In:
Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. e17513-e17513
Abstract:
e17513 Background: Persons with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) comprise a vulnerable subgroup of the population. Yet, rarely have studies on cancer disparities accounted for ESRD status. We sought to compare prostate cancer stage at diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes among men with and without ESRD. Methods: Utilizing SEER-Medicare database between years 2000-2016, we retrieved sociodemographic variables, including age (40-54, 55-64, 65-74, and 75+), race (African American vs. all others), marital status (married/partnered vs. all others), residence in a census tract with poverty rate 〉 20%; cancer stage at diagnosis (local, regional, distant, and unknown); treatment (surgery and radiation therapy); and overall and cancer specific survival (OS and CSS) from the SEER, and ESRD status preceding prostate cancer diagnosis from the Medicare portion of the file. In addition to descriptive analysis, multivariable survival analysis was utilized to evaluate the association of ESRD status with OS and CSS after adjusting for patient covariates. Results: Our study population included 2,922 ESRD and 600,848 non-ESRD men diagnosed with incident prostate cancer during the study period. A disproportionately higher percentage of ESRD patients were in the 40-54 age group compared to non-ESRD (9.7 vs 3.6%). Similarly, the percentage of prostate cancer patients who were African American was 41.5% among ESRD patients, compared with 14.4% in their non-ESRD counterparts. In addition, more ESRD than non-ESRD patients lived in census tracts with poverty rates greater than 20% (31.2% vs. 18.0%). With regard to stage, 10.6% of ESRD patients but only 4.5% of non-ESRD patients were diagnosed with distant-stage disease; and while only 24.8% of ESRD patients underwent surgery, 36.9% of non-ESRD patients did so. The rate of radiation therapy was similar across the two groups. Multivariable survival models showed that, adjusting for patient covariates, ESRD status was associated with unfavorable OS and CSS (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 4.00 (95% confidence interval: 3.82, 4.18), and AHR: 1.54 (1.37, 1.73), respectively). Median follow up was 3.35 and 7.13 years between the ESRD and non-ESRD cohorts. Conclusions: ESRD status in prostate cancer patients is associated with marked sociodemographic and economic disparities. Compared to their non-ESRD counterparts, more ESRD patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease, are less likely to undergo surgery, and experience shorter overall and cancer-specific survival. Future studies should be directed to gain insight into factors contributing to unfavorable cancer-specific outcomes.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0732-183X
,
1527-7755
DOI:
10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.e17513
Language:
English
Publisher:
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Publication Date:
2020
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2005181-5
Bookmarklink
