Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: JAMA, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 327, No. 18 ( 2022-05-10), p. 1782-
    Abstract: In nonurban areas with limited access to thrombectomy-capable centers, optimal prehospital transport strategies in patients with suspected large-vessel occlusion stroke are unknown. Objective To determine whether, in nonurban areas, direct transport to a thrombectomy-capable center is beneficial compared with transport to the closest local stroke center. Design, Setting, and Participants Multicenter, population-based, cluster-randomized trial including 1401 patients with suspected acute large-vessel occlusion stroke attended by emergency medical services in areas where the closest local stroke center was not capable of performing thrombectomy in Catalonia, Spain, between March 2017 and June 2020. The date of final follow-up was September 2020. Interventions Transportation to a thrombectomy-capable center (n = 688) or the closest local stroke center (n = 713). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was disability at 90 days based on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS; scores range from 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death] ) in the target population of patients with ischemic stroke. There were 11 secondary outcomes, including rate of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator administration and thrombectomy in the target population and 90-day mortality in the safety population of all randomized patients. Results Enrollment was halted for futility following a second interim analysis. The 1401 enrolled patients were included in the safety analysis, of whom 1369 (98%) consented to participate and were included in the as-randomized analysis (56% men; median age, 75 [IQR, 65-83] years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 17 [IQR, 11-21] ); 949 (69%) comprised the target ischemic stroke population included in the primary analysis. For the primary outcome in the target population, median mRS score was 3 (IQR, 2-5) vs 3 (IQR, 2-5) (adjusted common odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.82-1.29). Of 11 reported secondary outcomes, 8 showed no significant difference. Compared with patients first transported to local stroke centers, patients directly transported to thrombectomy-capable centers had significantly lower odds of receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (in the target population, 229/482 [47.5%] vs 282/467 [60.4%]; OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.45-0.76) and significantly higher odds of receiving thrombectomy (in the target population, 235/482 [48.8%] vs 184/467 [39.4%]; OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.13-1.89). Mortality at 90 days in the safety population was not significantly different between groups (188/688 [27.3%] vs 194/713 [27.2%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.79-1.18). Conclusions and Relevance In nonurban areas in Catalonia, Spain, there was no significant difference in 90-day neurological outcomes between transportation to a local stroke center vs a thrombectomy-capable referral center in patients with suspected large-vessel occlusion stroke. These findings require replication in other settings. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02795962
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0098-7484
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2958-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2018410-4
    SSG: 5,21
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Stroke, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 53, No. 12 ( 2022-12), p. 3728-3740
    Abstract: We aim to compare the outcome of patients from urban areas, where the referral center is able to perform thrombectomy, with patients from nonurban areas enrolled in the RACECAT trial (Direct Transfer to an Endovascular Center Compared to Transfer to the Closest Stroke Center in Acute Stroke Patients With Suspected Large Vessel Occlusion). Methods: Patients with suspected large vessel occlusion stroke, as evaluated by a Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation score of ≥5, from urban catchment areas of thrombectomy-capable centers during RACECAT trial enrollment period were included in the Stroke Code Registry of Catalonia. Primary outcome was disability at 90 days, as assessed by the shift analysis on the modified Rankin Scale score, in patients with an ischemic stroke. Secondary outcomes included mortality at 90 days, rate of thrombolysis and thrombectomy, time from onset to thrombolysis, and thrombectomy initiation. Propensity score matching was used to assemble a cohort of patients with similar characteristics. Results: The analysis included 1369 patients from nonurban areas and 2502 patients from urban areas. We matched 920 patients with an ischemic stroke from urban areas and nonurban areas based on their propensity scores. Patients with ischemic stroke from nonurban areas had higher degrees of disability at 90 days (median [interquartle range] modified Rankin Scale score, 3 [2–5] versus 3 [1–5], common odds ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.06–1.48] ); the observed average effect was only significant in patients with large vessel stroke (common odds ratio, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.08–1.65]). Mortality rate was similar between groups(odds ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.81–1.28] ). Patients from nonurban areas had higher odds of receiving thrombolysis (odds ratio, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.16–1.67]), lower odds of receiving thrombectomy(odds ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.51–0.75] ), and longer time from stroke onset to thrombolysis (mean difference 38 minutes [95% CI, 25–52]) and thrombectomy(mean difference 66 minutes [95% CI, 37–95] ). Conclusions: In Catalonia, Spain, patients with large vessel occlusion stroke triaged in nonurban areas had worse neurological outcomes than patients from urban areas, where the referral center was able to perform thrombectomy. Interventions aimed at improving organizational practices and the development of thrombectomy capabilities in centers located in remote areas should be pursued. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02795962.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0039-2499 , 1524-4628
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467823-8
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Stroke, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 54, No. 3 ( 2023-03), p. 770-780
    Abstract: We aim to assess whether time of day modified the treatment effect in the RACECAT trial (Direct Transfer to an Endovascular Center Compared to Transfer to the Closest Stroke Center in Acute Stroke Patients With Suspected Large Vessel Occlusion Trial), a cluster-randomized trial that did not demonstrate the benefit of direct transportation to a thrombectomy-capable center versus nearest local stroke center for patients with a suspected large vessel stroke triaged in nonurban Catalonia between March 2017 and June 2020. Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of RACECAT to evaluate if the association between initial transport routing and functional outcome differed according to trial enrollment time: daytime (8:00 am –8:59 pm ) and nighttime (9:00 pm –7:59 am ). Primary outcome was disability at 90 days, as assessed by the shift analysis on the modified Rankin Scale score, in patients with ischemic stroke. Subgroup analyses according to stroke subtype were evaluated. Results: We included 949 patients with an ischemic stroke, of whom 258 patients(27%) were enrolled during nighttime. Among patients enrolled during nighttime, direct transport to a thrombectomy-capable center was associated with lower degrees of disability at 90 days (adjusted common odds ratio [acOR] , 1.620 [95% CI, 1.020–2.551]); no significant difference between trial groups was present during daytime (acOR, 0.890 [95% CI, 0.680–1.163] ; P interaction =0.014). Influence of nighttime on the treatment effect was only evident in patients with large vessel occlusion(daytime, acOR 0.766 [95% CI, 0.548–1.072]; nighttime, acOR, 1.785 [95% CI, 1.024–3.112] ; P interaction 〈 0.01); no heterogeneity was observed for other stroke subtypes ( P interaction 〉 0.1 for all comparisons). We observed longer delays in alteplase administration, interhospital transfers, and mechanical thrombectomy initiation during nighttime in patients allocated to local stroke centers. Conclusions: Among patients evaluated during nighttime for a suspected acute severe stroke in non-urban areas of Catalonia, direct transport to a thrombectomy-capable center was associated with lower degrees of disability at 90 days. This association was only evident in patients with confirmed large vessel occlusion on vascular imaging. Time delays in alteplase administration and interhospital transfers might mediate the observed differences in clinical outcome. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02795962.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0039-2499 , 1524-4628
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467823-8
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Stroke, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 46, No. 12 ( 2015-12), p. 3437-3442
    Abstract: Recent trials have shown the superiority of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) over medical therapy alone in certain stroke patients with proximal arterial occlusion. Using data from the Randomized Trial of Revascularization With Solitaire FR Device Versus Best Medical Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Stroke due to Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Presenting Within 8-Hours of Symptom Onset (REVASCAT) and a parallel reperfusion treatment registry, we sought to assess the utilization of EVT in a defined patient population, comparing the outcomes of patients treated in and outside the REVASCAT trial. Methods— SONIIA [Sistema Online d’Informació de l’Ictus Agut], a population-based, government-mandated, prospective registry of reperfusion therapies for stroke encompassing the entire population of Catalonia, was used as data source. The registry documents 5 key inclusion criteria of the REVASCAT trial: age, stroke severity, time to treatment, baseline functional status, and occlusion site. We compared procedural, safety, and functional outcomes in patients treated inside and outside the trial. Results— From November 2012 to December 2014, out of 17596 ischemic stroke patients in Catalonia (population 7.5 million), 2576 patients received reperfusion therapies (17/100000 inhabitants-year), mainly intravenous thrombolysis only (2036). From the remaining 540 treated with EVT, 103 patients (out of 206 randomized) were treated within REVASCAT and 437 outside the trial. Of these, 399 did not fulfill some of the study criteria, and 38 were trial candidates (8 treated at REVASCAT centers and 30 at 2 non-REVASCAT centers). The majority of procedural, safety, and functional outcomes were similar in patients treated with EVT within and outside REVASCAT. Conclusions— REVASCAT enrolled nearly all eligible patients representing one third of all patients treated with EVT. Patients treated with EVT within and outside REVASCAT had similar outcomes, reinforcing the therapeutic value of EVT. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01692379.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0039-2499 , 1524-4628
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467823-8
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Stroke, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 45, No. 4 ( 2014-04), p. 1046-1052
    Abstract: We sought to assess outcomes after endovascular treatment/therapy of acute ischemic stroke, overall and by subgroups, and looked for predictors of outcome. Methods— We used data from a mandatory, population-based registry that includes external monitoring of completeness, which assesses reperfusion therapies for consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke since 2011. We described outcomes overall and by subgroups (age ≤ or 〉 80 years; onset-to-groin puncture ≤ or 〉 6 hours; anterior or posterior strokes; previous IV recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator or isolated endovascular treatment/therapy; revascularization or no revascularization), and determined independent predictors of good outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2) and mortality at 3 months by multivariate modeling. Results— We analyzed 536 patients, of whom 285 received previous IV recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. Overall, revascularization (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction scores, 2b and 3) occurred in 73.9%, 5.6% developed symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages, 43.3% achieved good functional outcome, and 22.2% were dead at 90 days. Adjusted comparisons by subgroups systematically favored revascularization (lower proportion of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages and death rates and higher proportion of good outcome). Multivariate analyses confirmed the independent protective effect of revascularization. Additionally, age 〉 80 years, stroke severity, hypertension (deleterious), atrial fibrillation, and onset-to-groin puncture ≤6 hours (protective) also predicted good outcome, whereas lack of previous disability and anterior circulation strokes (protective) as well as and hypertension (deleterious) independently predicted mortality. Conclusions— This study reinforces the role of revascularization and time to treatment to achieve enhanced functional outcomes and identifies other clinical features that independently predict good/fatal outcome after endovascular treatment/therapy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0039-2499 , 1524-4628
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467823-8
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Cerebrovascular Diseases, S. Karger AG, Vol. 49, No. 5 ( 2020), p. 550-555
    Abstract: 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Background: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 The evolution of the symptomatic intracranial occlusion during transfers from primary stroke centers (PSCs) to comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs) for endovascular treatment (EVT) is not widely known. Our aim was to identify factors related to partial or complete recanalization (REC) at CSC arrival in patients with a documented large vessel occlusion (LVO) in PSC transferred for EVT evaluation to better define the workflow at CSC of this group of patients. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Methods: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 We conducted an observational, multicenter study from a prospective, government-mandated, population-based registry of stroke patients with documented LVO at PSC transferred to CSC for EVT from January 2017 to June 2019. The primary end point was defined as partial or complete REC that precluded EVT at CSC arrival (REC). We evaluated the association between baseline, treatment variables and time intervals with the presence of REC. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Results: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 From 589 patients, the rate of REC at CSC was 10.5% in all LVO patients transferred from PSC to CSC for EVT evaluation. On univariate analysis, lower PSC-NIHSS (median 12vs.16, 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 = 0.001), tPA treatment at PSC (13.7 vs. 5.0%; 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 = 0.001), presence of M2 occlusion on PSC (16.8 vs. 9%; 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 = 0.023), and clinical improvement at CSC arrival (21.7 vs. 9.6% 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 = 0.001) were associated with REC at CSC. On multivariate analysis, clinical improvement at CSC arrival ( 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 & #x3c; 0.001, OR: 5.96 95% CI: 2.5–13.9) and PSC tPA treatment predicted REC ( 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 = 0.003, OR: 4.65, 95% CI: 1.73–12.4). 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Conclusion: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 REC at CSC arrival occurs exceptionally in patients with a documented LVO on PSC. Repeating a second vascular study before EVT would not be necessary in most patients. Despite its modest effect, tPA treatment at PSC was an independent predictor of REC.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1015-9770 , 1421-9786
    Language: English
    Publisher: S. Karger AG
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1482069-9
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Stroke, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 51, No. Suppl_1 ( 2020-02)
    Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine changes in vessel status between PSC and CSC according to site and occlusion level, rtPA-treatment, and pre-specified time intervals. Methods: Observational, multicenter study, from a prospective, government-mandated, population-based registry. We selected data from candidates to EVT with documented LVO at PSC who were transferred to CSC from January 2017 to June 2019. We used clinical variables and time intervals as the Symptom-Onset to Vascular-Imaging at CSC (SOTVI2). The primary endpoint was defined as no-occlusion/distal occlusion ineligible for EVT at CSC arrival (NOEVTatCSC) as was utilized. Results: From 589 patients, 37% received rtPA. Rate of NOEVTatCSC was 10.5% (n: 62) and 87% were treated with rtPA, being 35.8% of causes to exclude EVT at CSC arrival. In univariate analysis, lower baseline-NIHSS (median 12 vs. 16 p 〈 0.01), RACE-scale (median 5 vs. 6; p=0.04) and SOTVI2-time (mean-minutes 268.7 vs. 317.2; p=0.04), rtPA treatment (13.7% Vs. 5.0%; p 〈 0.01), and M2 occlusion (16.8% Vs. 9%; p= 0.02) were associated with NOEVTatCSC. In multivariate analysis, only rtPA-treatment was associated with NOEVTatCSC (OR: 4.65, 95%CI: 1.73-12.4, p= 0.003). In the rtPA subgroup, Basilar occlusion (28% Vs. 12%; p=0.04), lower baseline-NIHSS (13 Vs. 16; p 〈 0.01) and SOTVI2 times ≤240 minutes (28.9% Vs. 15.4%; p=0.02) were associated with NOEVTatCSC. In Multivariate analysis SOVI2 ≤240 minutes (OR: 2.109 95%CI: 1.008-4.401, p=0.04) emerged as the only predictor of NOEVTatCSC. Changes in the vessel status according to initial occlusion at PSC in anterior circulation were observed, and occurred in both; proximal and distal direction. In 11.2% of cases, occlusion site at CSC was more proximal than at PSC. Conclusion: In patient candidates for EVT transferred from PSC to CSC, NOEVTatCSC is infrequent making the need of a second vascular study before the angiogram at CSC arguable. Despite of its modest effect, tPA-treatment at PSC is the only factor associated with NOEVTatCSC. This could be most relevant in basilar occlusions and in the first 4-hours. Changes in the vessel status according to initial occlusion in PSC occur in anterior circulation. Future studies addressed to determine factors related to these changes are warranted.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0039-2499 , 1524-4628
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467823-8
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, BMJ, Vol. 11, No. 8 ( 2019-08), p. 751-756
    Abstract: Our aim was to revalidate the RACE scale, a prehospital tool that aims to identify patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO), after its region-wide implementation in Catalonia, and to analyze geographical differences in access to endovascular treatment (EVT). Methods We used data from the prospective CICAT registry (Stroke Code Catalan registry) that includes all stroke code activations. The RACE score evaluated by emergency medical services, time metrics, final diagnosis, presence of LVO, and type of revascularization treatment were registered. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for the RACE cut-off value ≥5 for identification of both LVO and eligibility for EVT were calculated. We compared the rate of EVT and time to EVT of patients transferred from referral centers compared with those directly presenting to comprehensive stroke centers (CSC). Results The RACE scale was evaluated in the field in 1822 patients, showing a strong correlation with the subsequent in-hospital evaluation of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale evaluated at hospital (r=0.74, P 〈 0.001). A RACE score ≥5 detected LVO with a sensitivity 0.84 and specificity 0.60 (AUC 0.77). Patients with RACE ≥5 harbored a LVO and received EVT more frequently than RACE 〈 5 patients (LVO 35% vs 6%; EVT 20% vs 6%; all P 〈 0.001). Direct admission at a CSC was independently associated with higher odds of receiving EVT compared with admission at a referral center (OR 2.40; 95% CI 1.66 to 3.46), and symtoms onset to groin puncture was 133 min shorter. Conclusions This large validation study confirms RACE accuracy to identify stroke patients eligible for EVT, and provides evidence of geographical imbalances in the access to EVT to the detriment of patients located in remote areas.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1759-8478 , 1759-8486
    Language: English
    Publisher: BMJ
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2506028-4
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: European Stroke Journal, SAGE Publications, Vol. 8, No. 2 ( 2023-06), p. 557-565
    Abstract: Previous studies have reported differences in the management and outcome of women stroke patients in comparison with men. We aim to analyze sex and gender differences in the medical assistance, access to treatment and outcome of acute stroke patients in Catalonia. Patients and methods: Data were obtained from a prospective population-based registry of stroke code activations in Catalonia (CICAT) from January/2016 to December/2019. The registry includes demographic data, stroke severity, stroke subtype, reperfusion therapy, and time workflow. Centralized clinical outcome at 90 days was assessed in patients receiving reperfusion therapy. Results: A total of 23,371 stroke code activations were registered (54% men, 46% women). No differences in prehospital time metrics were observed. Women more frequently had a final diagnosis of stroke mimic, were older and had a previous worse functional situation. Among ischemic stroke patients, women had higher stroke severity and more frequently presented proximal large vessel occlusion. Women received more frequently reperfusion therapy (48.2% vs 43.1%, p  〈  0.001). Women tended to present a worse outcome at 90 days, especially for the group receiving only IVT (good outcome 56.7% vs 63.8%; p  〈  0.001), but not for the group of patients treated with IVT + MT or MT alone, although sex was not independently associated with clinical outcome in logistic regression analysis (OR 1.07; 95% CI, 0.94–1.23; p = 0.27) nor in the analysis after matching using the propensity score (OR 1.09; 95% CI, 0.97–1.22). Discussion and conclusion: We found some differences by sex in that acute stroke was more frequent in older women and the stroke severity was higher. We found no differences in medical assistance times, access to reperfusion treatment and early complications. Worse clinical outcome at 90 days in women was conditioned by stroke severity and older age, but not by sex itself.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2396-9873 , 2396-9881
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2851287-X
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: JAMA Neurology, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 80, No. 10 ( 2023-10-01), p. 1028-
    Abstract: Prehospital transfer protocols are based on rapid access to reperfusion therapies for patients with ischemic stroke. The effect of different protocols among patients receiving a final diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is unknown. Objective To determine the effect of direct transport to an endovascular treatment (EVT)–capable stroke center vs transport to the nearest local stroke center. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a prespecified secondary analysis of RACECAT, a multicenter, population-based, cluster-randomized clinical trial conducted from March 2017 to June 2020 in Catalonia, Spain. Patients were evaluated by a blinded end point assessment. All consecutive patients suspected of experiencing a large vessel occlusion stroke (Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation Scale [RACE] score in the field & amp;gt;4 on a scale of 0 to 9, with lower to higher stroke severity) with final diagnosis of ICH were included. A total of 1401 patients were enrolled in RACECAT with suspicion of large vessel occlusion stroke. The current analysis was conducted in October 2022. Intervention Direct transport to an EVT-capable stroke center (n = 137) or to the closest local stroke center (n = 165). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was tested using cumulative ordinal logistic regression to estimate the common odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI of the shift analysis of disability at 90 days as assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death] ) in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes, included 90-day mortality, death or severe functional dependency, early neurological deterioration, early mortality, ICH volume and enlargement, rate of neurosurgical treatment, rate of clinical complications during initial transport, and rate of adverse events until day 5. Results Of 1401 patients enrolled, 1099 were excluded from this analysis (32 rejected informed consent, 920 had ischemic stroke, 29 had transient ischemic attack, 12 had subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 106 had stroke mimic). Thus, 302 patients were included (204 [67.5%] men; mean [SD] age 71.7 [12.8] years; and median [IQR] RACE score, 7 [6-8]). For the primary outcome, direct transfer to an EVT-capable stroke center (mean [SD] mRS score, 4.93 [1.38]) resulted in worse functional outcome at 90 days compared with transfer to the nearest local stroke center (mean [SD] mRS score, 4.66 [1.39]; adjusted common OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.96). Direct transfer to an EVT-capable stroke center also suggested potentially higher 90-day mortality compared with transfer to the nearest local stroke center (67 of 137 [48.9%] vs 62 of 165 [37.6%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.99-1.99). The rates of medical complications during the initial transfer (30 of 137 [22.6%] vs 9 of 165 patients [5.6%]; adjusted OR, 5.29; 95% CI, 2.38-11.73) and in-hospital pneumonia (49 of 137 patients [35.8%] vs 29 of 165 patients [17.6%]; OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.53-4.44) were higher in the EVT-capable stroke center group. Conclusions and Relevance In this secondary analysis of the RACECAT randomized clinical trial, bypassing the closest stroke center resulted in reduced chances of functional independence at 90 days for patients who received a final diagnosis of ICH. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02795962
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2168-6149
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 2023
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages