Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Russian State University of Justice ; 2023
    In:  Rossijskoe pravosudie , No. S ( 2023-04-12), p. 135-142
    In: Rossijskoe pravosudie, Russian State University of Justice, , No. S ( 2023-04-12), p. 135-142
    Abstract: The relevance of the topic is due to the lack of a unified point of view regarding the separation of the judicial service into an independent type of public service due to the lack of elaboration of this issue. As a result of the analysis of the scientific literature on the problems of the formation of types of public service, using the formal-logical method and hermeneutics, the author formulates conclusions according to which the only necessary and sufficient criterion for justifying the separation of the judicial service into an independent type of public service is the purpose of the judicial service, which consists in ensuring the independent and independent execution of the constitutional powers of a judge by committing organizational, technical and procedural actions, provided for by the norms of procedural law, which means that a separate federal law on the organization of this service should be adopted. Determining the status of the judicial service as an independent type of public service is a logical continuation of judicial reform and the next step in ensuring the independence of judicial authorities.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2072-909X
    URL: Issue
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Russian State University of Justice
    Publication Date: 2023
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Russian State University of Justice ; 2020
    In:  Pravosudie / Justice Vol. 2, No. 2 ( 2020-06-11), p. 170-194
    In: Pravosudie / Justice, Russian State University of Justice, Vol. 2, No. 2 ( 2020-06-11), p. 170-194
    Abstract: Introduction. The constitutionalization of criminal law, assuming the proper implementation in the theory and practice of criminal law regulation of constitutional principles and values, is a conscious, controlled process that has a strictly defined group of entities with their respective roles. Internally, the complex issue of the subjects of constitutionalization of criminal law has not yet been scientifically considered, which makes addressing the problem significant and timely. Theoretical Basis. Methods. The study is based on two major theoretical concepts developed by domestic experts: the theory of constitutionalization of the branches of law and the theory of systemic relations of criminal law. The methods of systems analysis, the method of constitutional examination, the analytical method, modelling and forecasting – all were used in this work. Results. The constitutionalization of criminal law presupposes the coordinated work of all state bodies to translate constitutional norms and principles into criminal law and practice. Moreover, each of the subjects of constitutionalization fulfills its functional role in this process. The institutional constitutionalization mechanism of criminal law, which is considered from an institutional point of view, includes: conducting a legal (including conformity with the Constitution of the Russian Federation) examination of draft criminal laws in the State Duma; conducting a legal examination of adopted criminal laws in the Federation Council, and interpreting criminal laws on the subject their compliance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation by courts of general jurisdiction; a ban on the application of criminal laws that are doubtful from the point of view of the court; an appeal to the Constitutional Court with a request for constitutional assessment; verification of the constitutionality of the criminal law in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, and the execution of its decisions by the legislator and enforcer. Discussion and Conclusion. Understanding the subjects of constitutionalization of criminal law and their powers enables us to identify weaknesses in the organization of this process, and to outline ways of optimising it. Among them, of particular importance are the conduct of a constitutional examination of draft laws on criminal liability, systematization of the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on criminal law issues, and the formation of a constitutional and legal awareness of the law enforcement.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2686-9241 , 2686-8377
    URL: Issue
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Russian State University of Justice
    Publication Date: 2020
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Russian State University of Justice ; 2022
    In:  Rossijskoe pravosudie , No. 4 ( 2022-03-25), p. 53-72
    In: Rossijskoe pravosudie, Russian State University of Justice, , No. 4 ( 2022-03-25), p. 53-72
    Abstract: Problem statement. Criminal punishment is traditionally one of the most important means of legal influence on a person who has committed a crime that involves the application of significant restrictions on their rights and freedoms. This circumstance makes it necessary to constantly monitor the system of punishments and the rules for their application for compliance with the constitutional standards for regulating criminal law relations. Meanwhile, this problem, and in particular, the problem of circumscribing the proportionality of legal restrictions in criminal law to the grounds for their application, is clearly given insufficient attention in Russian science. Goals and objectives of the study. At the moment, a comprehensive analysis of the legal positions of the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the European court of human rights in terms of determining the grounds and limits of criminal law restrictions on human rights, and a comparison of the developed humanitarian rules for the practice of designing and applying the system of punishments in criminal legislation is necessary. Methods. The paper uses traditional methods of legal research-generalization and analysis of judicial practice, dogmatic analysis of criminal law norms, humanitarian and constitutional expertise of criminal law norms. Results, brief conclusions. According to the constitutional standards of criminal law regulation, the state has the right to determine the types and content of criminal penalties relatively arbitrarily, as well as to set their size in the sanctions of certain criminal law norms. In this regard, the legislator has broad discretion. Meanwhile, strict conditions for the constitutional legitimacy of punishments include: prohibition of cruel, inhuman and degrading punishments; restriction of punitive influence on the person who committed the crime, exclusively within the framework of criminal liability; differentiation of criminal punishment and rules of its appointment; proportionality of the established and appointed punishment to the grounds for applying criminal liability measures and its ability to ensure the achievement of the goals of criminal law impact.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2072-909X
    URL: Issue
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Russian State University of Justice
    Publication Date: 2022
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages