feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: European Journal of Haematology, Wiley, Vol. 106, No. 3 ( 2021-03), p. 380-388
    Abstract: We conducted a population‐based study including 19 303 individuals diagnosed with MGUS in Sweden from 1985 to 2013, with the aim to determine whether a prior history of autoimmune disease, a well‐described risk factor for MGUS is a risk factor for progression of MGUS to multiple myeloma (MM) or lymphoproliferative diseases (LPs). Using the nationwide Swedish Patient registry, we identified MGUS cases with versus without an autoimmune disease present at the time of MGUS diagnosis and estimated their risk of progression. Results A total of 5612 (29.1%) MGUS cases had preceding autoimmune diseases. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we found the risk of progression from MGUS to MM (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.73‐0.94) and LPs (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.75‐0.94) to be significantly lower in MGUS cases with prior autoimmune disease (compared to MGUS cases without). Conclusions In this large population‐based study, a history of autoimmune disease was associated with a reduced risk of progression from MGUS to MM/other LPs. Potential underlying reason is that MGUS caused by chronic antigen stimulation is biologically less likely to undergo the genetic events that trigger progression. Our results may have implications in clinical counseling for patients with MGUS and underlying autoimmune disease.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0902-4441 , 1600-0609
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2027114-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: European Journal of Haematology, Wiley, Vol. 108, No. 2 ( 2022-02), p. 99-108
    Abstract: We describe real‐world evidence (RWE) from the nationwide Swedish and Danish registries that provide important information on incidence and outcome in multiple myeloma (MM). Method First line treatment data on more than 10.000 MM patients from Denmark and Sweden between 2005–2018 are presented. Key results from research conducted within the Swedish and Danish myeloma registries are summarized, describing subgroups of patients with comorbidity, myeloma complications, and early relapse. Results We show that national guidelines, generated on results from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are rapidly implemented and improve overall survival (OS). We find that both the incidence of MM and the median age at diagnosis is higher in national registries compared to results from referral centres, indicating a more complete coverage. This highlights the need of validation of prognostic scoring systems and indices in e.g., SMM and high‐risk MM in a real‐ world‐population. We show that these subgroups are unlikely to be captured in RCTs with narrow inclusion and exclusion criteria, that they have worse survival, and are in need of new treatment approaches. Conclusion National registries that include all MM patients are an important source of knowledge on epidemiology, treatment and outcome with implications for the planning of MM care. Despite the introduction of new and better treatments, rapidly implemented in our countries, our registries uncover subgroups of patients that still have inferior outcome. Our RWE can help to identify important research questions to be studied in further clinical trials also in patients currently not included in RCTs.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0902-4441 , 1600-0609
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2027114-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: European Journal of Haematology, Wiley, Vol. 101, No. 2 ( 2018-08), p. 237-244
    Abstract: The incidence of multiple myeloma is characterized by a steep increase with advancing age. Dramatic improvements in survival have been reported in clinical trials; however, elderly patients are generally underrepresented in these. The aims of this study are to review patterns of incidence and survival in multiple myeloma in the general population. We searched PubMed for population‐based studies on trends in incidence and survival published between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2017 and based on regional or national cancer registries and report the following results of the review. The age‐adjusted incidence of multiple myeloma has increased during the second half of the twentieth century in some countries but remained stable in areas with high case ascertainment and access to universal medical care. The crude incidence is increasing globally due to an aging population. Survival rates have improved, and 5‐year relative survival rates are now around 50% and over 60% in patients 65‐70 years or younger. Preliminary data suggest a 3‐fold increase in the prevalence of multiple myeloma. We conclude that the number of multiple myeloma patients is increasing in the general population due to (i) aging populations and (ii) more patients living longer due to modern drugs.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0902-4441 , 1600-0609
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2027114-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 601-601
    Abstract: Background: Salvage autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is used in selected patients with relapsed multiple myeloma after up-front ASCT. However, there are limited data on the optimal induction therapy before salvage ASCT. There is strong support for the use of maintenance therapy after upfront ASCT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma whereas data on maintenance therapy after salvage ASCT are sparse. The Nordic Myeloma Study Group (NMSG) initiated the CARFI trial (NCT02572492), an open randomized phase II study, to investigate the efficacy and safety of carfilzomib as part of induction and conditioning in salvage ASCT and to evaluate the role of carfilzomib/dexamethasone maintenance after salvage ASCT. Methods: Patients with first relapse after up-front ASCT were treated with an induction regime containing four cycles of CAR-CY-DEX (iv carfilzomib 20 mg/sqm → 36 mg/sqm on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16, tablet cyclophosphamide 300 mg/sqm on days 1, 8 and 15 and tablet dexamethasone 20 mg on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 in each 28-days cycle). The subsequent conditioning regimen contained iv carfilzomib 27 mg/sqm on day -2 and -1, and iv melphalan 200 mg/sqm on day -2. The patients had not received any maintenance therapy after upfront ASCT. Two months after ASCT patients were randomized (1:1) to observation or maintenance therapy with iv carfilzomib 27 mg/sqm → 56 mg/sqm every second week and tablet dexamethasone 20 mg every second week. The randomization was stratified according to relapse 1 - 2 year or & gt; 2 years after up-front ASCT, ISS stage and standard versus high-risk cytogenetics. Primary endpoint was comparison of time to progression (TTP) after up-front ASCT and TTP after salvage ASCT with CAR-CY-DEX induction. Another primary endpoint was to compare TTP between carfilzomib-dexamethasone maintenance and observation in patients treated with salvage ASCT. Results: 200 patients were enrolled in the study and 32 of these went off study during the induction and after ASCT. The remaining 168 patients were randomized to carfilzomib-dexamethasone (82 patients) or observation (86 patients). The median age was 62 (interquartile range: 56; 66) years and the median follow-up from time of inclusion was 20.1 (14.1 - 27.6) months. The median TTP after up-front ASCT was 33.2 (31.0-37.8) months compared with 28.1 (24.9-31.5) months after salvage ASCT. The two groups randomised to maintenance therapy or observation were balanced regarding age, time from myeloma diagnosis, treatment at diagnosis, performance status, ISS stage and high-risk cytogenetics (Table 1). The median TTP from randomisation was 28.8 (95% CI: 24.4-NR) months in the maintenance group and 18.5 (95% CI: 14.3-22.0) months in the observation group (hazard ratio 0.42 (95% CI: 0.26-0.68, P = 0.0003)) (Figure I). For the maintenance group TTP from inclusion was 35.4 (30.9-NR) months compared with TTP of 31.3 (29.4-37.8) months (P = 0.71) after up-front ASCT for these patients. A total of 53 serious adverse events (SAE) were reported in 25 patients on carfilzomib-dexamethasone maintenance and 33 SAEs in 21 patients in the observation group. The majority of the SAEs were infections; 39 in the maintenance group and 25 in the observation group, divided into viral infection (10 versus 3), septicemia (2 versus 0) and pneumonia (12 versus 7). Three SAEs classified as cardiac-pulmonary were observed in the maintenance group (syncope, atrial fibrillation and pulmonary embolism) in contrast to three in the observation group (atrial fibrillation and dyspnea(2)). Conclusion: In this randomized phase 2 trial, maintenance therapy with carfilzomib and dexamethasone prolonged median TTP with approximately 10 months following salvage ASCT in multiple myeloma. The difference between TTP after upfront ASCT and TTP after salvage ASCT with carfilzomib based induction therapy was small which supports the use of salvage ASCT followed by maintenance in selected patients at first relapse. Disclosures Remes: Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Congress Support; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Congress Support; Amgen: Other: Congress Support; Celgene: Other: Congress Support; Sanofi: Other: Congress Support. Schjesvold:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; SkyliteDX: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Abildgaard:Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Vangsted:Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria; Jansen: Honoraria. Blimark:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia, Elsevier BV, Vol. 21 ( 2021-10), p. S138-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2152-2650
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2540998-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2193618-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia, Elsevier BV, Vol. 19, No. 10 ( 2019-10), p. e209-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2152-2650
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2540998-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2193618-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Haematologica, Ferrata Storti Foundation (Haematologica), Vol. 103, No. 3 ( 2018-03), p. 506-513
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0390-6078 , 1592-8721
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ferrata Storti Foundation (Haematologica)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2186022-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2030158-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2805244-4
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: European Journal of Haematology, Wiley, Vol. 108, No. 1 ( 2022-01), p. 34-44
    Abstract: We investigated the efficacy and safety of carfilzomib‐containing induction before salvage high‐dose melphalan with autologous stem‐cell transplantation (salvage ASCT) and maintenance with carfilzomib and dexamethasone after salvage ASCT in multiple myeloma. Methods This randomised, open‐label, phase 2 trial included patients with first relapse of multiple myeloma after upfront ASCT who were re‐induced with four cycles of carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone. Two months after salvage, ASCT patients were randomised to either observation or maintenance therapy with iv carfilzomib 27 → 56 mg/sqm and p.o. dexamethasone 20 mg every second week. The study enrolled 200 patients of which 168 were randomised to either maintenance with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (n = 82) or observation (n = 86). Results Median time to progression (TTP) after randomisation was 25.1 months (22.5‐NR) in the carfilzomib‐dexamethasone maintenance group and 16.7 months (14.4–21.8) in the control group (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30–0.71; P  = .0004). The most common adverse events during maintenance were thrombocytopenia, anaemia, hypertension, dyspnoea and bacterial infections. Conclusion In summary, maintenance therapy with carfilzomib and dexamethasone after salvage ASCT prolonged TTP with 8 months. The maintenance treatment was in general well‐tolerated with manageable toxicity.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0902-4441 , 1600-0609
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2027114-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 1631-1631
    Abstract: Background: Despite evidence from clinical and real-world studies demonstrating a consistent association between minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity and improved survival in patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), MRD testing has not been fully integrated into routine clinical practice. A paucity of data from clinical trials of MRD-directed therapy is a contributing factor. Until more data are available, consensus regarding the practical utility of MRD testing in MM established via a modified Delphi process can help guide clinical practice. Objective: To establish areas of consensus and non-consensus regarding the current utility of MRD status to assess and confirm response to MM therapy, and to provide guidance regarding its utility in disease management. Methods: The modified Delphi process, a systematic validated approach to gain consensus, is composed of two or more iterative rounds of surveys answered by a panel of experts. This expert Delphi panel comprised 61 practicing hematological oncologists from 14 European countries (Figure). A group of 11 advisors (within the panel) developed the survey questions and analyzed the results. Survey 1 assessed experts' opinions on and challenges associated with MRD testing in different clinical situations. Survey 2 further refined the use of MRD testing, methodologies, and frequency in different clinical settings using case studies. Consensus to an individual question was defined a priori as 75% agreement or disagreement by the panel. Of the 61 experts, most (87%) had treated ≥50 patients with MM in the 12 months prior to the study, and all had experience with MRD testing in MM in routine clinical practice and/or clinical trials. All members completed Survey 1, and 53 (87%) completed Survey 2. Results: The advisors determined that two rounds of surveys were sufficient for data interpretation. Only 64% of the Delphi panel felt suitably informed regarding the use of MRD testing in MM, and only half reported that MRD is covered in the treatment and/or prognostic guidelines that they use, suggesting that MRD-testing guidelines are limited. The panel reached consensus agreement that clinicians will benefit from more education/resources in the use of MRD testing to guide treatment decisions (92%) and guidelines on the use of MRD testing in routine MM care (75%). Panel consensus agreement was reached on MRD testing in routine care for patients who are transplant-eligible (TE), in good fitness, and who have achieved complete response (CR; Table). Panel consensus was also reported for TE patients who are positive on positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan, with PET-CT and MRD assessment of the bone marrow (BM) being deemed complementary tests post-transplant. If a patient is transplant-ineligible and in CR, panel consensus agreement for MRD testing was achieved for younger patients (≤70 years). However, for those ≥75 years old, there was consensus agreement that MRD testing is recommended if the patient is fit and in CR (Table). For patients with relapsed MM who achieve CR with reinduction therapy, consensus was reached for MRD testing. Panel consensus agreement was reached for repeated MRD testing in routine care for CR patients at a frequency of & gt;6 months to annually (Table). In addition to the TE patient cohort, the panel agreed that high-risk disease is a key driver for MRD testing. On MRD testing use for treatment decisions, the panel did not reach consensus on any clinical scenarios that would lead to their support for treatment discontinuation, nor on the type of relapse (biochemical or MRD-positivity) that would prompt treatment re-initiation. Conclusions: In this modified Delphi study, the panel reached consensus that clinicians require MRD routine care guidelines and education on MRD testing. A patient's CR status, transplant eligibility, fitness, and high-risk disease status were drivers for MRD testing. Consensus was also achieved for PET-CT being complementary to BM MRD in TE patients and regular MRD testing of & gt;6 months frequency. There was no consensus on treatment decisions based on MRD data. Results from on-going clinical studies will allow further refinement of this guidance. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ramasamy: GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene - Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Avet-Loiseau: Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Blimark: Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Delforge: Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gay: Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene - Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bluebird Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptide: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria. Manier: Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Regeneron: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene - Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Martinez-Lopez: Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mateos: Celgene - Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sea-Gen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bluebird bio: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria. Mohty: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. van de Donk: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Weisel: GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia, Elsevier BV, Vol. 21 ( 2021-10), p. S127-S128
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2152-2650
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2540998-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2193618-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages