Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Type of Medium
Publisher
Language
Years
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    S. Karger AG ; 2016
    In:  Complementary Medicine Research Vol. 23, No. 3 ( 2016), p. 165-169
    In: Complementary Medicine Research, S. Karger AG, Vol. 23, No. 3 ( 2016), p. 165-169
    Abstract: Herbal medicine is a promising alternative in the treatment of acute rhinosinusitis (ARS). We performed a systematic review for phytopharmaceutical treatments of ARS. A computerized search of databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Scopus) up to 16 September 2015 was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled trials (CTs) were included and assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Seven trials on 〈 i 〉 Pelargonium sidoides 〈 /i 〉 (EPs 7630, Umckaloabo®), Myrtol (GeloMyrtol® forte), BNO 1016 (Sinupret® extract), BNO 101 (Sinupret®), 〈 i 〉 Cyclamen europaeum 〈 /i 〉 (Nasodren®), and Esberitox® were included. Risk of bias was heterogeneous. EPs 7630 appeared to be useful in the treatment of ARS. Myrtol showed benefits against a placebo compound, and BNO 1016 and BNO 101 might be helpful; however, there was little evidence for the effectiveness of 〈 i 〉 Cyclamen europaeum 〈 /i 〉 and Esberitox®. Herbal medicine might be effective for the treatment of ARS, but given the low number of clinical trials and the heterogeneous methodological quality, further research is necessary.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2504-2092 , 2504-2106
    Language: English
    Publisher: S. Karger AG
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2888724-4
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages