In:
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 17, No. 5 ( 2022-5-24), p. e0268814-
Abstract:
Fear conditioning paradigms are critical to understanding anxiety-related disorders, but studies use an inconsistent array of methods to quantify the same underlying learning process. We previously demonstrated that selection of trials from different stages of experimental phases and inconsistent use of average compared to trial-by-trial analysis can deliver significantly divergent outcomes, regardless of whether the data is analysed with extinction as a single effect, as a learning process over the course of the experiment, or in relation to acquisition learning. Since small sample sizes are attributed as sources of poor replicability in psychological science, in this study we aimed to investigate if changes in sample size influences the divergences that occur when different kinds of fear conditioning analyses are used. We analysed a large data set of fear acquisition and extinction learning (N = 379), measured via skin conductance responses (SCRs), which was resampled with replacement to create a wide range of bootstrapped databases ( N = 30, N = 60, N = 120, N = 180, N = 240, N = 360, N = 480, N = 600, N = 720, N = 840, N = 960, N = 1080, N = 1200, N = 1500, N = 1750, N = 2000) and tested whether use of different analyses continued to produce deviating outcomes. We found that sample size did not significantly influence the effects of inconsistent analytic strategy when no group-level effect was included but found strategy-dependent effects when group-level effects were simulated. These findings suggest that confounds incurred by inconsistent analyses remain stable in the face of sample size variation, but only under specific circumstances with overall robustness strongly hinging on the relationship between experimental design and choice of analyses. This supports the view that such variations reflect a more fundamental confound in psychological science—the measurement of a single process by multiple methods.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1932-6203
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.g001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.g002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.g003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.t001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.t002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s009
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s010
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s011
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s012
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s013
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s014
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s015
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s016
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s017
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s018
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s019
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s020
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s021
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s022
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s023
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s024
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s025
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s026
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s027
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s028
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s029
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s030
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s031
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s032
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s033
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s034
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s035
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s036
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s037
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s038
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s039
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s040
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s041
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s042
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268814.s043
Language:
English
Publisher:
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Date:
2022
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2267670-3
Bookmarklink