Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 4432-4432
    Abstract: Abstract 4432 Background: The incidence of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), reported from some population based registries, varies significantly. CML is known as age-dependent disease, so population age structure may strongly influent on the data. For international comparisons several systems for age-standardization are using in epidemiological studies. We conducted our retrospective study to reveal differences in CML incidence rates on the basis of calculation – crude or age-adjusted according to different population standards in St. Petersburg and Leningrad region. Methods: In 2005 the database of Ph- and/or bcr-abl- positive CML patients (pts) was conducted in St. Petersburg and Leningrad region. Since then the data from all newly diagnosed CML patients were included prospectively on population basis. The database was updated at least bi-annually. The data were obtained from hematologists, as general practitioners and private physicians are not licensed to treat oncohematological disorders. The data were double checked from the list of Imatinib distribution (the only drug reimbursed for first line treatment). To calculate crude CML incidence rate we use the data of the general census of the population in Russia in 2010 (the whole population of our region is 6596434 with population in age 15 and above 5821133). For age-adjusted CML incidence rate we use three of currently existing standards: The Segi (“World”), The Scandinavian (“European”) and the WHO standard (based on world average population between 2000–2025). Results: There are 258 (242 in chronic, 9 in accelerated and 7 in blastic phases) CML adult (15 years and above) pts, registered during 2006–2011. The median age is 53 years (48,5 and 55,5 years for men and women respectively). Sokal score was evaluable in 209 pts. It is low in 37%, intermediate in 35% and high in 28% pts. The crude CML incidence rate is slightly higher in men than in women with ratio 1,2:1. Mean annual crude CML incidence rate was 0,65 per 100 000 whole population of Saint Petersburg and Leningrad region, but it was 0,74 in adult population (15 years old and above). Mean annual CML incidence rates in the same age groups were slightly higher in all three standardized systems: 0,94 in Segi, 0,84 in Scandinavian and 0,88 in WHO standard populations. CML incidence rates in all age groups are presented in the table 1. CML incidence rate was lowest in young pts. It was unexpectedly very low in senior pts. CML incidence rates nearly for all age groups were slightly higher in St. Petersburg than in the Leningrad region. The majority of pts (98%) were treated with Imatinib (93% first or second line) or other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (5% first line-in international clinical trials, 18% after Imatinib failure or intolerance). Stem cell transplantation was performed only in 8/258 (3%) pts. Only 25235 (7,5%) evaluable pts progressed from chronic to advanced phases. Only 29/258 (11%) pts dead mostly due to CML (21 CML related deaths were reported). Estimated 5 years overall survival is 91,5%. Mean annual overall CML pts death rate was 1,9% (mean annual death rate between 2006–2010 in whole population of our region was 1,6%). Mean pts accumulated very fast - annual CML prevalence increasing rate between 2005–2011 was more than 14% (Picture 1). Conclusions: CML incidence both crude and age-adjusted in our population based registry is nearly the same in young and middle age, but much lower in senior (65 years and above) pts groups in comparison with published data from other registries which probably represents peculiarities of health system rather than real incidence. In the tyrosine kinase inhibitors era CML patients death rate is very low (nearly the same as in whole population) and CML pts is accumulated very fast in our region. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 3148-3148
    Abstract: Objectives and background: Introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) led to favorable outcome in the majority of patients.About 70% of patients with early molecular response (BCR-ABLIS ≤ 10% at 3-months) have 5-year overall survival of 95%. Nonetheless, CML patients remain heterogeneous group and several studies in recent years were aimed to personalize treatment based on individual patients’ characteristics. One of them was the study by B. Hanfstein et al. (2014), which showed good prognostic potential of 0.35 ratio BCR-ABL level at 3 months to absolute transcript level at diagnosis[1] . In this study, GUS was used as control gene, but at present ABL is normalization gene for BCR-ABL quantification worldwide. One of the obstacles to use of baseline BCR-ABL/ABL level is a distortion of the results of its measurement (non-linearity) due to the mixture of BCR-ABL with normal ABLgene. During the first month of therapy there takes place a rapid tumor mass reduction. The aims of our study were to assess potential of ratio BCR-ABL level at 3 months to baseline and ratio BCR-ABL level at 3 months to 1 month using ABLas control gene to predict optimal response related to individual patient’s tumor characteristic. Methods: Forty-three patients (median age, 50 years; range 24-84; 17 male and 26 female) with chronic phase CML were included in the study, Sokal risk groups were low-23 / intermediate-10 / high-10; 8 patients had EUTOS high-risk. Thirty-one patients started treatment with Imatinib 400 mg/day, 11 patients started with Nilotinib 600 mg/day and 1 patient started with Dasatinib 100 mg/day. Median BCR-ABLIS transcript levels was 18.886% at diagnosis, range 3.390-3185.361%. In all patients BCR-ABL levels were monitored at diagnosis and at 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment, additionally 10 patients from this group had BCR-ABL levels evaluation at 1 month. The ratio of BCR-ABL levels at 3 months to baseline for each patient was calculated. In addition, we calculated ratio of BCR-ABL levels at 3 months to BCR-ABLlevels at 1 month for 10 patients. We performed ROC curve analysis to establish the best cut-off value to predict MMR achievement as optimal treatment results at 12 months. Then we compared predictive sensitivity of our ratio cut-off and early molecular response at 3 months (10% by IS). Statistical analysis was conducted with ROC analysis and Fisher exact test. Results: The ratio BCR-ABL at 3 months to baseline as 0.1 had chosen as best cut-off value (sensitivity 83.33 CI 62.6-95.3; specificity 66.67 CI 34.9-90.1) to predict MMR at 12 months. Nineteen out of 23 patients (82.6%) with ratio below than 0.1 achieved MMR at 12 months, while only 9 of 20 patients (45%) with ratio more than 0.1 had optimal response (hazard ratio = 0.2625; p=0.013). Ratio of BCR-ABL levels at 3 months to BCR-ABL levels at 1 month also showed good results with the same cut-off value – 5 out of 6 patients (83.3%) with ratio BCR-ABL at 3 months to 1 month below than 0.1 achieved MMR, while patients with ratio more than 0.1 none achieved optimal response (p=0.0238). Application of early molecular response at 3 months (10% by IS) yielded worse discrimination results: 25 of 35 (73.9%) patients with BCR-ABL ≤10% at 3 months had achieved MMR at 12 months, whereas 3 of 8 (37.5%) patients with BCR-ABL level 〉 10% had MMR at 1 year (p=0.1036). Moreover application of our cut-off value among patients with BCR-ABL level ≤10% at 3 months allowed us to revealed additional 4 high-risk patients have not reached MMR to a 1 year of therapy. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the individual BCR-ABL decline rate from baseline to 3 months might be useful prognostic marker that allowed detecting more patients at risk who had no MMR at 1 year of treatment and ABL should be used as control gene. Also the study showed that the individual ratio of BCR-ABL level at 3 months to 1 month might be studied as more predictive landmark for change of TKI treatment even among these patients that have BCR-ABLlevels ≤10% at 3 months. References: 1. B. Hanfstein, V. Shlyakhto, M. Lauseker et al. Velocity of early BCR-ABL transcript elimination as an optimized predictor of outcome in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in chronic phase on treatment with imatinib. Leukemia. 2014 May 6. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.153. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 5556-5556
    Abstract: Objectives and background. Nowadays chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) other than chronic myelogenous leukemia undergo renaissance of interest. It results from advances in decryption of molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis and invention of target drugs. Epidemiological information is needed to assess potential effect and additional costs of new diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. The objective of our study was to review experience of MPN diagnostic and treatment in our center for past ten years. Methods. Our institution serves as primary hematological outpatient department for a half of Saint-Petersburg city with about 2 million inhabitants. We reviewed patients' charts to obtain information about incidence, symptoms, diagnostic test results, treatment options and relationship to prognostic factors. Statistical methods included descriptive statistics, nonparametric ANOVA for frequencies comparisons and Kaplan-Meyer method with log-rank test for survival comparisons in Statistica 7.0 package. Results. Since 2004 to 2013 there were 570 newly diagnosed MPN patients (pts) in our center. This group consisted of primary myelofibrosis (PMF) (203 pts; 126 female, 77 male; median age 63 years, range 16-83 years), essential thrombocythemia (ET) (201 pts; 146 female, 55 male; median age 58 years, range 23-78 years), polycythemia vera (PV) (166 pts; 96 female, 70 male; median age 57 years, range 20-85 years). The incidence rates were stable during study period: PMF incidence varied from 0.65 to 1.35 with mean of 1.01 new patient per 100 000 inhabitants per year; ET had incidence from 0.60 to 2.1 with mean of 1.00 and PV had incidence from 0.5 to 1.15 with mean of 0.83. The most prevalent symptoms of disease were: splenomegaly (65.5%), constitutional symptoms (fever, night sweats, weight loss) (31.0%), anemia (36.3%) thrombosis (24.1%) for PMF; fatigue (33.2%), headache and dizziness (25.6%), arthralgia (21.8%), erythromelalgia (15.8%) for ET; plethora (82.5%), headache and dizziness (52.4%), fatigue (31.3%) for PV. JAK2V617F was detected in 49.7% of PMF pts, 57.8% of ET pts and in 97.7% of PV pts. Thrombosis rates according WHO IPSET-thrombosis system risks` groups of ET and PV pts were: low-risk group 3.33% (3/90), intermediate-risk group 11.1% (13/117) and 39.4% (63/160) in high-risk group with highly significant (p 〈 0.0001) differences between risks' groups. There were 169 lethal outcomes in the analysed group (102 PMF; 31 ET; 36 PV). Ten-years overall survival rates were 49.8% in PMF pts, 84.6% in ET pts and 78.3% in PV pts. (fig.1). Overall survival in PMF was significantly influenced by risk stratification as IPSS, DIPSS and DIPSS+. Survival curves according DIPSS+ groups are presented in fig.1. Conclusions. Patients with MPN are presented in substantial number; therefore need much finance for novel therapy introduction. Risk stratification systems has high predictive value. Innovative drugs treatment results should be evaluated in comparison with historical control. Figure1 Overall survival in PMF patients according to DIPPS+ stratification groups. Figure1. Overall survival in PMF patients according to DIPPS+ stratification groups. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 4476-4476
    Abstract: Abstract 4476 At present, the main goal of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapy is to obtain complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) which is strongly associated with patient's survival. The second main factor for good prognosis after CCyR achievement is its stability. The aim of this study was to reveal factors, influencing the stability of CCyR in CML chronic phase (CML-CP) patients on Imatinib (IM) therapy in routine clinical practice. Patients and methods: In patients database of St-Petersburg and Leningrad region there are 235 CML-CP patients, who received IM for 12 months or more. Eligibility criteria for analysis were as follow: IM start dosage 400 mg/day, CCyR, which was confirmed by at least 2 consecutive cytogenetic analysis with 0% Ph+ cells in at least 20 metaphases. Patients in CCyR with IM therapy interruptions more than 3 months were censored at the date of last cytogenetic analysis. Results: 115 patients from our database were found to eligible for analysis. The median age at the diagnosis was 48 years (16-76 years). Male/female ratio was 50/65. The median time from diagnosis to IM treatment was 7 months (0.1-108 months), 55 patients begun the IM treatment in early CML-CP (≤ 6 months since diagnosis). 64, 38 and 13 patients had low, intermediate and high Sokal scores respectively. There were no differences between patients in early and late CML-CP. 56 (48,7%) patients before IM were treated with interferon. The median observation time on IM treatment was 56 months (16-88 months). Overall estimated probability of CCyR loss was 16%, rate 12.1% (14/115). In 10 patients CCyR was lost within major CyR. The estimated overall survival (all causes of death) was 78% (death rate 4.3% (5/115)), and only 1 death was CML-related. The probability of CCyR loss was not depend on previous interferon therapy and was equal in both groups -16%. The rate of CCyR loss was 15.3% (9/59) vs 8.9% (5/56) in pts with or without interferon pretreatment respectively. Sokal scores also didn't influence CCyR stability: CCyR loss rates were 10.9% (7/64), 13.2% (5/38), 15.4% (2/13) for low, intermediate and high risks, respectively (p 〉 0.1). Probabilities of CCyR loss in different ages groups were similar: 13% (rate 8% (4/50)) vs 18% (rate 15.4% (10/65)) in patients older and younger than 50 years old, respectively (p 〉 0.1). CCyR loss was less frequent in early CML-CP 10% (rate 3.6% (2/55)) then in late CML-CP 21% (20% (12/60)), p=0.032. For more thoroughly analysis, patients in late CML-CP were divided in subgroups related to duration of CML before IM initiation: 〉 6 and ≤12 months, 〉 12 and ≤60 and more than 60 months. Probabilities of CCyR loss in this groups were 22% (rate 20% (3/15)), 27% (rate 25.7% (9/35)) and 0% (rate 0% (0/10)), respectively (p 〈 0.05). The median time to CCyR loss was 29.5 months in early CP, 10.3 months in group 6–12 months before IM, and 14.2 months in 12–60 months before IM group (p 〈 0.01). Probability of CCyR loss was correlated with time to its achievement. CCyR was lost in 10% (rate 8.9% (7/78) of patients with CCyR obtained within 12 months of IM treatment with counterpart of 28% (18.9% (7/37)) for late-responders (CCyR after 12 months IM), p=0.02. The further subdivision by the time to CCyR achievement did not reveal any significant differences. Among patients, who lost CCyR, only 2/14 (14%) patients progressed to blast crisis. One of them was treated with chemotherapy followed by allo-SCT. At present, he is still alive in CCyR and complete molecular response. Another patient with blast transformation was treated by high dose IM with chemotherapy. There is no response and patient died due to progressive disease. From other patients: CCyR was re-obtained in 7 patients - in 5 patients on IM (2 pts on the same dose and 3 pts after IM dose escalation) and in 2 pts on second generation TKIs. One patient after IM dose escalation is not yet evaluable. Other 3 patients didn't respond either high dose IM or second generation TKIs, but are still alive in CML-CP. One patient lost from follow up. Conclusions: Patients in CML-CP with CCyR has very good prognosis. Very few patients progressed and dead during several years. There are two factors, which influence the probability of CCyR loss: initiation of IM in early CP and CCyR in first year of treatment are favorable to good prognosis for CCyR durability. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages