Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 75, No. 23_Supplement ( 2015-12-01), p. B12-B12
    Abstract: Reactivation of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) expression enables cells to overcome replicative senescence and escape apoptosis, fundamental steps in the initiation of human cancer. Multiple cancer types, including up to 83% of glioblastomas (GBM), harbor highly recurrent mutations in the TERT promoter specific to two nucleotide positions. The common mutation sites, G228A and G250A, may create de-novo ETS family transcription factor binding sites, but the precise mechanism of how these mutations confer increased TERT expression has been elusive. Here, we demonstrate the de-novo ETS motif to be critical for mutant TERT activation by site directed mutagenesis. A focused siRNA screen of the many ETS transcription factors expressed in GBM identifies GABPA as the single ETS factor to selectively regulate the mutant but not the wild type TERT promoter. Single molecule binding assays and ChIP-qPCR analysis reveal that GABPA is exclusively recruited to the mutant allele in vitro and in vivo respectively. Furthermore, this allelic recruitment is consistent across four tested cancer types, highlighting a shared mechanism underlying mutant TERT promoter activation. Tandem flanking native ETS motifs critically cooperate with these mutations to activate TERT, likely by facilitating GABP heterotetramer binding. GABP thus directly links TERT promoter mutations to aberrant expression and may provide a novel therapeutic target for multiple cancers. Citation Format: Robert J.A Bell, H. Tomas Rube, Alex Kreig, Andrew Mancini, Shaun F. Fouse, Raman P. Nagarajan, Serah Choi, Chibo Hong, Daniel He, Melike Pekmezci, John K. Wiencke, Margaret R. Wrensch, Susan M. Chang, Kyle M. Walsh, Sua Myong, Jun S. Song, Joseph F. Costello. GABP selectively binds and activates the mutant TERT promoter across multiple cancer types. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Advances in Brain Cancer Research; May 27-30, 2015; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(23 Suppl):Abstract nr B12.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Genome Research, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Vol. 28, No. 1 ( 2018-01), p. 111-121
    Abstract: The DNA-binding interfaces of the androgen (AR) and glucocorticoid (GR) receptors are virtually identical, yet these transcription factors share only about a third of their genomic binding sites and regulate similarly distinct sets of target genes. To address this paradox, we determined the intrinsic specificities of the AR and GR DNA-binding domains using a refined version of SELEX-seq. We developed an algorithm, SelexGLM , that quantifies binding specificity over a large (31-bp) binding site by iteratively fitting a feature-based generalized linear model to SELEX probe counts. This analysis revealed that the DNA-binding preferences of AR and GR homodimers differ significantly, both within and outside the 15-bp core binding site. The relative preference between the two factors can be tuned over a wide range by changing the DNA sequence, with AR more sensitive to sequence changes than GR. The specificity of AR extends to the regions flanking the core 15-bp site, where isothermal calorimetry measurements reveal that affinity is augmented by enthalpy-driven readout of poly(A) sequences associated with narrowed minor groove width. We conclude that the increased specificity of AR is correlated with more enthalpy-driven binding than GR. The binding models help explain differences in AR and GR genomic binding and provide a biophysical rationale for how promiscuous binding by GR allows functional substitution for AR in some castration-resistant prostate cancers.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1088-9051 , 1549-5469
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1483456-X
    SSG: 12
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages