Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Cancers, MDPI AG, Vol. 15, No. 1 ( 2022-12-30), p. 222-
    Abstract: Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused significant mortality and mortality worldwide. There is limited information describing the outcomes of COVID-19 in cancer patients. Methods: We utilized the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2020 database to collect information on cancer patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in the United States. Using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) coding system, adult (≥18 years) patients with COVID-19 were identified. Adjusted analyses were performed to assess for mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization among cancer patients. Results: A total of 1,050,045 patients were included. Of them, 27,760 had underlying cancer. Cancer patients were older and had more comorbidities. The all-cause in-hospital mortality rate in cancer patients was 17.58% vs. 11% in non-cancer. After adjusted logistic regression, cancer patients had a 21% increase in the odds of all-cause in-hospital mortality compared with those without cancer (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.21, 95%CI 1.12–1.31, p-value 〈 0.001). Additionally, an increased odds in acute respiratory failure rate was found (aOR 1.14, 95%CI 1.06–1.22, p-value 〈 0.001). However, no significant differences were found in the odds of septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and mechanical ventilation between the two groups. Additionally, no significant differences in the mean length of hospital stay and the total hospitalization charges between cancer and non-cancer patients. Conclusion: Cancer patients hospitalized for COVID-19 had increased odds of all-cause in hospital mortality and acute respiratory failure compared with non-cancer patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2072-6694
    Language: English
    Publisher: MDPI AG
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2527080-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2023
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. e18778-e18778
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. e18778-e18778
    Abstract: e18778 Background: COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on global health, causing significant mortality and morbidity. Cancer patients are particularly vulnerable to the virus, with increased risks of adverse outcomes. In an effort to understand the factors that contribute to these outcomes, our study analyzed the predictors of mortality in cancer patients who were hospitalized for COVID-19 in the United States. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we used the National Inpatient Sample database 2020, the largest inpatient database in the United States, to analyze adult patients (≥18 years) who were hospitalized for COVID-19 and had a cancer diagnosis, as determined by ICD-10-CM codes. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included acute respiratory failure (ARF), the need for mechanical ventilation (MV), length of stay (LOS), and total charges (TC). To identify predictors of in-hospital mortality, we performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted based on the type of cancer. Results were considered statistically significant if the p-value 〈 0.05. Statistical analysis was conducted using STATA 17.0. Results: A total of 28,300 adult patients with cancer who were hospitalized for COVID-19 were included. The mean age was 71 years, with 56.8% being male and 63.6% being White. The most prevalent comorbidities were hypertension (70.1%), hyperlipidemia (44.5%), and diabetes mellitus (34.5%). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 17.4%. About 56.9% of the patients experienced ARF and 10.1% required MV. The mean LOS and TC were 8.1 ± 8.7 days and $82,731 ± 152,297, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that predictors of in-hospital mortality were age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95%CI 1.03-1.05, p-value 〈 0.001), male gender (OR 1.18, 95%CI 1.01-1.37, p-value 0.03), congestive heart failure (OR 1.35, 95%CI 1.12-1.63, p-value 〈 0.001), chronic kidney disease (OR 1.46, 95%CI 1.21-1.76, p-value 〈 0.001), liver disease (OR 2.41, 95%CI 1.8-3.24, p-value 〈 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (OR 1.22, 95%CI 1.04-1.43, p-value 0.01). No racial or socioeconomic disparities were found to be associated with in-hospital mortality. Sensitivity analysis according to cancer type showed that patients with lung cancer had the highest in-hospital mortality rate (OR 1.89, 95%CI 1.22-2.92, p-value 0.004). Conclusions: The results of our study indicate that age, male gender, and the presence of certain comorbidities such as congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, liver disease, and diabetes mellitus significantly impact in-hospital mortality among cancer patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Notably, lung cancer patients experienced the worst outcomes. These findings provide valuable insights for clinical decision making and future research on COVID-19 in cancer patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2023
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. e18783-e18783
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. e18783-e18783
    Abstract: e18783 Background: COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a global health crisis with widespread mortality and morbidity. Patients with chronic leukemias (CL) are at an increased risk for severe outcomes due to their compromised immune system. Despite the potential impact of COVID-19 on this population, there is a scarcity of information on the outcomes for CL patients. Our study aims to evaluate the mortality and morbidity of COVID-19 in CL patients in the United States. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we employed the National Inpatient Sample database of 2020, the largest inpatient database in the United States, to include adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with chronic leukemias (CL) who were hospitalized for COVID-19, as identified by ICD-10-CM codes. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality, while the secondary outcomes were acute respiratory failure (ARF) and the requirement for mechanical ventilation (MV). To identify the predictors of mortality, we conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses, with a p-value of less than 0.05 being considered statistically significant. Additionally, we conducted sensitivity analyses based on the type of CL (chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)) and the remission status (in remission, not achieved remission, and relapse). The statistical analysis was performed using STATA software. Results: Among 91,375 patients with CL, 5.2% were hospitalized for COVID-19, with 87% of these patients having CLL. The majority of the CL patients (88.6%) had not achieved remission. The mean age of the patients was 72.7 years, with 62.4% being male and 78.9% being white. The mortality rate among CL-COVID-19 patients was 17%, with no significant difference in mortality rates between patients with and without CL (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-1.14, p-value 0.65). About 61.5% of CL-COVID-19 patients had ARF and only 10.5% required MV. Patients with CL showed a 16% increase in the odds of ARF (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.32, p-value 0.03) while no significant difference was found in the odds of MV. Sensitivity analysis showed no significant differences in mortality, ARF, or MV rates between CLL and CML groups. Another analysis by remission status revealed that patients who had not achieved remission had higher odds of ARF (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.09-2.46, p-value 0.018) compared to those in remission or relapse. Conversely, patients in remission had a significantly lower likelihood of ARF (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.97, p-value 0.036). No significant differences in mortality and MV odds were found according to remission status. Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the importance of vigilant monitoring and management of CL patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly for those who have not achieved remission, to reduce their risk of severe respiratory outcomes.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Veterinary World, Veterinary World
    Abstract: Background and Aim: Human monkeypox is an emerging global threat. Hundreds of publications were disseminated in the last few months. This study aimed to map, analyze, and evaluate the bibliometric indicators of the global monkeypox research output. Materials and Methods: All documents published in the past 20 years were retrieved using the Scopus database. Papers published in English and peer-reviewed journals were included. VOSviewer was used to create density and network visualization maps. Results: A total of 1725 published documents were retrieved. Of these, 53% were published in 2022. The average number of authors per document was 4.2. Authors from the USA were the most active and published about 42.1% of the total documents. International collaboration was evident between the USA and both UK and Congo. Keywords mapping identified the main research lines in this field that correlate monkeypox with public health, smallpox, vaccination, and antiviral treatment. Conclusion: This study analyzed and mapped the expanding field of monkeypox research across the world. The bibliometric analysis revealed that the United States has contributed greatly in terms of both individual researchers and academic institutions. There was less cooperation on a global scale than was anticipated. Fostering international cooperation is essential for countering this worldwide danger. Additional scientific research should be conducted to investigate the link between smallpox immunization and monkeypox epidemics. Keywords: bibliometric study, coronavirus disease, epidemic, monkeypox, outbreak, smallpox, virus.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2231-0916 , 0972-8988
    Language: English
    Publisher: Veterinary World
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2456277-4
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: International Journal of Molecular Sciences, MDPI AG, Vol. 24, No. 2 ( 2023-01-10), p. 1354-
    Abstract: Untargeted multi-omics analysis of plasma is an emerging tool for the identification of novel biomarkers for evaluating disease prognosis, and for developing a better understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying human disease. The successful application of metabolomic and proteomic approaches relies on reproducibly quantifying a wide range of metabolites and proteins. Herein, we report the results of untargeted metabolomic and proteomic analyses from blood plasma samples following analyte extraction by two frequently-used solvent systems: chloroform/methanol and methanol-only. Whole blood samples were collected from participants (n = 6) at University Hospital Sharjah (UHS) hospital, then plasma was separated and extracted by two methods: (i) methanol precipitation and (ii) 4:3 methanol:chloroform extraction. The coverage and reproducibility of the two methods were assessed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS). The study revealed that metabolite extraction by methanol-only showed greater reproducibility for both metabolomic and proteomic quantifications than did methanol/chloroform, while yielding similar peptide coverage. However, coverage of extracted metabolites was higher with the methanol/chloroform precipitation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1422-0067
    Language: English
    Publisher: MDPI AG
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2019364-6
    SSG: 12
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: International Journal of Molecular Sciences, MDPI AG, Vol. 24, No. 1 ( 2022-12-25), p. 348-
    Abstract: Glioblastoma (GB) is a primary malignancy of the central nervous system that is classified by the WHO as a grade IV astrocytoma. Despite decades of research, several aspects about the biology of GB are still unclear. Its pathogenesis and resistance mechanisms are poorly understood, and methods to optimize patient diagnosis and prognosis remain a bottle neck owing to the heterogeneity of the malignancy. The field of omics has recently gained traction, as it can aid in understanding the dynamic spatiotemporal regulatory network of enzymes and metabolites that allows cancer cells to adjust to their surroundings to promote tumor development. In combination with other omics techniques, proteomic and metabolomic investigations, which are a potent means for examining a variety of metabolic enzymes as well as intermediate metabolites, might offer crucial information in this area. Therefore, this review intends to stress the major contribution these tools have made in GB clinical and preclinical research and highlights the crucial impacts made by the integrative “omics” approach in reducing some of the therapeutic challenges associated with GB research and treatment. Thus, our study can purvey the use of these powerful tools in research by serving as a hub that particularly summarizes studies employing metabolomics and proteomics in the realm of GB diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1422-0067
    Language: English
    Publisher: MDPI AG
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2019364-6
    SSG: 12
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: International Journal of Molecular Sciences, MDPI AG, Vol. 24, No. 2 ( 2023-01-13), p. 1604-
    Abstract: Skin cancer, including malignant melanoma (MM) and keratinocyte carcinoma (KC), historically named non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC), represents the most common type of cancer among the white skin population. Despite decades of clinical research, the incidence rate of melanoma is increasing globally. Therefore, a better understanding of disease pathogenesis and resistance mechanisms is considered vital to accomplish early diagnosis and satisfactory control. The “Omics” field has recently gained attention, as it can help in identifying and exploring metabolites and metabolic pathways that assist cancer cells in proliferation, which can be further utilized to improve the diagnosis and treatment of skin cancer. Although skin tissues contain diverse metabolic enzymes, it remains challenging to fully characterize these metabolites. Metabolomics is a powerful omics technique that allows us to measure and compare a vast array of metabolites in a biological sample. This technology enables us to study the dermal metabolic effects and get a clear explanation of the pathogenesis of skin diseases. The purpose of this literature review is to illustrate how metabolomics technology can be used to evaluate the metabolic profile of human skin cancer, using a variety of analytical platforms including gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Data collection has not been based on any analytical method.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1422-0067
    Language: English
    Publisher: MDPI AG
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2019364-6
    SSG: 12
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 530-530
    Abstract: 530 Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are captured in validated tools to provide the patients’ perspective and voice on their physical, social, emotional, functional, and cognitive abilities. Pre-treatment PROs have shown prognostic importance in other cancer types, however, the prognostic value of PROs in breast cancer has been minimally explored. Methods: In a pooled analysis of contemporary clinical trial IPD from patients with breast cancer, cox-proportional hazard analysis and binary logistic regression was used to assess the association between potential predictors with overall survival (OS) and adverse event (grade ≥ 3) outcomes, respectively. PROs were recorded using the EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3.0 questionnaire in the pooled cohort. Statistical significance was set at a threshold of P 〈 0.05 and was determined via the likelihood ratio test. Model fit and linearity of variable associations were assessed via the Akaike information criterion (AIC). All analyses were stratified by age, performance status, treatment arm, and study. The primary assessed outcome was OS, with grade ≥ 3 adverse events assessed as a secondary outcome. A forward inclusion process (starting with the variable of lowest AIC, PRO domains were retained in the model if they decreased the AIC by 2 or more on addition, and remained statistically significant) was used to evaluate the value of multiple PRO domains on prognostic performances. Results: Within data available, the EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3.0 questionnaire was used in a pooled cohort of 8,544 patients across 8 clinicals trials. In the pooled cohort, the association between PROs and outcomes was best described by a linear association. Patient-reported physical functioning, appetite loss, and pain were significantly associated with OS. On forward-inclusion, only physical functioning remained within the OS prognostic model. Except for patient-reported financial difficulties, all PRO domains were significantly associated with grade ≥ 3 adverse events. On forward-inclusion, physical functioning, pain, and constipation all remained statistically significant. Conclusions: Within large high-quality IPD, pre-treatment PROs demonstrated significant prognostic relationships with therapeutic outcomes in patients with breast cancer initiating contemporary anticancer treatments. Patient-reported physical functioning was found to be the most prognostic PRO domain for OS, while patient-reported physical functioning, pain, and constipation were retained in a multivariable model prognostic of grade ≥ 3 adverse events.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Informa UK Limited ; 2020
    In:  Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs Vol. 29, No. 5 ( 2020-05-03), p. 475-482
    In: Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, Informa UK Limited, Vol. 29, No. 5 ( 2020-05-03), p. 475-482
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1354-3784 , 1744-7658
    Language: English
    Publisher: Informa UK Limited
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2030114-5
    SSG: 15,3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2021
    In:  Drug Delivery and Translational Research Vol. 11, No. 3 ( 2021-06), p. 1261-1272
    In: Drug Delivery and Translational Research, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 11, No. 3 ( 2021-06), p. 1261-1272
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2190-393X , 2190-3948
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2590155-2
    SSG: 15,3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages