Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (24)
Type of Medium
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (24)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 4046-4046
    Abstract: 4046 Background: Adding a claudin18.2 antibody to a chemotherapy is a clinically validated approach for patients with high CLDN18.2 expressing tumors. TST001 is a best in class differentiated antibody whose improved CLDN18.2 affinity and enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, leads to anti-tumor activity in low to medium CLDN18.2 expressors gastric cancer cells. Pre-clinical studies also showed that TST001 has stronger tumor regression effects than the IMAB362-analog at the same dose. Methods: The efficacy and safety of osemitamab with CAPOX as 1st line treatment with G/GEJ cancer was explored in a dose escalation and expansion phase 1/2 study in China (Cohort C, NCT04495296). Positive claudin18.2 expression (membranous staining ≥1+ intensity in≥10% of tumor cells) as assessed centrally using the LDT assay was required in the expansion phase only. Results: As of Dec 31, 2022, 64 patients were dosed with osemitamab in combination with CAPOX, 15 patients received osemitamab at doses ranging from 1 to 8 mg/kg Q3W in the dose escalation and 49 patients at 6 mg/kg in the dose expansion. The median follow up was 151 days. Patient characteristics were typical of 1st line G/GEJ cancer, with relatively higher percentage of peritoneal disease (48.4%). Nausea (65.4%), vomiting (46.2%) and hypoalbuminemia (65.4%) were the most common adverse events related to TST001 at dose of 6mg/kg in 52 patients (3 patients in dose escalation and 49 patients in dose expansion), most of them were grade 1 or 2 (only one patient experienced grade 3 nausea and vomiting, and one experienced grade 3 hypoalbuminemia). In the expansion cohort, 40 of the 45 patients with measurable lesions had at least one post-treatment tumor assessment. 27 achieved partial response (PR) of which 21 were confirmed. There was no obvious trend in improved efficacy with higher level of CLDN18.2 expression based on overall response rate (ORR). Progression free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR) were still immature. Conclusions: TST001 in combination with CAPOX as first-line treatment for the patients with G/GEJ cancer is safe and encouraging anti-tumor activities have been observed regardless of the CLDN18.2 expression levels above 1+ intensity in 〉 =10% tumor cells per central LDT assay. Updated ORR, mPFS and mDOR will be presented at the time of the congress. Clinical trial information: NCT04495296 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 3590-3590
    Abstract: 3590 Background: It is still controversial for colon cancer patients with unresectable metastases whether to resect the primary tumor when there are no symptoms of primary lesion. Methods: This is an open-label, single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled phase II trial. Colon cancer patients aged 18-80 years with unresectable metastases at enrollment will be randomly allocated to either resection group (group A) or chemotherapy group (group B), and stratified by tumor response and number of organ metastases, after receiving induction chemotherapy with 4 cycles of XELOX or 6 cycles of mFOLFOX6, excluding those with disease progression, lesions radically resectable, or primary lesion unresectable. Patients in group A received resection of primary lesion and then continued chemotherapy, and patients in group B just continued chemotherapy, both up to 4 cycles of XELOX or 6 cycles of mFOLFOX6, and capecitabine maintenance afterwards. If progression occurs 3 months after discontinuation of oxaliplatin and toxicity has recovered to grade I, the original regimen can be applied again. The primary endpoint was TFS (time to failure of strategy, defined as the time from randomization to secondary progression in patients received re-introduce of the induction chemotherapy regimen, or to first progression in patients without re-introduce of the original regimen). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS, the time from randomization to first progression), overall survival (OS, the time from enrollment to death), and adverse events (AEs). Efficacy data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02291744. Results: Between April, 2015, and July, 2020, 140 patients were enrolled, and 54 patients withdrew due to colon obstruction (16), perforation (1), disease progression (22), death (1), radical resection (3), or other reasons (11). Finally, 86 patients were randomized into group A (n = 42) or group B (n = 44). The median TFS was 143 days (95%CI: 104.9-181.1) in group A, and 196 days (95%CI: 96.5-295.5) in group B (HR:0.930 95%CI:0.589-1.468, p = 0.755). The median PFS was 147 days (95%CI: 105.7-188.3) in group A, and 206 days(95%CI:180.9-231.1) in group B (HR:0.831, 95%CI:0.522-1.323, p = 0.436). The median OS was 530 days (95%CI: 308.9-751.1) in group A, and 779 days (95%CI:626.3-931.7) in group B (HR:0.948 95%CI:0.554-1.622, p = 0.845). The incidence of treatment-related AEs was similar between two groups. Conclusions: Resection of primary tumor after induction chemotherapy could not bring survival benefits. It’s not recommended for patients without symptoms of primary lesion to receive primary tumor resection, but it also requires individualized treatment as colon obstruction or perforation occurred in some patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02291744.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 4062-4062
    Abstract: 4062 Background: TST001 is a recombinant humanized IgG1 antibody specifically against human Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) with high affinity and enhanced FcR engaging of NK cells, which can induce strong antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activities. TST001 monotherapy dose-escalation study has been completed (IGCC2022-ABS-1152) and promising anti-tumor activities were observed in advanced gastric cancer patients with CLDN18.2 overexpression who had failed multiple lines of prior therapies. The current study is an open-label, multi-center, multiple cohorts, phase I clinical trial of TST001 monotherapy or in combination with standard treatments in Chinese patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors (NCT04495296). Methods: This cohort is aimed to determine the recommended phase II dose, evaluate safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of TST001 in combination with CAPOX as a 1 st line treatment of advanced G/GEJ cancer. A 3+3 design was utilized in the dose escalation phase with treatment naïve advanced G/GEJ cancer patients regardless of Claudin18.2 expression. Claudin 18.2 positive G/GEJ cancer patients were planned to be enrolled in the dose expansion phase in selected dose cohorts. Results: The TST001/CAPOX combination cohort was initiated in August 2021 and is ongoing in multiple sites in China with a data cutoff date of January 27, 2022. 12 subjects were dosed with TST001 with a dose range from 1 to 8mg/kg Q3W in combination with the standard dose of CAPOX in the dose escalation phase and one subject with central lab tested Claudin 18.2 overexpression was dosed in the expansion phase of TST001 at 6mg/kg Q3W with CAPOX. There was no subject experienced dose-limiting toxicity. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mostly grade 1-2, including nausea (76.9%), anemia (69.2%), vomiting, AST increased (63.8% respectively), hypoalbuminemia, ALT increased (46.2%, respectively). Treatment related grade 3 AEs were hypertension (15.4%), anemia, hypoproteinemia, WBC count decreased, hypocalcemia aggravated (7.7%, respectively). Among the eight patients from the dose escalation part (with no CLDN18.2 expression selection yet with measurable disease ) with at least one post-treatment tumor assessment, four had achieved partial response, three had achieved stable disease and one had progressive disease as the best tumor response per RECIST1.1. Conclusions: Conclusion: TST001 in combination with CAPOX in first line gastric cancer patients is safe and encouraging anti-tumor activities have been observed. Additional data from the 6 mg/kg dose expansion cohort will be updated at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT04495296.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 4054-4054
    Abstract: 4054 Background: Paclitaxel is a microtubule stabilizing agent that has been the standard second line chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. This study was designed to find out the clinical outcome of paclitaxel plus raltitrexed regimen as second line treatment in MGC patients. Methods: In an open, randomized, multi centers phase II clinical trial , 148 patients were randomly assigned and treated with either RP (raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 d1 and paclitaxel 135mg/m2 d1,3w) or P (paclitaxel 135mg/m2 d1,3w) as second-line palliative chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is PFS, secondary endpoint is ORR, OS and safety. Results: In 148 randomly assigned and treated patients (RP = 73; P = 75), the majority of patients were males (94 vs. 54). Progression free survival has a tendency to be prolonged with RP versus P (2.7m vs. 1.7m, p = 0.148). Overall survival also has a tendency to be prolonged with RP versus P (10.2m vs. 6.1m, p = 0.140). Overall response rate was equal with RP versus P (6.8% vs.4.0%, p = 0.72). DCR in the RP group was 56.2%, P group was 36.0%. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 36.2% (RP) v 28.2% (P) of patients. Frequent grade 3 to 4 toxicities for RP v P were: neutropenia (11.0% v 4.0%), anemia (1.4% v 4.0%), thrombocytopenia (1.4% v 5.3%), and all grade peripheral neurotoxicity (12.3% v 17.3%),all grade elevated aminotransferase (27.4% v 14.1%). Subgroup analysis shows if the disease combined with ascites or peritoneal involved , OS of RP regimen is more longer (p = 0.05). Conclusions: Second-line palliative chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus raltitrexed provides a tendency to prolong PFS and OS, and the patients with ascites or peritoneal involved may get benifits from combined chemotherapy, which needs to be confirmed by larger sample studies. Clinical trial information: NCT02072317.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 3521-3521
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 35, No. 4_suppl ( 2017-02-01), p. 128-128
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 4_suppl ( 2017-02-01), p. 128-128
    Abstract: 128 Background: Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is a major problem particularly in Asian countries. The treatment options are limited after standard first line chemotherapy. This phase I/II study aimed to evaluate the tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of fruquintinib, a selective oral VEGFR inhibitor, combined with paclitaxel as second-line therapy in Chinese patients with AGC. Methods: This open arm phase I/II trial (NCT02415023) consisted of dose finding and dose expansion stages. In the dose finding stage, 3 dose levels of fruquintinib (2, 3, 4 mg; once daily for 3 weeks) were evaluated in combination with standard 80 mg/m2 paclitaxel (once weekly on Days 1, 8 and 15) in a 28-day cycle until the maximum tolerated dose or recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was reached. Additional patients were enrolled at the RP2D to further assess the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic profile. Results: As of Sept. 10, 2016, a total of 32 patients were enrolled including 15 during dose escalation. The RP2D regimen was determined to be fruquintinib 4mg daily combined with paclitaxel 80mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off in a 4 week cycle. Two patients at 4mg experienced dose-limiting toxicity, both with febrile neutropenia. The grade 3 or 4 treatment emergent adverse events were neutropenia (40.6%), leukopenia (28.1%), decreased hemoglobin (6.25%), hand-foot skin reaction (6.25%), neurophlegmon (6.25%), and hypertension (6.25%), more frequent in the 4mg cohort. At steady state, Fruquintinib AUC (AUC ss ) increased dose-proportionally and within the historic range as a single agent, while paclitaxel exposure, at the RP2D regimen, increased by approximately 30% compared to the AUC prior to fruqintinib dosing. Twenty-eight of 32 patients were evaluable for response, and of these, 10 patients had partial response (Objective Response Rate = 35.7%), 9 patients experienced stable disease for at least 8 weeks (Disease Control Rate = 67.9%). At RP2D, ≥ 16w-PFS = 50% and ≥ 7m-OS = 50%. Conclusions: Combination of fruquintinb and paclitaxel appeared to be generally well-tolerated with promising tumor response. Further evaluation in a controlled phase II study is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02415023.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 4070-4070
    Abstract: 4070 Background: Docetaxel has shown antitumor activity in the treatment of MGC as a single or combination chemotherapy. This study was designed to compare the clinical outcome of docetaxel based and platinum based doublet regimen as first-line treatment in MGC patients. Methods: In an open, randomized, single center phase II trial, 134 pts were randomly assigned and treated with either TX (capecitabine 1g/m2/twice daily/ 1-14 days and docetaxel 75mg/m2 in 1st day) or XELOX (capecitabine 1g/m2/twice daily/ 1-14 days and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 in 1st day) as first-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is finding potential predictive factors, secondary endpoint is ORR, PFS, OS and safety. After progression, patients were switched into the other group. Results: Now, the potential predictive factors are testing in genomics and proteomics. In 134 randomly assigned and treated pts (TX = 69; XELOX = 65). Most pts were male (87pts).Overall survival was longer with TX versus XELOX (13.1m vs. 9.6m, p = 0.173), but no statistical differences. Progression free survival was similar with TX versus XELOX (4.57m vs. 5.27m, p = 0.297). Overall response rate was equal with TX versus XELOX (50.8% vs. 47.6%, p = 0.72). G3-4 treatment-related AE occurred in 60.6% (TX) v 55.4% (XELOX) of patients. Frequent G3-4 toxicities for TX v XELOX were: neutropenia (60.6% v 15.4%), febrile granulocyte deficiency (17.4% v 1.5%), anemia (10.1% v 10.8%), thrombocytopenia (1.4% v 15.4%), and all grade peripheral neurotoxicity (11.6% v 38.5%).After first-line treatment failure, 35 patients in the TX group switched to XELOX, and 27 patients in the XELOX group switched to TX, and there is also no significant difference in survival time from the first-line treatment between the two groups (p = 0.129). Conclusions: Although TX led to more neutropenia, first-line palliative chemotherapy with docetaxel based doublet regimens provides a new choice and can gain almost the same response rate and survival time as frequently-used fluorouracil and platinum based regimen. And potential predictive factors will indicate who will get more benefit from taxanes or platinums. Clinical trial information: NCT01963702.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 3544-3544
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 4 ( 2018-02-01), p. 350-358
    Abstract: Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) was effective in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a phase II Japanese trial. This regional trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in Asian patients with mCRC with or without exposure to biologic therapy. Patients and Methods This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial was conducted at 30 sites in China, the Republic of Korea, and Thailand. Patients ≥ 18 years old with histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum and known KRAS status who were refractory or intolerant to two or more prior chemotherapy regimens were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio; minimization method) to receive trifluridine/tipiracil (twice per day orally; 5 days on and 2 days off for 2 weeks, followed by 14 days off per cycle) or placebo. The primary end point was overall survival (intent-to-treat population). Results Between October 16, 2013, and June 15, 2015, 406 patients were randomly assigned to receive trifluridine/tipiracil (n = 271) or placebo (n = 135). Risk of death was significantly lower in the trifluridine/tipiracil arm than in the placebo arm (hazard ratio for death, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.99; log-rank P = .035). Median overall survival was significantly longer in the trifluridine/tipiracil than in the placebo arm (7.8 months [95% CI, 7.1 to 8.8 months] v 7.1 months [95% CI, 5.9 to 8.2 months] , respectively), for a median survival follow-up time of 13.8 months (95% CI, 13.1 to 15.3 months) compared with 13.4 months (95% CI, 11.6 to 17.3 months), respectively. The incidence of serious adverse events was similar between the arms (trifluridine/tipiracil, n = 63 [23.2%]; placebo, n = 32 [23.7%] ). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusion Trifluridine/tipiracil has a statistically significant survival benefit compared with placebo in Asian patients with mCRC refractory or intolerant to standard chemotherapies, regardless of exposure to biologic therapy. The safety profile is similar to previous reports.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 4_suppl ( 2023-02-01), p. 353-353
    Abstract: 353 Background: NIVO + chemo demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS) and an acceptable safety profile vs chemo in previously untreated Chinese pts from CheckMate 649, consistent with the overall study population with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC. Results from CheckMate 649 led to approval of 1L NIVO + chemo in multiple countries, including China. We report 3-year follow-up results in Chinese pts. Methods: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced or metastatic, non-HER2-positive GC/GEJC/EAC were enrolled regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Randomized pts received NIVO (360 mg Q3W or 240 mg Q2W) + chemo (XELOX Q3W or FOLFOX Q2W), NIVO + ipilimumab, or chemo. Dual primary endpoints for NIVO + chemo vs chemo were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) in pts with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5. Results: 208 Chinese pts were randomized to NIVO + chemo or chemo. At 37 month (mo) minimum follow-up, NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful improvement in OS and PFS vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and in all randomized pts. The 36-mo OS rate was 31% with NIVO + chemo vs 11% with chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and 26% vs 9% in all randomized pts, respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) (95% CI) per BICR in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 who had measurable lesions at baseline was 68% (56-79) with NIVO + chemo and 48% (36-60) with chemo, and in all randomized patients was 66% (55-76) and 45% (35-56), respectively. Responses were more durable with NIVO + chemo vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5, with median duration of response (mDOR) (95% CI) of 12.5 mo (7.2-23.4) vs 6.9 mo (3.9-8.5); in all randomized pts, mDOR was 12.5 mo (7.2-17.7) vs 5.6 mo (4.4-8.3), respectively. No new safety signals were identified. Conclusions: After 3 years of follow-up, NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful survival benefit and durable objective responses vs chemo in Chinese pts, with an acceptable safety profile, consistent with the overall study population with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC. These results further support NIVO + chemo as a 1L treatment option for Chinese pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02872116 . [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages