Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (3)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 34, No. 15_suppl ( 2016-05-20), p. e17556-e17556
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. e13073-e13073
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. e13073-e13073
    Abstract: e13073 Background: After radical surgery for breast cancer, routine laboratory or imaging studies for metastases screening are not indicated in the absence of clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of recurrence. While the goal of therapy is the extension of survival and maintenance of quality of life (QOL), therapies themselves could induce adverse events, resulting in deterioration of QOL. We evaluated quality adjusted life years (QALYs), which is survival adjusted by QOL, of the patients with recurrent breast cancer retrospectively and adequate follow-up measures. Methods: Fifty seven patients with recurrent breast cancer who died already were included. Survival curves were partitioned into two health states: time with ≥ grade 2 chemotherapy-related toxicity (TOX) and time without toxicity (TWiST). QALYs were acquired as follows: QALYs = TWiST + 0.7 * TOX. We compared clinical factors in the patients between with (symptomatic group, n = 32) and without symptoms (asymptomatic group, n = 25). Results: The median age of the patient at diagnosis of recurrence was 57 years. Luminal (hormone receptors (HR) - and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) -), HER2 (HER2 +), triple negative (TN) (HR - and HER2 -), and unknown were 29, 7, 15, and 6 cases, respectively. The proportion of HER2 and TN was significantly higher in the symptomatic group than that in the asymptomatic group (58.6, 21.7 %, p 〈 0.05). 44.6 % of the patients had visceral metastases at diagnosis of recurrence and the proportions were not different between the groups. Although post recurrent survival (PRS) was shorter significantly in the symptomatic group (22.5, 42,0 months, p 〈 0.01), overall survival from diagnosis of primary breast cancer (OS) was identical (60.5, 91.0 months). Additionally, QALYs after recurrence was shorter in the symptomatic group (23.0, 41.1 months, p 〈 0.01) and QALYs from diagnosis of primary breast cancer was identical (58.7, 91.0 months). Conclusions: Although there was no significant difference in OS between the both groups, the duration of therapy received was longer in the symptomatic group. In the present study, we acquired limited information due to retrospective manner. Prospective evaluation of QALYs, including patient reported outcome and symptoms derived from cancer itself, would turn out adequate measures of follow-up after radical surgery for primary breast cancer.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. e12576-e12576
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. e12576-e12576
    Abstract: e12576 Background: Breast cancer is classified into three prognostic groups based on the following biologic factors: estrogen-receptor (ER) status, progesterone-receptor (PR) status, and nuclear grade (NG). According to this classification, we determined the biological behavior in order to understand if a small breast cancer is biologically more favorable than a large one (T1-2 breast cancers). Methods: The inclusion criteria for this study were (1) presence of T1-2 breast cancer measurable by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound(US), and (2) availability for determination of ER, PR, and NG histological status. Inflammatory breast cancer, male breast cancer, tumors of unknown size on MRI or US, and complications due to other cancers were excluded from this study. From April 2007 to December 2019, 1173 patients with surgically proven breast cancer presented at National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center, and 1080 patients were retrospectively analyzed. The favorable (F), intermediate (I), and unfavorable (UF) groups were defined as follows. F: NG1 (ER+PR+, ER+PR-, ER-PR+), UF: NG2 (ER-PR-) or NG3 (ER-PR-, ER+PR-, ER-PR+). IF: all other types of F and UF. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP 9.0.2, and probability values of 〈 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Number (%), age (year), size (cm), and 10-year OS (%) in the F, I, and UF groups are presented in the table. The tumor size in F group was significantly smaller than that in the other groups and had better prognoses. The F, I, and UF distribution of tumors less than 1 cm in size were 66%, 29%, and 5%, respectively. On the other hand, the F, I, and UF distribution of tumors 1-2 cm, 2-3 cm, 3-4 cm, 4-5 cm in sizes were (42%, 41%, 17%), (34%, 46%, 20%), (31%, 39%, 30%), and (27%, 45%, 28%), respectively. The 10-year OS of F group stage I, I group stage I, F group stage II, and UF group stage I were 99%, 94%, 93%, and 80%, respectively. Conclusions: Small breast cancers, especially those less than 1 cm in size, were shown to be significantly biologically favorable. Small breast cancers are candidates for de-escalation of treatment. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages