In:
International Journal of Sports Medicine, Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Vol. 43, No. 12 ( 2022-11), p. 981-995
Abstract:
The purpose was to analyze the comparison of velocity-based resistance training
and one-repetition maximum (%1RM) percentage-based training in maximal strength improvement by meta-analyzing and to find the reasons for the
controversial findings of different studies. Ten studies were included in the systematic review and seven were subjected to meta-analysis. A total of 139
subjects were selected from the included articles after exclusion, including athletes of different specialties (N=93) and non-athletes mainly from
fitness groups (N=46). The overall effect size was SMD=0.26 (95%CL 0.03 to 0.49, P=0.03, I²=0). As for the
comparison of the analysis of different intervention objects as subgroups, the effect size of athletes as the subgroup was 0.35 (95%CI 0.06 to 0.64,
p=0.02, I²=0), indicating that in the RCT with athletes as the intervention target, the effect of VBRT in improving the maximal strength
was significantly different from that of PBT. Velocity-based resistance training might be more effective than percentage-based training in maximal strength
improvement, in which velocity-based resistance training is more suitable for athletes in season, while percentage-based training is more suitable for the
general sports population. More high-quality researches should deal with the effect of other athletic performance with velocity-based resistance training in
the future.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0172-4622
,
1439-3964
Language:
English
Publisher:
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Publication Date:
2022
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2041541-2
SSG:
31
Bookmarklink
