Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 122, No. 21 ( 2013-11-15), p. 830-830

Abstract: Background Cyto- and molecular-genetic abnormalities evaluated at initial diagnosis are the most powerful prognostic and in part also predictive markers in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with regard to achievement of complete remission (CR) and survival. Nonetheless, after relapse the prognostic impact of clinical characteristics and genetic abnormalities assessed at initial diagnosis with respect to achievement of subsequent CR and survival are less clear. Aims To evaluate the probability of CR achievement and survival in relapsed AML patients in correlation to clinical characteristics and genetic abnormalities assessed at initial diagnosis as well as treatment strategy. Methods The study includes intensively treated adults with newly diagnosed AML enrolled in 5 prospective AMLSG treatment trials between 1993 and 2009. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded. All patients received intensive therapy, including allogeneic (allo) and autologous (auto) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) during first line therapy. Results A total of 3218 patients (median age, 54 years; range, 16-85 years) were enrolled in 5 AMLSG treatment trials. Of these, 1307 (41%) patients (16-60 years, n=958; ≥61 years, n=349) experienced relapse, n=194 after alloHSCT, n=75 after autoHSCT and 1038 after chemotherapy. Salvage strategies were as follows: (i) n=907, intensive chemotherapy (INT) followed in n=450 by HSCT (matched related donor [MRD], n=114; matched unrelated donor [MUD] , n=303; cord blood graft [CB], n=3; haplo-identical family donor [HID] , n=18; autoHSCT, n=12); (ii) n=100, direct alloHSCT (MRD, n=31; MUD, n=63; HID, n=4) or n=2 autoHSCT (TPL); (iii) n=29, donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) in patients after alloHSCT in CR1; (iv) n=60, demethylating agents/low-dose cytarabine (NON-INT); (v) n=24, experimental treatment within phase I/II studies (EXP); (vi) all other patients (n=187) received best supportive care (BSC). After salvage therapy CR rate was 38% and after the different treatment approaches as follows: INT, 37%; TPL, 73%; DLI, 38%; NON-INT, 8%; EXP, 29%. After failure to respond to INT, n=159 additional patients achieved a CR2 after HSCT resulting in an overall CR2 rate of 50%. A logistic regression model revealed CEBPA double-mutant (dm) (OR, 6.42; p=0.0001), core-binding factor (CBF) AML (OR, 2.87; p=0.0002), a direct HSCT strategy (OR, 3.32; p=0.0002), and mutated NPM1 (OR, 1.59; p=0.02) as favorable (only if response after HSCT was included) and FLT3-ITD (OR, 0.66; p=0.04), age (difference of 10 years; OR, 0.82; p=0.003), NON-INT (OR, 0.08; p=0.0001) and in trend a previous alloHSCT in CR1 (OR, 0.65; p=0.08) as unfavorable independent parameters for achievement of CR2. Median follow-up for survival after relapse was 4.3 years and survival after 4 years was 22% (95%-CI, 19-25%). Patients proceeding to alloHSCT after first relapse (n=536; MRD, n=145; MUD, n=366; HID, n=22; CB, n=3) had a 4-year survival of 36% (95%-CI, 32-41%) and those not proceeding to alloHSCT of 8% (95%-CI, 6-11%). In univariable analyses the combined genotype mutated NPM1 in the absence of FLT3-ITD (p=0.66) was not associated with a favorable outcome. A multivariable regression model including alloHSCT as a time-dependent co-variable revealed alloHSCT performed after relapse (HR, 0.34; p 〈 0.0001), CEBPAdm (HR, 0.48; p=0.002), CBF- AML (HR, 0.50; p 〈 0.0003) and DLI in relapsed patients with a previous alloHSCT performed in CR1 (HR, 0.40; p=0.002) as significant favorable factors, whereas FLT3-ITD (HR, 1.35; p=0.005) and in trend NON-INT (OR, 1.40; p=0.06) were unfavorable factors. Due to collinearity of FLT3-ITD with duration of first remission (cut point at 1 yr), the latter was not included into the multivariable models. Of 561 patients achieving CR2, 252 experienced 2nd relapse (REL2) and 114 died in CR2. Most REL2 patients (n=117) received INT whereas n=54 received BSC only. Allo- and autoHSCT were performed in 55 and 3 REL2 patients, respectively. CR3 rate in patients who received treatment was overall 40% including response to HSCT of 58%. Conclusions Patients with relapsed AML have an overall probability of less than 50% to achieve a CR2 and CR3 after intensive salvage chemotherapy; the only exceptions are AML with CEBPAdm and CBF-AML. AlloHSCT either as direct treatment of relapse or as salvage therapy after failure of intensive chemotherapy may overcome chemo-resistance. Disclosures: Schlenk: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Ambit: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Pomalidomide in Myelofibrosis. Kindler:Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V122.21.830.830

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2013

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 149, No. 2 ( 2023-02), p. 913-919

Abstract: An increasing number of international studies demonstrate serious negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the timely diagnosis of cancer and on cancer treatment. Our study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate the capacities of German Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs) in different areas of complex oncology care during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Prospective panel survey over 23 rounds among 18 CCCs in Germany between March 2020 and June 2022. Results The COVID-19 pandemic substantially affected the oncological care system in Germany during the first 2 years. Persistent limitations of care in CCCs primarily affected follow-up (− 21%) and psycho-oncologic care (− 12%), but also tumor surgery (− 9%). Substantial limitations were also reported for all other areas of multidisciplinary oncological care. Conclusions This study documents the limitations of oncological care during the COVID-19 pandemic and highlights the need to develop strategies to avoid similar limitations in the future.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0171-5216 , 1432-1335

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04407-1

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2023

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1459285-X

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 449-449

Abstract: Background: Internal tandem duplications (ITD) in the receptor tyrosine kinase FLT3 occur in roughly 25% of younger adult patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The multi-targeted kinase inhibitor midostaurin combined with intensive chemotherapy has shown activity against AML with FLT3 mutations. However, toxicity and potential drug-drug interactions with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors such as posaconazole may necessitate dose reduction. Aims: To evaluate the impact of age and midostaurin dose-adaptation after intensive induction chemotherapy on response and outcome in AML with FLT3-ITD within the AMLSG 16-10 trial (NCT01477606). Methods: The study included adult pts (age 18-70 years (yrs)) with newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD positive AML enrolled in the ongoing single-arm phase-II AMLSG 16-10 trial. Pts with acute promyelocytic leukemia were not eligible. The presence of FLT3-ITD was analyzed within our diagnostic study AMLSG-BiO (NCT01252485) by Genescan-based DNA fragment-length analysis. Induction therapy consisted of daunorubicin (60 mg/m², d1-3) and cytarabine (200 mg/m², continuously, d1-7); midostaurin 50 mg bid was applied from day 8 until 48h before start of the next treatment cycle. A second cycle was allowed in case of partial remission (PR). For consolidation therapy, pts proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation (HCT) as first priority; if alloHCT was not feasible, pts received three cycles of age-adapted high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) in combination with midostaurin starting on day 6. In all pts one-year maintenance therapy with midostaurin was intended. The first patient entered the study in June 2012 and in April 2014, after recruitment of n=147 pts, the study was amended including a sample size increase to 284 pts and a dose reduction to 12.5% of the initial dose of midostaurin in case of co-medication with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (e.g. posaconazole). This report focuses on age and the comparison between the first (n=147) and the second cohort (n=137) of the study in terms midostaurin dose-adaptation. Results: Patient characteristics were as follows: median age 54 yrs (range, 18-70; younger, 68% 〈 60 yrs; older, 32% ≥ 60 yrs); median white cell count 44.7G/l (range 1.1-1543 G/l); karyotype, n=161 normal, n=16 high-risk according to ELN recommendations; mutated NPM1 n=174 (59%). Data on response to first induction therapy were available in 277 pts; complete remission (CR) including CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi) 60%, PR 20%, refractory disease (RD) 15%, and death 5%. A second induction cycle was given in 54 pts. Overall response (CR/CRi) after induction therapy was 76% (76%, younger; 76%, older) and death 6% (4%, younger; 10% older). The dose of midostaurin during first induction therapy was reduced in 53% and 71% of patients in cohort-1 and cohort-2, respectively. Reasons for dose reduction were in 58% and 49% toxicity, and in 9% and 23% co-medication in cohort-1 and cohort-2, respectively. No difference in response to induction therapy was noted between cohorts (p=0.81). Median follow-up was 18 months. Overall 146 pts received an alloHCT, 128 in first CR (n=94 younger, n=34 older; n=92 from a matched unrelated and n=36 from a matched related donor). In pts receiving an alloHCT within the protocol in median two chemotherapy cycles were applied before transplant (range 1-4). The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and death after transplant were 13% (SE 3.2%) and 16% (SE 3.5%) without differences (p=0.97, p=0.41, respectively) between younger and older patients. So far maintenance therapy was started in 86 pts, 61 pts after alloHCT and 25 pts after HDAC. Fifty-five adverse events 3°/4° were reported being attributed to midostaurin; cytopenias after alloHCT were the most frequent (29%). CIR in patients starting maintenance therapy was 20% one year after start of maintenance without difference between alloHCT and HiDAC (p=0.99). In addition, no difference in CIR was identified in patients after consolidation with alloHCT or HDAC according to dose reduction of midostaurin during first induction therapy (p=0.43, p=0.98, respectively). Median overall survival was 25 months (younger, 26 months; older 23 months; p=0.15). Conclusions: The addition of midostaurin to intensive induction therapy and as maintenance after alloHCT or HDAC is feasible and effective without an impact of age and dose adaptation on outcome. Disclosures Schlenk: Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Fiedler:GSO: Other: Travel; Pfizer: Research Funding; Kolltan: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Gilead: Other: Travel; Ariad/Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Teva: Other: Travel. Lübbert:Celgene: Other: Travel Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Other: Travel Funding, Research Funding; Ratiopharm: Other: Study drug valproic acid. Greil:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria; GSK: Research Funding; Ratiopharm: Research Funding; Cephalon: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria; Eisai: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Greiner:BMS: Research Funding. Paschka:ASTEX Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Medupdate GmbH: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer Pharma GmbH: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Heuser:Bayer Pharma AG: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; BerGenBio: Research Funding; Tetralogic: Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V128.22.449.449

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2016

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 2586-2586

Abstract: Background: CBF-AML is defined by recurrent genetic abnormalities which encompass t(8;21)(q22;q22), inv(16)(p13.1q22) or less frequently t(16;16)(p13.1;q22). Most frequent secondary chromosome aberrations in t(8;21) AML are del(9q) or loss of a sex chromosome, and in inv(16)/t(16;16) AML trisomy 22 or trisomy 8. At the molecular level mutations involving KIT, FLT3, or NRAS were identified as recurrent lesions in CBF-AML. However, the underlying genetic alterations which might trigger relapse in CBF-AML are not well delineated. Thus, the aim of our study was to characterize the clonal architecture of relapsed CBF-AML. Methods: We performed mutational profiling (KIT, FLT3-ITD, FLT3-TKD, NRAS, ASXL1) in paired samples obtained at diagnosis and at relapse from 66 adults with CBF-AML [inv(16), n=43; t(8;21), n=23] who all were treated within the AMLSG studies. Results: In inv(16) AML, the following mutation pattern was identified at diagnosis: KIT 13/40 (33%; exon 8, n=6; exon 17, n=5; exon 8+17, n=1; exon 11, n=1; missing data, n=3), NRAS 18/43 (42%), FLT3-TKD 4/43 (9%); none of the pts harboured FLT3-ITD or ASXL1 mutations. At the time of relapse, there was a shift in the mutation pattern in 26 pts (60%): KIT mutations (exon 8, n=5; exon 17, n=2; exon 8+17, n=1) were lost in 8 pts and 1 pt acquired an exon 17 KIT mutation; similarly, 15 pts lost and 1 pt gained NRAS mutation, respectively. Of note, all FLT3-TKD mutations were lost at the time of relapse, and only one pt gained a FLT3-ITD mutation. Based on these findings we calculated the stability in inv(16) AML for KIT, NRAS and FLT3-TKD mutations as 38%, 17%, and 0%, respectively. AML with t(8;21) presented a different diagnostic mutation profile: KIT 9/23 (39%; exon 17, n=8; exon 11, n=1), FLT3 -ITD 3/23 (13%), NRAS 2/23 (9%), and ASXL1 1/23 (4%); there were no FLT3-TKD mutations. At the time of relapse, the mutation pattern changed in 9 pts (39%); KIT mutations were lost in 4 pts (exon 17, n=3; exon 11, n=1), but acquired in 2 pts with both of them located in exon 17; only 1 pt lost the NRAS mutation. FLT3-ITD was lost in 2 and gained in 3 pts. There was no change in the ASXL1 mutation status. Thus, the stability for KIT, NRAS, FLT3-ITD and ASXL1 mutations in t(8;21) AML was calculated as 56%, 50%, 33% and 100%, respectively. Of note, mutations affecting the KIT and NRAS gene were almost mutually exclusive; there were only 3 pts with concurrent KIT and NRAS mutations at diagnosis [inv(16), n=2; t(8;21), n=1] . Conclusion: CBF-AML cases display a high degree of molecular heterogeneity with shift of the mutation pattern at relapse in both CBF-AML subtypes. The frequent loss of KIT and NRAS mutations at relapse suggests that there might be other important secondary lesions driving relapse. Ongoing high-resolution genome-wide profiling will further unravel the clonal hierarchy and genomic landscape in CBF-AML. Disclosures Götze: Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene Corp.: Honoraria. Greil:Celgene: Consultancy; Ratiopharm: Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria; Astra-Zeneca: Honoraria; GSK: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cephalon: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; AOP Orphan: Research Funding; Roche, Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schlenk:Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Arog: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V126.23.2586.2586

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2015

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 322-322

Abstract: Background: Internal tandem duplications (ITD) in the receptor tyrosine kinase FLT3 occur in roughly 25% of younger adult patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), implicating FLT3 as a potential target for kinase inhibitor therapy. The multi-targeted kinase inhibitor midostaurin shows potent activity against FLT3 as a single agent but also in combination with intensive chemotherapy. Aims: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of midostaurin in combination with intensive induction therapy and as single agent maintenance therapy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) or high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC). Methods: The study includes adult pts (age 18-70 years (yrs)) with newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD positive AML enrolled in the ongoing single-arm phase-II AMLSG 16-10 trial (NCT: NCT01477606). Pts with acute promyelocytic leukemia are not eligible. The presence of FLT3-ITD is analyzed within our diagnostic study AMLSG-BiO (NCT01252485) by Genescan-based fragment-length analysis (allelic ratio & gt;0.05 required to be FLT3-ITD positive). Induction therapy consists of daunorubicin (60 mg/m², d1-3) and cytarabine (200 mg/m², continuously, d1-7); midostaurin 50 mg bid is applied from day 8 onwards until 48h before start of the next treatment cycle. A second cycle is optional. For consolidation therapy, pts proceed to alloHSCT as first priority; if alloHSCT is not feasible, pts receive three cycles of age-adapted HIDAC in combination with midostaurin from day 6 onwards. In all pts maintenance therapy for one year is intended. This report focuses on the first cohort of the study (n=149) recruited between June 2012 and April 2014 prior to the amendment increasing the sample size; the amendment to the study is active since October 2014. Results: At study entry patient characteristics were median age 54 years (range, 20-70, 34% ≥ 60 yrs); median white cell count (WBC) 48.4G/l (range 1.1-178G/l); karyotype, n=103 normal, n=3 t(6;9), n=2 t(9;11), n=20 intermediate-2 and n=7 high-risk according to ELN recommendations, n=14 missing; mutated NPM1 n=92 (62%). Data on response to first induction therapy were available in 147 pts; complete remission (CR) 58.5%, partial remission (PR) 20.4%, refractory disease (RD) 15% and death 6.1%. A second induction cycle was given in 34 pts. Overall response after induction therapy was CR 75% and death 7.5%. Adverse events 3°/4° reported during the first induction cycle were most frequently gastrointestinal (n=34) and infections (n=81). During induction therapy midostaurin was interrupted, dose-reduced or stopped in 55% of the pts. Overall 94 pts received an alloHSCT, 85 in first CR (n=65 age & lt;60 yrs, n=20 age ≥60 yrs) and 9 pts after salvage outside the protocol or after relapse (n=70 from a matched unrelated and n=24 from a matched related donor). In pts receiving an alloHSCT within the protocol in median 2 chemotherapy cycles were applied before transplant (range 1-4) and the cumulative incidence of relapse and death at 12 months were 9.2% (SE 3.3%) and 19.5% (SE 4.8%). Maintenance therapy was started in 52 pts, 40 pts after alloHSCT and 12 pts after HIDAC. Only 4 adverse events 3°/4° were attributed to midostaurin. First analyses revealed a low cumulative incidence of relapse irrespective of the FLT3-ITD mutant to wildtype ratio ( & lt;0.5 versus ≥0.5) in patients proceeding to alloHSCT with 12% and 5% as well as for those after HIDAC consolidation with 28% and 29%, respectively. Conclusions: The addition of midostaurin to intensive induction therapy and as maintenance after alloHSCT or HIDAC is feasible and compared to historical data may be most effective in those patients with a high FLT3-ITD mutant to wildtype ratio. Disclosures Schlenk: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Salwender:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Bristol Meyer Sqibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Götze:Celgene Corp.: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V126.23.322.322

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2015

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 253-253

Abstract: Introduction Salvage high dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is used in fit patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (RMM) in clinical practice. However, the role of this approach in the era of continuous novel agent based treatment has not been defined in randomized trials. The ReLApsE trial compared lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rd) re-induction, salvage HDCT/ASCT and lenalidomide (R) maintenance with standard continuous Rd in a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Methods Between 2010 and 2016, 282 patients were randomized of whom 277 constituted the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (arm B/A n=139/138). Arm B received 3 cycles of Rd (lenalidomide 25 mg, day 1-21; dexamethasone 40 mg, day 1, 8, 15, 22; 4 week cycles) re-induction, HDCT (melphalan 200 mg/m2), ASCT and R maintenance (10 mg daily) until progression (PD). Arm A was treated with Rd until PD. In both arms stem cells were harvested after the 3rd Rd cycle if no back-up transplant was available. Key inclusion criteria were 1-3 prior therapy lines, age ≤ 75 years, time to PD ≥ 12 months in case of front-line HDCT/ASCT and WHO PS ≤ 2. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), response rates and toxicity. ISRCTN16345835, Eudra CT-No: 2009-013856-61. Results Arm B and A were balanced regarding age (median 61.3 vs. 62.2 years), ISS (I/II/III in 62.6/24.4/13% vs. 59.7/31/9.3%) and WHO PS (0/1/2 in 69.1/30.9/0% vs. 76.1/23.2/0.7%). Almost all patients had only 1 prior therapy line (arm B: 94.2% vs. arm A: 93.5%) and had received front-line HDCT/ASCT (92.8% vs. 94.2%). More patients in arm B had high risk cytogenetic aberrations (HR-CA; 42.9% vs. 31.6%) based on a higher frequency of t(4;14) (20.2% vs. 10.1%). The overall response rate (≥ partial response; ORR) for arm B and A was 77.9% and 74.6% (p=0.57) with 49.3% and 47.1% (p=0.81) achieving ≥ very good partial response as best response. Within a median follow up of 36.3 months, 183 PFS events and 76 deaths occurred. Median PFS in the ITT population was 20.7 months in arm B and 18.8 months in arm A without a statistically significant difference (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.65-1.16; p=0.34). Median OS was not reached (NR) in arm B vs. 62.7 months in arm A (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.52-1.28; p=0.37). In arm B, 41 patients (29.5%) did not receive the planned HDCT/ASCT. Thus, exploratory landmark (LM) analyses from HDCT and the contemporaneous Rd cycle 5 in arm A were performed (median interval from randomization to HDCT/Rd cycle 5: 117/122 days; n=103[B]/114[A] ). They showed a trend towards superior PFS (23.3 vs. 20.1 months; HR 0.74; p=0.09) and significantly superior OS (NR vs. 57 months; HR 0.56; p=0.046) in arm B vs. A. Multivariate analyses revealed significant associations of treatment in arm B with superior LM PFS (HR 0.6; p=0.01) and LM OS (HR 0.39; p=0.006). Other factors in the LM multivariate models showing significant associations with survival were HR-CA (PFS, OS), number of prior therapy lines (PFS), and age (PFS). The ORR in arm B after HDCT/ASCT was significantly higher than in arm A after Rd cycle 5 (82.3% vs. 69.6%; p=0.04). Grade ≥3 adverse events were reported in 83% (arm B) and 74.5% (arm A; p=0.11). Grade ≥3 leukopenia/neutropenia was reported in 61.5 vs. 24.8% (p 〈 0.001), grade ≥3 thrombopenia in 45.2 vs. 11% (p 〈 0.001) and grade ≥3 mucositis in 10.4% vs. 2.1% (p=0.005). No significant difference in grade ≥3 infections/infestations (33.3 vs. 27.6%; p=0.3) was observed. Eleven patients died on protocol treatment (B: 4 vs. A: 7). No deaths occurred in the HDCT/ASCT phase. Conclusions This is the first RCT comparing salvage HDCT/ASCT with continuous novel agent based treatment. No significant PFS or OS difference was observed in the overall trial population. However, HR-CA were more frequent in the HDCT/ASCT arm and ~30% of patients did not receive the planned HDCT/ASCT. Landmark analyses from the time of HDCT indicate superior PFS and OS in patients actually undergoing salvage HDCT/ASCT. Salvage HDCT/ASCT was safe with an expected increase in hematological as wells as gastrointestinal toxicity but without treatment-related mortality in patients up to the age of 75 years in this multicenter trial. However, the number of patients not undergoing salvage HDCT/ASCT and the approval of more active Rd-based triplet regimens after the initiation of this trial prevents definite conclusions on the role of salvage HDCT/ASCT. Disclosures Goldschmidt: Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; ArtTempi: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding. Baertsch:Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Raab:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hillengass:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Sanofi: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; BMS: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Graeven:AbbVie: Honoraria; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fenk:Takeda: Honoraria; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Other: travel grant; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Haenel:Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Scheid:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Salwender:Celgene: Honoraria, Other: travel suppport, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: travel suppport, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: travel suppport, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Other: travel suppport, Research Funding. Weisel:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, and Sanofi: Research Funding; Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Juno, Sanofi, and Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-99-111203

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2018

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 123, No. 26 ( 2014-06-26), p. 4027-4036

Abstract: The addition of valproic acid to intensive induction therapy in combination with all-trans retinoic acid did not result in an improvement of clinical outcome. Valproic acid-related hematologic toxicity and higher death rates were observed when valproic acid and idarubicin were given in parallel.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-12-546283

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2014

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 23 ( 2014-11-27), p. 3441-3449

Abstract: In FLT3-ITD–positive AML, high allelic ratio and ITD insertion site in TKD1 predict for low complete remission rates and poor survival. In FLT3-ITD–positive AML, allogeneic HSCT in first CR outweighs the negative impact of high allelic ratio on survival.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-578070

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2014

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 3096-3096

Abstract: 3096 Background: CV8102 is a non-coding, non-capped RNA that activates the innate (via TLR7/8, RIG-I) and adaptive immunity dose-dependently. CV8102 injected intratumorally (i.t.), as a single agent or combined with systemic anti-PD-1 antibody (Ab) led to tumor growth inhibition in animal models and showed synergism with PD-1 blockade. Methods: An open-label, cohort-based, dose escalation and expansion study in patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma (cMEL), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (hnSCC) or adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is ongoing investigating i.t. CV8102 as single agent and in combination with anti-PD-1 antibodies. [NCT03291002] . Results: As of December 2019, 23 patients in the cohort A (single agent) and 13 patients in cohort C (combination with anti-PD-1 Ab) were exposed to at least one dose of CV8102 at dose levels of 25-600 µg (single agent) and 25-450 µg (combination). No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed within the first two weeks of study drug treatment. Most frequent TEAEs were G1/2 fatigue, fever, chills and headache. 4 (17%) patients (pts) in cohort A and 3 (23%) pts in cohort C experienced related G3 TEAEs that were manageable with supportive treatment (liver enzyme increases (3), abscess at injection site (1), hypertension (1), asymptomatic elevation of pancreatic enzymes (2)). In cohort A, 2 cMEL patients experienced an objective response according to RECIST 1.1 (1 CR in a PD-1 naïve pt and 1 PR in a PD-1 refractory pt) and 2 further pts (cMEL, hnSCC) showed SD with shrinkage of tumor lesions. Conclusions: CV8102 i.t. was well tolerated without dose limiting toxicities to date and showed evidence of single agent activity. Updated results on safety, efficacy and serum biomarkers will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03291002 .

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.3096

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date: 2020

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 8563-8563

Abstract: 8563 Background: Patient selection, dosing regimens and resistance mechanisms for immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy remain unmet medical needs in lung cancer. We present interim data from the small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) cohort of the ongoing BIOLUMA trial which evaluates efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab in lung cancer with a broad translational program to identify potential biomarkers predictive of response and/or resistance including whole exome sequencing (WES) of serial biopsies, functional analysis of peripheral T-cells and gut microbiome analyses. Methods: BIOLUMA is an investigator initiated, multicentre non-randomised phase II trial in 2 nd line patients with SCLC. The initial all-comer SCLC cohort was recently amended for inclusion of patients with high tumor mutation burden (TMB) only. Patients are pre-screened for TMB by WES at the time of first diagnosis. After progression on platinum-based therapy, 4 cycles of nivolumab 1 mg/kg q3w in combination with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg q3w and subsequent nivolumab 240 mg flat dose as monotherapy are given. Primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR) of the upfront combination therapy. Analysis of sequential tumor biopsies, blood and gut microbiome is performed at different timepoints. Results: The SCLC cohort was amended to include TMB high patients only, after two treatment-related deaths had occurred and emerging data indicated treatment benefit depends on high TMB status for the combination therapy. Both patients with treatment-related death had a CT-scan documented partial response (not confirmed according to RECIST due to death). One each died of pneumonitis and encephalitis. From the all-comer cohort, efficacy data are available for 18 patients. ORR was 38.8% with 7 partial and no complete responses. Stable disease occurred in 16.7% (n = 3) resulting in a DCR of 55.5%. TMB pre-screening for the amended cohort is currently ongoing. Conclusions: In the SCLC cohort, upfront combination therapy of nivolumab and ipilimumab shows remarkable ORR but is accompanied by high toxicity rates. In order to ensure a reasonable balance of risks and treatment benefit, only TMB high patients are included after an amendment of the cohort to improve the risk/benefit ratio. Clinical trial information: NCT03083691.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.8563

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date: 2019

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5