Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 4452-4452
    Abstract: Abstract 4452 Imatinib (IM) is now used world-wide as a first line chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment. Although some time lack may exist between diagnosis and IM treatment. Earlier (Blood 2009, 114: Abstract 4278) we have shown that in CML chronic phase (CP) pts with very long history of the disease(more than five years)the pretreatment by Busulfan was the adverse prognostic factor on Imatinib therapy. Now we extend our study by a population of pts recently and for rather short time pretreated by busulfan. Aim. To investigate the effect of busulfan pretreatment on survival and responses to imatinib in CML pts in late CML CP. Materials and methods. In retrospective study 85 pts with CML CP from St-Petersburg, Leningrad region (Russian Federation) and several Ukrainian centers were included. The main inclusion criteria were: CML late CP (the duration of the disease more than 6 mos before IM start), IM therapy in routine clinical practice at least 12 months. The median time of IM therapy was 42,9 mos (12–97 mos), the median age of pts at the IM start was 49,5 years (19–83), male/female ratio 31/54. 23 patients were pretreated with busulfan (the study group) and 62 were not (control group). These groups were equal by age, sex, the median time from diagnosis to the IM start (28,3 mos in the study group and 23,9 in the control group), Sokal risk groups. Median time of busulfan pretreatment was 3,9 mos (1–62 mos). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 17. Results. In the whole group of patients frequency of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) was 60% (51/85), estimated overall survival (OS) by 5 years from IM start was 87% (death rate 7% - 6/85). In the study group CCyR rate was significantly lower, than in the control group: 34,8% (8/23) and 69,35% (43/62), respectively, p=0,038. Estimated OS by 5 years was 72% (death rate 17% - 4/23) for busulfan-pretreated pts and 95% (death rate 3% - 2/62) for the control group, p 〈 0,01. Interestingly, that in the group of shortly busulfan-pretreated pts (the duration of pretreatment ≤6 mos), the lower CCyR rate has also been observed – 31% (4/13), although all other parameters were seemed equal to the control group (median time before IM start 28,3 mos). Conclusion. The pretreatment with busulfan impaired negatively the efficacy of imatinib treatment in CML late CP patients. Even short pretreatment (less than 6 mos) had adverse effect on CCyR. The mechanism is unclear. Busulfan pretreatment before imatinib therapy should not be used. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 4288-4288
    Abstract: Abstract 4288 Resistance to imatinib could be overcome by new generations of TKIs. Data about the efficacy of second line TKI treatment may help to create a system for prognosing the duration of 2nd line TKI treatment and time of switching from second line TKI treatment to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of 2nd line TKI treatment in patients resistant or intolerant to imatinib. Patients and methods 44 resistant and 3 intolerant to imatinib pts were included. Cytogenetics with G-banding and PCR with sequencing were performed for evaluation the response and mutations. There were 39, 7 and 1 pts in CP, AP and BP respectively, Patients were treated by three different ATP-pocket inhibitors. The follow-up on 2nd line TKIs was 0.9-48mons (Median - 15.9 mons), median follow-up from diagnosis was 73,9 mons. In prognosis analysis (CHR, cytogenetics, Sokal) intolerant patients were not included. Results Probability of overall survival from diagnosis by 10 years was 85%. Probability of survival from the start of TKI2 by 4 y -90%. There were no differences in survival in pts with primary and secondary resistance, in CP and AP. Patients with low and intermediate Sokal risk did better than patients with high risk (p=0.014, Fig. 1.). 8 pts had T315I mutation when studied on second line TKI therapy. Achievement of CCyR was 50% (58% when T3151 patients were excluded), it was higher in low+intermediate in comparison with high risk pts (60% vs 30%, p=0.091), in CP than in AP (56% vs 20%,p=0.07), in patients with CHR at switching than in those without CHR (72% vs 18%, p=0.014). We failed to find any differences in CCyR achievement in pts with different best cytogenetic response on imatinib (complete, major, minor, minimal responses, absence of cytogenetic response). MCyR depended on the type of resistance - it was higher in secondary, than in primary resistant pts (80% vs 45%,p=0.06, Fig2). Probability of MCCyR loss was 20%, all of them appear during the first year of treatment. It was higher in AP than in CP (40% vs 12%,P=0.04). Probability of 4 years PFS was high - 75%, also without differences in primary vs secondary resistance and even in AP vs CP. Conclusion Second line TKI treatment is very efficacious in imatinib resistant pts. The effect depended on the type of resistance and phase of the disease, CHR at the moment of switching to 2nd line treatment. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 4278-4278
    Abstract: Abstract 4278 Imatinib(IM) has become the “gold standard” for the treatment of CML CP. In clinical trials the majority of pts obtain complete hematologic (CHR) and complete cytogenetic (CCyR) responses. The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of treatment by IM in CML CP pts in general practice (outside clinical trials). Patients and methods There are 335 pts with CML in databases in Saint-Petersburg and Leningrad region. Most of them (283/335-84,5%) are ever treated with IM. Disease phases at the time of the start of IM therapy by ELN (from 268/283 evaluable pts) and MDACC (from 256/283 evaluable pts) criteria were: CP – 232 and 215, AP – 28 and 33, BP - 8 and 8 respectively. All 232 pts in CML CP (by ELN criteria) treated since 2001 by IM were included in the study. Before IM 91/232(39%), 114/232(49%) and 17/232 (7,3%) pts were pretreated by hydroxyurea, interferon-alfa with or without hydroxyurea and busulfan. 12/335(4%) pts were undergone alloSCT(6 alive, 6 dead due to progression or TRM) There were 134/232(58%) pts in early (duration before Im ≤ 12 mos) and 98/232(42%) pts in late CP ( 〉 12 mos). In early and late CP, there were 49/123 and 50/89, 40/123 and 23/89, 34/123 and 16/89 evaluable pts with low, intermediate and high Socal score respectively. The predominance of low Sokal score in late CP pts could to be related to survival benefit before imatinib.. The median time before Im for the whole group, for early and late CP pts were 7,4 mos(from 7 days to 132 mons), 1,8 mons (form 7 days to 12 mons) and 39 mons (from 12,1 mos to 132 mos) respectively. Median time of Im therapy was 33 mos (1 - 75 mos) in whole group, 24mons (1 - 73mos) in early and 34mos(2 - 75mos) in late CP pts respectivel Results Estimated overall survival by 6 years was 94,2% in whole group, 97% and 87% in early and late CP pts resp. Only 14/228(6,1%) of evaluable patients died due to CML: 4/130(3%) in early and 10/98(10,2%) in late CP group. 4 pts, resistant to IM, were transplanted: 1 in early CP and 3 in BP. Deathes were due to TRM or disease progression. CHR was achieved by 3 mons in most cases: 82/110(74,5%) and 36/64(56%) pt, in early and late CP, resp. Patients (39 in hole group, 12 in early and 27 in late CP) with CHR before IM were excluded from these analyses. The probability of CCyR by 6 years was 98% in early CP and 82% in late CP (p=0.002). The rate of CCyR was 75% 80/107) vs 31% (14/75) in patients with or without CHR by 3 mons (p=0.00). The same differences were found in early and late CP. CCyR in patients with CHR before IM was the same as in patients with newly obtained CHR by 3 mons on IM. Thereafter we have divided group of pts with late CP according to its duration before IM (very early - 〈 6mons, early late - 6-60 mons and very late ≥60 mons) and compared CCyR in early CP with different subgroups of late CP. Achievement of CCyR was higher in pts in very early(69.1%) and early –late(68.2%) than in very late group(34.6%)(p=0.09) Further subdivisions of the period of 6-60 mos did not reveal any differences. Moreover, when we deleted the patients pretreated with busulfan, the differences were found only between early and early-late phases. We have separately analyzed very late group, it appeared that pretreatment with busulfan severely decreases CCyR (22% vs 81% in with (12 pts) or without (7 pts) busulfan pretreatment, p=0,002. Probably, patients in very late CP is a specific group of patients with preformed very good prognosis. Clonal evolution before treatment (8 pts in early CP and 7 in late CP) did not influence CCyR achievement. The probability of progression to AP/BP was slightly higher in late (6%) than in early CP (3%) (p=0.05). The appearance of clonal evolution was higher in late than in early CP (p=0,0002). Progression to AP/BP was 1% vs 11% in pts with or without CHR by 3 mos resp. (p=0.003). Conclusions Imatinib is efficacious drug in general hematological practice with very high probability of overall survival, CCyR and low risk of progression to AP/BP. CHR is an early and very important predictor for further successful treatment. Achievement of CCyR strongly depends on CHR by 3 mons. Patients with CHR before imatinib have similar CCyR in patients with CHR by 3 mons on imatinib. Pretreatment period predispose patients to clonal evolution on imatinib treatment. Busulfan pretreatment severely decreases probability of CCyR. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 4447-4447
    Abstract: Abstract 4447 Background: High efficiency of imatinib (IM) in CML therapy has been proven in clinical trials. However, the outcomes of CML treatment by IM in clinical practice are not covered in the literature. Objectives: To evaluate the results of CML treatment by TKI in clinical practice in the Russian Federation. Patients and treatment: The data analysis from 28 administrative regions of theRussian Federation was performed. The selection of regions was based on the quality of the data from CML pts registry. 524 CML pts were included in this study. Inclusion criteria were: Ph/bcr-abl-positive CML diagnosed in 2002– 2006, age of pts ≥ 18 years (y), initiation of IM therapy ≤ 6 months (mo) from the date of diagnosis. Median (Me) age was 47(18 – 81) y, sex ratio (M/F (%)) 250/274 (48/52) pts, Me time from diagnosis to IM treatment was 2.4(0 – 6) mo. Pretreatment: Hydrea 398 (76%) pts; Mielosan 3 (0.5%) pts, chemotherapy 21(4%)pts, IFN-α 30 (5.7%) pts. Me follow-up since the beginning of CML treatment was 55.2 (1 – 108) mo (*6 pts have not data on the date of analysis). In Chronic Phase (CP) were 478 (91.2%) pts, in Accelerated Phase (AP) - 40 (7.6%) pts and in Blast Crisis (BC) - 6 (1.2%). Sokal risk stratification, %: 52 low (L)/22 intermediate (Int)/26 high(H) (78 pts with no baseline data. Statistical analysis was performed using a package SAS9.1.3. Result: 427 (89%) from 478 CP CML pts were alive on May2011, 51(11%) pts were died. In this cohort of CP CML pts 5-year Overall Survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS) to AP/BC were 89% and 95% respectively (Me 56.4 (1 – 108) mo). The slow achievement of complete hematologic response (CHR) and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) should be noted. On the IM therapy, 48% pts have achieved CHR by 3 mo only and 86% pts have achieved CHR by 12 mo (Me 3.2 (0.1 – 85) mo); CCyR at any time was achieved in 77% of pts, but by 12 mo – in only 40% of pts (Me 15 mo (0.7 – 75). There was no clear evidence of the dependence of OS rate from % of Ph’-positive cells in bone marrow after 6, 12, 18 and 36 mo were not received (p 〉 0.5 in all cases). Analysis of molecular response (MR) was performed in 338 (70%) pts (not standardized rtPCR method): major MR was achieved in 241 (71%) pts (Me 42 (6–86) mo), complete MR - in 172 (50%) pts (Me 53(6–100) mo). OS by Sokal in pts with L and Int risk groups was identical and better than in pts with H, consistent with 90 and 83%, respectively (p=0.04). The probability of CCyR by Sokal were 85, 80 and 70% for the L, Int and H risk of disease progression, respectively (p=0,0002). IM therapy is still ongoing in 362 (85%) pts in doses 400/600/800mg/day-54%/33%/13%, respectively. 41(10%) pts were switched to 2nd line TKI (25 pts to Nilotinib, 10 pts- Dasatinib, 6 pts-Bosutinib). In total, 51 (11%) pts died (21 pts with progression to AP/BC, 30pts with associated diseases). Conclusion: The research program EUTOS enabled Russian hematologists to cooperate with an international research group (ELN) and this cooperation allows to improve the quality of CML treatment, monitoring MRD and data collection in the Russian CML registry. The analysis of data shows high rates of OS and PFS in CP CML, despite the delay of CHR and CCyR achievement. In clinical practice the low significanse of Sokal risk criteria and the absence of the influence of cytogenetic response achievement on OS was established that differ from clinical trial data and that may be due to a non-standardized approach to treatment and retrospective data collection. Disclosures: Turkina: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kulikov:Novartis: statistical tasks. Kutsev:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Golenkov:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Ivanova:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Pospelova:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Konstantinova:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Lazareva:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, work with CML Registry. Khoroshko:Novartis: Speakers Bureau.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2012
    In:  Thrombosis Research Vol. 130 ( 2012-10), p. S165-S166
    In: Thrombosis Research, Elsevier BV, Vol. 130 ( 2012-10), p. S165-S166
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0049-3848
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1500780-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 4949-4949
    Abstract: Background. Several genetic alterations such as translocations, gene mutations and deletions play an important role in myeloid leukemogenesis. The cytogenetic information is a very significant tool to classify pts at their initial diagnosis into prognostic categories. For pts with cytogenetically normal AML, prognosis can be specified by mutational status of the genes NPM1, FLT3, CKIT, NRAS and DNMT3A. The aim of the research was to investigate the frequency and prognostic impact of FLT3, NPM1, CKIT, NRAS and DNMT3A mutations in AML pts and to analyze their interaction with other prognostic markers. Methods. This study was performed in 200 adult pts (190 pts with de novo and 10 pts with secondary AML), previously untreated, median age 55 years (18-86). According to the results of cytogenetic analyses pts were separated in four groups: with favourable (9,0%), unfavourable (14,0%) prognosis, with normal karyotype (NK) (48,5%) and other aberrations (28,5%). Mutations in FLT3, CKIT and NPM1 were analysed by PCR and in NRAS by sequencing. Mutation analysis of DNMT3A R882 was performed by high-resolution melting curve analysis. Cytogenetic studies were analysed on bone marrow samples using standard GTG-method. Results. Mutations in FLT3, CKIT, NRAS and NPM1 genes were detected in 105/200 (52,5%) pts. A total of 128 mutations were revealed in this group: 24,0% - FLT3-ITD, 6,5% - FLT3-TKD, 20,5% - in NPM1, 10,0% - in NRAS and 3,0% - in CKIT. 82 pts had single mutations and in 23 pts mutations occurred simultaneously: 17 with FLT3-ITD and in NPM1, 2 with FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD, 1 with FLT3-TKD and in NPM1, 3 with NPM1 and NRAS mutations. We found that mutations with the significantly higher incidence (p=0,001) were observed in the group of pts with NK (80/97), whereas there were only 8/28 pts with mutations in the group with complex karyotype. When analyzing the age-related features, it was shown that the majority of mutations were detected in the group of pts at the age from 60 to 69 years. Mutations FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD were associated with higher WBC count comparing with pts without mutations (p=0,001 and p=0,014, respectively). The median follow-up for overall (OS) and relapse-free (RFS) survival for pts with FLT3-ITD against ptswith FLT3-ITD- was: 5,4 vs 12,8 months and 4,9 vs 10,0 months (p=0,001 and p=0,001), respectively. Mutation FLT3-TKD was also found to be prognostically unfavorable, but only comparing with pts with FLT3-ITD- genotype. As the result of OS and RFS analyses in pts with and without NPM1 mutations we revealed the significant favorable influence of NPM1 mut on the prognosis (p=0,002 and p=0,020, respectively). However pts with genotype FLT3-ITD+/NPM1+ were found to get to the group with an intermediate risk. We detected the significant adverse influence of CKIT mut on RFS (p=0,041). Mutations in NRAS didn't impact on prognosis; we only showed the tendency towards worsening of OS and RFS in group of pts with favorable cytogenetics (p=0,214 and p=0,160, respectively). Mutations DNMT3A R882 were investigated in group of 143 AML pts and were detected in 23 (16,1%) pts. Pts with DNMT3A R882 had higher WBC (p=0,001) and platelets (p=0,020) count at diagnosis and more frequently belonged to FAB groups M5 (p=0,003), as compared with DNMT3A wt. Of 23 pts who had AML with DNMT3A mutations, 17 had tumors with NK profiles (24,3% of a total of 70 cytogenetically normal samples) (p=0,009). Pts with isolated DNMT3A mutations were seen in 4 cases, whereas in the rest of pts they were detected simultaneously with mutations in genes FLT3, NPM1, NRAS and CKIT. DNTM3A mutations were significantly more prevalent in NPM1 mut (p=0,005) and FLT3-ITD (p=0,005) positive cases than wild type. DNMT3A mutations were associated with negative influence on pts OS and risk of relapse, compared with DNMT3A wt (р = 0,031 and р = 0,045, respectively). Summary. Mutations in FLT3 and NPM1 had a significantly higher incidence in the group of pts with a normal karyotype. FLT3 mutations showed the adverse prognostic value. Insertions in NPM1 were shownto be the favorable factor, correlating with prolonged RFS in all pts excepting pts with FLT3-ITD+/ NPM1+ genotype. CKIT mut was associated with higher relapse incidence in AML pts, while NRAS mut showed lack of prognostic significance. AML with DNMT3A mut represent the group, homogeneous on a number of clinical and laboratory parameters, associated with adverse prognosis and a high risk of the relapse. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages