Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (2)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. e21076-e21076
    Abstract: e21076 Background: PD-L1 inhibitor, durvalumab has been approved since the PACIFIC study showed its efficacy as consolidation therapy after CCRT for locally advanced NSCLC. But predictive factor for the efficacy of CCRT on this post PACIFIC era have not been known. LIPI has been proposed as a new biomarker for the anti-PD-1 therapy of advanced NSCLC. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of LIPI as a predictive marker in multicenter cohort of patients with locally advanced NSCLC who received CCRT as initial treatment. Methods: 219 patients with available baseline LIPI were reviewed. The progression free survival (PFS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and LIPI were calculated at baseline. Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS and recurrence were compared using the log-rank test for trend. Multivariable analysis was conducted using the Cox and logistic regression models, respectively, adjusted for age, sex, ECOG-PS, smoking, histology, TNM stage, chemotherapy regimens, Body mass index (BMI), PD-L1 status, EGFR or ALK mutation, and baseline LIPI. Results: 62.5% (n = 137) of the patients had a good (0 factors) LIPI, while 37.5% (n = 82) had intermediate (1 factor) and poor (2 factors) LIPI respectively. In multivariable analysis, good LIPI (0 factors) were significantly associated with longer PFS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.28-0.75; P 〈 0.01) as did ECOG-PS0 (P 〈 0.01), ≤stageIIIA (P 〈 0.01), being treated with durvalumab after CRT (P = 0.04). There were no difference in the patient characteristics between good LIPI and intermediate/poor LIPI, significantly. Higher LIPI (1 or 2 factors) were strongly prognostic factor for recurrence after CCRT in multivariate analysis (P = 0.04), along with ECOG-PS1≤ (P 〈 0.01), stage IIIB≤ (P 〈 0.01). Conclusions: The good LIPI predictive value for PFS and disease control in patients treated with CCRT was confirmed. Although a strong statistical significance, we needs to be confirmed further with longer follow-up and prospective study.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 9039-9039
    Abstract: 9039 Background: Durvalumab was approved as a consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and established as the standard of care. However, since the approval of durvalumab, little has been reported on the frequency, severity, or clinical course of pneumonitis/radiation pneumonitis throughout the course of CRT. Methods: We conducted a 17-center, retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with locally advanced NSCLC who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with platinum-based chemotherapy between May 2018 and May 2019. Results: A total of 275 patients were included; their median age was 69.9 (range, 40.3-87.5), mean V 20 was 19.4% (range, 1.4-37.9), and mean "mean lung dose" was 10.9 Gy (range, 1.5-31.3). Of these, 204 patients received durvalumab consolidation therapy (74.2%). Median follow-up time from the initiation of CCRT was 8.4 months (range, 1.5-15.7). During follow-up, 225 patients (81.8%) developed any-grade pneumonitis/radiation pneumonitis. Of these, more than half (134 of 225) were asymptomatic (grade 1), 18 (6.5%) were ≥grade 3, and 4 patients (1.5%) had fatal pneumonitis/radiation pneumonitis. By the time of initial assessment of response to CCRT, 64 (23.3%) patients had developed radiation pneumonitis. Logistic regression revealed that only V 20 ≥25 % was an independent risk factor of symptomatic (≥grade 2) pneumonitis/radiation pneumonitis (OR: 2.74, 95% CI: 1.35-5.53, p = 0.0045). Of the 275 patients, 67 were treated with corticosteroids for pneumonitis/radiation pneumonitis (24.7%), and 14 (5.1%) needed home oxygen therapy after the treatment of pneumonitis/radiation pneumonitis. Among patients treated with corticosteroids, 21 patients received durvalumab rechallenge. Of the 21 patients, 6 (29%) showed pneumonitis/radiation pneumonitis relapse, of which 3 (14%) resulted in suspension of durvalumab rechallenge, but none were fatal. Conclusions: Although over four-fifths of the patients treated with CCRT after the approval of durvalumab developed pneumonitis/radiation pneumonitis, more than half of them were asymptomatic, and ≥grade 3 events accounted for 6.5%. Sometimes patients needed corticosteroid therapy, which was in many occasions effective, and some also underwent durvalumab rechallenge. V 20 was an independent risk factor of symptomatic pneumonitis/radiation pneumonitis.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages