP after 〉 8 yrs median follow-up. These results may have implications for tailoring clinical management in these patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.6_suppl.29
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
    Open Access Request
    Availability (electronic / print)
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Risk of breast or ovarian cancer in family members who do not carry the BRCA1 or BRCA2 family mutation: Findings from the EMBRACE study.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 1558-1558
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 1558-1558
    Abstract: 1558 Background: BRCA1/BRCA2 true-negatives are proven non-carriers of the BRCA mutation segregating within their family. Currently, there is no conclusive evidence on the risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer in these individuals, potentially leading to non-uniform clinical practices. The purpose of this study was to estimate breast and ovarian cancer risks for true-negatives from the EMBRACE prospective cohort study. Methods: Risks were calculated separately for incident invasive breast cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We used cohort analysis to estimate incidences, cumulative risks and standardised incidence ratios (SIRs). Results: A total of 1895 unaffected women were eligible for inclusion in the breast cancer analysis and 1736 for the ovarian cancer analysis. There were 23 incident invasive breast cancers and 2 EOCs diagnosed during follow-up. The cumulative risk of invasive breast cancer was 9.4% (95% CI 5.9%-15%) by the age of 85-years, whilst the corresponding risk of EOC was 0.6% (95% CI 0.2%-2.6%). The SIR for breast cancer was 0.93 (95% CI 0.62-1.40) in the overall cohort, 0.85 (95% CI 0.48-1.50) in non-carriers from BRCA1 families and 1.03 (95% CI 0.57-1.87) in non-carriers from BRCA2 families. The SIR for EOC was 0.79 (95% CI 0.20-3.17) in the overall cohort and 1.74 (95% CI 0.44-6.98) in non-carriers from BRCA2 families. Conclusions: This is the largest cohort to date of prospectively ascertained true-negatives from BRCA1/ BRCA2 families. Our results did not provide evidence for elevated risks of invasive breast cancer or EOC in proven non-carriers. Risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy may not be appropriate for these individuals. Female relatives of a known BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carrier should be advised towards genetic testing to avoid unnecessary surgical procedures. However, we were not able to investigate variation in risks by cancer family history. Therefore, we cannot rule out that risks may be slightly higher for close relatives of affected mutation carriers. In such cases, model-based estimates incorporating family history, such as those given by BOADICEA, can be used in the counselling process.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.1558
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
    Open Access Request
    Availability (electronic / print)
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Prediction of Breast and Prostate Cancer Risks in Male BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers Using Polygenic Risk Scores
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 35, No. 20 ( 2017-07-10), p. 2240-2250
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 20 ( 2017-07-10), p. 2240-2250
    Abstract: BRCA1/2 mutations increase the risk of breast and prostate cancer in men. Common genetic variants modify cancer risks for female carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations. We investigated—for the first time to our knowledge—associations of common genetic variants with breast and prostate cancer risks for male carriers of BRCA1/ 2 mutations and implications for cancer risk prediction. Materials and Methods We genotyped 1,802 male carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 by using the custom Illumina OncoArray. We investigated the combined effects of established breast and prostate cancer susceptibility variants on cancer risks for male carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations by constructing weighted polygenic risk scores (PRSs) using published effect estimates as weights. Results In male carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations, PRS that was based on 88 female breast cancer susceptibility variants was associated with breast cancer risk (odds ratio per standard deviation of PRS, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.56; P = 8.6 × 10 −6 ). Similarly, PRS that was based on 103 prostate cancer susceptibility variants was associated with prostate cancer risk (odds ratio per SD of PRS, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.35 to 1.81; P = 3.2 × 10 −9 ). Large differences in absolute cancer risks were observed at the extremes of the PRS distribution. For example, prostate cancer risk by age 80 years at the 5th and 95th percentiles of the PRS varies from 7% to 26% for carriers of BRCA1 mutations and from 19% to 61% for carriers of BRCA2 mutations, respectively. Conclusion PRSs may provide informative cancer risk stratification for male carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations that might enable these men and their physicians to make informed decisions on the type and timing of breast and prostate cancer risk management.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.4935
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
    Open Access Request
    Availability (electronic / print)
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    BRCA carrier status as an independent prognostic factor associated with earlier biochemical relapse in local prostate cancer.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2012
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. 1545-1545
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. 1545-1545
    Abstract: 1545 Background: Biochemical relapse after local treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) indicates recurrent disease and is associated with shorter survival. Germline BRCA mutations are associated with worse PCa outcomes. BRCA carriers are currently treated with the same protocols used for non-carriers. We analyzed biochemical-progression free survival (bPFS) after conventional treatment for localized PCa in a cohort of BRCA patients (pts). Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, each BRCA carrier (9 BRCA1 and 34 BRCA2) treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (RT) was matched with 3 non-carriers (NC) by age at diagnosis (±5 yrs), TNM stage, Gleason score, presenting PSA, local treatment , androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and year of treatment (±3 yrs). All NC were screened for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Biochemical failure was reviewed according to ASTRO and NCCN criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariate Cox regression model adjusted by matching factors were employed. Results: 172 pts were included. Median follow-up was 76 months (ms). Median age at diagnosis was 58 yrs (43-75). Tumour stages were I 11%, IIA 19%, IIB 28%, III 28%, IV 14%. 80 pts received RT (18 BRCA2, 5 BRCA1, 57NC) and 85% also received ADT (70% for ≥6 months). 92 pts underwent RP (16 BRCA2, 4 BRCA1 and 72 NC), and 9% of them received ADT ( 〈 6months). Overall, median bPFS was 71ms. For those treated with RT, median bPFS was 65ms in NC vs 39ms in BRCA carriers (p=0.023). bPFS was not affected by ADT duration. Median bPFS after RP was 65ms in BRCA carriers. No difference was observed in 3yrs-bPFS between BRCA carriers and NC (73% vs 76%). The adjusted MVA confirmed the independent prognostic value of tumour stage (p=0.004) and BRCA status (p=0.032) for bPFS. Among BRCA carriers, the risk was greater when the analysis was limited to BRCA2 pts (p=0.013, HR 2.1,.95%CI 1.2-3.7). Conclusions: Our results suggest that BRCA carriers with PCa have worse local disease control than NC when treated with RT, regardless of ADT duration. No differences in bPFS were observed in pts treated with RP after 〉 6 yrs median follow-up. These results may have implications for tailoring clinical management for these patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.1545
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
    Open Access Request
    Availability (electronic / print)
Nothing or not found what you are looking for? Please check your search query or use the Interlibrary Loan Search.
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages